110 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructor's Championship?

    • Red Bull Renault
    • McLaren Mercedes
    • Ferrari
    • Mercedes GP
    • Lotus Renault GP
      0
    • Williams Cosworth
    • Force India Mercedes
      0
    • Sauber Ferrari
    • Scuderia Toro Rosso Ferrari
      0
    • Team Lotus Renault
    • Hispania Racing Team Cosworth
    • Marussia Virgin Racing Cosworth
  2. 2. Which driver will win the World Driver's Championship?

    • Sebastian Vettel
    • Mark Webber
    • Lewis Hamilton
    • Jenson Button
    • Fernando Alonso
    • Felipe Massa
    • Michael Schumacher
    • Nico Rosberg
      0
    • Nick Heidfeld
    • Vitali Petrov
      0
    • Rubens Barichello
      0
    • Pastor Madonaldo
      0
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Paul di Resta
      0
    • Kamui Kobayashi
    • Sergio Perez
    • Sebastian Buemi
    • Jaime Algersuari
    • Other (specify below)
      0


Recommended Posts

Laughable. He had the move done, and Massa turned in on him, something Massa is prone to doing when being passed. I thought the stewards were over the top here, however I am pleased to see another penalty for the Maldonado incident is unlikely

What a load of twaddle. The thing Massa is most prone to doing while being passed is jumping well out of the way.

Such a lame ending. Ferrari & Alonso had the perfect strategy and it was a Senna-Mansell-esque fight to the chequered flag if not for the amateurs that belong in GP2. Drop Hamilton back there for a couple of races too, he fits in nice with the crashfest.

pile of crap. :x

Laughable. He had the move done, and Massa turned in on him, something Massa is prone to doing when being passed. I thought the stewards were over the top here, however I am pleased to see another penalty for the Maldonado incident is unlikely

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

As for the Maldonado "pass", that was just plain bad driving. He could have caught him coming out of the tunnel, and left everyone on track.

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

Look at the line Felipe took, if Lewis wasn't inside that corner Massa would've taken Webber out (which he almost did despite that btw). It was Massa's intention to crash into Lewis in my view.

He tried the same pass as Paul Di Resta, and he got got a drive thro' why don't you think Hamilton should have been punished. I doubt Massa was expecting Hamilton to pass there, hence why he might have turned in.

As for the Maldonado "pass", that was just plain bad driving. He could have caught him coming out of the tunnel, and left everyone on track.

I don't think Di Resta should have been penalised either, he came off worse in that incident. If you penalise drivers for doing what Lewis and Paul did, they will be to nervous of penalty to try risky overtakes in the future, and for me that's not a route Formula 1 should be heading down.

post-286512-0-57438600-1306694321.jpg

This is a shot taken as Massa started to turn into the corner, the angle of his car clearly suggests that he was trying to squeeze Lewis to the apex of the corner and run him off the track

post-286512-0-78043200-1306694332.jpg

And this is taken from the point that he hit webber. He was focused so much on Lewis he didn't even see webber.

There's no way that he didn't see Lewis coming.

Since Massa is ahead, it's up to him what line he takes around a corner. He doesn't have to get out of the way. Lewis tried to pass him on the inside in probably the tightest corner of any F1 circuit. If Massa didn't jerk to the right into Webber, him and Hamilton would have touched for sure.

Since Massa is ahead, it's up to him what line he takes around a corner. He doesn't have to get out of the way. Lewis tried to pass him on the inside in probably the tightest corner of any F1 circuit. If Massa didn't jerk to the right into Webber, him and Hamilton would have touched for sure.

Racing etiquette dictates that if someone's making a pass on you, and they're far enough alongside to be visible then you should not try to squeeze them off the track. It's way above defending your position when you actively try and run your competitor off the track, and that's why Schumacher was punished at Hungary last year.

Racing etiquette dictates that if someone's making a pass on you, and they're far enough alongside to be visible then you should not try to squeeze them off the track. It's way above defending your position when you actively try and run your competitor off the track, and that's why Schumacher was punished at Hungary last year.

Racing etiquette is one thing, rules are another. In situations where there is plenty of space available, I agree. In this corner, Massa was trying to turn it as was his right. Hamilton didn't pass him so he had no reason to expect Massa to get out of the way. He was coming in at a narrow angle, he should have known the risks.

Racing etiquette is one thing, rules are another. In situations where there is plenty of space available, I agree. In this corner, Massa was trying to turn it as was his right. Hamilton didn't pass him so he had no reason to expect Massa to get out of the way. He was coming in at a narrow angle, he should have known the risks.

Sure, it was risky, but if a driver were to be punished every time they took a risk there would be practically no passing at all. It's a dick move by the FIA to punish it when you're trying to encourage more overtaking.

Sure, it was risky, but if a driver were to be punished every time they took a risk there would be practically no passing at all. It's a dick move by the FIA to punish it when you're trying to encourage more overtaking.

He wasn't penalised for just taking a risk. He was punished for a dangerous manoeuvre that led to an avoidable collision. Is that Monaco hairpin really the best place to overtake with traffic ahead of you?

