Sony Raids Hacker's Home; Hacker Shares All Known HV Info


Recommended Posts

It was Sony's fault for locking out GNU/Linux to begin with, thats what prompted the 'surge' of hackers that ramped up exploits of their own in order to unlock full access to the system.

Yeah, it's cause and effect. Sony locks out something that hackers and other computer-smart people want, hackers open it up for everyone anyway. The only way sony could stop it would be to unlock it again.

What do these guys (Geohot) expect when they parade around the internet like it's the front cover of a teen magazine?

You make threats, publicly publish sensitive information that's a major security threat and inflate your ego sky high whilst poking a bear with a stick, it's going to lash back, hard.

I have absolutely no sympathy at all, and the idea of even thinking about donating my hard earned money to these clowns is laughable.

At the end of the day are potential fines, jail time and carrying these court cases/charges on your record for your entire life really worth a little internet fame? People even suggesting Sony hire these fools is laughable, what trust could any company put in them? I don't just mean trust in the companies security, trust that they'll act like civil, responsible and mature employees.

They will destroy his life as they will finish off Geohot - and they both deserve it.

Hopefully Sony will sue and drain these guys to the point where they have barely enough money to eat and have to beg on the street.

You're a terrible human being.

Let's see.

Sony has a community of tens of millions of gamers who want to play games and not worry about hackers and, don't have any interest in running a useless linux on their PS3. Sony is tryign to protect these guys and give them a safe gamign enviroment where they don't have to worry about cheating. or people disablign their consoles

The hackers, are bringing cheapskates who don't pay for their games to the scene, people who can disable other people's consoles, and most improtantly they bring cheating.

now who do you think this 40+ millions of gamers dislike the most, Sony or the hackers....

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

The onus is on the part of Sony, not the hackers, to provide a safe and controlled experience.

What an insane comment.

When your house gets robbed, do you blame the police for not preventing it or do you blame the burglers who took your stuff?

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

They did a great job of making it secure, it was a human that decided it would be cool to steal a jig key and that's how it all started. The hackers really had no hope till that happened.

It's been unhacked for years till that happened, in my eyes that's a pretty secure machine.

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

Yeah...let's blame Sony for not securing the PS3...

Let's also blame people that get shot for not wearing a bulletproof vest.

BTW, considering games get hacked within hours of going gold, the fact that the PS3 was secure for 4 years is damn impressive.

Both the Wii and the Xbox360 were hacked within a year of release (if not less). Heck, the entire Wii can be emulated on a computer now.

What do these guys (Geohot) expect when they parade around the internet like it's the front cover of a teen magazine?

You make threats, publicly publish sensitive information that's a major security threat and inflate your ego sky high whilst poking a bear with a stick, it's going to lash back, hard.

I have absolutely no sympathy at all, and the idea of even thinking about donating my hard earned money to these clowns is laughable.

At the end of the day are potential fines, jail time and carrying these court cases/charges on your record for your entire life really worth a little internet fame? People even suggesting Sony hire these fools is laughable, what trust could any company put in them? I don't just mean trust in the companies security, trust that they'll act like civil, responsible and mature employees.

Didn't you mod your 360? Why are you any better than Gehot and others then?

They will destroy his life as they will finish off Geohot - and they both deserve it.

Hopefully Sony will sue and drain these guys to the point where they have barely enough money to eat and have to beg on the street.

I hope that Sony goes down. They are a ****ty company, with no business ethics. Such as removing Linux support from their playstations because it is a "security" issue, even though that wasn't why [and it was an advertised feature]. Also when they were installing root-kits on PC's to prevent copying of music CD's. Yah thats a great company, good side to choose :rolleyes:

And if the police raided my house, because I was hacking, there would be a firefight. Protect my property. :cool:

What an insane comment.

When your house gets robbed, do you blame the police for not preventing it or do you blame the burglers who took your stuff?

If I'm home, I'm going to break a few arms of the burglers. And I'm going to blame myself for not having my house secure enough. And I'm going to try to track down the burglers and beat the crap out of them. ;)

I hope that Sony goes down. They are a ****ty company, with no business ethics. Such as removing Linux support from their playstations because it is a "security" issue, even though that wasn't why [and it was an advertised feature]. Also when they were installing root-kits on PC's to prevent copying of music CD's. Yah thats a great company, good side to choose :rolleyes:

And if the police raided my house, because I was hacking, there would be a firefight. Protect my property. :cool:

Ironic you talk about protecting your property while bashing Sony for protecting theirs.

Ironic you talk about protecting your property while bashing Sony for protecting theirs.

