Windows Phone 7: Why It's a Disaster for Microsoft


Recommended Posts

The truly sad part about the Anti-MS sentiment and fanboyism, is WP7 defintely exceeded my expectations. I make my living in IT with lots of MS products as well as Open Source, and I own and Droid and iPhone 4. WP7 is so much more responsive and useable. They really nailed it. Try it for one day, and you'll be sold.

I've also discovered Zune which is a great piece of software. Much better than iTunes IMO, which feels like a huge piece of slow malware sometimes. It should replace WMP in Windows.

The people hub and live tiles, there's so much, yet I have to do so little. I can't wait till this matures because right now it's 9/10. I don't throw away investments easy but my iPhone is dead weight now, and I loved it.

Oh, and I can toggle bluetooth and wifi with 3 taps without a third party app. tap, tap, tap (put your settings tile on home screen). One thumb for all the FM Radio control (if you have a Focus). Really sweet. Just go try one for yourself.

If you buy a pencil looking for a pencil and come to find out it doesn't write in ink, that isn't a shortcoming.

It is a shortcoming if a sizable proportion of users expect it to, and other competing pencils can.

Unlike a Nintendo DS or something, a smartphone is inherently not a consumer-only device, and it's not like "consumers" and "corporate users" are distinct subsets that don't overlap each other either, plenty of people are both. By not designing for corporate users, Microsoft is essentially sidelining a large number of consumers as well. They probably have good reasons, but I'm not seeing it.

So yeh Microsoft omitting things like copy and paste, full exchange support

Even on my iPhone I have never used c/p. I hear some people do, I'm sure they'll add it in time just to have it. Speaking of Exchange, sending with high priority actually means something now. How sweet is the "urgent" messages tile in WP7's outlook? Now I can tell everyone, stop flagging every email as high priority, when I go to the urgent tile, I expect it to be urgent dammit!

It is a shortcoming if a sizable proportion of users expect it to, and other competing pencils can.

Unlike a Nintendo DS or something, a smartphone is inherently not a consumer-only device, and it's not like "consumers" and "corporate users" are distinct subsets that don't overlap each other either, plenty of people are both. By not designing for corporate users, Microsoft is essentially sidelining a large number of consumers as well. They probably have good reasons, but I'm not seeing it.

Did you completely miss the demographics of the product? This isn't a smart phone for people who want to hack their device - its being marketed to the "pro-sumer" who wants to have a "smart" phone and get on with his/her life. Have you not seen the commercials? That doesn't mean its lacking in comparible features either, its just not the initial market (and wisely so)

I'm sure the "corporate back end" will come in time but that certainly isn't the starting point for this phone and MS realized its easier to build a new market around new users than to try and convince the entrenched users who are already committed to a product/brand.

Its a phone that will convince the bazillions of non smart phone users why they need a smart phone and its so easy to use and seem less it may just pull it off.

Whilst I will agree that WP7 has a lot of drawbacks this line:

The result is that Apple's iPhone -- which started as a consumer device -- is now the second most secure device after the BlackBerry, and it's gaining trust at financial institutions, hospitals, and other regulated businesses, while Windows Phone 7 can't even be considered. How stupid was that decision?

Indicated either a stupid reviewer, or a biased article. Bearing in mind the considerable ease with which every single iOS release gets jailbroken i'd hardly call the iOS security stellar.

I don't know why the "it's a 1.0 so of course it lacks things" argument isn't valid by some. And also why some people thing MS can't add the things they're missing back quicker than it took Apple or even Google to do? If the 1.0 argument isn't valid for MS why did it apply to Android? Wasn't android missing loads of stuff? Didn't it take till v2.0 to finally start showing what it could do? By that logic wasn't Android also "late to the party/game/market" or "too little too late" because the iPhone had such a huge lead over everything else a year ago when the first android handsets shipped?

What is it with this constant double standard when it comes ot MS, and why is it everyone else seems to get a free pass on the same issues? Look at the facts, Android was lacking lots of things at first, and was "way behind" others yet, oh look, it's a year later and it's fighting and taking over the top spot. Why can't MS also have WP7 at that spot a year from now?

Even on my iPhone I have never used c/p. I hear some people do, I'm sure they'll add it in time just to have it. Speaking of Exchange, sending with high priority actually means something now. How sweet is the "urgent" messages tile in WP7's outlook? Now I can tell everyone, stop flagging every email as high priority, when I go to the urgent tile, I expect it to be urgent dammit!

