Intel wants to charge $50 to unlock stuff your CPU can already do


Recommended Posts

This is like buying a car and not being able to drive it unless you buy a steering wheel. Once bought, the car is yours to keep and do whatever you want with it, but if you want to unluck its full capacities (like driving), you'll need to spend $300 more ($50 in Intel's case).

This is just over the top.

I you want to go with car analogies, it's more like buying a car and then paying to get the ECU tuned or upgraded. The car was working perfectly fine when you bought it, same as with the CPU, and you got exactly what was advertised. It just happens that you can pay more to get some extra performance without replacing the engine/CPU with a new one.

I don't see anything wrong with this. Intel thought it was feesable and consumers will pay to upgrade.

OMG you don't see anything wrong with a company trying to make money?? Intel is evil, this is an evil idea. It should be free like everything else.

this is way too funny.... i bet they learned that from airlines....

watch me... once this go through and people fall for it, it's going to be like airline business. They will start adding extra fees for everything. sad....

Why not? You get several editions of Windows on a DVD these days so why not do the same with hardware?

No, that is somewhat different. You have to pay a different price for different versions of Windows (though the pricing ought to be different ._. W7 Starter ought to be no more than $50 :p), and unless Intel knocks $50 every processor they do this on, it's bologna!

seems like a prime solution in a business/manufacturing sense.

intel seems to start getting high yields in what would be high ended models. IIRC, they usually shave off defective cache memory or rerouting past defective hardware components (which stretches the critical path) on the die - causing this tier of models we see today (e.g. extereme models probably are "perfectly" manufactured which definitely has low yields -- causing a lot of dough. Every thing else is just a defective form of extreme that was altered after fabrication).

Obviously if they had more higher end yields, it would be quite stupid to permanently cripple a working device. Tiered selling and an option to unlock is a good way to keep the same system & streamline the manufacturing process.

+1

Hackers will hack this so yeah. This will fail because of that.

I wouldn't be so sure, you don't see people unlocking the multipliers on non-extreme chips so I don't see why Intel couldn't lock other features.

I wouldn't be so sure, you don't see people unlocking the multipliers on non-extreme chips so I don't see why Intel couldn't lock other features.

Really big difference between chips that are physically locked and this which is designed to be unlocked via software.

so now you can buy a computer with 1 core, 1 gig of ram, 8x speed DVD drive, etc...

but you can pay extra to unlock a couple cores, a few gigs of ram, speed up your DVD drive...

like a custom built computer, with no building involved!

LOL :pinch:

Apple wouldn't have the balls to do this. Their computers are already outdated on launch :laugh:

they would and have. remember people with ipod touch's having to pay for firmware/OS updates?

I'm currently looking into building a new computer. I was leaning towards Intel but after seeing this, my new rig will now be AMD. Sorry Intel but after seeing this I will not be purchasing any of your CPU's in the future.

AMD has always ruled anyway!!

Intel is just a con job business now a days.

AMD has always ruled anyway!!

Intel is just a con job business now a days.

:rolleyes:

So considering that nothing AMD has out now can even remotely compete with an I7 means nothing right?

:rolleyes:

So considering that nothing AMD has out now can even remotely compete with an I7 means nothing right?

I don't hear anyone complaining about Phenom II's performance.

Aside the fact that performance has a partial claim in this matter, Intel's business model does not benefit consumers in anyway, they're essentially charging for what should already come with the product originally.

Kind of stupid idea to begin with, why not just charge $50 more for the full power of the cpu to begin with?

Also what's next auto manufactures going to do the same? buy this 201x Mustang with 300hp off the showroom floor, but wait later on you can go to

the dealer and buy a card to get the firmware on the cars computer updated and you'll get 500 hp instantly afterwards.

It's marketing and a money grab. I've always been an Intel fan boy, I'll stay the course for now, but if Intel starts stupid moves like this with their

mainstream proccessors it maybe be time to go AMD.

It's a gimmick, plain and simple. Unlocking functionality for something that is already in the product is stealing. It's like buying a brand new car and they tell you you can only open 1 door (the driver's) but it has 4. They will sell you a special key so you can open the other three for a *minimal fee.

*minimal fee = a few thousand.

It's immoral and wrong. Stop it, Intel. You know better.

Yet, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. ou can have your weak 6 core AMD processors.

And yet, you go and take the discussion to where it was not intented in the first place. The topic is about Intel's business practices, not their performance. Nothing beats the i7, yes, we know that.

Yet, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. you can have your weak 6 core AMD processors.

et, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. ou can have your weak 6 core AMD processors.

Old System: CPU: AMD Athlon X2 64 3800+ 2.00GHz, Mobo: HP a1700n Video: nVidia GTS250 512MB, RAM: 2.5GB DDR2 533, HDD: 2x500GB + 1x120GB

New System: CPU: Intel Xeon x3440 2.53GHz, Mobo: EVGA P55 LE Video: nVidia GTS250 512MB, RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333, HDD: 2x500GB

Technology is very unpredictable, couple of years intel was king of the hill, then amd, then intel, then amd and for teh time being intel. Your sig is proof :)

And I don't mind not buying an UBER ultra fast intel i9 when I can have a better bang for buck, withouth having to pay extra for it!

It's a gimmick, plain and simple. Unlocking functionality for something that is already in the product is stealing. It's like buying a brand new car and they tell you you can only open 1 door (the driver's) but it has 4. They will sell you a special key so you can open the other three for a *minimal fee.

*minimal fee = a few thousand.

It's immoral and wrong. Stop it, Intel. You know better.

no, this is more like upgrading the ecu as someone said or tuning the engine for more power, only opening 1 door, would be reduced functionality, this is performance there selling

no, this is more like upgrading the ecu as someone said or tuning the engine for more power, only opening 1 door, would be reduced functionality, this is performance there selling

It's exactly what this is! The CPU is already capable of certain performance when it leaves the factory but they reduce or lock -whatever you want to call it- (either Ghz speed, cores, etc) so that you can UNLEASH the full functionality (what you paid for in the first place ;) ) for a little more. Think about it, it's not the same as upgrading, don't let them confuse ya.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This and Crazy Taxi are the two games that interested me the most from this showcase.
    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!