Pirelli: Ban red flag tyre changes

Pirelli has called for a change to the red flag rules in Formula 1 to prevent teams from changing tyres if a race is stopped - after feeling fans were robbed of a great finish to the Monaco Grand Prix.

The battle for victory in Monte Carlo was finely poised between Sebastian Vettel, Fernando Alonso and Jenson Button in the closing stages of the race, with all three running around on tyres that were at very different stages of their wear life.

But with their individual situations set to create a thrilling climax to the race, the battle came to a premature end when a late-race red flag, caused by Vitaly Petrov's accident, meant they were allowed to change rubber.

....

Source: Autosport

So.

F***ing

True.

Too right. If they weren't allowed to change tyres yesterday, then maybe Alonso or Button would have won instead, as when the red flag came down, Vettel had the worst tyres of the three; he'd done about 50 laps on that set alone! Alonso had a fresher set, and I think Button had an even fresher set, so it could have been an epic finish to an epic race if they weren't allowed to change tyres.

Too right. If they weren't allowed to change tyres yesterday, then maybe Alonso or Button would have won instead, as when the red flag came down, Vettel had the worst tyres of the three; he'd done about 50 laps on that set alone! Alonso had a fresher set, and I think Button had an even fresher set, so it could have been an epic finish to an epic race if they weren't allowed to change tyres.

Agreed, letting them change tyres ruined the last laps...would have been more interesting to see Vettel fend off Alonso, whilst alonso trying to attack vettel and fending of Button at the same time..

I think Mark Webbers tweet said it all...

"Did 2 F1 races on Sunday,1 long one 1 short one. In the short race you can change wings,tyres,engine,oops where's the 1000 page rulebook?!"

It was right to continue the race. It wasn't over and they were in the 2 hour time limit.

However 75% of the race had been completed, and full points could have been awarded. I believe it's up to the race director to make that call, which he's fully entitled to do.

IMO, I think fans would have preferred that option as apposed to the farcical half dozen parade lap that it turned it turned into.

He wasn't penalised for just taking a risk. He was punished for a dangerous manoeuvre that led to an avoidable collision. Is that Monaco hairpin really the best place to overtake with traffic ahead of you?

You could make that argument for almost any corner on any track at one point or another. Overtaking almost always carries some risk, and if you stifle drivers risk taking, you dull the sport.

Source: Autosport

So.

F***ing

True.

Amen, this regulation needs to be changed, quickly.

The opportunities to overtake at Monaco are so few that you have to take chances to try and make the move.

Let's face it, Hamilton and Kobayashi are the only drivers who really will take the risks to over take these days.

Ayrton Senna once said 'If you no longer go for a gap, then you are no longer a race driver'.

Long live the race drivers.

Ayrton Senna once said 'If you no longer go for a gap, then you are no longer a race driver'.

Long live the race drivers.

That quote popped straight into my mind when I saw the people on here complaining about Hamilton. (Y) Everyone has to remember that the Monaco circuit is much harder to overtake than the other circuits on the calendar, so the stewards shouldn't have punished Hamilton. He made a clean overtake in the tunnel (which until yesterday, almost everyone would have said is impossible to do without crashing), then Massa screws up, and Hamilton gets penalised. Makes you wonder if the FIA are biased towards Ferrari? I mean, Jean Todt is the president after all...

You could make that argument for almost any corner on any track at one point or another. Overtaking almost always carries some risk, and if you stifle drivers risk taking, you dull the sport.

I have no problem with drivers taking risk without undesired consequences. If a driver takes a risk that results in avoidable damage, he should be punished. There is no reason for irresponsible risk-taking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Good, because the nonstop chattering from the voices in her head made me quit the second game.
    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case by Sayan Sen At Computex 2026 earlier this month, AMD announced a couple of new X3D processors for both sockets AM4 and AM5 as it confirmed the support extension of the latter till 2029. And although Intel didn't unveil any new desktop chips, the company's Core Ultra 200S Plus series is relatively new too. Let's say though that you want the best of both worlds simultaneously, and instead of running two different systems, you can have both running together side-by-side, or rather on top of one another. That's exactly what Thermaltake's CAPO X dual system is made for doing. While it's not exactly mandatory to run AMD with Intel, or vice versa, you get the idea. As you can see in the render above, it is essentially like a double-decker PC case that is capable of holding two microATX (mATX) motherboards. Even running just one discrete graphics card in a PC can get toasty, so you may be wondering how well the cooling is designed on the CAPO X, Thermaltake has confirmed, as is evident from the marketing promo image above, that the case supports up to two 360 mm AIO liquid coolers. 420mm is not supported. In total there is room for 13 120mm case fans. In terms of I/O (input/output) options for the two systems, there are naturally two places for those ports, one at the top and one at the very bottom of the chassis in the front panel. In terms of use cases, there are many possibilities. Thermaltake itself, for example, highlights how one system can be your main PC while the other could be the AI agent PC. Another example given is how it can be used to stream and game simultaneously with dedicated systems instead of hogging one with the entire load. Nothing regarding pricing or availability was said. Source: Thermaltake (YouTube, X)
    • There might be some passive design improvements (cooling, etc), but I doubt they'd change the core performance spec of the hardware mid-generation when they've already got a new console in development.
    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!