Recommended Posts

I understand this is the beta but holy crap on the map glitches/clipping (PS3 version). A lot of players are taking advantage of this bug and camp under the map. I've been killed this way so many times, especially near the A m-com.

As for teammates playing CoD style, very true. Last game I was in, there were so many running around trying to find enemies to kill that it left holes in defense to let them through. Hopefully the experience will be better if my friends were on at the same time.

I have been in games from both sides, one where everybody backed everybody else up (on a PS3 with no mics) and we ran through metro it was seemed like 5 mins.

Then later that night a team full of deserters, in a 12x12 game I could only see me and two others defending.

Still on the fence I have it pre-ordered and just hope they make it a bit harder to kill people, I am killing way to many people compared to my BF2 days and I am worried I am getting a "unload the full mag" syndrome.

there is a suppresor for lens flare if you preorder you get it apperently, dunno about later buyers

Flash suppressor is a barrel attachment that just reduces the flash when you fire the gun. Not flash from other peoples lights. And I know it was a hot topic before because people thought those things would be exclusive to that pack but every other gun in the game has all the same exact attachments.

How you get invited to Caspian Border? I really want to play that one.

You can't anymore. They shut all the servers hosting that map down.

Also, WTF is with this crap falling under the map. I thought they fixed that?? I was just in a map and I kept sinking down just standing there.

I like the lens flare, though, it does need adjusting as it's very bright in very dark places which is unusual. The tactical flashlight is annoying if many of your team mates have it as they like to look at you and blind you, haha. Really wanted to play the other map but disappointed they shut down the servers before anyone really had a good go at it. :(

Anyone?

My brother gets random crashes while playing BF3. He's using the beta drivers from ATI though he hasn't figured out what the problem is on his side. I do think that it might be the drivers though.

Ok, can not get this game to play more than 10 min without freezing up. Did a complete re-install of Windows. Loaded the bare minimum to play this game still the same. Have no issues any other games.

Win7 64bit, i7 920, XFX Ati 5850 black edition 6 gb ram. I tried the beta drivers and release drivers from Ati no change. Any ideas?

You know it really needs to be said...

DICE and EA really, really dropped the ball here with this Beta.

All this talk of going head to head with MW3, and they release a Beta that has way, way to many issues (granted I did not see many with my brief time playing it, but obviously plenty of people did).

It literally is dumbfounding to me.

They have been in this game long enough to know gamers are among the most fickle consumers out there, and first impressions mean everything.

People no longer take the word Beta for what it is meant to represent. In their eyes, this is a representation of the final product.

So they have really, really hurt themselves with this Beta. They truly have.

Ultimately it is no real skin off my back, I am going to play the game and enjoy it regardless, but they should have known better. Really is as simple as that.

Most of the issues happening in the beta have already been fixed. I'm working with http://battlefieldo.com and we've had several chances to speak on TeamSpeak and in-game with zh1nt0 and some DICE developers, due to their interest in playing with the community on their free time. You guys are making a big deal out of the beta, which it initially is/was a month old beta build.

Most of the issues happening in the beta have already been fixed. I'm working with http://battlefieldo.com and we've had several chances to speak on TeamSpeak and in-game with zh1nt0 and some DICE developers, due to their interest in playing with the community on their free time. You guys are making a big deal out of the beta, which it initially is/was a month old beta build.

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

  • Like 2

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

(Y)

Started the Battlefield Veterans Platoon. Gonna invite some friends but I like the social aspect of it.. Emblem editor is cool. You can do some cool stuff (nothing super complex) but it works ok.

http://www.bozzified...ts/060422e1.png

That's a pretty cool image. Did you make it yourself? Also, I sent an application to that platoon. (Y)

Anyway, people shouldn't join the servers with more than 32 slots. See here:

We are aware that a number of servers have appeared and are running game modes and player counts that have not currently been seen. Please try to remain on official servers.

Official servers run the following configuration

Max Players: 32

Map: Operation Metro

Mode: RUSH

Please avoid temptation and remain on these official servers while we work to have these servers dealt with.

Playing on those servers can cause your account to become compromised, stats to be altered or other issues to arise which may lead to having your account banned by EA.

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2826564925948154637/

If this is a month old then why are we playing it and why is EA sending me emails asking for my Feedback?

QMqOF.png

EA and DICE just jerking us around? - Hey we want your feedback, oh everything you say is irrelevant as we've already fixed all your complaints and you're playing a month old copy of the game. This just makes me p***ed off.

This isn't a beta this is a glorified demo. And a poor one at that.

You are making ridiculous assumptions. Just because the build is a month old does not mean all feedback is irrelevant...

You really think they'd release a demo where everyone falls through the ground? What DICE is trying to say, and what people refuse to understand is a beta build is NOT representative of the final. Of course bugs are fixed between the beta and final build.

You know it really needs to be said...

DICE and EA really, really dropped the ball here with this Beta.

All this talk of going head to head with MW3, and they release a Beta that has way, way to many issues (granted I did not see many with my brief time playing it, but obviously plenty of people did).

It literally is dumbfounding to me.

They have been in this game long enough to know gamers are among the most fickle consumers out there, and first impressions mean everything.

People no longer take the word Beta for what it is meant to represent. In their eyes, this is a representation of the final product.

So they have really, really hurt themselves with this Beta. They truly have.

Ultimately it is no real skin off my back, I am going to play the game and enjoy it regardless, but they should have known better. Really is as simple as that.

The thing is, even if we're supposed to be reporting bugs...it's a waste of time. The "beta" build we're playing is outdated by as little as several weeks and as much as several months(when was Gamescomm?). And I've heard that they've fixed around 200+ bugs in their release build from what I've read. I don't know if that's true, but given that they did this exact same thing with BC2 I would believe that it is.

So if it was meant to be an actual beta test then it fails because we're playing an outdated version of the game. And if it's meant to be a demo it fails because it was so buggy it was giving a lot of people bad impressions from the game. Although it's much better after they sent the terrain glitch hotfix out to server providers.

So yeah, it's like you said, you'd think they would have learned how to do it by now.. I don't think this game will have nearly the fallout that MoH did, but certainly some people will choose not to buy the game because of this beta demo.

The thing is, even if we're supposed to be reporting bugs...it's a waste of time. The "beta" build we're playing is outdated by as little as several weeks and as much as several months(when was Gamescomm?). And I've heard that they've fixed around 200+ bugs in their release build from what I've read. I don't know if that's true, but given that they did this exact same thing with BC2 I would believe that it is.

So if it was meant to be an actual beta test then it fails because we're playing an outdated version. And if it's meant to be a demo it fails because it was so buggy it was giving a lot of people bad impressions from the game. Although it's much better after they sent the terrain glitch hotfix out to server providers.

They mainly need to test the servers, the backend, the leveling system, and battlelog. The beta is less about the client and more about the new stuff battlelog introduces. How are people not seeing this?

They mainly need to test the servers, the backend, the leveling system, and battlelog. The beta is less about the client and more about the new stuff battlelog introduces. How are people not seeing this?

That may be true, but nowhere is that stated. Nowhere have they said "we need feedback on the battlelog, leveling systems, and servers". It's just here's the beta, post on the battlelog forum, have fun.

And even still, as we saw in BC2, server stability and latency problems can change from patch to patch, so if we're not playing the latest version of the game it's still kind of pointless to give feedback on things that will definitely change after release.

I'm having fun playing, but I really don't get what they're after with this beta thingy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!