Introducing Yahoo! Messenger 11 Beta!


Recommended Posts

Isn't it actually harder to make a UI that looks like this rather than a simpler one that actually makes an effort to conform to Aero Glass standards?

Well the UI has already been like this for ages, so they are actually just being incredibly lazy and not changing anything.

The only Yahoo Messenger for Windows I ever installed was the WPF Vista version and it was one of the most visually appealing programs I've ever seen. I still have that installer.

yeah I loved it

looks just like the old one.

They messed up. shouldnt have canceled the messenger for vista. Was beautiful!

What yahoo needs to do is fix their chat rooms. 98% of the chatters on there are porn spam bots.

Yahoo! doesnt seem to even want to succeed at anything.

Sticking to Trillian, and/or just adding yahoo contacts to my WLM :D

Your comment on the Yahoo! blog is right before mine. :p (Y)

You really aren't getting it, are you?

It's precisely those users that refuse to upgrade *from* XP that killed the WPF-based YM (that version required Vista, at minimum, due to the WPF support).

If you won't support XP and develop applications for Windows, you're going to get chewed up and spat out.

A big reason that WLM 2011 is getting hammered (in addition to the ads) is the lack of XP support.

I actually liked the WPF-based YM (and I like WLM 2011 today); however, I run Windows 7 (and was running Vista when the WPF YM was in beta), which garnered me a particularly nasty amount of scorn at the time.

You really aren't getting it, are you?

It's precisely those users that refuse to upgrade *from* XP that killed the WPF-based YM (that version required Vista, at minimum, due to the WPF support).

If you won't support XP and develop applications for Windows, you're going to get chewed up and spat out.

A big reason that WLM 2011 is getting hammered (in addition to the ads) is the lack of XP support.

I actually liked the WPF-based YM (and I like WLM 2011 today); however, I run Windows 7 (and was running Vista when the WPF YM was in beta), which garnered me a particularly nasty amount of scorn at the time.

What the heck are you talking about?! :blink: Where did I talk about XP?! Yes, in my comment I did mention Aero as the preferred native interface for post-XP Windows, but that's not implying that they have to abandon XP because of that.They can use whatever native UI API that ships with the OS, while keeping both worlds (pro XP and others) happy.

WPF is not exclusive to Vista, let me tell you.Yahoo! could use WPF to develop their messenger for all Windows versions which have WPF support, including the fossil XP.But they have too horrible UI coders to realize that I guess.

Well the UI has already been like this for ages, so they are actually just being incredibly lazy and not changing anything.

Well, maybe not for ages.Version 8 was actually pretty good and used native interface.

Adding an Aero window border to it doesn't really make it any less ugly to be honest. Talk about lipstick on a pig.

Then you didn't notice the color/skin-changer in YM (and understandable, since it's both really small and it's tucked in to the left of the Minimize button),

I went with cloud blue (to match my wallpaper and general color scheme).

The Aero support is better than WPF YM as well (performance is better than YM 10, in fact).

The performance increase (despite additional features and code) is, in fact, the biggest surprise (YM 10 tended to hitch when being minimized; this version does not).

I'm really stoked by this new YM.

Then you didn't notice the color/skin-changer in YM (and understandable, since it's both really small and it's tucked in to the left of the Minimize button),

I went with cloud blue (to match my wallpaper and general color scheme).

The Aero support is better than WPF YM as well (performance is better than YM 10, in fact).

The performance increase (despite additional features and code) is, in fact, the biggest surprise (YM 10 tended to hitch when being minimized; this version does not).

I'm really stoked by this new YM.

I've tried YIM 11 beta in a Win7 VM last night. Aero enabled and all.

The performance is ok. No complaints there. The addition of Jumplist support is nice as well.

The look and feel however is not what it could be. Yes, you can change the skin colour and make it fit in with the OS look and feel - but only to a degree. Too many elements of the skin still feel like YIM is an app written for XP in 2004/05. The way the menus are drawn, using Tahoma 8 pt instead of Segoe UI 9 pt as user interface font - small but (imho) important details.

