Intel wants to charge $50 to unlock stuff your CPU can already do


Recommended Posts

It's exactly what this is! The CPU is already capable of certain performance when it leaves the factory but they reduce or lock -whatever you want to call it- (either Ghz speed, cores, etc) so that you can UNLEASH the full functionality (what you paid for in the first place ;) ) for a little more. Think about it, it's not the same as upgrading, don't let them confuse ya.

No. You paid for what you got. What you paid for in the first place doesn't include the full functionality. e.g. you paid $100 for 2.0 GHz, not 3GHz. What makes people like you tick is because you already know the hardware is already in your possession. But if you think about it, you are still getting what you paid for.

I really don't see anything wrong with it. It's a process decision. It is probably cheaper to have one manufacturing process versus the hardware cost of teh extra features.

This sounds exactly like buying a car that has all the features of climate control installed, but you need to pay the dealer extra to enable it or it won't function...
But the point is you didn't pay for climate control in the first place. The dealer just opted to put it there in case you decided to activate it. It is not your concern why they do it like that, so to speak.

Why is everyone jumping all over Intel for this? This 'upgrade card' is only for a Gateway system. Sounds more like a Gateway stunt than an Intel one to me. Looks like you pay $50 to essentially upgrade your motherboard BIOS.

Either way....lame.

Technology is very unpredictable, couple of years intel was king of the hill, then amd, then intel, then amd and for teh time being intel. Your sig is proof :)

And I don't mind not buying an UBER ultra fast intel i9 when I can have a better bang for buck, withouth having to pay extra for it!

intel has been king since Core 2 duo

that is like 3+ years ago

And people support this bull**** of a company to the point where they can do this.

And I dont want to hear any bull**** excuses like "well thats why you build your computers, this is only on store bought versions" or a blah blah blah. The fact they are gonna do this and no one will boycott them, means the company can go die.

I stopped supporting intel awhile ago, and im glad i did. On top of all this, they bought mcafee a few weeks ago which definitely made me look at intel like NO.

Why is everyone jumping all over Intel for this? This 'upgrade card' is only for a Gateway system. Sounds more like a Gateway stunt than an Intel one to me. Looks like you pay $50 to essentially upgrade your motherboard BIOS.

Either way....lame.

I don't know, this looks more like an Intel plot to me:

https://retailupgrades.intel.com/Page.aspx?Name=WhereToBuy

Granted, they completely forgot to add actual content to that page, but the simple fact that such a page exists on Intel's website suggests that they're planning to do this on more than just this one laptop.

I don?t know what the higher ups at Intel are thinking anymore. Not supporting the new USB standard, limiting over clocking, and now this. Worst of all though, the mess they?ve made with having two commercial sockets during the same generation.

Intel?s chips outperform AMD?s by a healthy margin, but it seems like they?ve chosen to shoot themselves in the foot.

I call this BS . You already pay premium for the mobo's socket , that changes with every new chip revision ( roughly a year and a half )

The sale is not for 75% of the product (example figure) , yet this is what you get for full price . Legally you can't pursue this , because the card is a product by itself .

The next decade yields promise for hardware piracy.?

^Yup, I believe staff in places like Best Buy will be pushed to recommend these kinds of things in the future, along with product protection, internet security and microsoft office. :p

Great, another KPI to go with the 30+ they already have. >_>

A tad extreme to have another KPI just for an Intel processor add-on (although it wouldn't surprise me) :laugh: But I totally know where you're coming from, push push push!

Oh, the joys of KPIs!

I don't see the problem.

People who want to purchase the extra processing power and think that this is a reasonable value will do so. People who don't believe this to be a reasonable value won't. If you buy a Celeron processor and have the option of giving it i7 performance, how is Intel really at fault? You paid for the Celeron, right?

and then the intel somehow will force us,to use one program to check if our bios is hacked and cpu unlocked illegally.if yes,they will disable another one core,except the unlocked one and the updates will continue to pop out...

hm,something reminds me...hm,ps3?! :whistle:

I don't know, this looks more like an Intel plot to me:

https://retailupgrades.intel.com/Page.aspx?Name=WhereToBuy

Granted, they completely forgot to add actual content to that page, but the simple fact that such a page exists on Intel's website suggests that they're planning to do this on more than just this one laptop.

