Opera 11 is better than the latest Chrome and Firefox Nightlies


Recommended Posts

polyarchist great post, you should express yourself more often. I disagree with your opinion of Opera although I run it from time to time to check on it's improvements. Although not important I will add I use chromium as my default browser agree with most of you on what it lacks and where it excels and my hopes are for a similar browser (such as chrome/chromium) that hasn't been developed by Google perhaps a Neowin browser?

Hello everybody, I've been reading this forum for a long time and decided to finally post something I felt was lacking in this subforum.

I've been using Firefox since before it was called Firefox, and I've switched to Chrome last year but recently I've been using Opera 11 and its become my default browser.

Why Firefox is lacking: The interface is terribly slow compared to the other 2 browsers, Gecko is notorious for being very slow due to the sheer amount of code, and even the Minefield nightlies continue to lag behind even Chrome and Opera stable versions in terms of compliance and speed. While it may have the biggest amount of extensions, it is only this fact that is keeping people in the Firefox world. Once extensions development approaches the comprehensiveness of Firefox's ecosystem, I see many users going to Chrome instead of Firefox. In other words, unless Mozilla can rewrite Firefox from scratch, I don't see how it can possibly compete with the Webkit browsers alone and I can see Chrome being the #2 browser for Windows by 2014 or so.

Why Chrome is lacking: Despite its massive gains over Firefox in terms of speed, compliance and UI responsiveness, it still has a lot of basic issues to deal with that continue to be ignored by Google: Why can't I manage the cache? Why can't I delete my history upon exiting the browser. I would say that that has a lot of to do with the spying that Chrome does with your browsing sessions. It can't create a profile of your browsing habits efficiently if you keep clearing out your history, as many people would choose to do. Also, the download manager is terrible and copy and paste functions continue to be extremely buggy on many website. Why does it have to save every torrent file I open? Why does it have to open the download bar when I right click save an image? All these things should have been fixed by now, but they aren't, because Google is too busy on only 2 things: 1) Performance 2) Finding new ways to mine your data, such as their sync, cloud print, and DNS options. While Chrome is faster than Firefox in many ways, it is not as good a browser in terms of features and privacy options, simply because Google is an advertising company, and the more control you have over your browser, the less of your data it can keep. There's a reason why there's an 11 page thread on this forum called "Things you hate about Chrome", you know!

Why Opera is best: Recent benchmarks show that Opera is similar to Chrome in terms of speed, and the interface is just as responsive while still using less memory than Chrome (but still more memory than Firefox) Best of all, Opera 11 now has extensions that are very similar to Chrome and every Chrome extension can be easily ported to Opera. Through these open standards, it is easier than ever to write an extension for a browser. With Opera, you get all the strengths of both Firefox and Chrome: You get Chrome's speed and Firefox's featureset, with even more built-in, like native content blocking, email, IRC, etc. You even get built-in Greasemonkey script support! There is really no reason to use either Chrome or Firefox when Opera simply combines the two in a lightweight installation.

Try Opera 11 when it becomes stable this month, guys, and get all the benefits of Chrome while not sacrificing even the basic browser that Firefox provides, and start from scratch with its new extension support.

IE9 is better than all :p :D

:rofl:

No, they don't the only cookies that they track are their own. And that other data, bookmarks ETC are only stored if you decide to use the sync options built into Chrome... it's completely optional in case you hadn't realised.

LOL You seriously need to educate yourself on web tracking. The sheer lack of knowledge about the subject is blowing my mind.

http://samy.pl/evercookie/ - evercookie is a javascript API available that produces extremely persistent cookies in a browser. Its goal is to identify a client even after they've removed standard cookies, Flash cookies (Local Shared Objects or LSOs), and others.

http://www.networkadvertising.org/ - Notice why Google is in that list?

Here's something about FTC and IE9: http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/2445-Internet-Explorer-9-to-Include-Tracking-Protection-Content-Blocking

I don't just trust Google, I keep data on Facebook as well FYI. The simple point of the matter is that there are data protection laws in place, to protect people and if corporations misappropriate your data, they can be legislated against.
Right and did you open the ports on your computer? You so conveniently ignored that part of my post. Why don't you open your computer to the web and publish everything? You trust Google. You trust Facebook. Why don't you trust everyone else? Don't the data protection laws apply to everyone else too? Just because someone says they adhere to data protection laws, doesn't mean "they do". The simple fact that everyone fails to understand is that, there are rules, but nobody *has to* obey them.

