110 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructor's Championship?

    • Red Bull Renault
    • McLaren Mercedes
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes GP
    • Lotus Renault GP
      0
    • Williams Cosworth
    • Force India Mercedes
      0
    • Sauber Ferrari
    • Scuderia Toro Rosso Ferrari
      0
    • Team Lotus Renault
    • Hispania Racing Team Cosworth
    • Marussia Virgin Racing Cosworth
  2. 2. Which driver will win the World Driver's Championship?

    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Mark Webber
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • Jenson Button
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Felipe Massa
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Nico Rosberg
      0
    • Nick Heidfeld
    • Vitali Petrov
      0
    • Rubens Barichello
      0
    • Pastor Madonaldo
      0
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Paul di Resta
      0
    • Kamui Kobayashi
    • Sergio Perez
    • Sebastian Buemi
    • Jaime Algersuari
    • Other (specify below)
      0


Recommended Posts

Laughable. He had the move done, and Massa turned in on him, something Massa is prone to doing when being passed. I thought the stewards were over the top here, however I am pleased to see another penalty for the Maldonado incident is unlikely

What a load of twaddle. The thing Massa is most prone to doing while being passed is jumping well out of the way.

Such a lame ending. Ferrari & Alonso had the perfect strategy and it was a Senna-Mansell-esque fight to the chequered flag if not for the amateurs that belong in GP2. Drop Hamilton back there for a couple of races too, he fits in nice with the crashfest.

pile of crap. :x

Laughable. He had the move done, and Massa turned in on him, something Massa is prone to doing when being passed. I thought the stewards were over the top here, however I am pleased to see another penalty for the Maldonado incident is unlikely

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

As for the Maldonado "pass", that was just plain bad driving. He could have caught him coming out of the tunnel, and left everyone on track.

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

Look at the line Felipe took, if Lewis wasn't inside that corner Massa would've taken Webber out (which he almost did despite that btw). It was Massa's intention to crash into Lewis in my view.

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

As for the Maldonado "pass", that was just plain bad driving. He could have caught him coming out of the tunnel, and left everyone on track.

I don't think Di Resta should have been penalised either, he came off worse in that incident. If you penalise drivers for doing what Lewis and Paul did, they will be to nervous of penalty to try risky overtakes in the future, and for me that's not a route Formula 1 should be heading down.

post-286512-0-57438600-1306694321.jpg

This is a shot taken as Massa started to turn into the corner, the angle of his car clearly suggests that he was trying to squeeze Lewis to the apex of the corner and run him off the track

post-286512-0-78043200-1306694332.jpg

And this is taken from the point that he hit webber. He was focused so much on Lewis he didn't even see webber.

There's no way that he didn't see Lewis coming.

Since Massa is ahead, it's up to him what line he takes around a corner. He doesn't have to get out of the way. Lewis tried to pass him on the inside in probably the tightest corner of any F1 circuit. If Massa didn't jerk to the right into Webber, him and Hamilton would have touched for sure.

Since Massa is ahead, it's up to him what line he takes around a corner. He doesn't have to get out of the way. Lewis tried to pass him on the inside in probably the tightest corner of any F1 circuit. If Massa didn't jerk to the right into Webber, him and Hamilton would have touched for sure.

Racing etiquette dictates that if someone's making a pass on you, and they're far enough alongside to be visible then you should not try to squeeze them off the track. It's way above defending your position when you actively try and run your competitor off the track, and that's why Schumacher was punished at Hungary last year.

Racing etiquette dictates that if someone's making a pass on you, and they're far enough alongside to be visible then you should not try to squeeze them off the track. It's way above defending your position when you actively try and run your competitor off the track, and that's why Schumacher was punished at Hungary last year.

Racing etiquette is one thing, rules are another. In situations where there is plenty of space available, I agree. In this corner, Massa was trying to turn it as was his right. Hamilton didn't pass him so he had no reason to expect Massa to get out of the way. He was coming in at a narrow angle, he should have known the risks.

Racing etiquette is one thing, rules are another. In situations where there is plenty of space available, I agree. In this corner, Massa was trying to turn it as was his right. Hamilton didn't pass him so he had no reason to expect Massa to get out of the way. He was coming in at a narrow angle, he should have known the risks.

