Opera 11 is better than the latest Chrome and Firefox Nightlies


Recommended Posts

Google has been purposely sabotaging Opera for years now, every since they took over what is now google docs, they then added code that would break the site in google (except google logo's it was the only thing added to the site), it wasn't just browser snifing either, they purposely added non standard code that would break in opera. They're such a nice and non evil company.

But they did add the moving top bar to Opera in Gmail - still waiting for Safari to support that.

Opera is simply the standard by which other browsers should be measured. Sure it has it flaws like other browsers, like rendering certain websites.

I switched from firefox to Opera quite some time ago and have never looked back, it has all the functions I require in a browser, and more!

Opera is simply the standard by which other browsers should be measured. Sure it has it flaws like other browsers, like rendering certain websites.

I switched from firefox to Opera quite some time ago and have never looked back, it has all the functions I require in a browser, and more!

Except loading sites properly and non buggy flash

I don't think Opera 11.50 is faster than the Firefox 7.0a2 aurora build I'm beta testing.

Plus Opera doesn't seem to handle Youtube videos well (forum discussion here)

Agreed.

Firefox 7.0a2 is MUCH better on RAM use vs the stable Firefox 4/5 releases as those will eventually go higher and higher with random loading and closing of websites where as Firefox 7.0a2 eventually seems to stable out around 200MB of RAM.

because that was hands down my biggest complaint with Firefox 4/5 is the RAM slowly needing more and more the longer it stayed open but it seems to be cured in Firefox 7.0a2.

p.s. for those who want to try Firefox 7 you will most likely need to force it to use your extensions otherwise ill bet most of them will get disabled. http://goo.gl/r6G02 , but instead of where it has "extensions.checkCompatibility.4.0" put "extensions.checkCompatibility.7.0a" . which will force Firefox 7 to try using your extensions. (i got about 4 extensions and around 3 of them got disabled)

Dont know about everyone else, but Im sticking with Internet Explorer 9. I can't stand Opera and Firefox for some reason, and I also dont like Google as a company with their "We're not evil" BS.

Whats up with IE9 and Opera butchering long-string-of-text-without-spaces-like-this-one-for-example such as on bugzilla.mozilla.org and youtube profiles?

They go outside of the space dedicated to them bleeding into other columns...

Ugly as ****

opera blowed up when they implemented torrent and widgets... they loose so much time with these stupid things.

BitTorrent and widgets were added years ago. Where on earth have you been?

As for widgets being "stupid," Opera is apparently making a lot of money from them through licensing agreements, so it looks to me like it was a clever move. Besides, it was the first step towards real offline web applications.

Dont know about everyone else, but Im sticking with Internet Explorer 9. I can't stand Opera and Firefox for some reason, and I also dont like Google as a company with their "We're not evil" BS.

You prefer to stay with Microsoft, a company notorious for spending hundreds of millions of dollars on PR campaigns to make people like you think they are the good guys?

BitTorrent and widgets were added years ago. Where on earth have you been?

As for widgets being "stupid," Opera is apparently making a lot of money from them through licensing agreements, so it looks to me like it was a clever move. Besides, it was the first step towards real offline web applications.

You prefer to stay with Microsoft, a company notorious for spending hundreds of millions of dollars on PR campaigns to make people like you think they are the good guys?

As opposed to people who cant produce a competitive product, that cry to the EU because theyre too lazy to advertise...durr

As opposed to people who cant produce a competitive product, that cry to the EU because theyre too lazy to advertise...durr

You mean like Google, who filed antitrust complaints against Microsoft?

Or Microsoft, who filed antitrust complaints against Google?

Or Google and Mozilla, who were part of the browser antitrust complaint in the EU?

Or what are you referring to, exactly?

As for being too lazy to advertise, how do you out-advertise Google, an online ad monopolist?

I have a netbook with a good-ish GPU (Nvidia 9400M). I prefer Chrome but the atom CPU just isn't up to scratch.