Hmmm...compelling evidence, Joey. If they want to make it possible for people to upgrade the CPU on their laptops why don't they do something outrageous like, say....making the CPU socket user-serviceable. There'd be a lot less consumer backlash & Intel would make more money than this scheme will.

The only reason I see this being useful is because it helps lower cost of deployment for not only Intel but also Gateway. This allows gateway to purchase more of a single type of chip while providing different hardware speeds. I'm not 100% sold on this being a viable option with ALL types of processors, but for the lower end I don't see why not.

This also leaves a decent upgrade option for users without having to buy a complete new system because sometimes that difference in CPU can be larger than $50 because typically the manufacture includes other options to jump the price.

The only reason I see this being useful is because it helps lower cost of deployment for not only Intel but also Gateway. This allows gateway to purchase more of a single type of chip while providing different hardware speeds. I'm not 100% sold on this being a viable option with ALL types of processors, but for the lower end I don't see why not.

This also leaves a decent upgrade option for users without having to buy a complete new system because sometimes that difference in CPU can be larger than $50 because typically the manufacture includes other options to jump the price.

I don't see why they have to disable SMT and 1MB of L3 cache. They could just buy the chips as intended (untampered with) and put them in.

Unless they discount the price of the entire machine, which I have my doubts about.

If it's a software based solution that is used to unlock the CPU, once hackers get their hands on it, they will find a way to do it for nothing and release it. Regardless, it's an interesting and slightly strange tactic from Intel

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
    • Gears of War: E-Day brings 12-player co-op, smoother traversal mechanics, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Right as the Xbox Games Showcase came to an end today, The Gears of War developer The Coalition took over to show off its next project: E-Day. This prequel project was announced back in 2024, but now we have a lot more details about its campaign, new gameplay mechanics, and even a release date. The studio says this is the first time it has managed to get the time to build the entire game in a new engine, as it had worked non-stop on new titles for years while porting classic code and assets. With Unreal Engine 5 now powering Gears of War: E-Day, The Coalition says it started completely anew, with all assets, animations, environments, and others being built from scratch. The campaign will take place across three days in the city of Kalona. The story will follow the events through the eyes of Bravo Squad. This is made up of the returning classic duo Marcus and Dom, as well as the new characters Mags Carter and Lucas Reyes. Watch the trailer below to see Marcus in action without his iconic armor and gear, just as the Locust invasion kicks off. The story will draw on classic Gears novels like Aspho Fields as well, with the studio even collaborating with author Karen Traviss. "That continuity is what makes the destruction land," says the studio. "In E-Day, you watch a living city torn apart—homes still lit, meals half-finished—while people abandon their cars and run for cover. Small details—a child’s toy, an uneaten dinner—make the loss real as everyday places collapse under the Locust assault." The movement system is getting a big overhaul here. Players will be able to slide while running, jump across gaps, climb head-height covers, and even crawl on the ground to avoid fire from enemies. As for the returning horde mode, The Coalition teased a new 12-player PvE mode. This will involve three squads of Gears going up against the incoming Locusts in larger city maps than usual. The studio says that it is going to reimagine the classic formula just as co-op games are going through a resurgence. Multiplayer was touched on today too, where Versus is coming back touting four versus four Gears PVP action set across Kalona maps. More details about multiplayer will be revealed later. Open beta weekends are kicking off this August for fans wanting to jump in early too. Gears of War: E-Day is releasing on Xbox Series X|S and PC on October 6 with pre-orders available now. It will also be a part of Xbox Game Pass on day one. Microsoft has confirmed this as an Xbox platform exclusive, as there are no plans to bring it to PlayStation or Switch.
    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!