new nikon D7000


Recommended Posts

_16.2 Megapixels. (CMOS sensor, DX format, 6fps)

_1080p full HD video. (24fps)

_ISO up to 6400 (pushable to 25,600)

_Magnesium alloy construction (read “pro quality”)

_6FPS

_39 pt AF system

_Dual SD

_$1200

http://nikonrumors.com/2010/09/15/the-official-announcements.aspx

http://nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-SLR/25468/D7000.html

http://blog.chasejarvis.com/blog/2010/09/nikon-d7000/

Looks pretty sweet. It's like a DX D700 with higher FPS (without the grip on D700).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/938370-new-nikon-d7000/
Share on other sites

Yeah, I saw that earlier. Seems like a great camera. I think my brother may get that in near future to upgrade from D700. Who knows.

I don't think it's an "upgrade" from a D700. It's equal to a D700, but at less than 50% the price.

39 pt AF. Holy crap!

D300 and above has 51af points.

Congrats, that looks like a nice camera..... :)

I don't own it... it was just announced last night.

I don't think it's an "upgrade" from a D700. It's equal to a D700, but at less than 50% the price.

Lol, upgrade from D700? How is going from FX to DX an upgrade? It's not even an equal. ISO numbers might be the same, but the quality is far worse than that of D700. Look at the ISO 3200 samples posted by Chase Jarvis.

It's not what I meant... I wasn't talking about to trade in for D7000... I meant my bro can use D7000 for something else. Since D700 do not have D-movie feature in it. He may get D7000 if he's interested in it. He likes D700 a lot but no movie feature. He would like to make some short movies.

Why do people feel the need to have hd video on cameras like this. I would rather have better function than hd video, for the same price.

What "better feature" would you like them to add? I believe that given the sensors going into these cameras to make them the cameras they are, HD video is basically a freebie for the manufacturer.

Why do people feel the need to have hd video on cameras like this. I would rather have better function than hd video, for the same price.

Some movie/TV directors use their DSLRs to make TV shows or movies. Did you hear about the "House MD" director that he used his DSLR for the final episode while back?

They use their either Nikon or Canon cameras. House MD director uses Canon 5D Mark II.

I made some videos with my DSLR. My brother borrows my camera sometimes since he doesn't have video feature in his DSLR.

Why do people feel the need to have hd video on cameras like this. I would rather have better function than hd video, for the same price.

I'm tired of people complaining about video on DSLRs. It's been TWO YEARS. Get over it, seriously. Go complain other places. Many MANY people use video on their DSLRs. The HD video on my D90 has payed for itself in stock video sales on places like pond5.com and istockphoto.com.

It basically rivals the 7D at 60D prices. Sweet WIN for Nikon.

Well, In the UK you can get a 7D for ?999.98 and the 60D ?839.98 where as the D7000 is ?1,089.99. I mean, its not that much more considering how good the specs are, It only matters if you are canon or nikon already :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I can't believe Starmer is still there...his party lost so big. He's a stubborn coot, but this is largely unenforceable, so I would imagine he'll be resigning soon. A key here is for parents to buy their kids phones sans Internet access--and set up the Internet at home, where mom and day can, you know, act like parents instead expecting the government to raise their kids.
    • EA launches in-game advertising platform for brands to "connect with audiences" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The gaming giant Electronic Arts is exploring more ways to inject real-life brands into its games. Announced today as EA Advertising, the new platform is attempting to make it easier for brands to reach out for deals with the company and put their products inside titles like EA Sports FC, Madden, NHL, Skate, or The Sims. EA revealed that its EA Sports side of the company brings in "hundreds of millions of players across console, PC, and mobile" every year. Fan engagement of these titles was also touted as being "extraordinary," with 23,000 NFL seasons worth of games being played in Madden NFL daily, while EA Sports FC sees over a billion matches a day. “Players come to EA’s games and live experiences every day to play, watch, create and connect,” said David Tinson, Chief Experiences Officer at Electronic Arts. “That gives brands a meaningful opportunity to show up in ways that add value and respect the player experience, while maintaining authenticity in the worlds our teams are building. With EA Advertising, we’re helping brands become part of those moments in ways that are relevant and built for players.” Using the new program EA Advertising, brands will be able to inject their products into games in real-time via dynamic placement. EA says partners will have access to everything from stadium signage in sports games and targeted adverts to in-game content custom-made for the brands. These are described as additions designed to "enhance, not disrupt" experiences. "In these interactive gameplay environments, brands become part of the game itself, reflecting how players engage with advertising in real-world contexts," adds the company "Brands can activate across live environments, tailoring placements to meet campaign objectives, and update campaigns with ongoing optimization informed by aggregated engagement insights." Current real-world brand partnerships EA has built into its games include Visa (EA Sports FC and College Football), Lowe's (EA Sports FC, Madden NFL, and College Football), Red Bull (EA SPORTS FC), Xfinity and Peacock (EA SPORTS FC), and Mountain Dew’s (College Football).
    • Will be surprised if there isn't a new ver of youtube just for labelled educational content
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels A few months ago, Neowin reported that the UK was trialing a social media ban with 300 teenagers for six weeks, that testing has come to an end, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that the country will ban under-16s from social media. Starmer said that this technology is making children unhappy and making it easier for bullies to harass and abuse them. He continued to talk about the addictive nature of social media, saying that it uses an infinite scroll designed to lock users in for hours. He said this interferes with children doing their homework, reading, playing with friends outside, and going to bed on time. Tackling the idea that nothing can be done about social media, Starmer said: The government’s action won’t stop at social media either, the PM said. It plans to take action on gaming services and livestreaming platforms. Right now, he said, strangers can contact any child unchecked. He said this wouldn’t happen in real life, and the government is going to stop it from happening online, too. The Labour government has overseen the introduction of the Online Safety Act, a big change to the internet which includes age verification on adult websites. This has led to a fair bit of backlash, but overall, the government is pushing ahead with these changes.
    • Still using Hexchat every day but i would not consider it Retro 😛
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!