is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?


Recommended Posts

How on earth is xp dead when it has %40 usage of all pc's.It's still in half of the computers you see.But since Frylock calls it dead i guess we can trust his instincts and move on.

It's gonna take at least 2 years to get there.People would probably move on to Windows 8 by then so Win7 will never pass XP's usage ratio.

it well

i notice every 12 month win7 share increase by roughly 15% to 16% trend

it is now roughly 31% worldwide , doing the math that would land us

at about 47%+ for win7

XP would take most of the decline obviously which lower it to 30% to 33% since it is the older sister OS

by next april or may 2012

[that is not taking on the estimation June >>> oct 2012 , because they *may* as well be count as Win8 , eliglble for free upgrade to win8 for OEMs PC ]

Windows 8 is due out oct 2012

people actually using it means nothing? :rolleyes: And yes people will be moving away.The key word is "will be"....and the majority haven't.

Not to Microsoft. And the "majority" depends on where you live. Here in the States, Vista/7 market share outnumbers XP, same int he UK, Australia, etc.

it well

i notice every 12 month win7 share increase by roughly 15% to 16% trend

it is now roughly 31% worldwide , doing the math that would land us

at about 47%+ for win7

XP would take most of the decline obviously which lower it to 30% to 33% since it is the older sister OS

by next april or may 2012

[that is not taking on the estimation June >>> oct 2012 , because they *may* as well be count as Win8 , eliglble for free upgrade to win8 for OEMs PC ]

Windows 8 is due out oct 2012

even if you're right and xp lowers to say %30.Can we say it's dead.If we do then let's not even talk about unix os or others.And according to netmarketshare xp is down from %61 to %54 over the last year.And Win7 is up from %14 to %23.Doing the math in 2012 xp would be %47 where as win7 will be 32.

Not to Microsoft. And the "majority" depends on where you live. Here in the States, Vista/7 market share outnumbers XP, same int he UK, Australia, etc.

by majority i mean our beloved planet..not just a city a country or a village.

even if you're right and xp lowers to say %30.Can we say it's dead.If we do then let's not even talk about unix os or others.And according to netmarketshare xp is down from %61 to %54 over the last year.And Win7 is up from %14 to %23.Doing the math in 2012 xp would be %47 where as win7 will be 32.

by majority i mean our beloved planet..not just a city a country or a village.

Hitslink are kind biased toword XP/IE6

my % figure is from Statcounter btw

a midiean of XP useage 40% which is even lower

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems

"January 22, 2009" <----LOL

Your own articles are out of date. Study up a bit more, kid.

  • Like 2

:rolleyes:

Now, WTF are you rolling your eyes for? YOU made your own mistake via posting outdated articles.

Guess what? XP is well on its way out, whether you like it or not. Quit trying to make/scare us into staying on XP.

You want to stay on XP, fine go for it, but don't make all of us stay.

Goddamn.

I'd rather not waste my breath with blinded Windows 7 fanboys. Oops! I just did a little bit. :whistle:

You've been trying to convince everybody in this thread that XP has been better than 7 for how long now? Sorry, but "not wanting to waste your breath" is a failed argument given you've been wasting your breath all this time, and all you've done is make yourself look more ridiculous each time. I actually feel bad for you, sitting there all alone, doing nothing with your time but scrolling up and down an Explorer window, and trying to pass that off as evidence of XP being more efficient than 7. Maybe you should get your parents to take you out for a drive or something.

That article doesn't even say what version of Office they used, hardly anything about their testing methodology... or anything useful for that matter. All I know is that all multi core aware applications that I use are every bit as fast on 7 as they ever were on XP

HEY GUYS! I just tested out MW2 on XP and I got better frames rates than I did on 7!

On XP I got 342 FPS, while on 7, I got 341 FPS!

XP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7

:shifty:

Damn you, I only got 340 FPS :(

lol :laugh:

So now that your arguements have been rendered moot, you're just going to sit there and laugh at everyone? Dude, you're on the wrong boards if you're going to act this way.

I believe InfoWaste's Save XP site is still up, maybe, just maybe, they'll hire you to look after it.

So now that your arguements have been rendered moot, you're just going to sit there and laugh at everyone? Dude, you're on the wrong boards if you're going to act this way.

I believe InfoWaste's Save XP site is still up, maybe, just maybe, they'll hire you to look after it.

He's got nothing anymore, hence his responses. He's still going through the denial phase.

He's got nothing anymore, hence his responses. He's still going through the denial phase.

lets all get along, everyone has their reasons for using what they are and pushing something will not help either. if something works for someone and they are happy with it then leave it at that. for me if say XP does the job without issue and i am happy with it then myself, i see no reason to change to something. the only way to know is to do trial and error.

The problem is not that people are still using XP, it is when they complain about new technologies are not included or saying useless arguments. So no, XP is not good anymore. Vista/7 have new technologies that mostly cannot be ported over at all. Microsoft has abandoned it mostly (Windows Live and IE 9 are Vista/7 only) and it will keep getting worse, not better. I do not know why anybody would want to stick with XP. Not to mention your new hardware will be useless if you put XP on it. Can you effectively run XP 64-bit on an i7 machine with 6-8GB of ram? Multi-core systems seem to be horrible with XP, at least in my experience. Not to mention that most developers completely ignore XP 64-bit in created stable and decent drivers.

All the arguments are pretty crazy anyway.

XP boots up way faster than 7 - In my experience, it is around the same. XP sometimes takes longer. 7 sometimes takes longer. But does it really matter? Turn on the computer, and get a snack, drink, coffee, or whatever. Boot times do not mean anything. It could be a slow hard drive. Does XP even install properly/easily with a SSD? I am not sure, I never tried.

