110 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructor's Championship?

    • Red Bull Renault
    • McLaren Mercedes
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes GP
    • Lotus Renault GP
      0
    • Williams Cosworth
    • Force India Mercedes
      0
    • Sauber Ferrari
    • Scuderia Toro Rosso Ferrari
      0
    • Team Lotus Renault
    • Hispania Racing Team Cosworth
    • Marussia Virgin Racing Cosworth
  2. 2. Which driver will win the World Driver's Championship?

    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Mark Webber
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • Jenson Button
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Felipe Massa
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Nico Rosberg
      0
    • Nick Heidfeld
    • Vitali Petrov
      0
    • Rubens Barichello
      0
    • Pastor Madonaldo
      0
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Paul di Resta
      0
    • Kamui Kobayashi
    • Sergio Perez
    • Sebastian Buemi
    • Jaime Algersuari
    • Other (specify below)
      0


Recommended Posts

Wow, this was an awesome race :D

Vettle was just wow, under such immense pressure he didnt make one tiny mistake, wow

Ham was just super, again no mistake from him either.

Ferrari should give Massa a good car the diff. between the two was too big, all this FA hype is getting them nowhere.

Good race from Merc., finallllllyyyyyyyyyyyyy MS makes it, top 6 :D :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot:

now, lets hope FIA bans the Engine mapping, then we'll see some real challenge from Macca to RBR

yup, official nooz-

McLarens, Webber under investigation

Lewis Hamilton, Jenson Button, Mark Webber and Jaimie Alguersuari are under investigation following the Spanish Grand Prix, having failed to slow down for yellow flags.

The FIA made the announcement after the race, where Hamilton finished in second, Button in third, Webber in fourth and Alguersuari in 16th.

Although the FIA did not specify at which point of the race they ignored the yellow flags, it is believed it happened when Lotus driver Heikki Kovalainen crashed out with 17 laps to go.

With 20-second penalties, however, the results for Hamilton, Button and Webber would stay unchanged.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91633

well i was just about to say how much i enjoyed this very exciting race on an usual boring track when i heard about the investigations.

would handle an uncompetitive alonso p2... coincidence? i dont think so.

lauda was furious on tv when he heard about it, he said that today it has shown that mclaren and redbull are by far the best and fastest cars and other teams should be just ashamed.

i wont even comment massa/ferrari anymore, san.W10 you have said exactly what i was thinking.

ferrari is becoming more and more of a big comedy and its a big fail. years ago they used to have 2 very competitive, fast and honest drivers and were well placed in the wcc.

now they have hired one hyped up driver grabbing the headlines by running with a qualifying setup yesterday and therefore struggling in the race today.

kudos to webber and vettel for staying cool at the start otherwise alonsos kamikaze action would have ended in big tears.

if ferrari doesnt change they can as well replace domenicali with briatore, hire piquet jr. again or even fisichella and tifosi will see how far they ll get with team alonso.

gr8 to see schumacher beating his teammate and ofc he had a super start as usual.

all in all, a nice race but: 2 drs zones from now on are definitely needed i get the feeling teams are already adapting too well to the new rules equaling each and everything out.

The way it is going, Vettel probably could have no KERs for the rest of the season and still win the championship. Chances are, if he had no KERs all race he might still be merely "second", if you give him some doubt in being able to get off the line without being mugged too much.

Schumacher's starts is simply amazing. If there is one thing we know, is how he managed to start from pole and stay first place during his glory years. It is almost as if he got double boost of power for the start, his throttling is amazing, last year he was good as well but he slipped back fast often normally. Webber on the other hand is starting to become a joke on the line. At the rate he is going, he is better off sitting with a brand new of soft and sit out Q3. Or just do it on hard or something. Is just not working out for him. I wonder who loses the most place on average I wonder, accidents aside, Webber must rank pretty high. Vettel on the other hand is solid if not good.

Dislike at Brundle not saying Vettel is the driver of the race, there is no other person who should get it. Lewis was fast yes, but I would say the reason he got there was because Webber was held off by Alonso and Button got a bad start, whilst the car was good as the RBR on harder tyres if not better. Vettel on the other hand had 2 critical passes in his first out lap to maintain position and maintained a mistake-free race even when under pressured by Hamilton. But otherwise, I like the DC-Brundle commentary line up.