And how much money did you blow with all that tin foil on your head? ;)

Google can have data; like others said, it's mainly to give us relevant ads designed for you personally. It's perfectly alright in my books... we all trust Facebook still, even with all their privacy flaws (the ones that are still going on, yet Google fixes theirs if people start to whine.)... so what is the big deal? So the browser knows your location? Who cares. So it knows that you watch porn cause you have no life... Who cares?! If it's not Google, it's going to be someone else. Deal with it, remove the tin foil hat, the Y2K scare is over, and we're not going to all die on 12/21/2012. KthnxBAI.

Why? Do you have a tin foil hat business? Sounds like you're good at wearing it and selling it.

Just because you are alright with getting tracked, doesn't mean everyone else is. Whether there is something to hide or not is irrelevant. Stop spreading your stupid religion.

You have completely ignored my post and I will not respond to your ignorant replies.

So i went back to the default theme, and flash is working perfect. Only sad thing is is that the themes i was using looked much better.

Does anyone know of a way to fix themes so that they work fine with flash?

also does anyone have a problem with this beta where it'll just show a blank page and never/or slowly load the site?

Not sure about how to get themes to work with flash sorry.

However, depending on which beta you were using, there was one that had troubles with https. It has since been fixed. That was the only time I was getting blank pages. Which sites were they?

Opera does have troubles with some sites/pages. But they do fix some of them if you post it on their blog. http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

So those who keep saying Google is spying you blah blah blah craps.....

Get another excuse please... The only thing you all can say bad about Google product is just this lame old excuse.

Do Google look like they care about what porn websites you visit?

Do Google care about where are you right now?

Ask yourself.. Do Google even know you exist in the world?

Its like OMG I cannot allow others know where I visit? OMG Google will send advertisements to my doorstep?!

Like who really cares about you? The police have all the informations about you. Whats your name? Where you live? When is your birthday? So you might want to call the police a spy because you just love to hide yourself from the world like you are some terrorists or wanted criminals.

tanjiajun, you make it sound like Google is some kind of entity beyond humanity. That, or you're drowning in self-proclaimed importance.

They have their reasons to track ones online life, and one has his own reasons to avoid it from happening. I don't think they'll unleash their Death Star anytime soon, they are probably just using the data for targeted advertisement, but if you don't want to contribute to that - you avoid using Chrome (and Google ads etc).

Now, dry your tears. There are choices and there is individuality, live with it.

Well 11 final was released, so I gave it another go. If you're an Opera fan it looks pretty good. Javascript speed is excellent, some of the new features are pretty nice as well (I like the tab stacking). But still no hardware acceleration, HTML5 support is poor, and extensions are still pretty flakey. Overall if I could live without my usual arsenal of extensions I'd probably give it serious consideration.. maybe once it's been out for a while and their extension library has grown (and gotten all the kinks worked out) I'll probably give it another spin.

Get another excuse please... The only thing you all can say bad about Google product is just this lame old excuse.

Do Google look like they care about what porn websites you visit?

Do Google care about where are you right now?

Ask yourself.. Do Google even know you exist in the world?

no it doesn't... and google adsense is nothing more than a charity fund.

I'm treating Opera right now how I treated Chrome for a while.

Long time FF user, Chrome came out with extensions, I waited until Chrome's extension library was large enough, then tried Chrome full time. It convinced me to switch.

Once Opera's library grows, I'll give it a shot.

no it doesn't... and google adsense is nothing more than a charity fund.

Oh so you prefer to see viagra ads then ads that is more related to you? And also stop trying to act stupid, like as if you all really scare google is spying you.

But still no hardware acceleration

So? Opera's software rendering is faster at somet hings than hardware accelerated rendering in other browsers.

HTML5 support is poor

This is simply false. You are probably basing this on some lame "test" like html5test.com that tests only a tiny part of HTML5, and also throws in a bunch of things that aren't even HTML5, and finally assigns scores completely randomly to different things.

The only cool thing about Opera is the scrolling, the rest is bloated and very bad organised.

I beg to differ. Opera is the only browser with the ability to handle hundreds of tabs, and not lock up all the time, or lag to hell and back. Also, the size of Opera 11 has been reduced by 30% or so compared to Opera 10. The other browsers are bloated compared to Opera now!

Tried the betas, wasn't impressed but downloaded the final and gave it another go, unfortunately still not impressed. Rendering problems on the Opera forums, crashed installing a skin from Opera's community site. That was enough for me, uninstalled, and will stick the Chrome and IE with Chrome currently being my browser of choice.

People worried about Google spying on your search habits just install the Disconnect extension, written by an ex Google employee.

So? Opera's software rendering is faster at somet hings than hardware accelerated rendering in other browsers.

Never said it was slow, and I do concede that it pretty quick, but at least on my system Firefox 3 tends to do rendering and scrolling a lot smoother,and the FF4 Minefield builds fly past Opera. This is "regular" browsing, not the new stuff that Opera just can't do yet.. IE9's fishtank demo or the 3D stuff for example is an unfair comparison and won't say "Opera sucks" because of that. Credit where it's due, Opera's javascript clocked in a tick faster, not dramatic but it's there.

