qdave Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Sad future is uppon us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ichi Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 This is like buying a car and not being able to drive it unless you buy a steering wheel. Once bought, the car is yours to keep and do whatever you want with it, but if you want to unluck its full capacities (like driving), you'll need to spend $300 more ($50 in Intel's case). This is just over the top. I you want to go with car analogies, it's more like buying a car and then paying to get the ECU tuned or upgraded. The car was working perfectly fine when you bought it, same as with the CPU, and you got exactly what was advertised. It just happens that you can pay more to get some extra performance without replacing the engine/CPU with a new one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yourpcnerd Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 cant seeing it happening any time soon, if it does, ill download the software of piratebay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watchthisspace Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with this. Intel thought it was feesable and consumers will pay to upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7Dash8 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with this. Intel thought it was feesable and consumers will pay to upgrade. OMG you don't see anything wrong with a company trying to make money?? Intel is evil, this is an evil idea. It should be free like everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanLeto Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Hello AMD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webeagle12 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 this is way too funny.... i bet they learned that from airlines.... watch me... once this go through and people fall for it, it's going to be like airline business. They will start adding extra fees for everything. sad.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr aldo Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Why not? You get several editions of Windows on a DVD these days so why not do the same with hardware? No, that is somewhat different. You have to pay a different price for different versions of Windows (though the pricing ought to be different ._. W7 Starter ought to be no more than $50 :p), and unless Intel knocks $50 every processor they do this on, it's bologna! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihilus Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 seems like a prime solution in a business/manufacturing sense. intel seems to start getting high yields in what would be high ended models. IIRC, they usually shave off defective cache memory or rerouting past defective hardware components (which stretches the critical path) on the die - causing this tier of models we see today (e.g. extereme models probably are "perfectly" manufactured which definitely has low yields -- causing a lot of dough. Every thing else is just a defective form of extreme that was altered after fabrication). Obviously if they had more higher end yields, it would be quite stupid to permanently cripple a working device. Tiered selling and an option to unlock is a good way to keep the same system & streamline the manufacturing process. +1 Hackers will hack this so yeah. This will fail because of that. I wouldn't be so sure, you don't see people unlocking the multipliers on non-extreme chips so I don't see why Intel couldn't lock other features. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomoko Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I wouldn't be so sure, you don't see people unlocking the multipliers on non-extreme chips so I don't see why Intel couldn't lock other features. Really big difference between chips that are physically locked and this which is designed to be unlocked via software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahhell Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 doesn't this have more to do with ****ty Gateway than it does Intel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttus Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 so now you can buy a computer with 1 core, 1 gig of ram, 8x speed DVD drive, etc... but you can pay extra to unlock a couple cores, a few gigs of ram, speed up your DVD drive... like a custom built computer, with no building involved! LOL :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajputwarrior Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Apple wouldn't have the balls to do this. Their computers are already outdated on launch :laugh: they would and have. remember people with ipod touch's having to pay for firmware/OS updates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whinges Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I'm currently looking into building a new computer. I was leaning towards Intel but after seeing this, my new rig will now be AMD. Sorry Intel but after seeing this I will not be purchasing any of your CPU's in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cork1958 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I'm currently looking into building a new computer. I was leaning towards Intel but after seeing this, my new rig will now be AMD. Sorry Intel but after seeing this I will not be purchasing any of your CPU's in the future. AMD has always ruled anyway!! Intel is just a con job business now a days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahhell Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 AMD has always ruled anyway!! Intel is just a con job business now a days. :rolleyes: So considering that nothing AMD has out now can even remotely compete with an I7 means nothing right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Motoko. Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 :rolleyes: So considering that nothing AMD has out now can even remotely compete with an I7 means nothing right? I don't hear anyone complaining about Phenom II's performance. Aside the fact that performance has a partial claim in this matter, Intel's business model does not benefit consumers in anyway, they're essentially charging for what should already come with the product originally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpablo Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Kind of stupid idea to begin with, why not just charge $50 more for the full power of the cpu to begin with? Also what's next auto manufactures going to do the same? buy this 201x Mustang with 300hp off the showroom floor, but wait later on you can go to the dealer and buy a card to get the firmware on the cars computer updated and you'll get 500 hp instantly afterwards. It's marketing and a money grab. I've always been an Intel fan boy, I'll stay the course for now, but if Intel starts stupid moves like this with their mainstream proccessors it maybe be time to go AMD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyF Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Well, before I liked AMD simply do to fanboyism, which got me mocked, but now I actually have a sensible justifiable reason to choose AMD over Intel. Thanks Intel! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sic133 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 It's a gimmick, plain and simple. Unlocking functionality for something that is already in the product is stealing. It's like buying a brand new car and they tell you you can only open 1 door (the driver's) but it has 4. They will sell you a special key so you can open the other three for a *minimal fee. *minimal fee = a few thousand. It's immoral and wrong. Stop it, Intel. You know better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZekeComa Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 AMD has always ruled anyway!! Intel is just a con job business now a days. Yet, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. you can have your weak 6 core AMD processors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sic133 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Yet, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. ou can have your weak 6 core AMD processors. And yet, you go and take the discussion to where it was not intented in the first place. The topic is about Intel's business practices, not their performance. Nothing beats the i7, yes, we know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconian Guppy Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 Yet, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. you can have your weak 6 core AMD processors. et, AMD's processors are still garbage. I'll keep my Intel Xeon. ou can have your weak 6 core AMD processors. Old System: CPU: AMD Athlon X2 64 3800+ 2.00GHz, Mobo: HP a1700n Video: nVidia GTS250 512MB, RAM: 2.5GB DDR2 533, HDD: 2x500GB + 1x120GB New System: CPU: Intel Xeon x3440 2.53GHz, Mobo: EVGA P55 LE Video: nVidia GTS250 512MB, RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333, HDD: 2x500GB Technology is very unpredictable, couple of years intel was king of the hill, then amd, then intel, then amd and for teh time being intel. Your sig is proof :) And I don't mind not buying an UBER ultra fast intel i9 when I can have a better bang for buck, withouth having to pay extra for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murkurie Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 It's a gimmick, plain and simple. Unlocking functionality for something that is already in the product is stealing. It's like buying a brand new car and they tell you you can only open 1 door (the driver's) but it has 4. They will sell you a special key so you can open the other three for a *minimal fee. *minimal fee = a few thousand. It's immoral and wrong. Stop it, Intel. You know better. no, this is more like upgrading the ecu as someone said or tuning the engine for more power, only opening 1 door, would be reduced functionality, this is performance there selling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sic133 Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 no, this is more like upgrading the ecu as someone said or tuning the engine for more power, only opening 1 door, would be reduced functionality, this is performance there selling It's exactly what this is! The CPU is already capable of certain performance when it leaves the factory but they reduce or lock -whatever you want to call it- (either Ghz speed, cores, etc) so that you can UNLEASH the full functionality (what you paid for in the first place ;) ) for a little more. Think about it, it's not the same as upgrading, don't let them confuse ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts