Sony Raids Hacker's Home; Hacker Shares All Known HV Info


Recommended Posts

It was Sony's fault for locking out GNU/Linux to begin with, thats what prompted the 'surge' of hackers that ramped up exploits of their own in order to unlock full access to the system.

Yeah, it's cause and effect. Sony locks out something that hackers and other computer-smart people want, hackers open it up for everyone anyway. The only way sony could stop it would be to unlock it again.

What do these guys (Geohot) expect when they parade around the internet like it's the front cover of a teen magazine?

You make threats, publicly publish sensitive information that's a major security threat and inflate your ego sky high whilst poking a bear with a stick, it's going to lash back, hard.

I have absolutely no sympathy at all, and the idea of even thinking about donating my hard earned money to these clowns is laughable.

At the end of the day are potential fines, jail time and carrying these court cases/charges on your record for your entire life really worth a little internet fame? People even suggesting Sony hire these fools is laughable, what trust could any company put in them? I don't just mean trust in the companies security, trust that they'll act like civil, responsible and mature employees.

They will destroy his life as they will finish off Geohot - and they both deserve it.

Hopefully Sony will sue and drain these guys to the point where they have barely enough money to eat and have to beg on the street.

You're a terrible human being.

Let's see.

Sony has a community of tens of millions of gamers who want to play games and not worry about hackers and, don't have any interest in running a useless linux on their PS3. Sony is tryign to protect these guys and give them a safe gamign enviroment where they don't have to worry about cheating. or people disablign their consoles

The hackers, are bringing cheapskates who don't pay for their games to the scene, people who can disable other people's consoles, and most improtantly they bring cheating.

now who do you think this 40+ millions of gamers dislike the most, Sony or the hackers....

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

The onus is on the part of Sony, not the hackers, to provide a safe and controlled experience.

What an insane comment.

When your house gets robbed, do you blame the police for not preventing it or do you blame the burglers who took your stuff?

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

They did a great job of making it secure, it was a human that decided it would be cool to steal a jig key and that's how it all started. The hackers really had no hope till that happened.

It's been unhacked for years till that happened, in my eyes that's a pretty secure machine.

Like I say, Sony are to blame as much as the hackers for the sub standard job they did securing the PS3

And in all honesty, I appreciate that other OS may seem like a niche feature to some, but if Sony hadn't disabled that feature, then the chances are the s*** wouldn't have hit the fan in the way that it has. So although the hackers are partly responsible, Sony cannot come out of this without sharing a portion of the blame, because ultimately people try and hack everything these days, and knowing this a company should do a FAR better job of securing their systems.

Fact is, the exploits are out there, and Sony are never going to stop them, so aggressively suing the hackers will achieve nothing whatsoever, except to encourage even more hackers to fill the void. Sony need to deal with this issue in a more common sense way, like Microsoft have done with xbox hacking.

Yeah...let's blame Sony for not securing the PS3...

Let's also blame people that get shot for not wearing a bulletproof vest.

BTW, considering games get hacked within hours of going gold, the fact that the PS3 was secure for 4 years is damn impressive.

Both the Wii and the Xbox360 were hacked within a year of release (if not less). Heck, the entire Wii can be emulated on a computer now.

What do these guys (Geohot) expect when they parade around the internet like it's the front cover of a teen magazine?

You make threats, publicly publish sensitive information that's a major security threat and inflate your ego sky high whilst poking a bear with a stick, it's going to lash back, hard.

I have absolutely no sympathy at all, and the idea of even thinking about donating my hard earned money to these clowns is laughable.

At the end of the day are potential fines, jail time and carrying these court cases/charges on your record for your entire life really worth a little internet fame? People even suggesting Sony hire these fools is laughable, what trust could any company put in them? I don't just mean trust in the companies security, trust that they'll act like civil, responsible and mature employees.

Didn't you mod your 360? Why are you any better than Gehot and others then?

They will destroy his life as they will finish off Geohot - and they both deserve it.

Hopefully Sony will sue and drain these guys to the point where they have barely enough money to eat and have to beg on the street.

I hope that Sony goes down. They are a ****ty company, with no business ethics. Such as removing Linux support from their playstations because it is a "security" issue, even though that wasn't why [and it was an advertised feature]. Also when they were installing root-kits on PC's to prevent copying of music CD's. Yah thats a great company, good side to choose :rolleyes:

And if the police raided my house, because I was hacking, there would be a firefight. Protect my property. :cool:

What an insane comment.

