IE9 download available!


Recommended Posts

It's kinda funny how not many people noticed that they also released PP5. I thought PP4 was the last Platform Preview but I guess not. This is good though, they're sticking to their release cycle. Hope to jump back with the next beta and see how that one goes.

Doesn't work.

+1. Doesn't work for me either.

Actually it should be "FilteringMode" instead of "PrivateMode".

"PrivateMode" seems to work for me, InPrivate filtering is enabled even after closing all instances of IE and reopening it. BTW I'm on win7 32bit.

So, clearly this is aimed at complete beginners? The kind that only have one or two tabs open and care about nothing else? I do realize that this is IE's primary target group, but what am I supposed to do if I have more than three tabs? Why on earth has the information bar been moved into a floating window at the bottom (which I suspect most people will think is something the website is showing and try to get rid of it by clicking any button they find as quickly as possible)? At least you can turn the status bar on.

"PrivateMode" seems to work for me, InPrivate filtering is enabled even after closing all instances of IE and reopening it. BTW I'm on win7 32bit.

Interesting. Because, I'm also on Win7 32 bit.

Yep you were right, :D after trying one more time it failed. So it should be "FilteringMode"? I'm not that familiar with registry. Thanks going to try.

Edit: "FilteringMode" works!!!

So, clearly this is aimed at complete beginners? The kind that only have one or two tabs open and care about nothing else? I do realize that this is IE's primary target group, but what am I supposed to do if I have more than three tabs? Why on earth has the information bar been moved into a floating window at the bottom (which I suspect most people will think is something the website is showing and try to get rid of it by clicking any button they find as quickly as possible)? At least you can turn the status bar on.

They are actually discouraging people to have 20+ tabs open. Because no matter which browser you use, having that many tabs open seriously hampers the usability. The preferred way of browsing would be to pin individual websites like Facebook, Neowin, Twitter etc to the taskbar, so each windows will have less than 5 tabs open. I think this is a very good move by Microsoft.

They are actually discouraging people to have 20+ tabs open. Because no matter which browser you use, having that many tabs open seriously hampers the usability. The preferred way of browsing would be to pin individual websites like Facebook, Neowin, Twitter etc to the taskbar, so each windows will have less than 5 tabs open. I think this is a very good move by Microsoft.

I agree completely and was also going to point that out to hdood.

hdood, I've been using IE 9 for a good few hours now and due to being able to pin apps to the Taskbar, I've not had many tabs open in each window. Also, even if I have had a fair few tabs open, I can get a good 8 tabs on the window without the title of each tab becoming too truncated (on my 17" screen). I've never really needed to see the title of each tab, so it doesn't bother me that when I have 20 tabs open I can only see the favicon because I find it pretty easy to find my tabs at all time. Another thing to point out is that when you hover over a tab, a tooltip appears informing you of the tab's title. I really see no need for them to place the tab bar anywhere else. I don't see what harm it's doing here, especially with the tooltip option.

[...] Why on earth has the information bar been moved into a floating window at the bottom (which I suspect most people will think is something the website is showing and try to get rid of it by clicking any button they find as quickly as possible)? [...]

You might be right about that, but people will just have to stop clicking anywhere and everywhere without reading, won't they? It frustrates me, as a designer and developer, that some people expect designers to not reach their full potential just because of some (often the majority of) users being ignorant. I think it's a much nicer place for the bar because it's much less obtrusive. I'm sure if people read and try to learn how the UI works, they would be able to figure out it's an IE element.

They are actually discouraging people to have 20+ tabs open. Because no matter which browser you use, having that many tabs open seriously hampers the usability. The preferred way of browsing would be to pin individual websites like Facebook, Neowin, Twitter etc to the taskbar, so each windows will have less than 5 tabs open. I think this is a very good move by Microsoft.

That is just a silly way of saying I should have multiple windows open instead of using tabs. You are of course entitled to feel that way, but for me, having 40 windows with 3 tabs would be a lot less productive and usable than having 6 with 20. Pinning is of little value to me, as I have no interest in keeping my bookmarks on the taskbar. I have better ways of organizing them. Really, what you describe is something that would work best for the group I mentioned.

I really see no need for them to place the tab bar anywhere else. I don't see what harm it's doing here, especially with the tooltip option.

It's a perfectly reasonable default, especially when you consider IE' target market, but I'm just not going to use something that won't let me at least change it.

You might be right about that, but people will just have to stop clicking anywhere and everywhere without reading, won't they?

That's never ever going to happen though. It's a basic design rule. People don't read things (especially if it's more than a few words), and if something pops up, they get scared and will try their best to get rid of it immediately so they can get back to what they were doing. That's just how it is.

I think it's a much nicer place for the bar because it's much less obtrusive. I'm sure if people read and try to learn how the UI works, they would be able to figure out it's an IE element.

