Recommended Posts

An open letter to the Battlefield development team.

Let me start off by saying I am happy to see that PC gaming is still alive and well. I was overcome with joy when I found out Battlefield was being developed for the PC first, and consoles second. It's one thing that has been missing from gaming for a while now. With that said, Battlefield 3 is nothing short but disappointing. It's incomplete. It's buggy. It's broken. I wanted to take this opportunity to list some things that I have noticed about this game since I first bought it.

First of all, gameplay. There's many things I like, but there are many more that I don't. First of all is the ranking system. This is one thing BF2 never had, and one thing I was happy to see, but the way it is implemented is ruining the game. Battlefield has always been a game that has focused on teamwork. If you didn't work with your team, your team lost, plain and simple. With Battlefield 3, the emphasis is on ranking up. This unfortunately means you will have players that are only interested in the almighty kill, and will stop at nothing to achieve that goal. They're playing for themselves, and themselves only. If you get in their way, they are not afraid to teamkill you in order to rank up. The ranking system also creates lopsided matches between teams, especially when vehicles are involved. Not sure why vehicles have ranks, but here a lot of higher ranking players take advantage of lower ranking players and really prevent them from doing anything. After all the basic starter jets are no match for the ones carrying heat seekers and jamming systems. In BF2, vehicle gameplay was based off skill, and wit. Not exactly "realistic", but it created a balance to the force.

Continuing on, in BF2, each team had a VoIP system that allowed free and open chat between players, and a commander's position to lead the team. Those things are both missing from BF3. Frankly speaking, VoIP should have been front and center in the development process, it's an essential service to ANY first person shooters. There is simply no reason why this shouldn't have been included in BF3. Without this, there is no team! Only a loose collection of players running around without heads. PC players have been asking for this feature since the game's release, and so far have fallen on deaf ears.

It was for this reason alone, that I loved and still love playing Battlefield 2, however, I just cannot continue with Battlefield 3. The botched gameplay piled on top of numerous bugs and glitches that have gone unresolved has killed the game for me. It is my hope that the development team can some how pull off a miracle and update the game to incorporate all that that made Battlefield 2 fun to play and a huge success among gamers.

I wanna add more to this letter, but at the moment I'm a bit stuck.

With Battlefield 3, the emphasis is on ranking up. This unfortunately means you will have players that are only interested in the almighty kill, and will stop at nothing to achieve that goal.

There are players who only care about their K/D in games without ranking systems. Some people call them snipers :p I love Snipers clans in TF2 2Fort, its so easy to **** them off.

An open letter to the Battlefield development team.

They didn't include voip because they figured any one who was serious into team play would have their own vent/mumble/teamspeak/whatever server going and a group of friends to play with on a regular basis. Doesnt battlelog have voip as well? Pretty sure it does but I haven't tested it.

Also you mention tking which leads me to believe that you play hardcore.. which I think is a large part of your problem. Hardcore encourages people "play for kills", and I'll leave it at that.

They didn't include voip because they figured any one who was serious into team play would have their own vent/mumble/teamspeak/whatever server going and a group of friends to play with on a regular basis. Doesnt battlelog have voip as well? Pretty sure it does but I haven't tested it.

It does, but in-game VOIP would still be nice. I do a lot of pubbing on my own, and so in-squad communication is hard sometimes :(

It does, but in-game VOIP would still be nice. I do a lot of pubbing on my own, and so in-squad communication is hard sometimes :(

I understand that. But it never worked right if it worked at all in previous games so they just decided to scrap it altogether from what I remember reading and my experience with it as well.

I understand that. But it never worked right if it worked at all in previous games so they just decided to scrap it altogether from what I remember reading and my experience with it as well.

Yeah that's what I heard too. If it's true, I can see why they removed it, and in all fairness, I don't miss it particularly often, it certainly isnt the zomgwtfbbq problem that everyone made it out to be when we first found out.

Why is that you need a highend machine in order for the graphics to look at clear as the ones in Modern Warfare 3?

What? MW3? Graphics not even comparable...

Frostbite 2.0 is a modern engine, MW3's engine is God only knows how old now? Older than dirt?

  • Like 1

Why is that you need a highend machine in order for the graphics to look at clear as the ones in Modern Warfare 3?

Modern Warfare 3 has a 3 or 4 year old engine, which looked good back in the original Moder Warfare' days.

Frosbite 2, the one that Battlefield 3 is running on, is a new one, and it is designed to be demanding, just like CryEngine 2.0. And 3.0?

They didn't include voip because they figured any one who was serious into team play would have their own vent/mumble/teamspeak/whatever server going and a group of friends to play with on a regular basis. Doesnt battlelog have voip as well? Pretty sure it does but I haven't tested it.

Also you mention tking which leads me to believe that you play hardcore.. which I think is a large part of your problem. Hardcore encourages people "play for kills", and I'll leave it at that.

Agreed, Hardcore is asking for a TK in BF3...I like HC as a game mode...but with all the newer CoD style players its not worth the hassle...

The last kills with M60E4 were awesome

+1

Impressive gameplay with a variety of guns and jets.

I like the no scope whilst parachuting in, that was cool. Anyone have any ideas what the name of the song is called? I can't see the comments from work and soundhound doesn't pick anything up.

I like the no scope whilst parachuting in, that was cool. Anyone have any ideas what the name of the song is called? I can't see the comments from work and soundhound doesn't pick anything up.

Make Me Worse (Muzzy Remix) by Kings of the City, was the top comment.

http://mp1st.com/201...-patch-details/

http://blogs.battlef...p-fix-now-live/

Apparently the ps3 version received a patch this morning, ps3 owners will be happy to hear they are still working on the input lag issues. Also contains some info on adjusting medals/ribbons and a few other tid bits of information about changes in an upcoming patch (tonight???).

This is cool too, what BF3 might look like during winter:

http://mp1st.com/201...-during-winter/

And last but not least there is this, Better Battleblog plugin for Firefox and Chrome:

http://better-battle...brainnrg.at/en/

I'm not sure I want to try it out but it looks really interesting. They are saying some dice devs have tried it out so I don't think anyone will get banned for using it but I'll wait until there is an official word on it.

That wasn't a hard find. At all.

Maybe not on the PC but on the 360 its impossible..it seems as though its on 1 map (Gulf) and only on 1 of the 3 variants of that map, just the large one, not the 2 smaller...and it never seems to comes up.

Don't know about consoles, obviously. :laugh:

On PC, in full Conquest Assault, on Gulf of Oman, there are three of them, as far as I think. One on D, one on B and one on G or H maybe

G and H! What is this madness lol.

Console has like 2 map varients that go to E rest are only A-C and of the ones with E you end up with the A-C versions 95% of the time....I need my new graphics card badly!

but yeah on Gulf we get it at RU spawn and D (construction site) when RU hold it, if the US holds it you get a LAV.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!