Recommended Posts

anyone wanna bet me that this game won't be on steam? origin only? they just pulled crysis 2...

honestly, for me. no steam = no buy.

From here:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/35247/Crysis_2_Removed_From_Steam_Available_Only_On_Origin.php

[update: EA has issued a response to the game's removal, saying that it was "not an EA decision or the result of any action by EA," saying instead that the game was removed because an agreement that developer Crytek made with "another download service" violates an unspecified rule Steam has for its distribution partners.

Valve has not responded to requests by Gamasutra for clarification. An EA spokesperson provided this statement to Gamasutra:

"It?s unfortunate that Steam has removed Crysis II from their service. This was not an EA decision or the result of any action by EA.

Steam has imposed a set of business terms for developers hoping to sell content on that service ? many of which are not imposed by other online game services. Unfortunately, Crytek has an agreement with another download service which violates the new rules from Steam and resulted in its expulsion of Crysis II from Steam.

Crysis II continues to be available on several other download services including Amazon, GameStop and Origin.com."]

So it looks like it wasn't EA that did this. Not sure if that's all true as Valve hasn't responded yet.

From here:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/35247/Crysis_2_Removed_From_Steam_Available_Only_On_Origin.php

So it looks like it wasn't EA that did this. Not sure if that's all true as Valve hasn't responded yet.

yeah i read that. im wondering what valve has to say about it...

yeah i read that. im wondering what valve has to say about it...

I doubt Valve will say anything, they're quite closed lip on their agreements with publishers (that is, they don't talk about specifics, but we know general stuff)

The rule EA/Crytek violated is most likely related to exclusivity (there's rumours they were going to make some DLC Origin only)

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Are you serious? Those PS3 shots are AWFUL pictures to begin with. Tons of compression already in the picture. Just look at the smaller picture of Fallon with the guests. They look like **** as well. So I really cannot see how one could make any type of real judgement based on those pictures. Yes, the textures look bad, but the source photos themselves really look like ass, and I just think this paranoidgamer wanted some hits on their site, as I never even heard of them until this "article."

Plus, considering the PC has been clearly stated to be the lead development platform, I would also not take any console footage shown right now as what it will look like as an end result.

But hey, if you want to get some knocks in on the PS3, who am I to stop you.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

+1

Really cannot help but feel that was meant as flamebait and a dig at the PS3 and nothing else.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Is this a joke? You're comparing uncompressed screenshots to screengrabs from a 1080i TV show.

What is wrong with you? It looks great. Granted that video is pretty poor quality(it looks off-screen).

But, I mean, what were you expecting six year old hardware to do?

EDIT: yep, the BF3 Blog confirms it was filmed off-screen.

It wasn't filmed off-screen. It was a direct feed, just like the presentation of the tank battle in E3.

If it wasn't, the end result would be a lot of this: http://i.imgur.com/l2EnK.jpg

Do notice there's no camera in front of the screen to capture the so called "off-screen" footage. And if there was a camera behind Jimmy and the guys from DICE capturing the screen showing the game, we would see their backs as they're in front of the screen. So no, def. not an off-screen footage.

wat.

You cant even compare a PC with 4Gb+ RAM and 1GB+ Video RAM to a PS3 with 256MB RAM and 256MB Video RAM. Use your brain.

I personally didn't posted the shots from the PC version for a 1:1 comparison to the PS3's version. The PC screenshots were posted just for reference, to see how many details were cut.

+1

Really cannot help but feel that was meant as flamebait and a dig at the PS3 and nothing else.

There was a "dig", but not at PS3. It was at DICE, for not trying hard enough for their debut of the console(s[?]) version.

Is this a joke? You're comparing uncompressed screenshots to screengrabs from a 1080i TV show.

No uncompressed screenshots were used by me above. All were taken from YouTube videos.

And if you don't want the YouTube encoded version of the PS3 demonstration run, a guy on Reddit posted the better original version: http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/i1z31/battlefield_3_pc_vs_ps3_graphics_comparison/c208dac

I personally didn't posted the shots from the PC version for a 1:1 comparison to the PS3's version. The PC screenshots were posted just for reference, to see how many details were cut.

There was a "dig", but not at PS3. It was at DICE, for not trying hard enough for their debut of the console(s[?]) version.

They cant work miracles, the PS3 has 256mb of ram and vram how are they supposed to fit such high res textures and models into so small amount of ram, with PCs they have multiple gigabytes to play with, with the PS3 just 512mb.

So much fail in the graphic department on the PS3 version, it's not even funny.

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

PC | PS3

http://theparanoidgamer.com/battlefield-3-pc-and-ps3-comparison/

It's like DICE didn't even try.

Did you really expect the console version to look as good as the pc version running in dx11 on a gtx 580?

Two are from the multiplayer so I doubt they're cutscenes and one of the developers said on Twitter that they were taken without DX11 hardware tessellation enabled so most certainly real-time and none of that pre-rendered stuff.

You can also see a weird blurry effect around the edges of the models.

Two are from the multiplayer so I doubt they're cutscenes and one of the developers said on Twitter that they were taken without DX11 hardware tessellation enabled so most certainly real-time and none of that pre-rendered stuff.

You can also see a weird blurry effect around the edges of the models.

if that's true colour me friggin impressed and slowly wanting this game more and more (if it's actually on steam)

I really hope it comes to steam, i will not buy it from EA's online store. I would sooner buy it at game stop or ever wal-mart lol. I have been saving for a new rig for sometime, I cant WAIT to buy it, not buying the rig though till close to the release of the game. It looks so damn beautiful <3

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!