Mac OS X Lion Discussion


Recommended Posts

Full-screen can come in handy for iPhoto or Photoshop (which we'll see feature support for in CS8), when you need to eliminate distractions and dedicate as much space as possible to your image.

Please God, no. I already hate the ridiculous Acrobat X interface, I really don't see how a CS software can be productive in full screen.

Please God, no. I already hate the ridiculous Acrobat X interface, I really don't see how a CS software can be productive in full screen.

Well picture editing and video editing applications are the most useful ones in fullscreen. Other ones, well, it’s good that they have the feature, but it’s not too handy indeed.

Browsing in fullscreen isn’t necessary, but it’s just cool in general to see websites in fullscreen :p

Can someone tell me the advantages of the Launch Pad over a stack containing all the Applications? I’ve never really understood, is it just for the sake of having a fullscreen stack ?

Well picture editing and video editing applications are the most useful ones in fullscreen. Other ones, well, it’s good that they have the feature, but it’s not too handy indeed.

Maybe it's because I work in a dual monitor environment, like many other.

Can someone tell me the advantages of the Launch Pad over a stack containing all the Applications? I’ve never really understood, is it just for the sake of having a fullscreen stack ?

Yeah, I can't stand launchpad neither. But I guess it's a feature we can just ignore and live without.

Maybe it's because I work in a dual monitor environment, like many other.

So what you probably have is Photoshop on one screen, maximized :laugh:

Fullscreen apps won’t change so many things for you.

Yeah, I can't stand launchpad neither. But I guess it's a feature we can just ignore and live without.

It’s not that I can’t stand it, it’s just that I don’t see why they created this just for applications, didn’t merge it with the Stacks features instead.

I’d prefer having what I will call a Full Screen Stack. No need for something so fancy, exclusively for applications, because it’s a lot of development and I see little but no gain at the moment.

I think the idea with Launchpad is you can organise the icons any way you like. You can have an "Internet" folder with all your internet apps without having to move them into an Internet subfolder of the Applications folder.

I was quite cynical about Launchpad at first but it sounds quite useful. I just haven't had a chance to give it some proper time yet.

The only app I ran fullscreen in Tiger and Snow was Traktor (DJ software). Partly because I didn't need access to anything else at the time and also to make the most of the relatively small screen area. If you have a 27" iMac fullscreen apps may seem less useful but if you have a 12" or 13.3" screen then every little helps.

Can someone tell me the advantages of the Launch Pad over a stack containing all the Applications? I’ve never really understood, is it just for the sake of having a fullscreen stack ?

It lets you organize into folders without actually moving the applications around in the file system. If you've ever tried to sort your apps into category folders you might have noticed that this does not work well at all for apps like iTunes and Safari that expect to be in directly in /Applications/.

Apple also included an Applications folder in the user's home directory in Lion - Launchpad will pull in apps from across your hard drive and let you organize them into "meta folders."

Am I the only one who thinks that the user-specific Applications folder is where apps downloaded from the Mac App Store will be placed in Lion, instead of being system-wide... or maybe youll be given a choice on install...hmm

Am I the only one who thinks that the user-specific Applications folder is where apps downloaded from the Mac App Store will be placed in Lion, instead of being system-wide... or maybe youll be given a choice on install...hmm

That would make a lot of sense. Especially considering the newly-added recovery functionality. If you hosed up your system you could boot into the recovery environment, install a fresh system and leave your apps untouched. Like an archive and install, but without the archiving.

That would make a lot of sense. Especially considering the newly-added recovery functionality. If you hosed up your system you could boot into the recovery environment, install a fresh system and leave your apps untouched. Like an archive and install, but without the archiving.

More than that it could potentially make a lot of financial sense to Apple.

Sally and Bob share their Mac, Bob buys an App but Sally can't use it on her account unless she buys it again herself!

As much as I hated it initially, I'm starting to think inverted scrolling makes more sense. I've still got it disabled, but I'm considering reenabling it - the more you use the multitouch gestures, the weirder it feels to not use inverter scrolling. Dunno if I'm the only one who's starting to feel that...

I've felt that way too. I turned off inverted scrolling and quickly found myself confused when trying to go back/forward in Safari and Launchpad. The "physical" aspect of the inverted scrolling make a lot of sense.

Merge folders, yes. Cut/paste, not sure. I'm not looking at my Lion installation right now.

We still cannot cut/paste. :cry:

Worst is, I always go to use Command+X in the Finder and then realize "Oh wait, this doesn’t work in OS X".

I swear, the day they will implement it, I will have conditioned myself to use another method. Murphy’s law hates me real bad.

the wi-fi still couldn't connect despite entering the right password it gives you connection time out...but after making sure the internet wi-fi DSN Server address and ip ,router is having the right information at first it finally connect but the speed is way too slower...what's happening !!!

i do expect some issues of course...but on the wi-fi? must be some kind of joke.lol,seriously anyway to fix it?

I'm going to be honest with you. I think that every single Mac OS X Developer Preview has had issues with Wi-Fi (Leopard, Snow Leopard, etc.)...they all have.

Just one thing - with the rewrite to Finder, can we finally copy/paste files and merge folders?

Nope, there is no cut and paste.

i do expect some issues of course...but on the wi-fi? must be some kind of joke.lol,seriously anyway to fix it?

If you expect some issues, then why are you complaining? You're using a developer preview. Wi-Fi doesn't work for me when I wake up my MacBook... I have to physically turn off Wi-Fi, turn it back on and then reconnect. It's annoying but it's the price you pay for using unfinished software.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!