Recommended Posts

I think I've seen it all now. There's a thread on bottlelog about someone complaining because people are too good at the game and they're upset because they're only average.

Also bottlelog will be down until release once the beta ends, too.

yeah!!!! the beta is officially over.... no battle log either

oh well :( i will be back on the 25th!!!!!

Meh. Even though my new graphics card makes my PC uber l337's and all that, meh. Caspian Border was pretty fun, but my lord was the game buggy. And laggy at times. But, it was a 3+ week old build so with any luck the retail release will be way better. And the changes they are making for retail do indicate that DICE is at least listening to us. I just wish Battlelog would die a horrible death.

Meh. Even though my new graphics card makes my PC uber l337's and all that, meh. Caspian Border was pretty fun, but my lord was the game buggy. And laggy at times. But, it was a 3+ week old build so with any luck the retail release will be way better. And the changes they are making for retail do indicate that DICE is at least listening to us. I just wish Battlelog would die a horrible death.

Try 3 month old build, that's a bit closer to how old the beta we were playing was. I have no source but last week I read somewhere that they've said among various other improvements to the game they've fixed around 200 bugs give or take that were present in the beta.

One thing I don't like about the beta is the fact about 5-7 people on caspian would just line up for a jet, not even bothered to help with the flags... :( Jets seem to be the end all be all in this great game... :(

Exactly why I won't be playing Conquest. I much prefer Rush.
Meh. Even though my new graphics card makes my PC uber l337's and all that, meh. Caspian Border was pretty fun, but my lord was the game buggy. And laggy at times. But, it was a 3+ week old build so with any luck the retail release will be way better. And the changes they are making for retail do indicate that DICE is at least listening to us. I just wish Battlelog would die a horrible death.
I'll think you'll find that a lot of the lagging was down underpowered servers running a 64 player game. They just couldn't handle the load.

All I can say I hope there's more weapons to be added either at release or over time. This isn't including the BF2 expansion weapons either.

One thing that would have gone down a treat in BF3 was soldier customizations like in play 4 free. Changing the gear/appearance of soldier along with weapons. This "10 unique" unlocks for each weapon is rubbish all it is is unlocking all the scopes for single weapon and not like you can attach a PSO easily to an M4 (realism, even just a little bit anyone ?) or a suppressor on a minimi or even having a muzzle flash suppressor as an unlock when nearly all guns have them anyway no matter what.

I seriously would have volunteered to offer military advisory assistance just to not see them make a damn mess of the game features. This has turned out about realistic as bad company which isn't a good thing even BF2 has more realism in it. At the end of the day they've branched out too much and spread too thin to actually evolve on what they had. Instead of working on what made the battlefield franchise popular and loved they instead tried too many different or new things and have lost focus badly for sake of pulling a few new 13 year old screechy call of duty kids on sales.

The maps are too small. There's not enough weapons. There's too much repetitiveness in everything and overt rubbish unnecessary balancing to the point where the game's just stupid in so many areas. I for one would take bf2's engine netcode and gaming back over this any day heck even play 4 free has more interesting features then most of this after trying it.

A new engine doesn't mean anything unless you put something new in it. Imo, looks like we're looking at another medal of honor screw up due to too many crap decisions unfortunately.

All I can say I hope there's more weapons to be added either at release or over time. This isn't including the BF2 expansion weapons either.

One thing that would have gone down a treat in BF3 was soldier customizations like in play 4 free. Changing the gear/appearance of soldier along with weapons. This "10 unique" unlocks for each weapon is rubbish all it is is unlocking all the scopes for single weapon and not like you can attach a PSO easily to an M4 (realism, even just a little bit anyone ?) or a suppressor on a minimi or even having a muzzle flash suppressor as an unlock when nearly all guns have them anyway no matter what.

I seriously would have volunteered to offer military advisory assistance just to not see them make a damn mess of the game features. This has turned out about realistic as bad company which isn't a good thing even BF2 has more realism in it. At the end of the day they've branched out too much and spread too thin to actually evolve on what they had. Instead of working on what made the battlefield franchise popular and loved they instead tried too many different or new things and have lost focus badly for sake of pulling a few new 13 year old screechy call of duty kids on sales.

The maps are too small. There's not enough weapons. There's too much repetitiveness in everything and overt rubbish unnecessary balancing to the point where the game's just stupid in so many areas. I for one would take bf2's engine netcode and gaming back over this any day heck even play 4 free has more interesting features then most of this after trying it.

