Recommended Posts

anyone wanna bet me that this game won't be on steam? origin only? they just pulled crysis 2...

honestly, for me. no steam = no buy.

From here:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/35247/Crysis_2_Removed_From_Steam_Available_Only_On_Origin.php

[update: EA has issued a response to the game's removal, saying that it was "not an EA decision or the result of any action by EA," saying instead that the game was removed because an agreement that developer Crytek made with "another download service" violates an unspecified rule Steam has for its distribution partners.

Valve has not responded to requests by Gamasutra for clarification. An EA spokesperson provided this statement to Gamasutra:

"It?s unfortunate that Steam has removed Crysis II from their service. This was not an EA decision or the result of any action by EA.

Steam has imposed a set of business terms for developers hoping to sell content on that service ? many of which are not imposed by other online game services. Unfortunately, Crytek has an agreement with another download service which violates the new rules from Steam and resulted in its expulsion of Crysis II from Steam.

Crysis II continues to be available on several other download services including Amazon, GameStop and Origin.com."]

So it looks like it wasn't EA that did this. Not sure if that's all true as Valve hasn't responded yet.

From here:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/35247/Crysis_2_Removed_From_Steam_Available_Only_On_Origin.php

So it looks like it wasn't EA that did this. Not sure if that's all true as Valve hasn't responded yet.

yeah i read that. im wondering what valve has to say about it...

yeah i read that. im wondering what valve has to say about it...

I doubt Valve will say anything, they're quite closed lip on their agreements with publishers (that is, they don't talk about specifics, but we know general stuff)

The rule EA/Crytek violated is most likely related to exclusivity (there's rumours they were going to make some DLC Origin only)

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Are you serious? Those PS3 shots are AWFUL pictures to begin with. Tons of compression already in the picture. Just look at the smaller picture of Fallon with the guests. They look like **** as well. So I really cannot see how one could make any type of real judgement based on those pictures. Yes, the textures look bad, but the source photos themselves really look like ass, and I just think this paranoidgamer wanted some hits on their site, as I never even heard of them until this "article."

Plus, considering the PC has been clearly stated to be the lead development platform, I would also not take any console footage shown right now as what it will look like as an end result.

But hey, if you want to get some knocks in on the PS3, who am I to stop you.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

+1

Really cannot help but feel that was meant as flamebait and a dig at the PS3 and nothing else.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Is this a joke? You're comparing uncompressed screenshots to screengrabs from a 1080i TV show.

What is wrong with you? It looks great. Granted that video is pretty poor quality(it looks off-screen).

But, I mean, what were you expecting six year old hardware to do?

EDIT: yep, the BF3 Blog confirms it was filmed off-screen.

It wasn't filmed off-screen. It was a direct feed, just like the presentation of the tank battle in E3.

If it wasn't, the end result would be a lot of this: http://i.imgur.com/l2EnK.jpg

Do notice there's no camera in front of the screen to capture the so called "off-screen" footage. And if there was a camera behind Jimmy and the guys from DICE capturing the screen showing the game, we would see their backs as they're in front of the screen. So no, def. not an off-screen footage.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

I personally didn't posted the shots from the PC version for a 1:1 comparison to the PS3's version. The PC screenshots were posted just for reference, to see how many details were cut.

+1

Really cannot help but feel that was meant as flamebait and a dig at the PS3 and nothing else.

There was a "dig", but not at PS3. It was at DICE, for not trying hard enough for their debut of the console(s[?]) version.

Is this a joke? You're comparing uncompressed screenshots to screengrabs from a 1080i TV show.

No uncompressed screenshots were used by me above. All were taken from YouTube videos.

And if you don't want the YouTube encoded version of the PS3 demonstration run, a guy on Reddit posted the better original version: http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/i1z31/battlefield_3_pc_vs_ps3_graphics_comparison/c208dac

I personally didn't posted the shots from the PC version for a 1:1 comparison to the PS3's version. The PC screenshots were posted just for reference, to see how many details were cut.

There was a "dig", but not at PS3. It was at DICE, for not trying hard enough for their debut of the console(s[?]) version.

They cant work miracles, the PS3 has 256mb of ram and vram how are they supposed to fit such high res textures and models into so small amount of ram, with PCs they have multiple gigabytes to play with, with the PS3 just 512mb.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Did you really expect the console version to look as good as the pc version running in dx11 on a gtx 580?

Two are from the multiplayer so I doubt they're cutscenes and one of the developers said on Twitter that they were taken without DX11 hardware tessellation enabled so most certainly real-time and none of that pre-rendered stuff.

You can also see a weird blurry effect around the edges of the models.

Two are from the multiplayer so I doubt they're cutscenes and one of the developers said on Twitter that they were taken without DX11 hardware tessellation enabled so most certainly real-time and none of that pre-rendered stuff.

You can also see a weird blurry effect around the edges of the models.

if that's true colour me friggin impressed and slowly wanting this game more and more (if it's actually on steam)

I really hope it comes to steam, i will not buy it from EA's online store. I would sooner buy it at game stop or ever wal-mart lol. I have been saving for a new rig for sometime, I cant WAIT to buy it, not buying the rig though till close to the release of the game. It looks so damn beautiful <3

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!