Sure, it was risky, but if a driver were to be punished every time they took a risk there would be practically no passing at all. It's a dick move by the FIA to punish it when you're trying to encourage more overtaking.

Sure, it was risky, but if a driver were to be punished every time they took a risk there would be practically no passing at all. It's a dick move by the FIA to punish it when you're trying to encourage more overtaking.

He wasn't penalised for just taking a risk. He was punished for a dangerous manoeuvre that led to an avoidable collision. Is that Monaco hairpin really the best place to overtake with traffic ahead of you?

Pirelli: Ban red flag tyre changes

Pirelli has called for a change to the red flag rules in Formula 1 to prevent teams from changing tyres if a race is stopped - after feeling fans were robbed of a great finish to the Monaco Grand Prix.

The battle for victory in Monte Carlo was finely poised between Sebastian Vettel, Fernando Alonso and Jenson Button in the closing stages of the race, with all three running around on tyres that were at very different stages of their wear life.

But with their individual situations set to create a thrilling climax to the race, the battle came to a premature end when a late-race red flag, caused by Vitaly Petrov's accident, meant they were allowed to change rubber.

....

Source: Autosport

So.

F***ing

True.

Too right. If they weren't allowed to change tyres yesterday, then maybe Alonso or Button would have won instead, as when the red flag came down, Vettel had the worst tyres of the three; he'd done about 50 laps on that set alone! Alonso had a fresher set, and I think Button had an even fresher set, so it could have been an epic finish to an epic race if they weren't allowed to change tyres.

Too right. If they weren't allowed to change tyres yesterday, then maybe Alonso or Button would have won instead, as when the red flag came down, Vettel had the worst tyres of the three; he'd done about 50 laps on that set alone! Alonso had a fresher set, and I think Button had an even fresher set, so it could have been an epic finish to an epic race if they weren't allowed to change tyres.

Agreed, letting them change tyres ruined the last laps...would have been more interesting to see Vettel fend off Alonso, whilst alonso trying to attack vettel and fending of Button at the same time..

I think Mark Webbers tweet said it all...

"Did 2 F1 races on Sunday,1 long one 1 short one. In the short race you can change wings,tyres,engine,oops where's the 1000 page rulebook?!"

It was right to continue the race. It wasn't over and they were in the 2 hour time limit.

However 75% of the race had been completed, and full points could have been awarded. I believe it's up to the race director to make that call, which he's fully entitled to do.

IMO, I think fans would have preferred that option as apposed to the farcical half dozen parade lap that it turned it turned into.

He wasn't penalised for just taking a risk. He was punished for a dangerous manoeuvre that led to an avoidable collision. Is that Monaco hairpin really the best place to overtake with traffic ahead of you?

You could make that argument for almost any corner on any track at one point or another. Overtaking almost always carries some risk, and if you stifle drivers risk taking, you dull the sport.

Source: Autosport

So.

F***ing

True.

Amen, this regulation needs to be changed, quickly.

The opportunities to overtake at Monaco are so few that you have to take chances to try and make the move.

Let's face it, Hamilton and Kobayashi are the only drivers who really will take the risks to over take these days.

Ayrton Senna once said 'If you no longer go for a gap, then you are no longer a race driver'.

Long live the race drivers.

Ayrton Senna once said 'If you no longer go for a gap, then you are no longer a race driver'.

Long live the race drivers.

That quote popped straight into my mind when I saw the people on here complaining about Hamilton. (Y) Everyone has to remember that the Monaco circuit is much harder to overtake than the other circuits on the calendar, so the stewards shouldn't have punished Hamilton. He made a clean overtake in the tunnel (which until yesterday, almost everyone would have said is impossible to do without crashing), then Massa screws up, and Hamilton gets penalised. Makes you wonder if the FIA are biased towards Ferrari? I mean, Jean Todt is the president after all...

You could make that argument for almost any corner on any track at one point or another. Overtaking almost always carries some risk, and if you stifle drivers risk taking, you dull the sport.

