Recommended Posts

They didnt. That is when the early access period commences, it says you will be emailed on the day you gain access.

If you ordered in July though id say its a pretty safe bet youll be getting in at the very start.

na i preordered begining of last month, its all good, smackin crap in skyrim in the meantime, then watching the stupid thing crash in revenge

Tbh, that is ridiculously unfair to SWTOR. It's hugely more detailed than KOTOR ever was - the similarity is in the general look and feel. Which, really, just says something for how well KOTOR defined itself.

(Yes, I played beta, and KOTOR)

Yeah sorry, I wasn't very clear in what I meant. It is a big step forward but the styling is the same and not being taken to the extremes of making the game try to be life like or Crysis

Sorry about not being clear there

I just found a new X3 expansion is released on the 15th!! YEAH!! So since I only pre-ordered the game at the beginning of this month after playing the weekend before and being converted to wanting to play the game I don't expect to get in early but X3 will keep me busy! :D

If you pre-ordered anywhere, you should have gotten a code to input online which tells them that you pre-ordered it. If you never got this code or never entered it, then you won't get early access since you won't be on the list of pre-orders.

If you pre-ordered anywhere, you should have gotten a code to input online which tells them that you pre-ordered it. If you never got this code or never entered it, then you won't get early access since you won't be on the list of pre-orders.

no the Pre-Order codes were only from the Retailers on the SWTOR site, for example, Target/Walmart/Origin/Amazon/Ect, but not NewEgg, or any other retailer.

no the Pre-Order codes were only from the Retailers on the SWTOR site, for example, Target/Walmart/Origin/Amazon/Ect, but not NewEgg, or any other retailer.

BS if the retailer says the pre order includes early play code, they do. I ordered from a Norwegian one computer parts company(newegg equivalent) and I got a pre order code from EA/SWTOR the next day(ordered late).

The retailer only need to inform EA/Bioware with your email and they'll send you a code. If you cancel, they inform Bioware, and your code is invalidated.

BS if the retailer says the pre order includes early play code, they do. I ordered from a Norwegian one computer parts company(newegg equivalent) and I got a pre order code from EA/SWTOR the next day(ordered late).

The retailer only need to inform EA/Bioware with your email and they'll send you a code. If you cancel, they inform Bioware, and your code is invalidated.

I'm just going by what was told to me, people saying they ordered from newegg and other stuff and they didn't get a code

Just preordered (I know very late!), But does that mean my early access starts later? If so I think that's kind of stupid how it is first come first served. I still paid the same amount as everybody else...

LOL really? But you waited until 4 days before it was released? Did you play the beta at all? We are getting rewarded for supporting the company even though we had no idea how good the game would be.. How is that unfair?

LOL really? But you waited until 4 days before it was released? Did you play the beta at all? We are getting rewarded for supporting the company even though we had no idea how good the game would be.. How is that unfair?

I played the betas, I've supported the company just as much as you have by paying the same amount of money? I waited 4 days for precisely that reason. I preordered, in the preoreder it says "Early game access".

As that is part of the preorder deal I should get the same early access regardless of when I preordered. Just because I didn't blindly jump into the purchase it doesn't mean I should suffer.

I played the betas, I've supported the company just as much as you have by paying the same amount of money? I waited 4 days for precisely that reason. I preordered, in the preoreder it says "Early game access".

As that is part of the preorder deal I should get the same early access regardless of when I preordered. Just because I didn't blindly jump into the purchase it doesn't mean I should suffer.

Also says Up To * Days. You'll get in.

On the bright side, you get to play, my box won't be shipped till the 23rd, and delivered till the 29th. So I won't be able to play till next year

That argument has holes.

If you and I both show up at Best Buy 4 hours early, one of us is still going to be last in line.

They're letting people into the game by groups, which means they had to choose some way

of selecting an order process. They went with Pre-order timing. I fail to see the problem.

That argument has holes.

If you and I both show up at Best Buy 4 hours early, one of us is still going to be last in line.

They're letting people into the game by groups, which means they had to choose some way

of selecting an order process. They went with Pre-order timing. I fail to see the problem.

I guess, Its probably just me being unhappy that I ordered it so late ;D

Gotta get me some star wars

That argument has holes.

If you and I both show up at Best Buy 4 hours early, one of us is still going to be last in line.

They're letting people into the game by groups, which means they had to choose some way

of selecting an order process. They went with Pre-order timing. I fail to see the problem.

Exactly this!

I was in the beta's, but didn't order until a couple of weeks ago for assorted reasons. I got my pre-order code on Friday but I'm not really bothered that I won't get in until almost release day. That's the way things work! They've sold WAY more copies than they thought they would and they just have to stagger launch or people will get massive login queues.

The only thing that IS slightly annoying is the pre-order code system is a bit borked... Didn't take my code, and now says its used to I'm waiting on second line support to fix it. Ho hum! It's no biggy, really. Technically I shouldn't be playing until the 25th anyway. ;)

I was reading somewhere, sorry, can't remember right now exactly where, that some people were sent a e-mail for early access to start on 12/13/2011. Any truth to this? I imagine if so, it's probably for the beta testers.

I was reading somewhere, sorry, can't remember right now exactly where, that some people were sent a e-mail for early access to start on 12/13/2011. Any truth to this? I imagine if so, it's probably for the beta testers.

No it's legit, they bumped it up another 2 days

Well, my Clan got put on The Ebon Hawk server.

I wish I knew what kind of server it was, though: PvP, PVE, RP, etc. Grr...

If you login to swtor with your account credentials, then go to www.swtor.com/guilds and click on your server name, it will show you the server type. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!