I don't think it's very unobtrusive. It floats on top of the content and is annoying, yet kind of has an appearance that makes it not quite clear that it's actually part of the program itself. It's not part of the container. The messages also makes no real sense. Is it really obvious what "only secure content is displayed" means when I'm just browsing a random major (non-SSL) site? I'm not a UI designer though, so I am open to it working better than the info bar even though it doesn't feel that way to me.

I'm sure if people read and try to learn how the UI works, they would be able to figure out it's an IE element.

People don't want to. You should try your best to make sure it's as obvious as possible from the start.

So, clearly this is aimed at complete beginners?

I wouldn't say "for complete beginners", it's more like "not for the hardcore users". MS has data to support design decisions and according to interviews very few people use power-user features. So they didn't add any and even degraded stuff like Quick Tabs which is why Opera will stay my main browser. But we have to realize that we're not really the target audience and not only beginners use browsers differently than we think. Another thing that surprised me for example was that MS said fewer and fewer people use bookmarks.

Behind the design of the Internet Explorer 9 chrome

"An obvious question people have asked ever since the UI leaked out a month ago is that how the browser deals with many tabs. Not surprisingly there is a power-user perception that everyone runs with dozens of tabs but as the design team found out via telemetry that it is simply not true.

For 90% of the browsing sessions they analyzed, most people had 4 or fewer tabs open and never more than 8. As such, on a reasonbly sized display, there is more than sufficient room for tabs used by most users."

That is just a silly way of saying I should have multiple windows open instead of using tabs. You are of course entitled to feel that way, but for me, having 40 windows with 3 tabs would be a lot less productive and usable than having 6 with 20. Pinning is of little value to me, as I have no interest in keeping my bookmarks on the taskbar. I have better ways of organizing them. Really, what you describe is something that would work best for the group I mentioned.

So will you find it more productive if EVERYTHING on your OS runs in a tabbed-browsing mode? Then you will have 4 Neowin.net tabs, 2 Microsoft Word windows, gmail.com, 3 Facebook tabs , Windows Live Messenger window, twitter.com, bbc.co.uk all running in separate tabs instead of Windows.

I like the fact that Microsoft is treating Web Applications like native apps and encouraging users to use separate Windows for them.

No, but then I never claimed that.

So if you can run Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel on separate Windows instead of tabs, what's wrong with running Facebook.com and Neowin.net separately as well? What do they have in common that Word and Excel don't have?

IMO, It's just a matter of mind-set.

So if you can run Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel on separate Windows instead of tabs, what's wrong with running Facebook.com and Neowin.net separately as well? What do they have in common that Word and Excel don't have?

IMO, It's just a matter of mind-set.

The way you phrased that, Its just that the tabs are at the top..

The task bar at the bottom could also be classed as tabbing.

Its just personal preference of the user.

So if you can run Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel on separate Windows instead of tabs, what's wrong with running Facebook.com and Neowin.net separately as well? What do they have in common that Word and Excel don't have?

Nothing. The problem arises when you have more than just a few open. Right now I have two Visual Studio windows open. One has 17 tabs, the other has 9. I could have had 26 windows open instead, but it would reduce usability. Tabs let you group documents, be it sheets in an Excel documents, source files in Visual Studio, or web pages in a browser. Again the problem is that you are describing the usage scenario of a very casual user. One that only has a couple of things open.

As for what Facebook and Neowin have in common versus Word and Excel. It wouldn't be unreasonable to want to group Facebook and Neowin together. They're both forumy community type sites where you can waste time. I tend to keep those things grouped in a separate window from, say, some topic I'm researching.

They did toss out real world stats they they've collected showing that <10% have 8 or more tabs open at one time in their browser. Around 8 to 9 is what I normally have for example but I know people who have more of course. That said, there's been lots of feedback arleady about having the option to move tabs back under the address bar so you have more room for space. Some people don't wanna pin everything to the taskbar and so on.

I expect to see that option and other things at some point, they've been listening to people more and more now.

Nothing. The problem arises when you have more than just a few open. Right now I have two Visual Studio windows open. One has 17 tabs, the other has 9. I could have had 26 windows open instead, but it would reduce usability. Tabs let you group documents, be it sheets in an Excel documents, source files in Visual Studio, or web pages in a browser. Again the problem is that you are describing the usage scenario of a very casual user. One that only has a couple of things open.

But those 17 and 9 tabs are of the same application. Think of websites as separate applications. IE9 doesn't take away tabbed browsing from you. You can still have 5-6 Facebook tabs open in the Facebook window, separate from the 5 tabs in the msdn.com window. It's just that the IE9 UI discourages the user to open those 12 tabs in the same window because they are functionally different.

BTW, if you argue that you may need to have 20 tabs open from the same website at the same time, then you are a super minority.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!