Microsoft's Anti-Android FUD Campaign in Full Swing


Recommended Posts

With the release of Windows Phone 7 upon us, the hype machine now goes all the way up to 11. While hype machines are generally relatively harmless and easy to poke a hole through, coordinated FUD campaigns by patent trolls are not. After Apple and Microsoft trolled HTC, and Microsoft now trolling Motorola, the actual FUD campaign against Android is in full swing.

Windows Phone 7 has to succeed. Come hell or high water.

I wouldn't be surprised if Ballmer's position at Microsoft depends on Windows Phone 7's success. While Windows and Office continue to do well, Microsoft's other endeavours haven't been as successful; Windows Phone 7 should be the sign that Microsoft can still innovate and come up with something new that will enter a market, and grab a significant share.

Except, Android is in the way. Windows Phone 7 must appeal to the same OEMs currently selling Android devices, and in order to get them to even consider Microsoft's latest mobile offering, Redmond will have to convince them it's worth paying Microsoft for something they can get for free from Google.

There's two ways you can do this. One, Microsoft could offer such a compelling package with Windows Phone 7 that OEMs will line up to pay license fees to ship Windows Phone 7 devices, market them, and support them, all over the world. This is how competition works, and is the preferred way for consumers such as ourselves, since it would mean we get better products.

If that method fails - or you believe it will fail - you can always resort to what I call the rogue tactics. You can spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the competing platform - in this case, Android - by holding secret negotiations, speaking of patents nobody has ever seen, forbidding companies from ever revealing those supposed patents, and suing any company that flips you the bird (Motorola, you go girl).

Now that you spread the fear into everyone that your competitor is actually not free at all because of the patent deals you mafia'd OEMs into and the lawsuits you started against those that refuse to pay protection money sign such patent deals, you can then send your employees and executives on the warpath, instructing them to enlighten the world about how your competitor is not free at all.

And so we arrive at an interview in The Wall Street Journal with Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's CEO. The interview was held in honour of Windows Phone 7's upcoming launch, so of course Ballmer addressed Android's perceived free-ness by claiming it's not free at all - with the proof being the patent deals his company signed with HTC.

"Android has a patent fee," Ballmer told the WSJ, "It's not like Android's free. You do have to license patents. HTC's signed a license with us and you're going to see license fees clearly for Android as well as for Windows."

And now you have planted the seeds of fear, uncertainty, and doubt in the minds of the people making the decisions at OEMs. You have them where you want them. Google claims Android is free, but here you have that kind of huge company from Redmond claiming this isn't the case... And they have their own mobile offering we could use... And coincidentally, their patent agreement deal is just a little bit more expensive than their Windows Phone 7 OEM deal... Mmm.

As usual in technology media, the real questions weren't asked by The Wall Street Journal (too afraid to lose exclusives). Which patents, Mr Ballmer? What do they cover? Can you give us the patents' numbers? How many are there? Are they software or hardware patents? When do they expire? Why aren't you suing Google? Is it coincidental that Apple, a company you're very friendly with, is pretty much employing the same tactics you are?

Windows Phone 7 has to succeed. Come hell or high water.

Source OSnews ( a credible independent site )

Wow that took a long time to get to the point.

Anyway, Ballmer's right, it's not FUD. There are lingering license issues with Android, everyone knows that. There are also outstanding compatibility issues that Google will need to address at some point or another.

Anyway, Ballmer's right, it's not FUD. There are lingering license issues with Android, everyone knows that. There are also outstanding compatibility issues that Google will need to address at some point or another.

Of course it's FUD. It's part of a coordinated attack on Microsoft's rivals. It's part of Microsoft's strategy to blow things out of proportion and spread FUD about competitors. Ballmer has no credibility whatsoever.

OMG MS is protecting their patents, they can't do that. oh hey look we have a patent we can sue MS for, let's do it... :rolleyes:

Who said they have patents they can sue MS for?

