Recommended Posts

I just played it on the 360 about an hour and a half ago. It wasn't easy but I got in 3 times. The first time I got disconneted in the middle of a match.

It was probably a coincidence, but the 3 times I got on was after repeatedly hitting A for like 10 - 20 seconds (out of frustration lol) then waiting a minute or two to try again. Worked 3 out of 5 times, but like I said, it probably only by chance.

I'm running everything on Ultra + all settings on and it runs great (except with the raw mouse setting for some reason). I'm running it on a GTX 580.

I decided to try Ultra as generally speaking 2 460's in SLi are usually comparable to 1 580 in most benchmarks I have seen. I happened to join a match in progress, and it was in the subway indoor part of metro. I was getting 65 FPS, on Ultra, I was like DAMN, maybe I can play the game on Ultra.

The action moved outdoors, and that is when it all went downhill fast. Dropped down to 20 FPS, and even when I changed the settings back to Auto (which puts everything at default except AA Post gets set to Medium), it was still running at 20 FPS. I had to quit the game and launch it not once but twice before it got back to normal. The game is still definitely buggy, no doubt about it.

Suffice to say, I will never be running the game on Ultra. LOL

I'm running an MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC and I"m having a problem running the game on low myself (less than 60FPS unless I'm in a hallway in the subway). Anyone out there with this card and similar or lesser specs that can run the game properly?

My System:

Intel Core i5-2500K

MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC

8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3-1600

23" Monitor @ 1920x1080

I'm really not sure what the issue is here, but I just can't believe this system is unable to run the game at least on Medium flawlessly.

I'm running an MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC and I"m having a problem running the game on low myself (less than 60FPS unless I'm in a hallway in the subway). Anyone out there with this card and similar or lesser specs that can run the game properly?

My System:

Intel Core i5-2500K

MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC

8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3-1600

23" Monitor @ 1920x1080

I'm really not sure what the issue is here, but I just can't believe this system is unable to run the game at least on Medium flawlessly.

Have you downloaded the special drivers for the beta?

I wouldn't be surprised if that "special" driver was actually the issue honestly. As the entire 280 series has been crap.

I wouldn't be surprised either. I'll try rolling back, at this point I've exhausted all my options.

I wouldn't be surprised either. I'll try rolling back, at this point I've exhausted all my options.

That should fix it. Unless of course there's an underlying hardware issue that you're not aware of. You should test your video card in other games.

That should fix it. Unless of course there's an underlying hardware issue that you're not aware of. You should test your video card in other games.

I've played a few other games and everything seems fine.

I'm running an MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC and I"m having a problem running the game on low myself (less than 60FPS unless I'm in a hallway in the subway). Anyone out there with this card and similar or lesser specs that can run the game properly?

My System:

Intel Core i5-2500K

MSI GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC

8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3-1600

23" Monitor @ 1920x1080

I'm really not sure what the issue is here, but I just can't believe this system is unable to run the game at least on Medium flawlessly.

What is your PSU wattage rated at? Otherwise your resolution may be too high right now for that card.

What is your PSU wattage rated at? Otherwise your resolution may be too high right now for that card.

I rolled back my drivers and I see no improvement.

The PSU I have in this system is a Corsair TX650W. You can find all of the specifications here.

The beta is weeks old already. Many bugs have been fixed.

Then, why do EA and Dice shoot themselves in the foot by releasing a build they knew it was bad?

There may be a warning 'the build does not reflect the quality of the final product' but that really does not help.

The graphics are Xbox and absolute fine, I don't know why anyone would expect anything more.

The mind blowing videos a lot of gamers raved about, maybe? That everyone thought: Wow, Dice really milked the X360 GPU and did better than Crysys 2

The ones that said 'actual gameplay footage' or should have said: actual gameplay footage with a Quadro 6000 card or a 12-core Xeon X5690.

Found my first bug of not being able use iron sights in certain parts of Metro. And my god they need to sort out the balancing of that map, need to add more tickets, i played it quite a few times last night attacking and defending and i never saw it go past the 2nd stage, and half the time it didnt make it past the first stage,

Played a bit of caspian..can see why its 32v32 lol, heli's seem a lot better to control compared to BC2, and the damage is pretty cool as well, Didnt get a jet though, seemed to be 15 people waiting in the spawning area for one lol

Has anyone noticed that player tags during the game disappeared? The last few rounds i played (basically when i played caspian and all the games after) no player had a tag above there head, so it was impossible to tell who's side everyone was on except looking at the minimap...all i can say is thank god friendly fire wasnt on!

Anyone experienced that bug?

What is your PSU wattage rated at? Otherwise your resolution may be too high right now for that card.

I also want to mention that I tried playing the game at a lower resolution and it still wasn't running properly. If I remember correctly I tried 1680x1050.

Someone explain to me why my equipment changes after every round! My M4 keeps reverting back to an AKS-74u and my rockets keep reverting to RPG-7V2... WTF!

..now I have a SCAR-H... ?!

Russians and Americans have different starter weapons. You can unlock weapons that either side uses though. People were complaining about side specific weapons in BC2 a lot so I guess this is their compromise.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!