Drivers escape penalties in Spain

McLaren's drivers Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton, as well as Red Bull's Mark Webber, have escaped penalties after failing to slow down for yellow flags during the race.

Hamilton, Button, Webber, and Toro Rosso's Jaime Alguersuari were under investigation after not slowing down sufficiently following Heikki Kovalainen's crash.

McLaren boss Martin Whitmarsh said the FIA has just given them reprimands, which means the results of the Barcelona race stay unchanged.

"We were able to show that they were slower at that corner than we had been," Whitmarsh told the BBC. "The data showed that they had been [slower] but I think the stewards still felt a reprimand was appropriate, but I think they took a sensible view.

"Anyway, we move on now. We've got to make sure that we stay out of trouble, we do a good job, and it's only a few days before we get to Monaco."

He added: "It was in a part of the circuit where they weren't on throttle anyway. So that was the difficulty. Ordinarily you are having the debate and you can show a lift but when they are off throttle you can't show a lift, can you?"

Source: Autosport

Ferrari Accused Of Cheating

Red Bull?s F1 consultant Helmut Marko has accused Ferrari of cheating, he suspects the Italian outfit are secretly listening in on Red Bull?s race strategies during grand prix?s.

Marko revealed this accusation on German RTL television after the Spanish grand prix on Sunday. The Austrian explained his accusation ?We have noticed that Ferrari is doing some kind of espionage. We called Mark (Webber) into the box relatively late, and yet they (Ferrari) managed to get Alonso in as well. They had been able to respond to us."

Marko also revealed that his suspicions were even greater when Red Bull issued fake orders for their drivers to pit, and Ferrari still made moves to respond. Ferrari have not yet commented on this accusation.

http://www.motoring.co.uk/car-news/ferrari-accused-of-cheating_30013

i think this is true :rofl:

now, lets hope FIA bans the Engine mapping, then we'll see some real challenge from Macca to RBR

Almost every team on the grid except Williams, HRT, Virgin, and Lotus are using off throttle blown diffusers, it's not just Red Bull and McLaren. Banning them won't make the difference everyone seems to think, it will make all of the cars slower by pretty similar margins. Given how Renault have engineered their system it would probably hurt them the most.

Ferrari Accused Of Cheating

http://www.motoring.co.uk/car-news/ferrari-accused-of-cheating_30013

i think this is true :rofl:

Teams have been watching each other in the pits for decades, it's far from new. And radio traffic is open, listening to it isn't actually against the rules.

Ferrari Accused Of Cheating

http://www.motoring.co.uk/car-news/ferrari-accused-of-cheating_30013

i think this is true :rofl:

Could that be because the radio isn't private?

Once again Marko proves he has absolutely no clue about the world he's in.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's true! :rofl:

me neither! i was wondering yesterday already as it should have been easy for redbull to pass alonso already with the first round of pitstops but was surprised that they came in at the same time. (i fully expected them to pit webber first to put pressure on alonso and then vettel would have been ahead)

it would speak WORLDS about the current state of ferrari or better say team alonso. i really see 2, 3 guys sitting there and waiting what redbull does and then doing the same - not realising that redbull was most likely very aware of this, and therefore pulling out a dummy so to say. and then ferrari fails for it pit alonso after he has done only 10 laps on the harder tire. :woot: :rofl:

and we were told that its all solved now as they fired chris dyer after abu dhabi last year for the wrong strategy calls.

FIA agrees to Monaco tunnel DRS ban

Formula 1 drivers will be banned from using the DRS in the tunnel at this weekend's Monaco Grand Prix after the FIA reacted to drivers' concerns on Monday, AUTOSPORT can reveal.

On the back of continued fears from drivers that it could be too dangerous to use the DRS through the tunnel in practice and qualifying, FIA race director Charlie Whiting wrote to the Grand Prix Drivers' Association members on Monday to tell them he agreed with their stance.

To prevent the possibility of drivers being forced to take risks through the tricky right-hander in the tunnel by trying out DRS for a speed boost, Whiting told drivers that he was stamping out the possibility.

The FIA will lay down a ban on DRS between two points on the Monaco circuit - distance markers 1350m and 2020m - which is the area around the tunnel.

