Opera 11 is better than the latest Chrome and Firefox Nightlies


Recommended Posts

I have used Opera for the past few years but have switched to Chrome about a month ago. The reason I switched was mainly because of the speed. When trying to open Opera with about 10 tabs saved in a session took around 5 seconds with Chrome its instant.

Things I like about Opera

Smooth scrolling

Saved passwords (wand)

Zooming in and out of webpages is the best out of all the browsers (27" monitor need to zoom around 150%)

Things I dislike about Opera

Had massive problems with flash content

Some websites do not load correctly (e.g. YouTube not loading correctly and trouble playing videos from user channels was the deciding factor to move to Chrome)

Things I like about Chrome

Speed

Simplicity/minimalistic

Flash content and every website loads correctly

Things I dislike about Chrome

Password manager sometimes doesn't save passwords even when I ask it too

Zooming in and out is no where near Opera territory

When I have many tabs open and then close one it takes quite some time for Chrome to adjust (opera its instant)

Scrolling not as good as Opera

Not being able to use 'w Gothic Architecture' to search Wikipedia for example

Needed an extension for speedial

Needed and extension for 'control Z' (undo tabs)

They are both great browsers, miles ahead of the competition but I will continue to use Chrome even though it has some downfalls. At the rate that Google is pumping out versions I'm sure these problems and the other issues that you guys have stated will be fixed in the near future. I will gladly switch back to Opera if they come out with great new features.

post-317632-12921401575809.png

Can anyone enlighten me to what the hell is going on here? I have about 5 tabs open and chrome always has 10 + processes running.

I an tell you for a fact that many big business websites are only tested in IE6-8, Firefox 2-3, Safari and Chrome. I work for one of the worlds biggest holding companies, and we dont test in Opera. Not because it's banned by IT, but because no one uses it so it's not worth testing in.

Sometimes I wonder how much of its "install base" is just the fact that Adobe Creative Suit includes it. Its even hidden in one of the .apps on the OSX version. That speaks a lot of a company, they have to sneak the software into your system to get you to use it.

That's something I hate about Chrome too; you open a new tab and it has to open a whole new process (like it's a new window). It's ridiculous.

So you want 1 website crashing taking out your whole browser? The point of that is that if flash, or a websites poor code crashes Chrome the other 15 tabs you may have open aren't lost.

Google don't steal any data, they just monitor your usage habits. The tinfoil hat brigade seems to love these kind of threads.

Google doesn't have to steal anything. People just give it to them by using their products. (Same with Facebook.)

The reason people say "Google is stealing data" is because they are basically exploiting human weaknesses for their gain, which is the same as what any intelligent profit-making ad company does. Storing peoples's data without telling them, in an obvious fashion, the risks of having their data stored on Google servers and not giving them any control on that data, in a deeper sense, is considered stealing.

If anyone hasn't realized this so far, Facebook is an ad company. Hence, their valuation is >$40 billion.

I have to say I agree and when I try to tell people exactly what you're saying they call me a "Opera fanboy". Opera has passed Chrome a few times in terms of speed, kinda putting Chrome to the back bench.

Opera is a great browser, it just doesn't have the advertising platform to jump from like every other of the four main browsers does. It's actually quite amazing that people use a web browser MADE by a advertising company that is WELL KNOWN for stealing your data. Yes, I'm talking about Chrome.

When you say 'speed', you do we're talking absoulute miliseconds don't you? Meaning the difference in speed becomes irrelevent, no matter who's faster.

Okay if Opera's such a 'great' browser, then why does its market share constantly rise and drop from month to month?

To suggest Google steals data is absoultely untrue and obsurd, especially coming from someone responsible for posting unbias front-page content.

We recently heard in the news about how Google 'stole' public WiFi information and passwords, okay. However they did rectify the problem and purged all information that was obtained. Even so I don't see how this would relate to any of their other products, plus they didn't intentionally mean to do it.

To be honest I think that Opera is a decent browser, but the people who use it make me want to steer well away from it.

We recently heard in the news about how Google 'stole' public WiFi information and passwords, okay. However they did rectify the problem and purged all information that was obtained. Even so I don't see how this would relate to any of their other products, plus they didn't intentionally mean to do it.

We'll never know now would we? Or did you personally check that every bit of all copies of the data was incinerated? I presume "No".

LOL @ "... didn't intentionally mean to do it." You're funny.

There is no 'best' web browser per se. Which one is best is subjective and up to the user to decide. I'm using Chrome most of the time because it's fast and stays out of the way - its minimalism is a feature in my book.

Funny how none of you has mentioned Internet Explorer 9 yet. Having used the beta I must say I quite like it - just like Chrome it's fast and stays out of the way, it profits from being tailored for one platform only - its integration into Windows 7 is second to none. Come the final I could very well imagine using it as my primary browser.

There is no 'best' web browser per se. Which one is best is subjective and up to the user to decide. I'm using Chrome most of the time because it's fast and stays out of the way - its minimalism is a feature in my book.

Funny how none of you has mentioned Internet Explorer 9 yet. Having used the beta I must say I quite like it - just like Chrome it's fast and stays out of the way, it profits from being tailored for one platform only - its integration into Windows 7 is second to none. Come the final I could very well imagine using it as my primary browser.

Unless IE9 gets extension support, I don't see anybody here except you and a few others using it as a primary browser. Speed is worthless to the power user unless you have the extensibility to go with it. Google knew that and added extensions in record time. Opera is doing it before they lose their marketshare completely to Chrome, which is sapping away Firefox's marketshare.

Unless IE9 gets extension support, I don't see anybody here except you and a few others using it as a primary browser. Speed is worthless to the power user unless you have the extensibility to go with it. Google knew that and added extensions in record time. Opera is doing it before they lose their marketshare completely to Chrome, which is sapping away Firefox's marketshare.

IE add-ons gallery

There are add-ons for IE. That being said, I've never used many extensions/add-ons with any browser. An ad-blocker (with Neowin whitelisted of course), sure. But other than that? A browser for me is just that - a tool to browse the web. Most extensions are imho useless fluff. YMMV of course.

Sometimes I wonder how much of its "install base" is just the fact that Adobe Creative Suit includes it. Its even hidden in one of the .apps on the OSX version. That speaks a lot of a company, they have to sneak the software into your system to get you to use it.

What company are you talking about? What makes you so sure that Adobe chose Opera because Adobe wants "to get you to use it [Opera]" but not for some other reason? What, specifically, do you mean by "speaks a lot"?

http://www.opera.com...ses/2003/09/30/

"Adobe realizes and embraces this crucial design requirement ..."

"We are very happy that Adobe has chosen Opera's rendering engine ..."

IE add-ons gallery

There are add-ons for IE. That being said, I've never used many extensions/add-ons with any browser. An ad-blocker (with Neowin whitelisted of course), sure. But other than that? A browser for me is just that - a tool to browse the web. Most extensions are imho useless fluff. YMMV of course.

Can you really call any of those actual "extensions"? They're more like the Chrome web apps that are nothing more than a link. A real extension checks your email, blocks ads while updating itself, converts text into links, or put a chat client in the browser. I'm glad Opera went the Chrome way and started a real addon system.

When you say 'speed', you do we're talking absoulute miliseconds don't you? Meaning the difference in speed becomes irrelevent, no matter who's faster.

Speed becomes relevant when the seconds add up.

For example, if a browser opens 120 tabs and then renders another webpage, the number of tabs open will surely affect the amount of time the next webpage is rendered because of, for instance, the limitation of system resources.

For example, if the browser takes 1 millisecond to render a piece of code ("irrelevant") but when a large project requires the browser to render 2,000 pieces of that code, then the amount of rendering time will add up.

I'm sure there are billions of ways you can imagine where the amount of rendering time will add up.

Okay if Opera's such a 'great' browser, then why does its market share constantly rise and drop from month to month?

The large market share for an object is not necessarily a result of an increase in greatness of that object. Market share is not a direct, valid reason to explain why Opera is a great browser. In addition, the fluctuation of market share does not necessarily affect the greatness of an object, vice versa.

To be honest I think that Opera is a decent browser, but the people who use it make me want to steer well away from it.

Are you serious? If all murders use QiJian #4 pencils to draft a letter to MC Williams, then you should stay away from QiJian #4 pencils, unless you like murderers.

Can you really call any of those actual "extensions"? They're more like the Chrome web apps that are nothing more than a link. A real extension checks your email, blocks ads while updating itself, converts text into links, or put a chat client in the browser. I'm glad Opera went the Chrome way and started a real addon system.

Funny how many Opera users used to say 'Opera doesn't need extensions, everything you need is built-in!' prior to Opera 11...

As to the examples you mentioned: I - as many others - don't need a mail checker or an IRC client1 built into the web browser. I prefer to use separate programs for separate purposes.

