Recommended Posts

The Witcher 2 to have unlimited installs on unlimited PCs for non-GoG.com copies

thewitcher2april1200004april14.jpg

While the GoG.com version of The Witcher 2 will still be DRM free, other copies, including the retail version, of the upcoming fantasy RPG will have a DRM set-up. In a streaming press conference today, developer CD Projekt announced that they are using SecuROM for the game's DRM program However the developer also said that the game will only use the system in order to keep pirates from leaking the game before its scheduled release date of May 17.

The game will need a one-time login to the internet to start playing but will not have an "always on" set up to continue playing the game. The Witcher 2 will let PC gamers have unlimited installs on an unlimited amount of PCs and will let people play it on up to five PCs at once.

[...]

[source:BigDownload]

Wow! That's the best news I've read in awhile. I don't think any developer has offered a game that lets you play on up to 5 PCs at once with an unlimited number of installs on an unlimited number of PCs. The game will also require a one-time activation.

CD Projekt gets a thumbs up from me as well as a guaranteed sale.

[source:BigDownload]

Wow! That's the best news I've read in awhile. I don't think any developer has offered a game that lets you play on up to 5 PCs at once with an unlimited number of installs on an unlimited number of PCs. The game will also require a one-time activation.

CD Projekt gets a thumbs up from me as well as a guaranteed sale.

So uh...anyone want to go halfsies? :laugh:

I like the amount of different categories it has. But, I've never seen parents or shops pay any attention to game ratings - it's apparently fine to let your 7 year old kid play 18 rated games.

Yes, it is perfectly fine. The whole rating system is a piece of crap anyway.

So far the best price I've found is D2D@ ?31.50.

Another month-long wait. Maybe they'll do a Valve-potato gig ! :laugh:

Amazon UK has it for 24 pounds.

You don't need the 1st to play second, as AOK's has it's own story :), although your saves from the first can be carried over, but not necessary.

Lookin really good though, and a contender for GOTY alongside Portal 2 ;)

You see, this is a PC exclusive game and gonna **** a few console folks well off, I like! :yes:

You don't need the 1st to play second, as AOK's has it's own story :), although your saves from the first can be carried over, but not necessary.

Lookin really good though, and a contender for GOTY alongside Portal 2 ;)

You see, this is a PC exclusive game and gonna **** a few console folks well off, I like! :yes:

While both games are nice I don't see either as real contenders for GOTY over games like Mass Effect 3, Skyrim and Uncharted 3. All games which follow series that have taken home many GOTY awards.

While both games are nice I don't see either as real contenders for GOTY over games like Mass Effect 3, Skyrim and Uncharted 3. All games which follow series that have taken home many GOTY awards.

IIRC Portal won a few awards when it released. No reason why Portal 2 wouldn't be at least in the runnings for GOTY.....remember, the original Portal was almost a concept game....they hired some college kids with a neat idea and made a professional grade concept to see how the community took it. Portal 2 was Valves response to the amazing remarks that the original Portal brought about.

RPG style games definitely take the cake on staying fun longer, but in terms of having fun while playing, I personally score Portal 2 at an 8 or 9, and any RPG (ME, ME2, The Witcher, etc) at a 5-7. The RPG games have longer durations, but the fun never really goes above a certain value, whereas Portal and Portal 2 are much shorter, but are much more fun over the same duration.

But, it's all opinionated. I have a feeling Portal 2 is going to be my GOTY this year, many others will feel ME3 or Skyrim are better, I personally highly doubt I will, mostly due to my preferring FPS to RPG-style games, but Portal 2 also to me personally offers much more fun for the duration of the game. Not to mention the custom maps people can create increase replayability......hell, I plan to replay Portal 2 after I finish it just for the dev commentary anyway.....not something I would really do in an RPG game once I've gotten through the story.

Despite what game takes home GOTY, Portal 2 will definitely be one of my favorite games. Honestly, even with ME3 and Skyrim looming in the distance, I am not as excited for them as I was for Portal 2. As for AoK, I am not as excited for it as I was Portal 2, but more excited for it than I am for ME3 or Skyrim. I had more fun with the original than I did with any of the ME and Elder Scrolls series games....so by default I am expecting its sequel to be better than ME3 and Skyrim (for me personally...no doubt others will feel ME3 or Skyrim are GOTY).

IIRC Portal won a few awards when it released. No reason why Portal 2 wouldn't be at least in the runnings for GOTY.....remember, the original Portal was almost a concept game....they hired some college kids with a neat idea and made a professional grade concept to see how the community took it. Portal 2 was Valves response to the amazing remarks that the original Portal brought about.

RPG style games definitely take the cake on staying fun longer, but in terms of having fun while playing, I personally score Portal 2 at an 8 or 9, and any RPG (ME, ME2, The Witcher, etc) at a 5-7. The RPG games have longer durations, but the fun never really goes above a certain value, whereas Portal and Portal 2 are much shorter, but are much more fun over the same duration.