DRS use will be free elsewhere and the overtaking zone will be laid out on the start-finish straight - because the more obvious tunnel area was too dangerous.

Whiting had said last weekend that he did not believe that safety matters relating to Monaco were enough to justify banning DRS totally at Monaco.

However, not all drivers agreed with the decision and had continued to lobby him for a unique DRS ban in the tunnel.

"I would love the people at the top to sit in the car and try to do the tunnel with the DRS open," Rubens Barrichello said in Spain.

"In my opinion, they are waiting for something bad to happen. And when it happens, they will just say, 'oh, next year we will not have it for Monaco.'"

Source: Autosport

Finally some common sense, i was worried that the drivers were going to get injured using DRS on such a narrow track.

*edit* Seems i need to read the article more fully, i think its ridiculous that they are allowing DRS at all, its just asking for trouble.

Well, at least they're still allowed to use KERS. If they banned both for Monaco, there'd be hardly any overtaking.

It's Monaco. There won't be much overtaking - with or without KERS and DRS. Why? The track simply doesn't allow for it, save for a mistake by the driver in front.

A prime example: The closing stages of the 1992 Monaco GP. Nigel Mansell fell back behind Ayrton Senna after a pit stop. Yet despite having the much faster car Mansell could not get past Senna again. Video:

Mind you, the Williams FW14 of 1992 was in a totally different league compared to the rest of the field. Much more superior than the RBR 7 this year.

Costa relinquishes position at Ferrari

Ferrari's technical director Aldo Costa has relinquished his position as the team's technical director on the back of a disappointing start to the season, the Maranello squad announced on Tuesday.

Ferrari said Costa, who had been appointed technical director at the end of 2007, will "take on new responsibilities within the company".

The Italian squad also confirmed a new structure for the technical department, with Pat Fry becoming the director of the chassis side.

Production will be in the hands of Corrado Lanzone, while Luca Marmorini continues to be in charge of engine and electronics.

All of them will report directly to team principal Stefano Domenicali.

Ferrari endured a very disappointing Spanish Grand Prix last Sunday, with Fernando Alonso finishing a lap down despite having led in the early stages.

The Italian squad is currently third in the standings, but 110 points behind leader Red Bull.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91694

:rofl:

I think removing the use of DRS in the tunnel is a good move, I am surprised it's use hasn't been eradicated altogether for Monaco in all honesty, I can't see it making a shred of difference to passing considering how short the straight is that the DRS zone will be on.

lol @costa.

i aint surprised at all. dont forget this guy has done gr8 things for ferrari, he did the f2007 and f2008 and together with smedley, massa and baldisseri and an (unmanipulated) domenicali they came much closer to the world championship than with this santander paid spaniard.

i go as far as i say i wouldnt be surprised if alonso is behind this. ALWAYS and in every team he goes he brings his oversized ego and loads of unrest in the team.

now ferrari has to do without technical director this season. you read it here first, next to go is tombazis, smedley, massa and last domenicali.

then santanderlonso will maybe force in briatore as team principal.

ferrari has sold its soul and enzo would rotate in the grave if he seen this. this is not ferrari anymore. shame shame shame!

the scuderia always had 2 cars racing each other very closely and be evenly matched now its a gap from 1 second from alonso to massa - but for what price i ask? they fighting for p5-p8 now together with renault and mercedes while getting lapped from mclaren and redbull.

i say: make the f150th italia not undrivable for a certain driver to make the other one looking like he is god but make the car fast. and if it results in a 2nd 2008 where the de facto nr2 driver gets in a position to outpace the nr1 worldchampion driver, so be it!

but kicking out brilliant technical guys is not the solution. domenicali is digging his own grave right now and i fear he doesnt even realize it. :(

I think removing the use of DRS in the tunnel is a good move, I am surprised it's use hasn't been eradicated altogether for Monaco in all honesty, I can't see it making a shred of difference to passing considering how short the straight is that the DRS zone will be on.

Yep. The final corner is very slow so the car in front can get well ahead, they don't build up enough speed along the pit straight, and the first corner isn't designed for overtaking, inside or outside. Monaco may well turn out to be the most boring race of the year, unless the tyres they choose don't last long at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!