1Did you know that Neowin has an IRC channel btw? You're free to log on to it and discuss your ideas there as well.

Needed an extension for speedial

You could just use "most visited" section of the "new tab page" in Chrome if you are OK with just 8. Just visit your favourite site and then open a new tab. It should appear there, then hit the pin icon and it will stay. Did this myself and it works great.

Funny how many Opera users used to say 'Opera doesn't need extensions, everything you need is built-in!' prior to Opera 11...

As to the examples you mentioned: I - as many others - don't need a mail checker or an IRC client1 built into the web browser. I prefer to use separate programs for separate purposes.

1Did you know that Neowin has an IRC channel btw? You're free to log on to it and discuss your ideas there as well.

The point is that it's nice to be able to add whatever you want to the browser while keeping the installation lean. Opera does this while still including an email/IRC client and it has 4X less to install than with Chrome, and now with full extension support, Opera can be more popular since extensions are pretty much what drives the browser market for what I'd say a healthy 1/3 of web users.

Funny how many Opera users used to say 'Opera doesn't need extensions, everything you need is built-in!' prior to Opera 11...

That is true. I was quite surprised when Opera announced that it is working on an extension system, despite years of "don't need extensions". I'm actually very happy.
As to the examples you mentioned: I - as many others - don't need a mail checker or an IRC client1 built into the web browser. I prefer to use separate programs for separate purposes.

I prefer separate programs as well. For example, when the web browser crashes (ALL browsers crash), I will not lose access to my email client. Although I prefer separate programs, I am also delighted that the option to use an email client or IRC client is available. Sometimes, I use the IRC client to join for a quick chat in a help channel, when I don't have mIRC installed.

I'd rather use IE6 than opera.

All browsers have their good and bad points, it's personal choice. I find people just get used to whatever they started using.

I remember in the old days I started with Netscape because it was on the second hand PC I was using. I liked it and never gave IE a second thought. However I upgraded from 95 to 98 and for a few days used IE which I thought was much better. Never bothered installing Netscape.

Then when Firefox 1 was gaining a bit of a reputation as being better than IE6 I gave it a go, through sheer laziness I have stuck with it. Yes, I have tried Chrome, IE8, IE9, Safari and Opera but they don't offer anything significant over and above Firefox.

Plus if the buttons or menu system are different, which they are, I always get frustrated and just return to Firefox.

I am not saying Firefox is a better browser, it probably isn't, but it's what I like. You are not wrong for using a different browser so please don't say I am for using Firefox.

I think there's no denying that Firefox is dying (it rhymes! :) ), FF4 is taking forever to develop.

For me the best browsers out there atm are Chrome and Opera, IE9 will probably join them when it's released (which will still probably be sooner than FF4). Personally I use Opera, with Chrome installed as a secondary browser. It is sad that despite being a really good product Opera has such a small marketshare, but flaming about it is not helping. As Mephistopheles has pointed out - there's no best browser, there's just one that suits you best.

And yes speed matters, FF for me is too slow to be even considered (just fired it up to remember if it was really that slow - 5 second to start, with Chrome and Opera being instant on). Opera has similar performance to Chrome using less resources (people claminig that it uses much memory need to remember that it scales itself - if you have 4GB of RAM it will use around 400MB, but it doesn't really matter - does it?).

Google doesn't have to steal anything. People just give it to them by using their products. (Same with Facebook.)

The reason people say "Google is stealing data" is because they are basically exploiting human weaknesses for their gain, which is the same as what any intelligent profit-making ad company does. Storing peoples's data without telling them, in an obvious fashion, the risks of having their data stored on Google servers and not giving them any control on that data, in a deeper sense, is considered stealing.

If anyone hasn't realized this so far, Facebook is an ad company. Hence, their valuation is >$40 billion.

They are guilty of nothing more than a lot of web based companies do, gathering usage data to tailor their products. All that they store is information about websites that you visit, the same information for the record that is stored by your ISP. I don't see people having psycho fits about the data their ISP stores. There is nothing inherently bad in what Google do, unless you have something to hide which most ordinary people do not.

There is no 'best' web browser per se. Which one is best is subjective and up to the user to decide. I'm using Chrome most of the time because it's fast and stays out of the way - its minimalism is a feature in my book.