At the moment IE9 is miles faster than any other browser due to its graphics acceleration (both for 3d objects AND general page drawing). Having the GPU do some of the work on an underpowered system like mine makes a huge difference. I'm waiting for the Chrome and Firefox/Aurora nightlies to catch up, but they're still a bit too buggy (chrome is especially poor when full acceleration is enabled) for daily use.

To the OP, you need to grow up over google's use of information. They do not steal information, it is all handled by algorithms in a completely benign way.

In addition, given that the vast majority of computer users get to websites by search engines, you should be aware that you're about as tracked in firefox or opera as in chrome. Almost no one deletes browser history on close and if you're bothered enough to do that, you can just open an incognito / private windows anyway.

Edit:

On opera itself. Meh.

I feel really bad for them, because a LOT of things we take for granted in web browsers today (tabbed browsing, 'offline', web 'apps' etc) started or were pioneered by them, yet they never get traction.

I personally find it doesn't have enough of a reason to stay with it. Its standards compliance is very up to date, but conservative; a lot of html5 demos do work, but miss things (last time I used it their rounded corner support was very very basic) . Another thing that really ****ed me off is that it doesn't update images on every reload unless the website has bothered to tell it to or if you change the settings. This is really annoying for dynamic websites that change regularly.

In short, while it's not a bad browser, I don't think there's anything in it to compel someone to switch, and if you do you may well find the little quirks it has are not worth your time to learn and adapt to.

I feel really bad for them, because a LOT of things we take for granted in web browsers today (tabbed browsing, 'offline', web 'apps' etc) started or were pioneered by them, yet they never get traction.

Opera has more than 200 million users, profits are soaring, and they are basically the #1 mobile browser. They are huge on the desktop in countries like Russia and other emerging markets.

So Opera does have traction. It just doesn't have an online ad monopoly like Google, which makes it even more surprising that it has managed to get hundreds of millions of users.

  • 4 months later...

Does anyone else have an issue with Opera since the upgrade to 11.52?

In particular, my browser becomes very unresponsive after I've been using it for a while - scrolling will lock up for a second, or changing tabs will similarly cause the browser to lock up for a second or so.

I've had this issue before with Opera (I think version 10.x) and it went away. I'm hoping it goes away again soon because this is the only browser that it happens in - and Opera was by far my favourite for a long while.

^ Well, I have an issue when using the 'inspect element' when right-clicking: sometimes Opera simply shuts down for no reason and ask me to sent a bug report (which I do now for about 3 months, three times a week or so :p )

Other than that, great update, really love Opera!

Latest Opera is way more buggy.

So I checked out the Opera blog and I see a bunch of people reporting "x doesn't render right" type problems during in RC stages and final release still having all these issues.

Nice.

why does everyone care about google knowing how much porn you surf.... i know i don't care....

Dont worry, they know a lot more than your porn. You shouldnt worry how they use your information, you should worry to whom they are selling your information and what they could do.

Latest Opera is way more buggy.

So I checked out the Opera blog and I see a bunch of people reporting "x doesn't render right" type problems during in RC stages and final release still having all these issues.

Nice.

The latest is stable, 11.60 has some bugs just as any other browser would. while it has some bugs you can't expect a bug free browser. That's

just not going to happen.

I do like chrome but having the google moniker puts me off, I dont trust them, never have, thats why I use Chromium, all the google addons work with it cos its what Chrome is based on.

http://www.chromium.org/Home

But im happy enough using IE9 for day to day browsing, its quick, slick and works all the time, imo MS have finally got IE right.

The only opera I use is on my blackberries, Opera mini, much much better than the BBs comical pooh browser.

  • 1 month later...

The latest is stable, 11.60 has some bugs just as any other browser would. while it has some bugs you can't expect a bug free browser. That's

just not going to happen.

an upcoming 11.61 release of opera will be available later in January 2012, which should fix some of the recent bugs from 11.60.

Can I remove it and search from the address bar like most other browsers are doing now?

Yes, and not only that but you can set where to search in the address bar, for example:

g macbook pro // will search on google

z macbook pro // will search on amazon

w macbook pro // will search on wikipedia

you can define shortcuts for any search box so you could say do nw macbook pro // will search on neowin

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!