The property of the hackers that they took is not Sony's, nor is the Playstation 3 that the consumer bought. Playstation network is Sony's property, and all accounts on it, however I can do whatever I want with my own PS3 (except I had an XBox, not a PS3 :p)

Wow, Sony fans are so defensive, maybe if you paid for PSN sony would be bothered to make it more secure. :laugh:

This whole security thing is crap. You know nothing. The PS3 and the network took YEARS for hacks to come out. Xbox hacking was going on from damn near release.

This is nothing to do with it. It's a moral issue. Don't like something, don't buy it. Don't hack it and ruin it for everyone else. These hacks are being sued for a good reason and I hope they suffer stress that puts them in a very bad place.

This whole security thing is crap. You know nothing. The PS3 and the network took YEARS for hacks to come out. Xbox hacking was going on from damn near release.

This is nothing to do with it. It's a moral issue. Don't like something, don't buy it. Don't hack it and ruin it for everyone else. These hacks are being sued for a good reason and I hope they suffer stress that puts them in a very bad place.

Whats the good reason for the hacks being sued?

The property of the hackers that they took is not Sony's, nor is the Playstation 3 that the consumer bought. Playstation network is Sony's property, and all accounts on it, however I can do whatever I want with my own PS3 (except I had an XBox, not a PS3 :p)

Yeah do whatever you want with your PS3. Go paint it with neon lights. Upgrade the fan. Throw it off a cliff.

But, you don't own the software on the PS3.

Yeah do whatever you want with your PS3. Go paint it with neon lights. Upgrade the fan. Throw it off a cliff.

But, you don't own the software on the PS3.

I own the software on MY PS3. {As stated before I have an xbox, but I don't recommending adding neon lights, it didn't turn out so well).

I own the software on MY PS3. {As stated before I have an xbox, but I don't recommending adding neon lights, it didn't turn out so well).

Ha, no you don't. You license it.

You don't own it anymore than someone who leases a car owns the car.

Ha, no you don't. You license it.

You don't own it anymore than someone who leases a car owns the car.

:pinch:

Okay well for the sake of that, then Sony had no right to install rootkits onto users computers. They did not own the computers, the data, nor the software contained on it, nor did they ask for permission to install the software. So Sony is no better than a rogue hacker. End case.

Let's see.

Sony has a community of tens of millions of gamers who want to play games and not worry about hackers and, don't have any interest in running a useless linux on their PS3. Sony is tryign to protect these guys and give them a safe gamign enviroment where they don't have to worry about cheating. or people disablign their consoles

The hackers, are bringing cheapskates who don't pay for their games to the scene, people who can disable other people's consoles, and most improtantly they bring cheating.

now who do you think this 40+ millions of gamers dislike the most, Sony or the hackers....

I do not disagree with you. My point is, 3 weeks ago, no-one ever heard of these guys or the homebrew community. Now, it is on every news cast, media outlet, everywhere. Before, you would have only had to deal with a hand full of people hacking the PS3 and of those only a small amount being jerks. Now, Jim Bob up the street and his buddies will Google hacking the PS3, download some kiddie tools and make it miserable for everyone. If Sony would have just went the route Microsoft did, then the damage would have been minimal, but they decided to do this and now everyone will be involved. Just because they hate the man taking on the little guy.

:pinch:

Okay well for the sake of that, then Sony had no right to install rootkits onto users computers. They did not own the computers, the data, nor the software contained on it, nor did they ask for permission to install the software. So Sony is no better than a rogue hacker. End case.

Why are you bringing up the rootkit issue?

1. That is a legititmate blackeye on Sony, but the people responsbile for that have nothing to do with the PS3. That was Sony BMG which, at the time, was a joint venture between Sony and Bertelsmann AG.

2. Sony BMG got sued over the rootkit. So, doesn't it make sense that Sony sue the PS3 hackers?

3. What are you trying to say? Two wrongs make a right? Sony BMG installed rootkits so now people who own PS3 games should have to suffer hackers and cheaters?

At the end of the day, the people hurt most by hackers are Sony and the consumer. These hackers claim they are fighting to protect the consumer, but ask anyone that has had to suffer playing Black Ops against cheaters, they sure seem like they did more harm than good.

Why are you bringing up the rootkit issue?

1. That is a legititmate blackeye on Sony, but the people responsbile for that have nothing to do with the PS3. That was Sony BMG which, at the time, was a joint venture between Sony and Bertelsmann AG.

2. Sony BMG got sued over the rootkit. So, doesn't it make sense that Sony sue the PS3 hackers?

3. What are you trying to say? Two wrongs make a right? Sony BMG installed rootkits so now people who own PS3 games should have to suffer hackers and cheaters?

