D90 and D500 owners look here


Recommended Posts

Good deal, thanks for the heads up!

2 questions though.

1, what will this change?

2, how do I install it? :p

1. I am not ENTIRELY sure... it's supposed to help with distortion somehow... it was just released yesterday so I am going to wait a week to see what people on the web say!!

2. follow this: http://nikonimglib.com/dcdata/manual/En/lensprofile_win_en_ABF.html

Edit: I did install it myself just 10 minutes ago, but I haven't seen any differences, but I only shot like two pics in my bedroom....

here is a quote I found: "The Distortion Control Data firmware upgrade is available for Nikon D90 and D5000 cameras only. This is used to correct barrel and pincushion distortion during shooting and editing.”

I was hoping for a significant update... but I guess there won't ever be one as the D90 is almost phased out.... although idk what they could possibly improve over a firmware update :p

Whaaaaaat?! It better not! I just got mine a few months ago. :(

... lol what difference does it make if it's "phased out" or not? :p I didn't think it was a big deal... doesn't that just mean there is a replacement and you can no longer buy it?

You already have one, so who cares if its gone? :p

Isn't the D7000 it's replacement? Which means that, since it's replacement is out it should be discontinued shortly?

Edit: I guess technically the D7000 didn't replace it seeing as there is still three cameras in the Advanced category... But it's almost at the three year mark, so it will probably be replaced this coming August

ZOMG yet they can't upgrade the video at all :/

Whaaaaaat?! It better not! I just got mine a few months ago. :(

Way to pay attention to product life cycles... lol D90's been around since mid 2008.

And what remus said, who cares if you like it? I've had it since launch and I'm still fairly happy w/ it :)

ZOMG yet they can't upgrade the video at all :/

The whole "rolling stutter" thing I read way back when that it was HIGHLY unlikely (if even possible) that they'd upgrade the video... that's one of the downsides to getting the first DSLR that supported "HD" video, I didn't buy it for that anyway so doesn't bother me TOO much, would be nice though, as I have taken a few short clips here and there

Edit: I guess technically the D7000 didn't replace it seeing as there is still three cameras in the Advanced category... But it's almost at the three year mark, so it will probably be replaced this coming August

Good things dont get outdated :D

Anyway this update process looks difficult, and since i have no probs with current firmware i guess i will just stick with it :p

Good things dont get outdated :D

Anyway this update process looks difficult, and since i have no probs with current firmware i guess i will just stick with it :p

lol yeah, it's not necessary... but it's insanely easy to do? literally took me 30 seconds LOL...

All you do is download it... extract it... then copy the one file to your memory card... then go to "firmware" in the camera then click "update" done.

The step-by-step guide is just extremely tedious and makes it seem like it takes longer than it does, I didn't even need it, figured it out quickly, it's just for those who NEED to know step by step... e.g. right click here. lol

The whole "rolling stutter" thing I read way back when that it was HIGHLY unlikely (if even possible) that they'd upgrade the video... that's one of the downsides to getting the first DSLR that supported "HD" video, I didn't buy it for that anyway so doesn't bother me TOO much, would be nice though, as I have taken a few short clips here and there

Well there's that too, but I was also thinking how hard was it to upgrade to 1080 and something other than 24fps? Is that really limited by hardware or what?

Well there's that too, but I was also thinking how hard was it to upgrade to 1080 and something other than 24fps? Is that really limited by hardware or what?

TBH idk, it might be? Maybe the sensor just wasn't designed for that...but even if it was, I doubt they would do it at this stage of the game, if you want 1080p (and by you I mean consumers) your gonna have to buy their D7000 or other new model. D90 is old news, they are just focusing on the new and upcoming models.

Well there's that too, but I was also thinking how hard was it to upgrade to 1080 and something other than 24fps? Is that really limited by hardware or what?

Yeah it is. Apparently Expeed 1 wasn't up to the task of 1080, where as the new expeed2 in the d7000 is a lot faster.

So the D7000 is worthy of purchasing? I currently have a D40 but looking for something with additional features and preferably got HD video.. looked at the D3100 not too keen on that. Want something thats a worthy upgrade, more semi-pro.

So the D7000 is worthy of purchasing? I currently have a D40 but looking for something with additional features and preferably got HD video.. looked at the D3100 not too keen on that. Want something thats a worthy upgrade, more semi-pro.

The D7000 is apparently one of the best cameras Nikon has released in quite some time. It is currently second only to the Pentax K-5 in image quality (in APS-C cameras and by a close margin, the Sony A580 is third, also by a close margin).

So the D7000 is worthy of purchasing? I currently have a D40 but looking for something with additional features and preferably got HD video.. looked at the D3100 not too keen on that. Want something thats a worthy upgrade, more semi-pro.

yeah, the 3100 is just a newer version of your 40. the 5000 (5100?) would be a slight upgrade with some nice features) but I'd definately suggest the 7000 if you can afford it. I have a 90 myself, and I went from a D40.

yeah, the 3100 is just a newer version of your 40. the 5000 (5100?) would be a slight upgrade with some nice features) but I'd definately suggest the 7000 if you can afford it. I have a 90 myself, and I went from a D40.

Sweet so I know not to bother with the 3100.. I am stuck between D90 and D7000. One costs more but is far superior feature/technology wise. On the other hand D90 a massive upgrade from the basic D40 which I feel very limited by now. Oh what to dooooo! If I can get a cheap D90 body I will stick with that!!

a cheap D90 is still a great camera, sure the 7000 is better, but I'm not sure I'd say it's that much better it warrants the price difference.

unless you're really going to use it for filming, but you're not, cause no matter how good the DSLR's are at filming they're still horrible to use for it, at least without buying a shoulder frame that costs even more than the camera. and besides the D90 can, unlike what the haters say, make some really nice film, as long as it's no dark you won't even see the rolling shutter.

yeah, the 3100 is just a newer version of your 40. the 5000 (5100?) would be a slight upgrade with some nice features) but I'd definately suggest the 7000 if you can afford it. I have a 90 myself, and I went from a D40.

Isn't the Image quality in the D3100 a significant upgrade from the D3000 (which was like a D60 and slightly better than a D40)?

not sure about the 3000, and it depends on what you mean by image quality.

the sensor generally gets better. the D40 also had an upgrade, they did a significan't sensor resolution upgrade for the D40x, and the 3000 I believe replaced both the 40 and 60, thoguh arguably the 5000 is the 60 replacement.

not sure about the 3000, and it depends on what you mean by image quality.

the sensor generally gets better. the D40 also had an upgrade, they did a significan't sensor resolution upgrade for the D40x, and the 3000 I believe replaced both the 40 and 60, thoguh arguably the 5000 is the 60 replacement.

Well, yes, the D5000 took the D60's position on the market, however the D3000 was basically a re-badged D60 aimed at the entry-level market.

On the D3100 they moved from a CCD to a CMOS sensor and made other improvements as well.

Well, yes, the D5000 took the D60's position on the market, however the D3000 was basically a re-badged D60 aimed at the entry-level market.

On the D3100 they moved from a CCD to a CMOS sensor and made other improvements as well.

I have done a comparison on DP Review between the D90 & D7000. Seems the only significant differences I can see stat wise are:

D7000:

Higher Megapixels

Higher ISO Limit upto 25,600 with Boost

Newer focus system - Nikon Multi-CAM4800 DX

39 focus points compared to 11

Advanced metering

Newer battery

6fps

Thats all I can see from the comparison, would anyone say this is worth the extra cash? Oh of course there is some aesthetic changes to the camera also. I need a cheap D90.. looks like I have to spend at least £450 just for a body! Need a second hand one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!