richardsim7 Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshall Veteran Posted March 25, 2011 Veteran Share Posted March 25, 2011 Definitely the top one, the brightness and contrast are at better settings to provide a more crisp/clear image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazzy88ss Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 both look basically the same to me. They both look over-processed :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardsim7 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Share Posted March 25, 2011 Funnily enough the bottom one is a LOT closer to the real thing (if not pretty much what it looked like) :) The top one was HDR'd to hell and back :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazzy88ss Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Gun to head, I would pick the bottom one, yes. What does it for me is the shadow caused by the lil monument thing; the shadow loses some detail and therefore looks more real. I'm not saying the photos are BAD, just a bit over processed for my taste :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardsim7 Posted March 25, 2011 Author Share Posted March 25, 2011 Good point, hadn't noticed that before :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qdave Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 I also prefer top one...seems more "clear". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts