Maxthon 3 - What do you guys think?


Recommended Posts

IE8 came out March 19th, 2009. Google Chrome came out September 2nd, 2008. See where I am going to this? IE8, was in test for several months with said features, Google was testing it for several months with sandboxing being around since v1. Again, do your research. Chrome had it first. So... you were right they do have it in there, but you were wrong to think IE had it first.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2008/03/11/ie8-and-loosely-coupled-ie-lcie.aspx notice the date.

I tried Maxthon years ago on XP (can't remember the version it was then), and although it was nice, the "extra" features it had were pretty useless for my purposes. I prefer to have all the major browsers installed for testing my sites, so it's pointless for me.

One thing I definitely do like about Maxthon is the built-in download manager. It's very nice to have a feature such as a download manager built into a browser by default. Maxthon packs a ton of features into the install, and I do prefer it to some other browsers that boast multiple rendering engines. I can see Maxthon becoming a browser I enjoy using, so I'll continue to work with it and see if I can decide definitively whether or not this is the browser I will stick with.

I noticed that: So it looks like beta2 of IE popped out literally what? 6 days before Google released Chrome... but what I wanna know now is which team started on it first? It looks like some early builds of Chrome were out before Sept. 2008 that had the sandboxing feature.

IE8 came out March 19th, 2009. Google Chrome came out September 2nd, 2008. See where I am going to this? IE8, was in test for several months with said features, Google was testing it for several months with sandboxing being around since v1. Again, do your research. Chrome had it first. So... you were right they do have it in there, but you were wrong to think IE had it first.

IE 7.

Maxthon 3 looks like quite a browser - I do love it's UI.

Yea, there are a few things about the default UI I do want to change though:

- Remove the avatar from the upper left, stick it in a profile side-tab when you click on the Menu button (they had it like this in their Alpha version)

- Allow users to remove all the nonsense buttons. (I want to remove the Home button, the Undo Close Tab, and History)

- Remove search bar.

- Move bookmarks over to the Right side when bookmark menu isn't open.

- Combine Go/Refresh button in URL Box (like Chrome)

- Other small cosmetic issues.

It doesn't do it with anything else. Chrome opens. It just when I hit Enter to go to a site.

^^This is totally off topic: Disable all your add-on's and see what happens!

Back to the subject on hand: I have given it a look see and it's pretty cool, I have always enjoyed using this product, even from the early days. Had to install it on my old XP Pro Box as I am a Linux (Read as Chromium) user. Thanks for the heads up.

Back to the subject on hand: I have given it a look see and it's pretty cool, I have always enjoyed using this product, even from the early days. Had to install it on my old XP Pro Box as I am a Linux (Read as Chromium) user. Thanks for the heads up.

You're welcome, the theme does look good with more Aero (had to switch my theme from Static over to Shine-2.0) But still, these damn buttons need to be removed... or let us move them/remove them.

I've been using Maxthon for a few hours now, but the only problem I really have with it, is that it is too white. I know, it sounds like a stupid point, but I dislike looking at pure white for extended periods of time. I know I can change the theme, but I do prefer the default theme. The color is the only problem with it for me, but beyond that, it is excellent. If a 'Personas' feature or something to the same degree is released for it, then I think I could really enjoy Maxthon 3.

Was a user of Maxthon 2 (has been using since MyIE times) but changed to ChromePlus.

Had enough of M2 crashing on me at least once a day.

M3 hasn't got all the features there yet.

Still don't see search suggestions in the address bar and a plugin system.

But I do like how M3's GUI is customizable like Firefox's.

Although ChromePlus doesn't have the sidebar, it has most of the features I used in M2 plus extensions support.

[EDIT] Was looking around and found that M3 has a portable version here.

M3 hasn't got all the features there yet.

Still don't see search suggestions in the address bar and a plugin system.

But I do like how M3's GUI is customizable like Firefox's.

Not every browser is going to have all the feautres right away.

