Opera 11 is better than the latest Chrome and Firefox Nightlies


Recommended Posts

As do plugins. There has to be a delineation. Extensions function within the browser, not separately.

How many extensions or plugins do you know that function independently of the browser?

How many extensions or plugins do you know that function independently of the browser?

Subject Delta is right - for the most part extensions don't run outside the browser... plugins can however - they tend to be interfaces that allow external programs that literally "plug in" and be used within a browser, like Windows Media Player, Quick Time, Silverlight, Adobe Reader, etc. But that is not technically what he was getting at I think :p I guess there should probably be some distinction between the code that's plugging it in the the program that is being plugged in though? :p <img>

I've tried Opera on multiple occasions, last time around was with 10.1 and every time I'm annoyed by how it refuses to render many web pages properly. That's the main function of a web browser last I checked, so until that's fixed I'll stay well away.

I have the same problem with Opera Mobile on my iPhone, however at least on that particular platform I find use for it when I need some info quickly.

Subject Delta is right - for the most part extensions don't run outside the browser... plugins can however - they tend to be interfaces that allow external programs that literally "plug in" and be used within a browser, like Windows Media Player, Quick Time, Silverlight, Adobe Reader, etc. But that is not technically what he was getting at I think :p I guess there should probably be some distinction between the code that's plugging it in the the program that is being plugged in though? :p <img>

I guess even in those cases they are still being executed in the browser, and btw why do <img> tags appear in your posts? :/

In some way, whether it is an extension or a plugin, it is third party code that is being executed by the browser to change it's functionality. The framework of execution may well be different, and I admit that ActiveX plugins use a lot more native code than firefox extensions, however it's all to the same effect in my opinion.

One thing's for sure though, IE could seriously have benefited from the system Chrome has where the extensions are sandboxed and launched in a separate process. Back in the days of IE6 I used to get a lot of crashes caused by ActiveX plugins

I've tried Opera on multiple occasions, last time around was with 10.1 and every time I'm annoyed by how it refuses to render many web pages properly. That's the main function of a web browser last I checked, so until that's fixed I'll stay well away.

I have the same problem with Opera Mobile on my iPhone, however at least on that particular platform I find use for it when I need some info quickly.

opera mobile - not as good as opera mini - it's extremely fast on mine, and compresses pages to make a dramatic difference in the data downloaded.

As for opera, i've repeatedly compared it over the years to firefox and internet explorer. On a low spec/old pc, the difference really shows: opera is definitely faster, also less likely to crash/leak memory. it is true that for a few pages you have to keep some other browser around - i tend to use internet explorer when that's a problem, but it's hardly ever happening these days. i also keep firefox around for all the extras, but most of the time opera wins. chrome looks promising but it's got a little way to go yet.

I've tried Opera on multiple occasions, last time around was with 10.1 and every time I'm annoyed by how it refuses to render many web pages properly. That's the main function of a web browser last I checked, so until that's fixed I'll stay well away.

I have the same problem with Opera Mobile on my iPhone, however at least on that particular platform I find use for it when I need some info quickly.

Have you tried mask/identify as?

Again with the crap. Chrome doesn't have to be started up to access it's private session browsing, it's in the jump menu list regardless i Chrome is closed or open. So again, stop spewing crap.

Most people don't even know the jump menu exists. Come on now. Google is keeping these options out of the way on purpose. There should be an option right in the preferences that says "always be incognito" and you know it.

Most people don't even know the jump menu exists. Come on now. Google is keeping these options out of the way on purpose. There should be an option right in the preferences that says "always be incognito" and you know it.

Most people don't know the jumplist exists? Kind of hard to believe when it's a simple right click on a taskbar button, right?

Also just to be fair, from what I see you can't force Opera to start up a private tab on startup. Also Opera puts its new private window option behind a popup menu as well, under Tabs and Windows in the Opera menu, and also on the jumplist as well.

Now still on the topic of privacy, the option to wipe the cache on exit is missing from Chrome. Opera has the ability to wipe cache and history on exit, and Firefox has the ability to permanently turn on Private Browsing.

Most people don't even know the jump menu exists. Come on now. Google is keeping these options out of the way on purpose. There should be an option right in the preferences that says "always be incognito" and you know it.

If you're obsessed and paranoid enough to want your browser to start up like that, you're probably more than capable of adding the -incognito command line switch to your Chrome shortcut.

Look forward to seeing what other non-issues you'll bitch about next.

opera mobile - not as good as opera mini - it's extremely fast on mine, and compresses pages to make a dramatic difference in the data downloaded.

As for opera, i've repeatedly compared it over the years to firefox and internet explorer. On a low spec/old pc, the difference really shows: opera is definitely faster, also less likely to crash/leak memory. it is true that for a few pages you have to keep some other browser around - i tend to use internet explorer when that's a problem, but it's hardly ever happening these days. i also keep firefox around for all the extras, but most of the time opera wins. chrome looks promising but it's got a little way to go yet.

