Recommended Posts

Loving this addon :D, great work!

One request though; currently it doesn't seem possible to recolour/add transparency to the the bookmarks bar, and therefore it's stuck in the default blue/grey colour, unless I'm being stupid that is :cry: ?

There currently isn't an option for that, yet. We plan to add an option to color the active tab and nav-bar. We will probably link all three together, along with any additional toolbars.

Anyone got this tiny issue using the Stratiform style?

issue1.png

Notice that under the Gmail tab there is an extra pixel line compared to the other tabs? This line only appears if you leave the gmail tab open and a new mail comes in so the heading shows (1) or however many emails you have etc. If you then click on the tab and then click away to another tab the line goes away. Only comes back if another mail comes in thus updating the tab title .

Anyone got this tiny issue using the Stratiform style?

Notice that under the Gmail tab there is an extra pixel line compared to the other tabs? This line only appears if you leave the gmail tab open and a new mail comes in so the heading shows (1) or however many emails you have etc. If you then click on the tab and then click away to another tab the line goes away. Only comes back if another mail comes in thus updating the tab title .

Ah crap. Yea that's a bug. I'll have it fixed in the next release.

Thanks for all the positive feedback guys!

idea for next version, you should add an option for the app menu button to be transparent when the window is inactive, i liked when the button used to do that :)

That's not a bad idea. We're currently not adding anymore options into 1.1, but we may add it in a future version.

1.1

Changes from 1.1beta:

Added Polish language thanks to Micha? Morawski (moras86)

Fixed back-button not clipping properly with PersonalToolbar shown

Fixed missing back icon if back-button was placed in TabsToolbar

Fixed padding on star-button if placed on the left of the urlbar

Fixed 'titlechanged' on inactive tabs

Fixed active tab coloring on some Windows themes

Fixed two go buttons showing for IE9 text-field style

Fixed Strata40 (squared) not having squared tabs-bottom

Fixed some issues with Wave tab style with combined buttons (eg zoom buttons)

Updated Wave pressed glyph image

Updated some translations

Download

  • Like 2

This is an excellent addon, really polished indeed. I wish more were like this one...

There's a couple of things that bug me though, maybe this is just me nitpicking but I'm easily annoyed with the little details lol:

  • There's a top margin of 1 or 2 pixels between the tabs and the screen border (when firefox window is maximized with taps on top) without the Stratiform. With it, that breathing space is gone, looks weird, bug or feature?
  • I hate the fact that you added a "Stratiform Options..." menu item to "Firefox Menu ? Options". It would be great if an option to show/hide that menu item could be added.
  • Now this one is really nitpicking... The Stratiform icon size doesn't seem to conform with every other addon icon. It's just way to big compared to every other addon (look in the Add-ons Manager)

That's it. Yeah, I know, the last one is really nitpicking, but if the other two could be "fixed" for the next version, it would be great. I have temporarily fixed them with Stylish tweaks but it feels hacky and official options would be better.

Just my 2 cents.

This is an excellent addon, really polished indeed. I wish more were like this one...

There's a couple of things that bug me though, maybe this is just me nitpicking but I'm easily annoyed with the little details lol:

  • There's a top margin of 1 or 2 pixels between the tabs and the screen border (when firefox window is maximized with taps on top) without the Stratiform. With it, that breathing space is gone, looks weird, bug or feature?
  • I hate the fact that you added a "Stratiform Options..." menu item to "Firefox Menu ? Options". It would be great if an option to show/hide that menu item could be added.
  • Now this one is really nitpicking... The Stratiform icon size doesn't seem to conform with every other addon icon. It's just way to big compared to every other addon (look in the Add-ons Manager)

That's it. Yeah, I know, the last one is really nitpicking, but if the other two could be "fixed" for the next version, it would be great. I have temporarily fixed them with Stylish tweaks but it feels hacky and official options would be better.

Just my 2 cents.

1.) This may be an oversight on our part. We had to recreate the default tabs using CSS so that all our options could easily be applied to them.

2.) This seemed like the logical thing to do. One would expect some options to be placed there. I figured that would be another easy way to access our options tab.

3.) You have this backwards in fact. 48px is actually the standard for Firefox 4, however we're not seeing many developers supporting this.

1.) This may be an oversight on our part. We had to recreate the default tabs using CSS so that all our options could easily be applied to them.

2.) This seemed like the logical thing to do. One would expect some options to be placed there. I figured that would be another easy way to access our options tab.

3.) You have this backwards in fact. 48px is actually the standard for Firefox 4, however we're not seeing many developers supporting this.

1) Makes sense, maybe add the default breathing space or an option? It's up to you, but at least let it breathe lol.

2) That depends on the point of view. The same happened on previous Firefox versions with the Tools menu and look how that got really cluttered and unorganized. I like to keep my menus nice and tidy that's why I'm suggesting an option to add that menu option or not. I'm not suggesting to remove it entirely. But if we were to really discuss this I would say that I don't agree with every extension adding a menu item to access their options on that menu, all of them are easily accessible in the Addons Manager and I think it's enough. But of course, this is just my opinion.

