Recommended Posts

I think I already said that, but I'm very worried about the language quality. I'm not expecting Bioware-grade writing, but at least something between that and the barely functional translation we got in The Witcher. This is really what broke the original for me, and yet there hasn't been a word about it for the Witcher 2. We'll have to wait and see.

To be fair, some of the speech was hilarious.

"Where is Alina?"

"She's dead."

"Oh no."

"Yes."

I can't remember the exact speech, but that conversation when you tell Julian that Alina is dead, both you and him give such insincere reactions it's hilarious. I also like other moments where you have a massively long speech from one character, and Geralt just responds after a slight pause with "Yes."

honestly i don't find the conversations in the first Witcher that bad. they're not super great, but they're not bad. what bothers me more are the broken quests where you have to meet someone and they simply don't show up no matter what time of day it is. i sure hope they've taken care of this issue with the sequel.

There not using the same game engine for the Witcher 2, so I don't see why it would suffer any of the same bugs. It will likely have different ones, but I think it will be a better game, both in less bugs, and voice acting - The Witcher was reasonably successful, they have more money to do it better this time.

sure hope you're right, often new engines mean new problems, especially with smaller teams where manpower, time and funding are serious issues. granted they've had over three years to work in this, but who knows. the first Witcher was very nice overall and had some nice graphics, but the mechanics were definitely lacking.

Conversation wise I think DAO whipped the witcher but the witchers were still enjoyable, gritty, humerous, sometimes bemusingly seductive....(maybe not :p)

Still worst dialogue in the Witcher beats 99% of the dialogue in DAO2.

In any case I predict a gamergasm rating for this sequel.

Still worst dialogue in the Witcher beats 99% of the dialogue in DAO2.

In any case I predict a gamergasm rating for this sequel.

Eh, not really IMO. There are plenty of valid criticisms of DA2 but I think it had great dialogue. The party banter especially was frequently hilarious.

well, since the first one is so broken i can't even finish it after 30 hours of gameplay, i'm considering myself excused from buying the sequel...i mean i enjoyed every minute of those 30 hours over the course of like five months, but still, quests that can't be completed? missing key plot characters? erratic camera? not good, with all due respect to the developers, i'm not risking full price for the second one. the first i got off the Steam Xmas sale, so it's not such a big deal.

The first game was merely good at best. It had terrible pacing, terrible combat, way too much backtracking, and way too many Fedex quests. The dialogue was flat and contrived at best. Graphics were great, but nothing out of the ordinary. The only thing that really made it special was its potions system and its delayed morality system.

Though, the more I see of the second game, the more I drool over it. It appears to be an immense improvement over its predecessor.

The Witcher is a good game, it wasn't the best game in the world, but it was pretty good in it's genre. With the new game, it looks like they are trying to produce a game to the same quality as Bethesda RPGs, the Witcher is a good game, considering the difficulty with bugs in games of that genre, and the relative inexperience of the devs with large scale RPGs. The only bit of the plot I found dull was Chapter 4 - the whole chapter was pretty slow and random, and then the difficulty randomly got a lot harder in Chapter 5.

I think the new game will be good, but I don't think it's going to be one of the greatest RPGs ever, but maybe the Witcher 3 :shifty:

well, since the first one is so broken i can't even finish it after 30 hours of gameplay, i'm considering myself excused from buying the sequel...i mean i enjoyed every minute of those 30 hours over the course of like five months, but still, quests that can't be completed? missing key plot characters? erratic camera? not good, with all due respect to the developers, i'm not risking full price for the second one. the first i got off the Steam Xmas sale, so it's not such a big deal.

:huh: never had any issues with the first one.

I loved it, so looking forward to the sequel :yes:

This game... ONLY supports 16:9 resolutions :(

http://tw2.thewitcher.com/forum/index.php?topic=31346.msg5495989#msg5495989

Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.

As one that buys all his monitors in 16:9 flavor (I don't see the need for 16:10 yet, as pretty much nothing out there supports it properly and I hate the "black bars"), I can't complain.

Why would they do that? What pc game doesn't support 16:10? Even most ****ty ports do. This is just bizarre. I really hope that CD Projekt RED guy just mispoke.

Assassins Creed only uses 16:9 (16:10 maybe, don't remember seeing black bars but they might've been too small to notice) and nobody cares ;)

Eboue: you never had problems with Angus and Leuvaarden disappearing and simply not there for quests they're needed to progress?

as for the resolution issue, personally on 16:9 and i believe most people are, but still, both 4:3 and 16:10 should be supported for the next few years at least.

Witcher 2 gameplay videos show castle defenders, Geralt using his words

A few gameplay videos for The Witcher 2 have popped up online, and we?ve got a couple posted for you below.

They?re from Gamespot, and the first one posted below shows castle defenders trying to stop a player from arming a ballista. The second one shows our hero Geralt helping out townsfolk with ?words and actions.?

If you click on the link above, you will see a menu with more gameplay videos of The Witcher 2. Unfortunately the links are 404-ing on us at the moment, but hopefully it will be straightened out soon.

[...]

[source:VG247]

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!