When your house gets robbed, do you blame the police for not preventing it or do you blame the burglers who took your stuff?

If I'm home, I'm going to break a few arms of the burglers. And I'm going to blame myself for not having my house secure enough. And I'm going to try to track down the burglers and beat the crap out of them. ;)

I hope that Sony goes down. They are a ****ty company, with no business ethics. Such as removing Linux support from their playstations because it is a "security" issue, even though that wasn't why [and it was an advertised feature]. Also when they were installing root-kits on PC's to prevent copying of music CD's. Yah thats a great company, good side to choose :rolleyes:

And if the police raided my house, because I was hacking, there would be a firefight. Protect my property. :cool:

Ironic you talk about protecting your property while bashing Sony for protecting theirs.

Ironic you talk about protecting your property while bashing Sony for protecting theirs.

The property of the hackers that they took is not Sony's, nor is the Playstation 3 that the consumer bought. Playstation network is Sony's property, and all accounts on it, however I can do whatever I want with my own PS3 (except I had an XBox, not a PS3 :p)

Wow, Sony fans are so defensive, maybe if you paid for PSN sony would be bothered to make it more secure. :laugh:

This whole security thing is crap. You know nothing. The PS3 and the network took YEARS for hacks to come out. Xbox hacking was going on from damn near release.

This is nothing to do with it. It's a moral issue. Don't like something, don't buy it. Don't hack it and ruin it for everyone else. These hacks are being sued for a good reason and I hope they suffer stress that puts them in a very bad place.

This whole security thing is crap. You know nothing. The PS3 and the network took YEARS for hacks to come out. Xbox hacking was going on from damn near release.

This is nothing to do with it. It's a moral issue. Don't like something, don't buy it. Don't hack it and ruin it for everyone else. These hacks are being sued for a good reason and I hope they suffer stress that puts them in a very bad place.

Whats the good reason for the hacks being sued?

The property of the hackers that they took is not Sony's, nor is the Playstation 3 that the consumer bought. Playstation network is Sony's property, and all accounts on it, however I can do whatever I want with my own PS3 (except I had an XBox, not a PS3 :p)

Yeah do whatever you want with your PS3. Go paint it with neon lights. Upgrade the fan. Throw it off a cliff.

But, you don't own the software on the PS3.

Yeah do whatever you want with your PS3. Go paint it with neon lights. Upgrade the fan. Throw it off a cliff.

But, you don't own the software on the PS3.

I own the software on MY PS3. {As stated before I have an xbox, but I don't recommending adding neon lights, it didn't turn out so well).

I own the software on MY PS3. {As stated before I have an xbox, but I don't recommending adding neon lights, it didn't turn out so well).

Ha, no you don't. You license it.

You don't own it anymore than someone who leases a car owns the car.

Ha, no you don't. You license it.

You don't own it anymore than someone who leases a car owns the car.

:pinch:

Okay well for the sake of that, then Sony had no right to install rootkits onto users computers. They did not own the computers, the data, nor the software contained on it, nor did they ask for permission to install the software. So Sony is no better than a rogue hacker. End case.

Let's see.

Sony has a community of tens of millions of gamers who want to play games and not worry about hackers and, don't have any interest in running a useless linux on their PS3. Sony is tryign to protect these guys and give them a safe gamign enviroment where they don't have to worry about cheating. or people disablign their consoles

The hackers, are bringing cheapskates who don't pay for their games to the scene, people who can disable other people's consoles, and most improtantly they bring cheating.

now who do you think this 40+ millions of gamers dislike the most, Sony or the hackers....

I do not disagree with you. My point is, 3 weeks ago, no-one ever heard of these guys or the homebrew community. Now, it is on every news cast, media outlet, everywhere. Before, you would have only had to deal with a hand full of people hacking the PS3 and of those only a small amount being jerks. Now, Jim Bob up the street and his buddies will Google hacking the PS3, download some kiddie tools and make it miserable for everyone. If Sony would have just went the route Microsoft did, then the damage would have been minimal, but they decided to do this and now everyone will be involved. Just because they hate the man taking on the little guy.

:pinch:

Okay well for the sake of that, then Sony had no right to install rootkits onto users computers. They did not own the computers, the data, nor the software contained on it, nor did they ask for permission to install the software. So Sony is no better than a rogue hacker. End case.

Why are you bringing up the rootkit issue?

1. That is a legititmate blackeye on Sony, but the people responsbile for that have nothing to do with the PS3. That was Sony BMG which, at the time, was a joint venture between Sony and Bertelsmann AG.