Psst. Don't waste the breath trying to remind people that iPhone launched without:

- cut/copy/paste

- a full homescreen of icons

- iTunes store

- App store

- MMS (had to receive mms in the form of a web-link in a sms, then go hand type that into a web browser and login because ya know, no cut/copy/paste)

A better article would have been how minor WP7 fail is at launch compared to the epic fail that was iOS at launch.

I don't know why the "it's a 1.0 so of course it lacks things" argument isn't valid by some. And also why some people thing MS can't add the things they're missing back quicker than it took Apple or even Google to do? If the 1.0 argument isn't valid for MS why did it apply to Android? Wasn't android missing loads of stuff? Didn't it take till v2.0 to finally start showing what it could do? By that logic wasn't Android also "late to the party/game/market" or "too little too late" because the iPhone had such a huge lead over everything else a year ago when the first android handsets shipped?

What is it with this constant double standard when it comes ot MS, and why is it everyone else seems to get a free pass on the same issues? Look at the facts, Android was lacking lots of things at first, and was "way behind" others yet, oh look, it's a year later and it's fighting and taking over the top spot. Why can't MS also have WP7 at that spot a year from now?

No idea :)

Hopefully in early 2011 when its 1.01 with cut & paste and bing navigation all of this nonsense will be squashed.

You're going to be able to pick holes in any os especially one that just came out. iOS still has quite basic missing features after all these years, it doesn't make it a disaster. When you write a real review you have to look at the whole picture not just pick and choose what you don't like.

Did you completely miss the demographics of the product?

Did you completely miss what I was talking about for almost the entirety of my last post?

If the 1.0 argument isn't valid for MS why did it apply to Android?

What makes you think it does?

Psst. Don't waste the breath trying to remind people that iPhone launched without:

- cut/copy/paste

- a full homescreen of icons

- iTunes store

- App store

- MMS (had to receive mms in the form of a web-link in a sms, then go hand type that into a web browser and login because ya know, no cut/copy/paste)

A better article would have been how minor WP7 fail is at launch compared to the epic fail that was iOS at launch.

Quick reality check: Microsoft launched Windows 1.0 in 1985, without many of the features that people currently consider to be essential features to have in an OS. Now, if instead of releasing that basic feature-lacking OS in 1985, Microsoft released it now, tried to commercialize that product and have it compete against far better choices, would you choose to go with Windows?

Quick reality check: Microsoft launched Windows 1.0 in 1985, without many of the features that people currently consider to be essential features to have in an OS. Now, if instead of releasing that basic feature-lacking OS in 1985, Microsoft released it now, tried to commercialize that product and have it compete against far better choices, would you choose to go with Windows?

Quick reality check. iOS and Android both launched with maybe 1/15th of the features Windows Mobile had. How is it that 3 years later, iOS is the most popular, Android is second, and Windows Mobile is wayy down there.

Quick reality check number 2. Comparing a product from 1985 and one from 2010 is pretty dumb. I mean a 3 year difference sure it makes sense since there hasn't been any major major technology leaps in those 3 years...but 25 years

ago?

Quick reality check number 3. Look in the mirror, see any green tinges on your body?

I don't know why the "it's a 1.0 so of course it lacks things" argument isn't valid by some. And also why some people thing MS can't add the things they're missing back quicker than it took Apple or even Google to do? If the 1.0 argument isn't valid for MS why did it apply to Android? Wasn't android missing loads of stuff? Didn't it take till v2.0 to finally start showing what it could do? By that logic wasn't Android also "late to the party/game/market" or "too little too late" because the iPhone had such a huge lead over everything else a year ago when the first android handsets shipped?

What is it with this constant double standard when it comes ot MS, and why is it everyone else seems to get a free pass on the same issues? Look at the facts, Android was lacking lots of things at first, and was "way behind" others yet, oh look, it's a year later and it's fighting and taking over the top spot. Why can't MS also have WP7 at that spot a year from now?

Maybe, the point you are missing is that Android actually had more features than it's initial competitor, iOS when it launched. It already had C+P it already had MMS support, and it already had multitasking. If you look at how Android has evolved over the last 3 years, and compare it with what Microsoft have came up with after 3 years it's easier to understand why WP7 is such a lame duck.

Maybe, the point you are missing is that Android actually had more features than it's initial competitor, iOS when it launched. It already had C+P it already had MMS support, and it already had multitasking. If you look at how Android has evolved over the last 3 years, and compare it with what Microsoft have came up with after 3 years it's easier to understand why WP7 is such a lame duck.

