Recommended Posts

I understand this is the beta but holy crap on the map glitches/clipping (PS3 version). A lot of players are taking advantage of this bug and camp under the map. I've been killed this way so many times, especially near the A m-com.

As for teammates playing CoD style, very true. Last game I was in, there were so many running around trying to find enemies to kill that it left holes in defense to let them through. Hopefully the experience will be better if my friends were on at the same time.

I have been in games from both sides, one where everybody backed everybody else up (on a PS3 with no mics) and we ran through metro it was seemed like 5 mins.

Then later that night a team full of deserters, in a 12x12 game I could only see me and two others defending.

Still on the fence I have it pre-ordered and just hope they make it a bit harder to kill people, I am killing way to many people compared to my BF2 days and I am worried I am getting a "unload the full mag" syndrome.

there is a suppresor for lens flare if you preorder you get it apperently, dunno about later buyers

Flash suppressor is a barrel attachment that just reduces the flash when you fire the gun. Not flash from other peoples lights. And I know it was a hot topic before because people thought those things would be exclusive to that pack but every other gun in the game has all the same exact attachments.

How you get invited to Caspian Border? I really want to play that one.

You can't anymore. They shut all the servers hosting that map down.

Also, WTF is with this crap falling under the map. I thought they fixed that?? I was just in a map and I kept sinking down just standing there.

I like the lens flare, though, it does need adjusting as it's very bright in very dark places which is unusual. The tactical flashlight is annoying if many of your team mates have it as they like to look at you and blind you, haha. Really wanted to play the other map but disappointed they shut down the servers before anyone really had a good go at it. :(

Anyone?

My brother gets random crashes while playing BF3. He's using the beta drivers from ATI though he hasn't figured out what the problem is on his side. I do think that it might be the drivers though.

Ok, can not get this game to play more than 10 min without freezing up. Did a complete re-install of Windows. Loaded the bare minimum to play this game still the same. Have no issues any other games.

Win7 64bit, i7 920, XFX Ati 5850 black edition 6 gb ram. I tried the beta drivers and release drivers from Ati no change. Any ideas?

You know it really needs to be said...

DICE and EA really, really dropped the ball here with this Beta.

All this talk of going head to head with MW3, and they release a Beta that has way, way to many issues (granted I did not see many with my brief time playing it, but obviously plenty of people did).

It literally is dumbfounding to me.

They have been in this game long enough to know gamers are among the most fickle consumers out there, and first impressions mean everything.

People no longer take the word Beta for what it is meant to represent. In their eyes, this is a representation of the final product.

So they have really, really hurt themselves with this Beta. They truly have.

Ultimately it is no real skin off my back, I am going to play the game and enjoy it regardless, but they should have known better. Really is as simple as that.

Most of the issues happening in the beta have already been fixed. I'm working with http://battlefieldo.com and we've had several chances to speak on TeamSpeak and in-game with zh1nt0 and some DICE developers, due to their interest in playing with the community on their free time. You guys are making a big deal out of the beta, which it initially is/was a month old beta build.

Most of the issues happening in the beta have already been fixed. I'm working with http://battlefieldo.com and we've had several chances to speak on TeamSpeak and in-game with zh1nt0 and some DICE developers, due to their interest in playing with the community on their free time. You guys are making a big deal out of the beta, which it initially is/was a month old beta build.

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

  • Like 2

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

(Y)

Started the Battlefield Veterans Platoon. Gonna invite some friends but I like the social aspect of it.. Emblem editor is cool. You can do some cool stuff (nothing super complex) but it works ok.

http://www.bozzified...ts/060422e1.png

That's a pretty cool image. Did you make it yourself? Also, I sent an application to that platoon. (Y)

Anyway, people shouldn't join the servers with more than 32 slots. See here:

We are aware that a number of servers have appeared and are running game modes and player counts that have not currently been seen. Please try to remain on official servers.

Official servers run the following configuration

Max Players: 32

Map: Operation Metro

Mode: RUSH

Please avoid temptation and remain on these official servers while we work to have these servers dealt with.

Playing on those servers can cause your account to become compromised, stats to be altered or other issues to arise which may lead to having your account banned by EA.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2826564925948154637/

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

You are making ridiculous assumptions. Just because the build is a month old does not mean all feedback is irrelevant...

You really think they'd release a demo where everyone falls through the ground? What DICE is trying to say, and what people refuse to understand is a beta build is NOT representative of the final. Of course bugs are fixed between the beta and final build.

You know it really needs to be said...

DICE and EA really, really dropped the ball here with this Beta.

All this talk of going head to head with MW3, and they release a Beta that has way, way to many issues (granted I did not see many with my brief time playing it, but obviously plenty of people did).

It literally is dumbfounding to me.

They have been in this game long enough to know gamers are among the most fickle consumers out there, and first impressions mean everything.

People no longer take the word Beta for what it is meant to represent. In their eyes, this is a representation of the final product.

So they have really, really hurt themselves with this Beta. They truly have.

Ultimately it is no real skin off my back, I am going to play the game and enjoy it regardless, but they should have known better. Really is as simple as that.

The thing is, even if we're supposed to be reporting bugs...it's a waste of time. The "beta" build we're playing is outdated by as little as several weeks and as much as several months(when was Gamescomm?). And I've heard that they've fixed around 200+ bugs in their release build from what I've read. I don't know if that's true, but given that they did this exact same thing with BC2 I would believe that it is.

So if it was meant to be an actual beta test then it fails because we're playing an outdated version of the game. And if it's meant to be a demo it fails because it was so buggy it was giving a lot of people bad impressions from the game. Although it's much better after they sent the terrain glitch hotfix out to server providers.

So yeah, it's like you said, you'd think they would have learned how to do it by now.. I don't think this game will have nearly the fallout that MoH did, but certainly some people will choose not to buy the game because of this beta demo.

The thing is, even if we're supposed to be reporting bugs...it's a waste of time. The "beta" build we're playing is outdated by as little as several weeks and as much as several months(when was Gamescomm?). And I've heard that they've fixed around 200+ bugs in their release build from what I've read. I don't know if that's true, but given that they did this exact same thing with BC2 I would believe that it is.

So if it was meant to be an actual beta test then it fails because we're playing an outdated version. And if it's meant to be a demo it fails because it was so buggy it was giving a lot of people bad impressions from the game. Although it's much better after they sent the terrain glitch hotfix out to server providers.

They mainly need to test the servers, the backend, the leveling system, and battlelog. The beta is less about the client and more about the new stuff battlelog introduces. How are people not seeing this?

They mainly need to test the servers, the backend, the leveling system, and battlelog. The beta is less about the client and more about the new stuff battlelog introduces. How are people not seeing this?

That may be true, but nowhere is that stated. Nowhere have they said "we need feedback on the battlelog, leveling systems, and servers". It's just here's the beta, post on the battlelog forum, have fun.

And even still, as we saw in BC2, server stability and latency problems can change from patch to patch, so if we're not playing the latest version of the game it's still kind of pointless to give feedback on things that will definitely change after release.

I'm having fun playing, but I really don't get what they're after with this beta thingy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!