2. Sony BMG got sued over the rootkit. So, doesn't it make sense that Sony sue the PS3 hackers?

3. What are you trying to say? Two wrongs make a right? Sony BMG installed rootkits so now people who own PS3 games should have to suffer hackers and cheaters?

At the end of the day, the people hurt most by hackers are Sony and the consumer. These hackers claim they are fighting to protect the consumer, but ask anyone that has had to suffer playing Black Ops against cheaters, they sure seem like they did more harm than good.

Why are you bringing up the rootkit issue?

1. That is a legititmate blackeye on Sony, but the people responsbile for that have nothing to do with the PS3. That was Sony BMG which, at the time, was a joint venture between Sony and Bertelsmann AG.

2. Sony BMG got sued over the rootkit. So, doesn't it make sense that Sony sue the PS3 hackers?

3. What are you trying to say? Two wrongs make a right? Sony BMG installed rootkits so now people who own PS3 games should have to suffer hackers and cheaters?

At the end of the day, the people hurt most by hackers are Sony and the consumer. These hackers claim they are fighting to protect the consumer, but ask anyone that has had to suffer playing Black Ops against cheaters, they sure seem like they did more harm than good.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

There's a difference between giving a hacker a job, and giving a media whoring loud mouth who can do some hacking a job.

Not every hacker is the same, so why are we all treating them the same? Eg, making them into godly saints just because most of us on a forum can't do what they can. I can't do what a lot of people can, doesn't mean I'm going to/everyone else who can't do the same thing go nuts and be head over heels in love with them.

What I am saying is Sony is bad for both the consumer and the hacker, not the hacker is bad for both the consumer and Sony. The hacker (the real ones, such as GeoHot) is good for the consumer. Not every hacker is hacking Black Ops.

In matter of fact that is the only game I ever hear people complaining about being hacked, and the only people to blame is the consumer (the little kids that say oh this is cool I'm going to pwn some n00bz) for the black ops being hacked (and yes the hacker who hacked that game). But the ones allowing you to use YOUR OWN hardware the way you want, should not be though of as evil do-ers.

I don't hear people whining about iPhones being jailbroken, but apparently gaming consoles its a big "no-no" to do it to.

And to clarify a cheater is not a hacker. People need to learn, that the hackers aren't out there trying to ruin your gaming experience, it is the cheaters, and the punks that do it. So make sure to blame the right people. (Yes, the hackers enabled the options, but are there 10,000 hackers out there right now ruining your game of blackops by cheating. No, because cheaters don't have the brains and the scientific mindset to hack).

Edit: My solution: Offer those two hackers a job at Sony, so they can add ideas that would make the PS3 more awesome. They probably wouldn't take the job though, but I do like Microsoft's response to hackers.

What good did Geohot bring to the consumer, again?

Install Linux? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Install homebrew? What percent of PS3 users do that?

What good did Geohot bring to the consumer, again?

Install Linux? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Install homebrew? What percent of PS3 users do that?

Right

And did HE hack Black Ops?

Well lets see. The consumer, meaning all consumers, since you weren't specific to the PS3 consumers:

iPhone Jailbreaks/unlocks allowing you a world of apps and features that Apple would never have approved because they want complete control of your device.

What percent of iPhones are jailbroken? Apparently only 6.7 percent of people in 2009, due to a poll conducted by the NY Times.

So take a guess at what percent of PS3's are modded by GeoHot's PS3 jailbreak?

Freaking narcs what kicks does Sony get sending in people to look at peoples replies? No he doesnt deserve that, you are really retarted all of this for a game console?

It's a piece of hardware I paid $300 for and can't enjoy online because these kids decided they wanted to flex their e-penises and show off. I hope Sony takes everything from them now and for years to come.

Right

And did HE hack Black Ops?

Well lets see. The consumer, meaning all consumers, since you weren't specific to the PS3 consumers:

iPhone Jailbreaks/unlocks allowing you a world of apps and features that Apple would never have approved because they want complete control of your device.

What percent of iPhones are jailbroken? Apparently only 6.7 percent of people in 2009, due to a poll conducted by the NY Times.

So take a guess at what percent of PS3's are modded by GeoHot's PS3 jailbreak?

The harm from hacking the PS3: cheaters affecting thousands.

The benefit from hacking the PS3: a few people get to install Linux on their PS3.

Yeah, looks like the consumer made out like a bandit here.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!