60% of businesses could dump Windows for Chrome OS


Recommended Posts

I think 60% is another one of those gratuitous statistics or estimates you see on all sorts of things. I would be surprised if more then 2 or 3 % of businesses would do that for a variety of reasons. I sometimes wonder if these things aren't said just to try to create a psychological atmosphere where people will think such a thing is even possible, viable or probably. So to add to the gratuity of it all: I predict that 97% of the neowinians that read this will agree with me. :no: :yes:

I think it would be stupid to move to ChromeOS. I would think that having Windows for years would make your company a bit tied to it because of compatibility and things. Also ChromeOS isn't even really an OS, it's just an enhanced web browser with special things added. Even if those weren't a problem wouldn't the companies have to have blazing internet speeds to store and retrieve all the files they need that are stored in Google's Cloud? Last but not least how will they move to ChromeOS? Won't they have to upload every file they have to the cloud to be able to use them easily?

I think 60% is another one of those gratuitous statistics or estimates you see on all sorts of things. I would be surprised if more then 2 or 3 % of businesses would do that for a variety of reasons. I sometimes wonder if these things aren't said just to try to create a psychological atmosphere where people will think such a thing is even possible, viable or probably. So to add to the gratuity of it all: I predict that 97% of the neowinians that read this will agree with me. :no: :yes:

I think when companies make such poor predictions, it can hurt them greatly.

Think of it like this.

Say a company read this, and was like "Oh, most will be doing this, why not us!" because they think it must be good for a majority of companies. They for some reason do very little testing and deploy it, come to find out they can't do *anything* they want. They will likely NEVER trust anything from Google again!

Now of course, a small company would be more likely to do something like that, but still, small companies matter because small companies can grow... That's why Microsoft has that BizSpark thing, get them hooked when they are small for free, then when the grow, they will open up their checkbook!

Somehow I don't think Google plan to spin Chrome OS as its own Linux distro hoping people will download it.

They are waiting to get their hardware partners all on board before they do a serious blitz. Remember what they did with Android.

On the other hand, it will likely be harder for Google to move Chrome OS out there. I suspect one of the reasons they are positioning it as a 'webtop' is so that it looks different from a standard desktop. This strategy may work for them, but frankly I don't want all my junk stored online.

They may have trouble though, just the way Microsoft seem to have failed a second time this year to break into the phone market (yes, I know they haven't killed Windows Phone 7, but things just don't look good for them).

However, Google's corporate might may mean they succeed, using the sorts of strategies that have worked often for Microsoft.

LMAO. I'd be amazed if more than 5% of businesses dumped Windows for Chrome.

Erm, MS-DOS was. DOS (and its variations besides MS-DOS) wasn't. It was a heavy modification of a previous DOS release, but it was still Microsoft's.

The version they supplied to IBM was largely complete when they payed 50k for it off a startup :p

60% is way too much. I can see it being used in businesses like Starbucks or Indigo (books). I can't see it being used in a corporate environment.

I thought about the wording of this and it's possibly correct. It's 60% of businesses and the number of corporate businesses must be dwarfed by the number of very small businesses (mom & pop I guess.). These probably contribute little in terms of total IT users, but there have to be magnitudes more small businesses than corporations or even medium sized ones.

So in that context the statement is correct but well, are Google really aiming THAT low?

60% is way too much. I can see it being used in businesses like Starbucks or Indigo (books). I can't see it being used in a corporate environment.

Having worked in the Starbucks IT group, you are WAY WAY off base. Starbucks has a large IT effort, dealing with retail, warehousing, manufacturing, replenishment, etc. While they do have web enabled apps, most of it is not. Chrome OS wouldn't be a very good idea there.

Is it just me or does it sound like we're going to dust off "Big Bertha" the Mainframe from the 1970s? Everything now adays claims that "cloud" computing is the next big thing and how we're going to be using dumb terminals where we just pull everything from a big server. Would you guys make up your mind now we're going back to the "main frame" architecture.

Is it just me or does it sound like we're going to dust off "Big Bertha" the Mainframe from the 1970s? Everything now adays claims that "cloud" computing is the next big thing and how we're going to be using dumb terminals where we just pull everything from a big server. Would you guys make up your mind now we're going back to the "main frame" architecture.

Is it just me or does it sound like we're going to dust off "Big Bertha" the Mainframe from the 1970s? Everything now adays claims that "cloud" computing is the next big thing and how we're going to be using dumb terminals where we just pull everything from a big server. Would you guys make up your mind now we're going back to the "main frame" architecture.

sound true , except you are no longer constrained to small geographical place as it used to be, no?

60% of the business market? Laughable. Chrome OS isn't going to be a major player in any market really. Who posted this nonsense?

/me looks

Oh, Lechio. Why am I not surprised?

All this cloud OS business is getting old. The "cloud" has been around far longer then when it was dubbed "cloud" as many of you know. Between this and the reports of Windows 8 moving more the "cloud" format... and OS X getting "i-padded out" I really don't know what I'm gonna do when an OS upgrade is required :unsure:

60% ? (looks for source) Oh it's from the mouth of a Google exec! Imagine that.

[...] Between this and the reports of Windows 8 moving more the "cloud" format... and OS X getting "i-padded out" I really don't know what I'm gonna do when an OS upgrade is required :unsure:

[...]

From what Microsoft is doing, it is unlikely that Windows 8 will be anything like Chrome OS. Microsoft seems to do a mixture of cloud and local stuff. You may get stuff from the cloud, but it would be cached locally in case the Internet went down, or just to work offline.

Office 365 has an online version of Exchange, Office Web Apps, etc. but you can also get a subscription version of Office, the real full deal. However, if you stop paying for Office 365, the Office software stops working (well, goes into a "minimal mode").

I hope that's *something* like what Windows 8 is like... A combination of the cloud and local data.

(The great thing about getting an Office subscription, when say Office 2012 comes out, you get an update from 2010 to that... But of course, you are paying a monthly fee...)

This "cloud" concept is a disaster waiting to happen and I want no part of it.

For starters, I don't want or need to store ANY personal information I could very well keep to myself on someone else's server(s), then having to ask them to borrow it back. That's like keeping your car in someone else's garage! Plus, aside from the privacy concerns, what if the servers go down? I'm sure there's hard, physical backups somewhere (avoiding the privacy issues with that)--but who will have the time and money to train people to swap them in and out, all over the world? Seems like it would save more money to just keep things the way they are (given a few exceptions, of course).

60% of the business market? Laughable. Chrome OS isn't going to be a major player in any market really. Who posted this nonsense?

/me looks

Oh, Lechio. Why am I not surprised?

Let's not pretend you don't copy/paste just about anything onto this forum... No offense.

I agree though that this article is nonsense. Chrome OS's capabilities are far too limited and I think even the simplest of users will find it lacking. I know for a fact my mom, which isn't exactly a power user, won't be able to get around with it. Let alone when being at work.

Dear Google:

Stop being ridiculous about ChromeOS.

Nobody cares, even netbook users like to be able to have a decent amount of functionality offline.

On another note: ChromeOS will be born dead and I can't wait to see it being buried.

I suggest building a real OS, with some of the advantages of ChromeOS.

Thank you

Sincerely,

Glassed Silver:mac

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!