The fact is that Microsoft did the following: They first promised that they would not sue companies that used Windows Phone 7. They then proceeded with suing Motorola because they are not using WP7.

What an amazing business model: Use our product, or we'll sue your ass! Extortion.

Microsoft just can't handle real competition, so they resort to FUD and lawsuits.

Pathetic.

Wow that took a long time to get to the point.

Anyway, Ballmer's right, it's not FUD. There are lingering license issues with Android, everyone knows that. There are also outstanding compatibility issues that Google will need to address at some point or another.

Yeah, when I first got the Droid I was ecstatic. Then I could listen to voicemails from Cisco/Exchange. Then I couldn't install and app not on the market without rooting. Then I couldn't sync with Windows Media Player. Then I had to reset an Exchange p/w and it wouldn't let me until I removed my synced msn account (which now uses exchange push) and then re-added it. Sure there are workarounds, but the gloss quickly faded and I'm back to the iPhone awaiting WP7.

It's part of a coordinated attack on Microsoft's rivals. It's part of Microsoft's strategy to blow things out of proportion and spread FUD about competitors. Ballmer has no credibility whatsoever.

That's probably true. But that doesn't mean what he's saying isn't also true. Because you don't like it or don't want to hear it doesn't make it untrue. FUD, yes. Warranted, yes.

No they're suing because their using their technology without licensing it.

it's what everyone does, you protect your own technology.

That is true. They're also doing it now, because it's an opportune time. Why not. No law says you can't seek justice when it best suits you. AS you said, everyone in business does that.

Who said they have patents they can sue MS for?

The fact is that Microsoft did the following: They first promised that they would not sue companies that used Windows Phone 7. They then proceeded with suing Motorola because they are not using WP7.

What an amazing business model: Use our product, or we'll sue your ass! Extortion.

Microsoft just can't handle real competition, so they resort to FUD and lawsuits.

Pathetic.

You're lack of facts and glaring bias is what's pathetic here. Motorola, if they are, is not getting suied for not using WP7, you thinking that is the case is laughible. The Motorola case is over MS's ActiveSync APIs which even Google itself licensed and paids to use.

That is true. They're also doing it now, because it's an opportune time. Why not. No law says you can't seek justice when it best suits you. AS you said, everyone in business does that.

We actually don't know how long MS has been in talks with Motorola over this stuff. How many months was it that HTC signed on , probably due to using the same tech in it's own Sense apps etc. Just because the timing comes close to WP7 doesn't mean it was planned to be that way.

The real problem with Android isn't that individual OEM's need to license patents from MS, Apple, Nokia, Ericsson, and a whole bunch of other phone tech companies.

it's that Google isn't licensing all this for them. of course that would reveal the actual license cost for android as Google would need to charge that and some administration costs for each handset sold form each OEM. but overall it would be cheaper and more importantly easier for everyone. and it would let the OEM's rest certain that google has their back and there are no hidden fall traps in their products that'll end up biting them. Then they could go on to fix all the other issues with Android. I love my Android phone, but android has some serious flaws that need to be handled.

You're lack of facts and glaring bias is what's pathetic here. Motorola, if they are, is not getting suied for not using WP7, you thinking that is the case is laughible. The Motorola case is over MS's ActiveSync APIs which even Google itself licensed and paids to use.

We actually don't know how long MS has been in talks with Motorola over this stuff. How many months was it that HTC signed on , probably due to using the same tech in it's own Sense apps etc. Just because the timing comes close to WP7 doesn't mean it was planned to be that way.

All nine patents cited in the suit are over ActiveSync misuse? Where are you getting your information? I'm not sure how "notifying applications of changes in signal strength and battery power" is related to ActiveSync.

It's pretty simple to explain if you look at Ballmer's words. It's about IP and patents: either pay us royalties or get sued.

WSJ: You’re still charging a license fee for the software.

Mr. Ballmer: Sure.

WSJ: Is that difficult in an environment where Android is free?