Funny how none of you has mentioned Internet Explorer 9 yet. Having used the beta I must say I quite like it - just like Chrome it's fast and stays out of the way, it profits from being tailored for one platform only - its integration into Windows 7 is second to none. Come the final I could very well imagine using it as my primary browser.

I am not keen on IE9's font rendering, that is why I personally stay clear of it.

I always liked Opera because it was FAST, until chrome came into the picture.

Haven't used opera for a while, but I have just installed this new beta. looks a lot like the firefox 4 beta, but faster. Not sure I'm digging the look.

Opera definitely needs a new icon.

Funny how many Opera users used to say 'Opera doesn't need extensions, everything you need is built-in!' prior to Opera 11...

As to the examples you mentioned: I - as many others - don't need a mail checker or an IRC client1 built into the web browser. I prefer to use separate programs for separate purposes.

1Did you know that Neowin has an IRC channel btw? You're free to log on to it and discuss your ideas there as well.

Well there's an very obvious reason for that isn't there? rofl.gif Anyone who actually cared for extensions went and used FireFox because they needed too, Opera wasn't a choice for them. For those people who didn't really see much value in extensions, they could choose between Opera and Firefox. Ergo, of course it's obvious that the opinion of many Opera users is that they don't need extensions! That's how the ended up using it in the first place (:

Still they're there if anyone wants to use them I guess... there's still nothing particularly useful for me though, I only have one installed and that's ImgTip :p

Many, many programs include functions that some people might not need or would prefer to use another program to do. But there are also those who appreciate having it built in. Although I don't bother with Opera Mail myself, I do always use it's IRC client. It saves a lot of hassle to have something that just works, right there in the box.

Well, this whole thread is blatant flamebait, but what the hey. Just a few days ago I went and installed all the nightlies of Opera 11, Chromium, and Firefox 4. (I went with Chromium as I don't need the inane "update services" and all that other Google crap running in the background.)

Chromium, at least on my rig, handled javascript exceedingly quick, but the rest of the browser not so much. Wasn't slow, but it certainly wasn't impressive either.. not sure if it was a configuration error, but out of the box it as pretty underwhelming. Wasn't terribly impressed with the memory usage as well.. a few times it flew past FF4's usage. The one thing that struck me interesting was it's 'app store'. Novel idea, but my desktop runs desktop apps, and if I wanted an 'app store', I'd buy an Android or iPad.

Opera was pretty much identical in performance.. fast under the hood, but the browser itself was a "meh" at best. The few extensions that I tried failed miserably (at best buggy, at worst didn't run at all or even crashed the browser), but granted that's a "new" concept for Opera and it is a nightly, so to be expected I guess.. hopefully they get it worked out. As it stands currently though, borderline useless. Other than that, it's the same super-inflexible Opera that I've grown to dislike.

FF4 (Minefield nightly, not B7) on the other hand was almost as fast as Chromium in the JS department, but the browser itself was very fast.. just for a test IE's Fishtank demo for example, FF4 was the only one that I got a framerate that capped at my display's refresh speed, the other browsers weren't even close. Same with Futuremark's browser benchmark, overall I had better results with FF4. Regular browsing was near instant, no waiting. Plus FF4 still has by far the most and best extendability of any browser, period. I have still yet to find another browser with an AdBlock/NoScript type setup that actually comes even close to being as good.. they all have knockoffs, but they all fail to impress.

If pure JS speed is all that matters for you, then by all means go with Opera or Chrome. Me though, I prefer my browser to be a bit more flexible. Does it really matter what I think? Not in the least, nor do I care in the slightest what anyone else thinks. Find the one you like and stick with it, pat yourself on the back for making a decision. No need to start these inane threads though.

Flame on.

I agree! Flame on

P.S. I believe when Fx4 reaches final it will be the best overall browser. IMO it has the best GUI, features (although Opera is very good), extensions and the javascript performance will be as good as the others. But for me, it's more than just speed. I also see IE9 being a good browser as well. Anyway, my problem with Chrome is it lacks features and ugly GUI. And i think it's spyware :o

There is no 'best' web browser per se. Which one is best is subjective and up to the user to decide. I'm using Chrome most of the time because it's fast and stays out of the way - its minimalism is a feature in my book.

Funny how none of you has mentioned Internet Explorer 9 yet. Having used the beta I must say I quite like it - just like Chrome it's fast and stays out of the way, it profits from being tailored for one platform only - its integration into Windows 7 is second to none. Come the final I could very well imagine using it as my primary browser.

Very True. IE9 seams like a browser worthwhile.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!