I have no problem with drivers taking risk without undesired consequences. If a driver takes a risk that results in avoidable damage, he should be punished. There is no reason for irresponsible risk-taking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
    • Artist's renderings are so much nicer to view than the real thing, don't you think?
    • WildBit Viewer 6.20 released; no further updates planned by Razvan Serea WildBit Viewer is a popular, fast, and extensive image viewer offering a comprehensive suite of tools for photographers, designers, and image enthusiasts. It includes a powerful Viewer, Slide Show, Editor, Search, Profile Switcher, and Multi-Screen Viewer. The Viewer provides blazing-fast folder, file list, and thumbnail navigation with customizable headers, full-screen view, and a shell toolbar to organize favorite folders. It supports all major graphic formats (over 70), including JPEG, TIFF, PNG, BMP, GIF, PCX, TGA, and RAW formats. Detailed Image Info shows EXIF, IPTC, and XMP metadata, with rotation based on EXIF orientation, wallpaper setting, image comparison, geo-tag viewing, color labels, and CMS-aware color management. The Slide Show module offers 176 transition effects, multi-monitor support, custom shows with per-image settings, image marking, zoom, rotate, and desktop hiding for a professional viewing experience. The Editor supports advanced image manipulation, including crop, resize, color adjustments, curves, edge detection, effects, batch processing, retouching, layer support, and printing. Users can apply mass renaming, update or clear metadata, and work with multi-page TIFFs and animated GIFs. Search allows filtering by name, location, date, size, attributes, and metadata, while the Profile Switcher saves and loads custom layouts for all modules. The Multi-Screen Viewer opens multiple windows on available monitors, allowing simultaneous image viewing with independent zoom, pan, and rotation. WildBit Viewer also supports portable operation, 32- and 64-bit versions, Unicode, high-DPI displays, and multiple Windows styling options. With its combination of speed, versatility, and rich feature set, WildBit Viewer is an indispensable tool for managing, editing, and showcasing images efficiently. WildBit Viewer key features: Blazing-fast folder, file list, and thumbnail browsing Supports 70+ image formats including JPEG, TIFF, PNG, BMP, GIF, and RAW Full-screen view with multi-monitor support Explorer-style file handling with customizable headers Thumbnail Browser with sorting, view change, and fast size adjustment EXIF, IPTC, and XMP metadata viewing and editing Automatic rotation based on EXIF orientation Shell toolbar for organizing favorite folders Image Compare to calculate similarity between images Mass renaming and batch metadata updates File List Generator (HTML, CSV, RTF, TXT, Unicode) Rating and color labels, CMS-aware color management Video playback (AVI, MPG, MPEG, WMV) Animated GIF, multipage TIFF, Camera RAW support Slide Show with 176 transition effects and custom settings Editor: crop, resize, rotate, flip, canvas resize, and retouching tools Batch processing and image format conversion Multi-Screen Viewer: multiple windows with independent zoom, pan, and rotate Profile Switcher: save, load, reset, delete module profiles Portable operation, 32-/64-bit support, Unicode, and high-DPI ready WildBit Viewer 6.20 changelog: Viewer, Slide Show, Editor, Search, Profile Switcher & Multi Screen Viewer. Updated ImageEn to 15.0.0 version. Viewer, Slide Show, Editor, Search, Profile Switcher & Multi Screen Viewer. Updated Jedi JCL&JVCL. Viewer - Image Geo Info, OpenStreetMap removed. Slide Show Remote Mode removed. Note! This means that WildBit Slide Show Remote is now officially EOL. Editor - Shortcut keys for Capture removed. Optimized code. Note! This version includes help what supersedes all previous releases. plus Lots of bug fixes and changes, check Readme files for details. WildBit Viewer End‑of‑Life WildBit Viewer has reached its final release with version 6.20. As development comes to a close, no further feature updates are planned. WildBit Slide Show Remote reached End-of-Life on 06 June 2026, while WildBit Viewer will reach End-of-Life on 30 June 2026. Downloads will remain available until the end of July 2026 (possibly extending into early August). After End-of-Life, the software will no longer receive updates, security fixes, or technical support. Download: WildBit Viewer 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: WildBit Viewer 32-bit | Portable 32-bit Links: WildBit Viewer Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!