But, it's all opinionated. I have a feeling Portal 2 is going to be my GOTY this year, many others will feel ME3 or Skyrim are better, I personally highly doubt I will, mostly due to my preferring FPS to RPG-style games, but Portal 2 also to me personally offers much more fun for the duration of the game. Not to mention the custom maps people can create increase replayability......hell, I plan to replay Portal 2 after I finish it just for the dev commentary anyway.....not something I would really do in an RPG game once I've gotten through the story.

Despite what game takes home GOTY, Portal 2 will definitely be one of my favorite games. Honestly, even with ME3 and Skyrim looming in the distance, I am not as excited for them as I was for Portal 2. As for AoK, I am not as excited for it as I was Portal 2, but more excited for it than I am for ME3 or Skyrim. I had more fun with the original than I did with any of the ME and Elder Scrolls series games....so by default I am expecting its sequel to be better than ME3 and Skyrim (for me personally...no doubt others will feel ME3 or Skyrim are GOTY).

O yeah it'll be up there and will take home some awards just not the majority.

CD Projekt clarifies Witcher 2 console talk

Work won't begin on a console version of The Witcher 2 until the flagship PC release has happened, CD Projekt has explained to Eurogamer.

When that day comes, plans will be laid out for the new project, which may gain additional content beyond that of The Witcher 2 on PC.

Importantly, however, The Witcher 2 will be the same game on console as it is on PC. It won't be The Witcher 3.

[...]

"We won't wait to see how well The Witcher 2 does on PC first," he added. "After we release The Witcher 2 on PC we just sit down with Excel or Project and make schedules, make plans. Then we will be totally glad to announce what is coming out; we know what team we have, what capacity we have, but we still have to plan out the amount of work. Then we will tell the world what we plan to do and 'it will be that day of release', potentially."

Full article @ Eurogamer

Gop went on to reveal that "no", the console version wasn't in production - "at least not officially".

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-04-27-cd-projekt-clarifies-witcher-ii-console-talk

?It?s the first console project we would like to do,? he explained, adding that the console port is actually already playable in part.

http://www.vg247.com/2011/01/27/cd-projekt-the-witcher-2-designed-with-console-in-mind/

The more I see of this game the more unsure I become, I went from definite buy to hmm maybe I'll wait, I can understand why they're changing the game so much not a lot of people liked the first Witcher but personally I loved it and I hate change hopefully it's an amazing game. :whistle:

The Witcher 2 has gone gold!

We have some excellent news to share with our fans here on TheWitcher.com. The gold master version has been approved and has gone to production. Like you, the entire team here at CD Projekt Red is getting more and more excited as we move closer to our release date, May 17. So, we?re thrilled to tell you we have passed this very important milestone.

http://tw2.thewitcher.com/news/2011/4/5505525

well, seeing as i can't complete the first one after over 30 hours invested due to poor quest scripting, missing mission characters and horrible difficulty spikes, i'm excusing myself from the purchasing the sequel.

They did mention that the new game would be a lot better, you need the enhanced edition as well as wikia the problem is certain characters will only show up at a set time which is quite stupid they also don't always tell you the time, never noticed the massive difficulty spikes if your playing on hard then you'll have to use bombs, blade coatings, potions etc. diamond dust + argentia = 100% extra damage with silver swords.

There's some decent potions etc. you don't get till later but you can still make them by going to the wikia site.

White Raffard's Decoction; Instantly restores HP.

Swallow; Increases HP regen.

Full Moon; Potion which doubles your HP.

Argentia; Damage increased by 60%

I'm expecting a lot of broken quests on release*, which might take a long time before they're all fixed, and as I've mentioned previously, I'm not sure just how much improved the writing is, and it needs to be for me to purchase it. So I'm not pre-purchasing, even if that might end up wasting me 5$. Buying this game now is still taking a risk and I'd rather risk 5$ than 45$.

*Even Baldur's Gate 2 had tons of bugs on release (and even after all patches). RPGs are the worst offenders when it comes to bugs.

i'm with Asik, better wait for extensive feedback on this one.

thanks for the input Lovell, but i am playing the fully patched enhanced edition (got it from the Steam Xmas sales). Level 17 with 40% plus damage on both swords, swallow, food, potions for endurance regen and more...going into the Gold Rush Vivaldi and Sons bank fight i die in like six seconds against the scoiatel (spl?). also, both Angus and Loevaarden are simply missing from my campaign, and i have indeed consulted the wiki and other sources. they're just gone. shoddy programming makes for a very random experience. it's sad because i love the look and feel of the game, and i really enjoy the characters, conversations, locations etc. but there's no way i'm getting the sequel if it's even remotely as bad technically as the first.

So who's happy that they pre-order The Witcher 2 early? I know I am, especially after the massive price jump. $49.99 (with 10% discount) on Steam to $74.99.

Some recent videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REvGJAMFJzU

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-gameplay-the-witcher/713622

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!