Recommended Posts

For anyone with a 32bit Vista/7 and constant "BF3 has stopped working" errors in multiplayer caused by module: bf3.exe, do this:

1) Open a CMD

2) Enter: bcdedit /set increaseuserva 2500

3) Reboot!

This tweak should be completely harmless it just increases the virtual address space to 2.5GB as opposed to 2GB default on a 32bit OS, credit for this goes to striker475, the original Battlog topic: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2832654489420350764/

Well, I loved the following single players :

Bad Company

Bad Company 2

Modern Warfare

Modern Warfare 2

MOH

(all on pS3)

And I'm excited for this too :) Just because it's not 100% perfect, I guarantee you it's not 's**t' like some idiots here are saying. God, it's like you lot have made a f**king video game of this quality before and think you're amazing at it.

Sorry guys, but I'm looking forward to SP as much as MP :) Maybe I have lower expectations ... or perhaps I have more realistic ones?

Well, I loved the following single players :

Bad Company

Bad Company 2

Modern Warfare

Modern Warfare 2

MOH

(all on pS3)

And I'm excited for this too :) Just because it's not 100% perfect, I guarantee you it's not 's**t' like some idiots here are saying. God, it's like you lot have made a f**king video game of this quality before and think you're amazing at it.

Sorry guys, but I'm looking forward to SP as much as MP :) Maybe I have lower expectations ... or perhaps I have more realistic ones?

100% Agreed!

Great. So I just got the game and installed it from the DVD in Origin. Was all fine and activated.. Then I try to play the game and it then tells me that it failed to activate >_< The only thing I changed was my Origin name after the install of BF3 :/

Edit: So the authentication servers apparently are down.

472MB day 1 patch for PC :o

better then the mandatory 2 gigs you would have to download for BC2 for every patch...

Sorry guys, but I'm looking forward to SP as much as MP :) Maybe I have lower expectations ... or perhaps I have more realistic ones?

lower expectations. how anyone calls this good must have crappy standards. it's effin easy to. AI is dumb as ****. (only gone half way through, but effin stupid AI). none what they do makes sense. they just fire at you praying they can cut through your cover...

What a pile of **** orrible is, first the damn thing cant even update itself, which steam has done for years, it tells you that you have to download another installer in order to update. then when updated/reinstalled the friggin activation servers are offline. **** Off EA and your crappy servers and crappy pretend steam client. Ass Holes. Why the **** did I buy this game.

For anyone with a 32bit Vista/7 and constant "BF3 has stopped working" errors in multiplayer caused by module: bf3.exe, do this:

1) Open a CMD

2) Enter: bcdedit /set increaseuserva 2500

3) Reboot!

This tweak should be completely harmless it just increases the virtual address space to 2.5GB as opposed to 2GB default on a 32bit OS, credit for this goes to striker475, the original Battlog topic: http://battlelog.bat...54489420350764/

I keep getting 'You were disconnected from login server'.

Will this help?

What a pile of **** orrible is, first the damn thing cant even update itself, which steam has done for years, it tells you that you have to download another installer in order to update. then when updated/reinstalled the friggin activation servers are offline. **** Off EA and your crappy servers and crappy pretend steam client. Ass Holes. Why the **** did I buy this game.

Want some cheese with that whine?

What a pile of **** orrible is, first the damn thing cant even update itself, which steam has done for years, it tells you that you have to download another installer in order to update. then when updated/reinstalled the friggin activation servers are offline. **** Off EA and your crappy servers and crappy pretend steam client. Ass Holes. Why the **** did I buy this game.

Relax dude, they are having issues .. **** happens.

Personally I haven't had any problems, guess i'm lucky

Is it just me or the SP mode its just way too short! If you played continuously for 3hrs you can easily finished it. I'm quite disappointed but nevertheless the game looks good and the story is alright. If you want a bit of challenge then go for Hard settings otherwise you'll be going through the game like a sharp knife through butter.

For those having issue activating it in origin so you are unable to install it, go to https://activate.ea.com/ and activate it there, jsut put in product key and login details (will take a few min to open up the page) then close origin and open it back up, BF3 should now be there, so you can now either download it or install it from the disc (which im doing now)

This wont allow you to play it online though as it will need activating again after the patch i think

is any having issues with the CD key in the LE version from a SHOP. Ive read reports that people have bought the LE version and when they enter in their CDKEY its just the normal version. (Receiving standard key in BF3 Limited Edition packaging). And when contacting EA they are telling people to contact the shop you bought it from cause its not there fault!

source

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!