Here's hoping Yahoo! get some of those small details sorted out before YIM 11 goes final.

What the heck are you talking about?! :blink: Where did I talk about XP?! Yes, in my comment I did mention Aero as the preferred native interface for post-XP Windows, but that's not implying that they have to abandon XP because of that.They can use whatever native UI API that ships with the OS, while keeping both worlds (pro XP and others) happy.

WPF is not exclusive to Vista, let me tell you.Yahoo! could use WPF to develop their messenger for all Windows versions which have WPF support, including the fossil XP.But they have too horrible UI coders to realize that I guess.

Well, maybe not for ages.Version 8 was actually pretty good and used native interface.

And WPF performance on XP was pretty darn poor without hardware acceleration support (just as compositing in Linux is generally awful when hardware-acceleration support is absent).

Also, did anyone ever think that Yahoo caught such grief from the pro-XP crowd over WPF YM's no-XP requirement (you had to have Vista at that time; 7 was still in programmers' heads) that they went back to the typical "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" for that reason? (Further, Yahoo hasn't exactly been swimming in money to pay developers.)

I have to admit - this is the best-performing YM in quite a stretch (in fact, it performs better than YM 10, despite additional feratures and code). One particularly galling issue (hitch-on-minimize) is gone. Alerts are faster as well. Throw in the color/skin-changer (as I said in an earlier post here, and on the YM blog, I went with blue) and Yahoo actually has improved things since YM 10. So far, it's all win and no lose.

@PGHammer

It's not only the 'look' (which includes menu coloring, button shapes etc), but also the equally important 'feel'.The current version (10), lacks effects native to Windows such as the minimize animations and shadows.Is the minimze animation addressed?

Also, as you have tried it, does it integrate with Windows 7 features such as jumplists?

I've tried YIM 11 beta in a Win7 VM last night. Aero enabled and all.

The performance is ok. No complaints there. The addition of Jumplist support is nice as well.

The look and feel however is not what it could be. Yes, you can change the skin colour and make it fit in with the OS look and feel - but only to a degree. Too many elements of the skin still feel like YIM is an app written for XP in 2004/05. The way the menus are drawn, using Tahoma 8 pt instead of Segoe UI 9 pt as user interface font - small but (imho) important details.

Here's hoping Yahoo! get some of those small details sorted out before YIM 11 goes final.

Hopefully they will allow changes to that in Preferences (as they did with WPF YM). I agree - from a look standpoint, it's more an evolutionary change (how much of that is to avoid horking off the old crowd that are used to YM looking the way it has darn near untouched since YM 9, which is when YM adopted the core of the current design?). The performance changes, however, I definitely like (especially since my biggest gripe, the dreaded hitch-on-minimize, has been banished). If anything, it's faster than YM 10 (add features and code, and performance improves!).

For me, why an IM client earns its place is features and performance, not looks (as good as Trillian looks, performance bites compared to YM) - further, I have never been a fan of multi-protocol IM clients.

I've darn near banished AIM for performance reasons (despite still having friends and family that still use either it or AOL). WLM is therefore (at least in my computer use) YM's only competition (and I use both IM clients for different reasons - my lists on the two have no overlap).

@PGHammer

It's not only the 'look' (which includes menu coloring, button shapes etc), but also the equally important 'feel'.The current version (10), lacks effects native to Windows such as the minimize animation and shadows.

I think a great deal of reason for that has been Yahoo's cash-flow situation (application development costs money) - Yahoo likely didn't even HAVE the money for a serious YM revamp until it sold some assets (Zimbra among them)

The lack of minimize animation could be the reason for that awful hitch-on-minimize issue that I was plagued with while using 10 (I have noticed that 11, despite being beta, does not have that problem, which has been my biggest gripe with YM from a performance standpoint).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!