This is simply false. You are probably basing this on some lame "test" like html5test.com that tests only a tiny part of HTML5, and also throws in a bunch of things that aren't even HTML5, and finally assigns scores completely randomly to different things.

One of a few sites I've tried. Also tried "real world" HTML5 usage, and have also tested with some development tools. I stand by what I said, it's not great. Yet.. they're pretty good at standards.

I beg to differ. Opera is the only browser with the ability to handle hundreds of tabs, and not lock up all the time, or lag to hell and back. Also, the size of Opera 11 has been reduced by 30% or so compared to Opera 10. The other browsers are bloated compared to Opera now!

No comment there, I've never, ever had a reason to have hundreds of tabs open. That's just crazy. But I do agree that it's memory footprint is decent. Better than Chrome anyway. Personally, like I said earlier, overall I like it, if they can get their extensions worked out I'll give it another go. The few that I tried failed miserably or just wouldn't even run, but since this is brand new for Opera, it's to be expected. Right now it's a buggy mess though.

Speaking of Chrome, if you have issues with Google, can just use Chromium instead too. Same browser sans the Google stuff. I for one get irked by any application that assumes it's totally ok to have yet another random background updater service running 24/7 without even asking first. ChromeOS, sure, but for a browser it has no business whatsoever being a service.

Oh so you prefer to see viagra ads then ads that is more related to you? And also stop trying to act stupid, like as if you all really scare google is spying you.

no i'm not. But this doesn't mean google is not tracking your searches and your navigation, because it does so. this may bother you or not. and you can use chrome, or not.

The only cool thing about Opera is the scrolling, the rest is bloated and very bad organised.

I am using or at least trying to use Opera 11 and although I don't have problems with rendering, the UI gets on my nerve. I don't want to waste time customizing it to do some basic things that are standard across all browsers (Ctrl + left click) and I don't like the way the tabs work OOTB. I am all for customization options but the OOTB Opera is just stupid and I don't have enough time to fix it on every goddamn system I use it.

To be fair, Chrome has one quirk with Ctrl + Enter where it doesn't complete URL as expected but is much lesser annoyance than "Ctrl + left click to open new tab" that Opera doesn't do.

OOTB Opera is just stupid

Everything is going to seem "stupid" if you refuse to be open to new ways of doing things. You might as well stick with your current browser.

One of a few sites I've tried. Also tried "real world" HTML5 usage, and have also tested with some development tools. I stand by what I said, it's not great.

I'm guessing you've been looking at sites using vendor prefixes for CSS, and you are confusing that and HTML5.

I've never, ever had a reason to have hundreds of tabs open. That's just crazy.

No, what's crazy is being so egotistical as to think that your way of working represents everyone else.

Everything is going to seem "stupid" if you refuse to be open to new ways of doing things. You might as well stick with your current browser.

Believe me, I am all for changing for the better. But if Ctrl + Click works just like Click - then that is STUPID ( I don't have Opera handy to what exactly it does, but last time I tried that in Google Reader and it opened the link in the same window).

I'm guessing you've been looking at sites using vendor prefixes for CSS, and you are confusing that and HTML5.

No, I do this for a living, I know what the difference between a style sheet and HTML is. Stop guessing and making assumptions.

No, what's crazy is being so egotistical as to think that your way of working represents everyone else.

Whoa.. when did I say that my thoughts represent everyone else? Although I still can't for the life of me see anyone having hundreds (your words) of tabs open. memory usage aside that's just beyond impractical. 1) You'll notice that I (several times) commented that what I was saying was in my own experience, as I genuinely and honestly couldn't give a rats ass what anyone else is using, and 2) Stop being so defensive, nobody attacked your comments, so don't start being a self-absorbed ass. You'll notice I even credited Opera for a few of it's strengths. If you're trying to start a childish browser flame war, take it over to /b/ where somebody might actually care.

Believe me, I am all for changing for the better. But if Ctrl + Click works just like Click - then that is STUPID ( I don't have Opera handy to what exactly it does, but last time I tried that in Google Reader and it opened the link in the same window).

There is nothing stupid about it. Opera had tabs or multiple windows before anyone else, and always used Shift to open a new tab.

No, I do this for a living, I know what the difference between a style sheet and HTML is. Stop guessing and making assumptions.

I'm not making assumptions. I'm looking at your false claims about Opera, and coming up with the most likely explanation.

Whoa.. when did I say that my thoughts represent everyone else?

Ok, not everyone else. You just call anyone who is different from you "crazy."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!