It would be all fine if the Personal Menu extension would allow me to configure all the sub-menus, I wouldn't care less about which options extension developers add to the menus, as long as there's an easy way to enable/disable them instead of hacking through Stylish. For instance, taking the Tools menu as an example, I have that menu really tidy thanks to the Menu Editor extension. But neither of these 2 extensions allows to edit the menu items of split button sub-menus, which is a shame really cause they are great addons, maybe in the future.

3) I didn't know that. But it makes sense since Firefox 4 revamped the whole Addons Manager window. My experience tells me that when something like this changes on a product well established for a few years now, it will take ages for developers to adapt. On that note, the puzzle piece of a default extension without icon is not 48px either. But I understand your reasoning and I applaud you for keeping with the guidelines. If only more developers were like you...

Customizable colours for Tab > Tab Bar section would be cool. While I like the light grey colour of Strata40, it starts to go darker the further down it goes. For example; Bookmark bar under the address bar is difficult to read when used with a dark coloured desktop wallpaper.

Edit: added ss, light wallpaper background does make it look a lot better, but I dislike light wallpaper:

stratiform.png

Although this is not directly related to Stratiform, I'm gonna ask here anyway. How come we haven't seen any userstyle that changes the app button to look like the ones in the 3.7/4.0 mockups/like in Strata40? I find this very strange. Is it because the default button looks good or its just not possible?

  • Like 1

Although this is not directly related to Stratiform, I'm gonna ask here anyway. How come we haven't seen any userstyle that changes the app button to look like the ones in the 3.7/4.0 mockups/like in Strata40? I find this very strange. Is it because the default button looks good or its just not possible?

its possible it just takes lots of digging around in the neowin forums...use move app button extension plus usercripts and such.

Although this is not directly related to Stratiform, I'm gonna ask here anyway. How come we haven't seen any userstyle that changes the app button to look like the ones in the 3.7/4.0 mockups/like in Strata40? I find this very strange. Is it because the default button looks good or its just not possible?

Install following addon: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/movable-firefox-button/

And use the following stylish script:

For Strata40:

#appmenu-button {

-moz-transition-property: min-width, max-width, opacity, background-color !important;

-moz-transition-duration: .2s, .25s, .05s, .25s !important;

background-clip: padding-box !important;

border: 1px solid !important;

border-bottom: 0 !important;

margin-bottom: 0 !important;

-moz-border-top-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;

-moz-border-left-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.37) !important;

-moz-border-right-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.37) !important;

border-radius: 4.5px 4.5px 0 0 !important;

margin-top: 2px !important;

-moz-margin-end: 1px !important;

-moz-transform: translateY(-2px) !important;

box-shadow: 2px 0 2px -2px rgba(0,0,0,.25),

-2px 0 2px -2px rgba(0,0,0,.25),

0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.4) inset,

1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,.3) inset,

-1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,.3) inset !important;

}

For Strata40 (Square):

#appmenu-button {

-moz-transition-property: min-width, max-width, opacity, background-color !important;

-moz-transition-duration: .2s, .25s, .05s, .25s !important;

background-clip: padding-box !important;

border: 1px solid !important;

border-bottom: 0 !important;

margin-bottom: 0 !important;

-moz-border-top-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;

-moz-border-left-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.37) !important;

-moz-border-right-colors: rgba(0,0,0,.37) !important;

border-radius: 4.5px 4.5px 0 0 !important;

margin-top: 2px !important;

-moz-margin-end: 1px !important;

-moz-transform: translateY(-2px) !important;

box-shadow: 2px 0 2px -2px rgba(0,0,0,.25),

-2px 0 2px -2px rgba(0,0,0,.25),

0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.4) inset,

1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,.3) inset,

-1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,.3) inset !important;

border-radius: 0 !important;

}

For IE9:

#appmenu-button {

margin-top: 1px !important;

box-shadow: 0 5px 5px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.4) inset !important;

border: 1px solid rgba(96,96,96,.78) !important;

border-bottom: 0 !important;

margin-bottom: 1px !important;

border-radius: 0 !important;

}

For Wave:

#appmenu-button {

background-clip: padding-box !important;

margin-bottom: 1px !important;

margin-top: 1px !important;

border: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,0.3) !important;

border-bottom: 0 !important;

border-radius: 0 !important;

border-top-left-radius: 3px !important;

text-shadow: 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,0.3) !important;

box-shadow: 0 1px 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset,

1px 0 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset,

-1px 0 0 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.2) inset !important;

}

How it looks with Wave on my own firefox:

magic.png

  • Like 2

cleaned code a bit up ;P

link to cleaned up and combined code: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/4281191/appmenu-tab.css

That looks pretty good but I was just wondering. I actually quite like the way the App button looks now.

I thought it was a pretty good idea ;P

And it's not so hard to implent it in stratiform as option I think.

can we now have app button tweaks (in size , position etc) in stratiform ?

I think they can make a option to move it to tabbar and resizing is not so hard to do too but then I would only suggest to do width resizing.

  • 1 month later...

I think I have noticed a bug with the latest April 15th build of Stratiform. If I set my tab width and then later I go and drag a tab out of the window to make another window, the tab width resets itself to default and I then have to go and set it again in stratiform options.

I am unsure if it is just affecting just the recent nightlies, or all builds including stable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!