A new engine doesn't mean anything unless you put something new in it. Imo, looks like we're looking at another medal of honor screw up due to too many crap decisions unfortunately.

The beta did not have all the weapons that will be in the final game...

And IMO the maps aren't all "too small". Caspian was pretty large, and one of the other new maps they showed (operation firestorm) looked awesome as well. I had a lot of fun playing caspian border. This is nothing close to the failure that was medal of honor, its an absurd comparison.

One thing that bugged me, is that i couldn't seem to find any gun stats like there was for BC2, where it would show you Damage/Rate of fire/accuracy etc, during the beta i was just going on my BC2 experience, where the m416 and the AN94 were the most powerful assult rifles but have no idea if they've changed the stats on them in this game or if there are better ones

One thing that bugged me, is that i couldn't seem to find any gun stats like there was for BC2, where it would show you Damage/Rate of fire/accuracy etc, during the beta i was just going on my BC2 experience, where the m416 and the AN94 were the most powerful assult rifles but have no idea if they've changed the stats on them in this game or if there are better ones

Might be because they hadn't yet finalized the weapon characteristics for the time of beta. They will probably still tweak them now with all the feedback etc.

One thing that bugged me, is that i couldn't seem to find any gun stats like there was for BC2, where it would show you Damage/Rate of fire/accuracy etc, during the beta i was just going on my BC2 experience, where the m416 and the AN94 were the most powerful assult rifles but have no idea if they've changed the stats on them in this game or if there are better ones

I'm gonna go ahead and assume they did that on purpose. In BC2 the bars for various guns didn't actually represent their stats and people bitched a lot about them.

I like it this way better. Use what suits you instead of going by what's the "best". Which is what I think they are going for.

The beta did not have all the weapons that will be in the final game...

And IMO the maps aren't all "too small". Caspian was pretty large, and one of the other new maps they showed (operation firestorm) looked awesome as well. I had a lot of fun playing caspian border. This is nothing close to the failure that was medal of honor, its an absurd comparison.

I hope so...

As for maps... it took me 3-4 minutes to run from US spawn to Russian spawn in Caspian without enemy interference. By comparison Even on small BF2 vanilla map like Muttrah city or strike at karkand it'll take you about 6-10 minutes without taking shortcuts... Larger maps up to 15-20 minutes. On BF2 mods like PR which push bf2 engine map limits to the max like kashan desert it'll take you nearly 30 minutes. So if that's not small by comparison then I don't know what is.

Sure there's a lot of visual dead space as in those firestorm videos from the air barely any of it can be used by anything but aircaft cause of small boundaries.

I actually can't believe there are ANY complaints ... BF3 is insane! Beta ... BETA! For crying out loud ... it's fun, it's pretty solid (sure, it's got bugs but man, you ever worked on a game? I have ... lots of them ... and this is triple A). But for the most part, awesome. Large environments without becoming boring and full of wandering. The squad system is far simpler but just as good ... you don't have to navigate menus now. You just set up a squad in the main window. Brilliant. Sure, it ain't working properly in the beta, but again, it's a beta, so fair play. The system itself tho, from a design perspective is brilliant.

I can't fault the game. Sure, I get peeved if someone shoots me when they were facing the opposite direction, and I wish it had hardcore mode, instead of the normal baby mode. But it's a great beta and is free. FREE.

(Note: One thing I HATE about BF, is the MW style playing. It's a team game. You know what? I couldn't care less what score I get ... and I'm not a bad player... I just care if the team wins. Too many people are off shooting enemies when they should be working as a team to get the win).

I hope so...

As for maps... it took me 3-4 minutes to run from US spawn to Russian spawn in Caspian without enemy interference. By comparison Even on small BF2 vanilla map like Muttrah city or strike at karkand it'll take you about 6-10 minutes without taking shortcuts... Larger maps up to 15-20 minutes. On BF2 mods like PR which push bf2 engine map limits to the max like kashan desert it'll take you nearly 30 minutes. So if that's not small by comparison then I don't know what is.

Sure there's a lot of visual dead space as in those firestorm videos from the air barely any of it can be used by anything but aircaft cause of small boundaries.

Battlefield 2 didn't have unlimited sprint though...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!