Suggestions is a cool feature, and I hope they do implemente it, but they do have a plugin system, just an outdated one for Mx2! :p

Day two of Mx3 is complete for me, and I still am in love with this browser. I've had exactly ONE crash which involved trying to watch a youtube video. So good job Mx3, so far, so good.

IE was the first to use sandboxing technology.

It doesn't matter who was first, only who does it best. Chrome's sandbox is more advanced.

Performance is debateable.

IE and Chrome are the most reliable browsers.

Benchmarks?

let's take it up in another topic. IE7 protected mode was nothing like IE8's... so it's irrelevant.

There are no significant differences between protected mode in IE7 and IE8. They are essentially the same.

I have tried Maxthon 3 previously and I have to agree that it is an impressive browser. Ok, it kinda lacks some features, like those a power user used to Firefox might want. Ok, it has some features implemented by other browsers before it, but it is straight out of the box good. For daily browsing it is impressive.

Now, if they would let me tinker with it like I used to in Maxthon 2... Just saying, need more options ( security especially).

Benchmarks?

well according to the reliability monitor on my system chrome has had more crashes. IE however lists far more errors in the error count, but this is because IE also reports webpage display problems to the error log, unlike either chrome or Opera.

opera however, while it has more crashes than chrome(and those are old anyway, and from beta versions) seems to be the far stabler one, considering onmy system it has about 100+ times the usage of chrome which is only used as a secondary browser for some stuff.

funnily enough despite chrome process isolation it seems to be hard crashing more and bringing down the whole browser than Opera which is able to run stable without 50 processes.

actually come to think if it, with my 50+ tabs and the time I spend on chrome added together, opera is more likely to be used several thousand times more than chrome on my system :)

Hey look, a new thread that doesn't involve Chrome-Firefix-IE-or Opera! Wow!

Sadly by the time I reached this thread, 80% of it is talking about those browsers :laugh:

Maxthon 3 doesn't look bad at all!

well according to the reliability monitor on my system chrome has had more crashes. IE however lists far more errors in the error count, but this is because IE also reports webpage display problems to the error log, unlike either chrome or Opera.

opera however, while it has more crashes than chrome(and those are old anyway, and from beta versions) seems to be the far stabler one, considering onmy system it has about 100+ times the usage of chrome which is only used as a secondary browser for some stuff.

funnily enough despite chrome process isolation it seems to be hard crashing more and bringing down the whole browser than Opera which is able to run stable without 50 processes.

actually come to think if it, with my 50+ tabs and the time I spend on chrome added together, opera is more likely to be used several thousand times more than chrome on my system :)

I find chrome far from stable

If i leave it open and go do somethin, ill come back to a system sometimes that is DOGGING it

Core i7 with 6gb ram gaming system, has a delay when entering keys

I end the chrome task and its back to normal...

I find the speed different barely noticable anyways on this system so i stick to Firefox, Though now i think about it and read this thread..opera has NEVER glitched out on me compared to all the others.

Oh and..Maxthon 3 is quite fast...

I'm happy you guys like Maxthon. As an oldie Maxthon user myself (about 6 years), Maxthon 3 can't replace the older versions due to lack of various features that make Maxthon 2/1 really special.UI customization options are a must for me to use it in my daily browsing too.

I've been using Maxthon for a few hours now, but the only problem I really have with it, is that it is too white. I know, it sounds like a stupid point, but I dislike looking at pure white for extended periods of time. I know I can change the theme, but I do prefer the default theme. The color is the only problem with it for me, but beyond that, it is excellent. If a 'Personas' feature or something to the same degree is released for it, then I think I could really enjoy Maxthon 3.

I would love a Personas option. While I like that Maxthon 3 UI is color neutral (so it can fit with any windows visual theme/aero color), it's indeed too white and in desperate need for some color.

What would you guys like to have in future Maxthon releases? personally, I hope the groups feature of older versions is added back, also a spell check tool.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!