Sorry, I meant Opera Mini and that's where I'm also experiencing problems with many web pages displaying incorrectly. Even Neowin forums..

Which is a shame as it's 3-4x quicker to load web pages on 3G/GPRS than Safari. sad.gif

Have you tried mask/identify as?

No, care to explain more?

If you're obsessed and paranoid enough to want your browser to start up like that, you're probably more than capable of adding the -incognito command line switch to your Chrome shortcut.

Look forward to seeing what other non-issues you'll bitch about next.

I don't want that. I want to be able to manage my cache and then clear my history on exit so I have the convenience of using my history during my session.

Yeah, but the logo sucks (only 50% joking) :)

Seriously though... Opera 11 wastes space.... the Menu button could be alongside your first tab. Instead though it's above and you have all that glass above your tabs just wasted. Secondly, separate search bars are completely and utterly unnecessary. Can I remove it and search from the address bar like most other browsers are doing now?

I'm not sure what version of Opera you're using, but what you wish it to be is exactly what Opera looks like. :unsure:

No, care to explain more?

Right click on any page -> Site Preferences -> Network -> Browser identification

Alternatively, you can go to Appearance -> buttons -> status -> drag out the "Identify As" onto any toolbar

No, care to explain more?

Right click on any page -> edit site preferences -> network tab. Set browser identification as mask/identify as Firefox/IE etc. This is Opera's way around browser sniffing. Most of the time just doing this fixes the problematic site for me.

All options in edit site preferences tab is per site settings, including disabling/enabling content/plugins/scripting, per site.

Still no SOCKS4/5 proxy support (of which IE, Firefox and Chrome has), therefore it is unusable to me. This feature has been requested for a long time already but it seems that Opera AS deems that this isn't important. If basic networking feature like SOCKS support is not supported, while bloated features such as Opera Unite, Bittorent (which needs SOCK supports more than ever to bypass throttling), IRC etc. are included, then I will say that Opera AS has their priority misguided. They can stay with their paltry >5% market share for all I care.

Yeah, but the logo sucks (only 50% joking) :)

Seriously though... Opera 11 wastes space.... the Menu button could be alongside your first tab. Instead though it's above and you have all that glass above your tabs just wasted. Secondly, separate search bars are completely and utterly unnecessary. Can I remove it and search from the address bar like most other browsers are doing now?

the Menu button IS alongside your first tab by default, with maximized window that is. With non-maximized window, the Menu button is above the tabs which leaves glass above your tabs because you need to have some area to drag around your window, no?

And yup you can remove the search bar if you don't need the search suggestion feature, and search directly from the address bar. Actually, I think Opera is the first browser that provided the functionality of searching from address bar.

I really like the way that in Opera, i can create a private tab in a normal window and don't have to open up a new Window just for that purpose like in Chrome and IE. I tend to use them fairly often even at work and just this feature speeds up my browsing.

However im having trouble with some flash apps. such as blogtv, and stickam. i cant read the chats or anything. its really faded and i dunno. just ugly.

Are you by any chance not using Opera's default skin?<img><img>

im loving opera. Actually am using it full time now after finding a working ad block (using ad muncher which is a system wide adblocker, and works great btw :D ), and loving it.

However im having trouble with some flash apps. such as blogtv, and stickam. i cant read the chats or anything. its really faded and i dunno. just ugly.

also some sites wont let me login using opera which is odd, but over all i think i am sticking with it.

Especially since microsoft isnt giving us features we really want such as a spellchecker in ie9. and having a major problem with the firefox 4 betas and font rendering (font is blurry and smudged together).

but loving it. :D Allowing extensions finally really made the whole difference.

In my experience, custom skins tend to really !@#$ with Flash based content. If you're using a custom skin, try going back to the original.

I really like the way that in Opera, i can create a private tab in a normal window and don't have to open up a new Window just for that purpose like in Chrome and IE. I tend to use them fairly often even at work and just this feature speeds up my browsing.

+1, this is the feature which always stands out for me too

opera does not work right for me. pages load slower than ie, firefox and chrome. It feels like i'm on a dial-up connection and i have DSL :unsure:

Try turning off turbo in case of a fast connection instead of putting it on auto or on.

Sorry, I meant Opera Mini and that's where I'm also experiencing problems with many web pages displaying incorrectly. Even Neowin forums..

Which is a shame as it's 3-4x quicker to load web pages on 3G/GPRS than Safari. sad.gif

No, care to explain more?

Opera has a identify as option in the tools menu quick preferences probably. You can use that to identify as IE or FF. This can also be done on a per site basis. After the site loads, right click and click "Edit site preferences".

Hello everybody, I've been reading this forum for a long time and decided to finally post something I felt was lacking in this subforum.

You felt that an all out browser flamewar was lacking? :o

Dude... Nothing good can come from threads like this. Everyone uses his or her preferred browser. Live and let live already.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!