Mr. Ballmer: Android has a patent fee. It’s not like Android’s free. You do have to license patents. HTC’s signed a license with us and you’re going to see license fees clearly for Android as well as for Windows.

Of course it's FUD. It's part of a coordinated attack on Microsoft's rivals. It's part of Microsoft's strategy to blow things out of proportion and spread FUD about competitors. Ballmer has no credibility whatsoever.

Who said they have patents they can sue MS for?

The fact is that Microsoft did the following: They first promised that they would not sue companies that used Windows Phone 7. They then proceeded with suing Motorola because they are not using WP7.

What an amazing business model: Use our product, or we'll sue your ass! Extortion.

Microsoft just can't handle real competition, so they resort to FUD and lawsuits.

Pathetic.

Here come the fanbois, as if on-cue!

What's even more pathetic are people who don't even take the time to RTFA or take their rose-colored glasses off long enough to understand that Microsoft is suing Motorola for PATENT VIOLATIONS concerning technologies developed by Microsoft for synching info from and to PC's with "Smartphones", along with others, not because Motorola isn't using WP7 on some of their phones. Last time I checked, Motorola was still selling some WM6 phones, so your "Extortion" comment is both an epic-fail and an epil-FLAIL.

Here's a wash-rag to help you remove the egg from your face.

--ScottKin

It's pretty simple to explain if you look at Ballmer's words. It's about IP and patents: either pay us royalties or get sued.

That would be the case regardless of what OS motorola or whoever used. Where's the problem per se? Is it ok to sue if motorola was using it's own inhouse OS but it's wrong or evil to sue because they're using Android? Everyone should look at how often MS gets sued for patents and other things as well before they jump the gun here.

That would be the case regardless of what OS motorola or whoever used. Where's the problem per se? Is it ok to sue if motorola was using it's own inhouse OS but it's wrong or evil to sue because they're using Android? Everyone should look at how often MS gets sued for patents and other things as well before they jump the gun here.

I'm not arguing ethics or software patents--just clarifying information.

Of course it's FUD. It's part of a coordinated attack on Microsoft's rivals. It's part of Microsoft's strategy to blow things out of proportion and spread FUD about competitors. Ballmer has no credibility whatsoever.

Who said they have patents they can sue MS for?

The fact is that Microsoft did the following: They first promised that they would not sue companies that used Windows Phone 7. They then proceeded with suing Motorola because they are not using WP7.

What an amazing business model: Use our product, or we'll sue your ass! Extortion.

Microsoft just can't handle real competition, so they resort to FUD and lawsuits.

Pathetic.

Oh I am sure Larry Ellison is such a good friend of Ballmers' that he started the sue-Android party rolleyes.gif and joined in on the "co-ordinated attack".

Source OSnews ( a credible independent site )

so you are done FUDing front-page and back to your usual tactics in forums?

OSnews !! laugh.gif

I'm not arguing ethics or software patents--just clarifying information.

Ok, no problem. I'm just tossing out the question(s) for the sake of discussion.

Motorola, if they are, is not getting suied for not using WP7, you thinking that is the case is laughible.

They are, in fact, getting sued for not using WP7, in practice. First Microsoft "use WP7 and be safe, don't use it and be unsafe", and then they sued. Pure extortion.

The Motorola case is over MS's ActiveSync APIs which even Google itself licensed and paids to use.

Really? So you are claiming it's just one single patent? Is that it?

Of course it's FUD. It's part of a coordinated attack on Microsoft's rivals. It's part of Microsoft's strategy to blow things out of proportion and spread FUD about competitors. Ballmer has no credibility whatsoever.

So you're whole argument is...it's FUD because it's FUD. Well done.

Ballmer may have no credibility but Microsoft are receiving a license fee for every Android phone that HTC sells and they'll soon be receiving a fee from Motorola as well. Seems like they know what they're doing and it seems like it's you who's spreading the FUD :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!