At the end of the day, the people hurt most by hackers are Sony and the consumer. These hackers claim they are fighting to protect the consumer, but ask anyone that has had to suffer playing Black Ops against cheaters, they sure seem like they did more harm than good.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

There's a difference between giving a hacker a job, and giving a media whoring loud mouth who can do some hacking a job.

Not every hacker is the same, so why are we all treating them the same? Eg, making them into godly saints just because most of us on a forum can't do what they can. I can't do what a lot of people can, doesn't mean I'm going to/everyone else who can't do the same thing go nuts and be head over heels in love with them.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

What good did Geohot bring to the consumer, again?

Install Linux? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Install homebrew? What percent of PS3 users do that?

What good did Geohot bring to the consumer, again?

Install Linux? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Install homebrew? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Right

And did HE hack Black Ops?

Well lets see. The consumer, meaning all consumers, since you weren't specific to the PS3 consumers:

iPhone Jailbreaks/unlocks allowing you a world of apps and features that Apple would never have approved because they want complete control of your device.

What percent of iPhones are jailbroken? Apparently only 6.7 percent of people in 2009, due to a poll conducted by the NY Times.

So take a guess at what percent of PS3's are modded by GeoHot's PS3 jailbreak?

Freaking narcs what kicks does Sony get sending in people to look at peoples replies? No he doesnt deserve that, you are really retarted all of this for a game console?

It's a piece of hardware I paid $300 for and can't enjoy online because these kids decided they wanted to flex their e-penises and show off. I hope Sony takes everything from them now and for years to come.

Right

And did HE hack Black Ops?

Well lets see. The consumer, meaning all consumers, since you weren't specific to the PS3 consumers:

iPhone Jailbreaks/unlocks allowing you a world of apps and features that Apple would never have approved because they want complete control of your device.

What percent of iPhones are jailbroken? Apparently only 6.7 percent of people in 2009, due to a poll conducted by the NY Times.

So take a guess at what percent of PS3's are modded by GeoHot's PS3 jailbreak?

The harm from hacking the PS3: cheaters affecting thousands.

The benefit from hacking the PS3: a few people get to install Linux on their PS3.

Yeah, looks like the consumer made out like a bandit here.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
    • Price Drop: Save 86% on Microsoft Office 2021 Professional Plus lifetime digital license by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 86% on a lifetime license to Microsoft Office 2021 for Windows. This bundle is for families and small businesses who want classic Office apps and email. It includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and OneNote. A one-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work. Lifetime license for MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, & OneNote One-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work Instant Delivery & Download – access your software license keys and download links instantly Free customer service – only the best support! Microsoft Office Professional 2021 (for Windows) includes: Microsoft Office Word Microsoft Office Excel Microsoft Office PowerPoint Microsoft Office Outlook Microsoft Office Teams Microsoft Office OneNote Microsoft Office Publisher Microsoft Office Access No faffing about with subscriptions, just classic apps that don't expire. Good to Know ONE-TIME PURCHASE INSTALLED ON 1 DEVICE Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop Full versions No subscriptions – no monthly/annual fees Version: 2021 Updates included* *Support for this version of Office ends on Oct 13, 2026 A lifetime subscription to Microsoft Office 2021 Professional normally costs $219.99, but this deal can be yours for just $29.97, that's a saving of $190. For full terms, specifications, and license info, click the link below. Get Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for just $29.97, or learn more Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • The only reason I want to know where you from is because if you are not from the U.K, then why should you care what we in the U.K do or don't do? Racist I am not, I am fed up with the amount coming over here and feel they can come over here and think we need to support them. Do you know how much it costs this country to support these people coming over here? Even when we give them a place to live it is not good enough. We had a barge that was being used to house immigrants, oh but that was not good enough. A mate said to me at the time, when he was homeless, he would have been happy to live on the barge, instead of ending up sleeping on a bench on the beach. I am not scared to say what my family heritage is, unlike you who is scared to say where they are from or where they live. Father side U.S, mother side Wales, still have family living in the U.S. A mate who sadly died a few years ago, had a load of people from different races recording in his studio, I got on with all of them. Skin colour don't bother me, where they are from don't bother me. Religion don't bother me as long as they don't push it onto me and it is not crazy stuff. I am not religious. But if you are not living in the U.K, then why should you care if we are in the E.U or not? This the problem, too many people poking their noses into where it don't belong. But you believe what you believe, if you think I am racist, then be it, I really do not care. Just grow a pair
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!