And it took the iPhone 3 years to add those basic things, well 1-2 for MMS 3 for the rest. That didn't dent it sales did it?

Quick reality check: Microsoft launched Windows 1.0 in 1985, without many of the features that people currently consider to be essential features to have in an OS. Now, if instead of releasing that basic feature-lacking OS in 1985, Microsoft released it now, tried to commercialize that product and have it compete against far better choices, would you choose to go with Windows?

:rolleyes:

I don't know why the "it's a 1.0 so of course it lacks things" argument isn't valid by some.

Simply because WP7 isn't competing with Android and iOS of yesteryear. Consumers won't care if iOS and Android in their infancy didn't have x, y and z features.

Having said that, I would love to see WP7 (awesome UI) mature and take a comfortable, yet competitive position in the market.

I think the biggest problem with WP7 at this point is the browser. I mean... they're shipping IE7's engine on it, right?

It would be one thing to have such a browser on the desktop, where web applications are already largely held back by IE7 anyway. But Microsoft is entering a market where WebKit is king, and mobile web developers have been using that to their advantage. Just take the mobile version of Neowin as an example: we developed that with a focus on the majority of the mobile devices out there. It works beautifully on BB OS 6, WebOS, Android, iOS, and Nokia phones. It does not work (yet) on the newest mobile OS, WP7, because the browser engine is from 2006 - and in 2006, most web developers were shocked at how bad it was.

I mean... that's unacceptable. Simple as that. No one has designed mobile web applications for IE in the past few years, because the lowest common denominator for the majority of phones was WebKit.

If Microsoft doesn't port the IE9 engine over to WP7 once it's finished, I don't know how they're going to survive on the web app front.

Multitasking, copy and paste... we know all of that is coming. But on my phone, I spend most of my time calling, sending texts, and browsing. This phone can only really do two of those things well.

And it took the iPhone 3 years to add those basic things, well 1-2 for MMS 3 for the rest. That didn't dent it sales did it?

With Apple, if it's an iWhatever it will sell. Microsoft just don't have that same presence in the mobile device market.

All the reviews I have read from various sites been pretty positive. The main problem with Windows Phone launch has to do more with the carrier its launching with in the US rather then OS itself. It will have to add features both match its other two rivals and surpass Android before mass adoption takes place. Right now the basics are covered but it's still missing some key features. Although it is launching late, There is definitely room for another smart phone in the market. The reason Android has been such a success is because there are multiple vendors selling on multiple carriers, WP7 will be like this also. Right now most phones in market that being sold are feature phones. Once we transition to having most phone on the market being smartphones that leaves a lot of growth. Of all the other mobile OS available besides android and ios, I feel WP7 has the greatest chance to succeed. It is in between the free for all of android and the locked down nature of the Apple and the iPhone. I think there is probable only room in the market for 3 major mobile OSs. Nokia, Blackberry and HP/Palm are really in bag of hurt because they build there own devices , it will be very hard for them to attract the critical mass of developers needed to sustain smart phone platform.

I think the biggest problem with WP7 at this point is the browser. I mean... they're shipping IE7's engine on it, right?

It would be one thing to have such a browser on the desktop, where web applications are already largely held back by IE7 anyway. But Microsoft is entering a market where WebKit is king, and mobile web developers have been using that to their advantage. Just take the mobile version of Neowin as an example: we developed that with a focus on the majority of the mobile devices out there. It works beautifully on BB OS 6, WebOS, Android, iOS, and Nokia phones. It does not work (yet) on the newest mobile OS, WP7, because the browser engine is from 2006 - and in 2006, most web developers were shocked at how bad it was.

I mean... that's unacceptable. Simple as that. No one has designed mobile web applications for IE in the past few years, because the lowest common denominator for the majority of phones was WebKit.

If Microsoft doesn't port the IE9 engine over to WP7 once it's finished, I don't know how they're going to survive on the web app front.

Multitasking, copy and paste... we know all of that is coming. But on my phone, I spend most of my time calling, sending texts, and browsing. This phone can only really do two of those things well.

Who said you can't make a web browser on Windows Phone 7? It's not like you're going to be forced to use IE. Developers are allowed to use native code if their applications need it, you just have to contact Microsoft before hand and inform them of your requirement.

And as for mobile web, I personally hate going to a website and getting forced to look at a mobile version...I think its just stupid but that's just me. Btw please fix neowin mobile for opera mobile =P

Who said you can't make a web browser on Windows Phone 7? It's not like you're going to be forced to use IE. Developers are allowed to use native code if their applications need it, you just have to contact Microsoft before hand and inform them of your requirement.