Game X get 10 additonal FPS when running in XP instead of 7! - Again, who cares. This, along with most of the issues I have heard, are in the "You will only notice a issue if you look for it" category. It might be true that it gets some FPS. It does not really matter. Now if game X runs at 100+ FPS in XP and no more than 10 FPS in 7, that game has some issues. But from day-to-day use of Game X, can you tell a difference when running it on XP or 7? Probably not. Turn off the FPS display and give it a try.

Application X boots up faster in XP! - Combination of the two above.

Major CPU usage when I open Windows Explorer and sit there moving the scroll bar up and down repeatedly for several minutes so fast I cannot see anything! - Severe and useless test case. Who will sit there and do that? Again, from day-to-day usage you will not notice a difference.

I have an old computer and XP does what I need. - PERFECTLY fine argument! Keep it, it works, it will probably work better on an old machine than 7 would. But do not expect support for it forever. Some people still use Windows 95. Should MS support that as well?

Enough with these useless arguments. Is XP still good today for new systems? No. MS already wants to forget it, and it will just get worse. Is it still good today if you already have it and it works? Yes. Do you use a program that gets updated regularly? It might be a year or two until they drop support MAYBE.

  • Like 2

I have an old computer and XP does what I need. - PERFECTLY fine argument! Keep it, it works, it will probably work better on an old machine than 7 would. But do not expect support for it forever. Some people still use Windows 95. Should MS support that as well?

Problem is some people don't get this, and will rail on you for even mentioning/asking about XP, regardless of what your specs are (or without knowing them at all)

The problem is not that people are still using XP, it is when they complain about new technologies are not included or saying useless arguments. So no, XP is not good anymore. Vista/7 have new technologies that mostly cannot be ported over at all. Microsoft has abandoned it mostly (Windows Live and IE 9 are Vista/7 only) and it will keep getting worse, not better. I do not know why anybody would want to stick with XP. Not to mention your new hardware will be useless if you put XP on it. Can you effectively run XP 64-bit on an i7 machine with 6-8GB of ram? Multi-core systems seem to be horrible with XP, at least in my experience. Not to mention that most developers completely ignore XP 64-bit in created stable and decent drivers.

All the arguments are pretty crazy anyway.

XP boots up way faster than 7 - In my experience, it is around the same. XP sometimes takes longer. 7 sometimes takes longer. But does it really matter? Turn on the computer, and get a snack, drink, coffee, or whatever. Boot times do not mean anything. It could be a slow hard drive. Does XP even install properly/easily with a SSD? I am not sure, I never tried.

Game X get 10 additonal FPS when running in XP instead of 7! - Again, who cares. This, along with most of the issues I have heard, are in the "You will only notice a issue if you look for it" category. It might be true that it gets some FPS. It does not really matter. Now if game X runs at 100+ FPS in XP and no more than 10 FPS in 7, that game has some issues. But from day-to-day use of Game X, can you tell a difference when running it on XP or 7? Probably not. Turn off the FPS display and give it a try.

Application X boots up faster in XP! - Combination of the two above.

Major CPU usage when I open Windows Explorer and sit there moving the scroll bar up and down repeatedly for several minutes so fast I cannot see anything! - Severe and useless test case. Who will sit there and do that? Again, from day-to-day usage you will not notice a difference.

I have an old computer and XP does what I need. - PERFECTLY fine argument! Keep it, it works, it will probably work better on an old machine than 7 would. But do not expect support for it forever. Some people still use Windows 95. Should MS support that as well?

Enough with these useless arguments. Is XP still good today for new systems? No. MS already wants to forget it, and it will just get worse. Is it still good today if you already have it and it works? Yes. Do you use a program that gets updated regularly? It might be a year or two until they drop support MAYBE.

XP doesn't have SSD detection. Windows 7 didn't disable defragmenter for me when I had an 1st gen SSD, so it ain't perfect.

Additionally that SSD gave better read speeds under XP ~120 on XP vs ~90 on 7 according to HDTune benchmark.

Rebooting is a thing of the past in my opinion, just put your computer to sleep/hibernate/stand-by - this leads to a much faster startup.

One needs to know that although XP doesn't use all cores to boot itself - it is smaller and lighter so not that much needs to load.

One thing to do is to AVOID PRE-INSTALLED OS. HP W7 boots a lot slower than a clean W7 for example.

On weaker hardware this matters a lot more than on medium and high end hardware.

The point here is that Superfetch might simply be implemented to combat additional overhead that W7 introduced, otherwise XP applications should start slower compared to the same highly used applications on W7.

You don't get it. The Steps to Reproduce is quite simple really, for example, open Pictures Library - press down key to scroll. The issue is that Windows Explorer is highly used and should be able to scroll folders really fast using little CPU, like it DID on Windows XP. This is a regression. If W7 wan't installed on netbooks, I would be complaining - higher end CPU mask this issue. Why should any modern CPU go into high performance mode when scrolling your pictures library or scrolling your MP3 in Windows Media Player? Well, it shouldn't, it is a simple task that shouldn't waste battery life.

Just like to compensate for lack of W7 features on XP, there are good (f-in fast) explorer alternatives for W7, but hey, WTF Microsoft?

Agree.

Agree.

Problem is some people don't get this, and will rail on you for even mentioning/asking about XP, regardless of what your specs are (or without knowing them at all)

The question was about today's computing. He didn't ask "Is XP SP3 still a good OS for my fifteen year old crapbox PC."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!