And as for mobile web, I personally hate going to a website and getting forced to look at a mobile version...I think its just stupid but that's just me. Btw please fix neowin mobile for opera mobile =P

But no such browsers exist yet - and even if they did, we would still have to target IE, because that's what most WP7 users will use for the next while.

As for Opera... maybe :p

This article could also be titled

"I'm an Apple and iPhone fanboy and will hate anything by MS without even trying it. And if someone forces me to review one, I will only look at the flaws and ignore everything else, just like i ignore all the flaws of my perfect device"

At least it sums up the whole "article" if you want to call it that. but I'm sure the WP7 haters will hang on to this like flies to fresh dog crap. that's the purpose of it anyways.

+1

It just goes on to write unbased opinions on the future.

Windows Phone 7 is by far the best smartphone OS EVER in terms of UI and features. It will DESTROY iPhone and Android within a couple of years..... just like XBox 360 has destroyed PlayStation, and Internet Explorer destroyed Netscape Navigator.

Windows Phone 7 is by far the best smartphone OS EVER in terms of UI and features. It will DESTROY iPhone and Android within a couple of years..... just like XBox 360 has destroyed PlayStation, and Internet Explorer destroyed Netscape Navigator.

And like Internet Explorer is being destroyed by Chrome and Firefox now?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hands-on with BOOX Tappy: cute little reading accessory by Taras Buria Page turners are quite popular accessories for e-readers, as they enable a hands-free reading experience, which is particularly useful with large readers featuring 10-inch or larger displays. The BOOX Tappy is a new accessory that was introduced earlier this year, and we took this cute-looking thingy for a spin. The Tappy comes in a small box, with two additional buttons and a user manual. The device is made of glossy green plastic and resembles old appliances from the nuclear age. Material quality is great, and each part feels quite premium. Plastic is high-quality, the switch is nice to flick, and the buttons are not rattly. At the bottom, four rubberized feet prevent slipping when used on a desk. Unfortunately, there are no color options, and the Tappy is only available in green. It looks good, but I wish there were other options as well. There are two removable buttons, an on/off switch, and an LED indicator that displays connection mode, charging status, and more. The buttons resemble those of an old typewriter, with quite a long travel distance and a pleasant clack. In the box, you have four buttons with different icons: heart, coffee, O, and X. You can easily swap buttons by simply pulling them upwards. Tip: buttons come with plastic covers, but they are quite tricky to remove. It is hard to call the Tappy the most ergonomic remote control, but after fiddling with it for a few hours, I managed to find a comfortable hand position. Attaching a lanyard to it can make it more comfortable in use without the fear of dropping it, but unfortunately, the Tappy does not come with one. The Tappy connects via Bluetooth 5.2, and it works in three modes, which you can toggle by pressing and holding both buttons for about five seconds: Reading Mode Multimedia Mode Browsing Mode Next / Previous page Next / Previous Track Up / Down scroll If you pair the Tappy with a BOOX device (I tested it with the BOOX Go 10.5 Gen 2 Lumi), you will get small pop-ups indicating the current mode. Plus, you can customize what each button does when pressed one time, two times, or held for a few seconds. The list of available actions and features you can use is massive, and I like that BOOX lets you map stuff like brightness adjustment, app launching, screenshot-taking, screen rotating, navigation, and more. Note, however, that while you can use the Tappy with other readers, its customization is only available on BOOX devices running firmware version 4.2 and newer. I could not connect the Tappy to my computer (Windows 11 claims a driver error when I try), but it worked with the DuRoBo Krono that I recently reviewed. My Kindle Paperwhite refused to work with the Tappy, though, just like my iPhone. The Tappy uses a non-removable Li-Ion battery, which can be recharged with a Type-C cable. BOOX rates the remote for "weeks of use," and I can say that it indeed has very good battery life. While there are no battery indicators on the remote, you can see the current level in the status bar or in Input settings in the BOOX firmware. After a few days of active use, mine still shows about 95%. Overall, the Tappy left a nice impression. It is well-made, and the integration with BOOX devices is great. I also like that BOOX decided to have some fun with its design and swappable buttons. I cannot say I am a fan of its odd shape, though. Still, I managed to find a way to use it comfortably. And when not in use, it just looks neat sitting on the table doing nothing or serving you as a small clacky fidget. Buy BOOX Tappy - $29.99 on Amazon US As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • AdGuard Family lifetime deal now only $14.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 91% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $14.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $14.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!