Recommended Posts

Before you start flaming members, click on the link in my signature. They will never catch up with Chrome, I never said they would.. Mozilla does not have the funding that Google does. The point I was trying to make is that Mozilla could still release updates or revisions every 6 weeks, but they really do not need three channels to do it. One cannot file a bug report on a procedural issue. I just do not ever move up with the channel. I stay with the Nightly builds as my extensions will continue to work and not be borked for a couple of days while ACR is updated. Yes Heartripper this is an old issue.

So first you claim that Mozilla is artifically inflating Firefox's version numbers to keep up with Chrome, and then you turn around that Mozilla doesn't have the funding that Google does. Why would Mozilla need funding to keep up with Chrome's version numbers? How poor do you need to be before you're unable to afford to artificially bump version numbers? Your claims are all contradicting each other. They don't even come together to form a cohesive story, much less any facts.

Mozilla needs multiple release channels because no sane software vendor writes fresh patches for a product as complex as Firefox and deploys it to the masses six weeks later. Six weeks is simply nowhere near enough time for QA and for add-on authors to test and react to new changes. Do you honestly believe that everyone should be running the Aurora channel?

So first you claim that Mozilla is artifically inflating Firefox's version numbers to keep up with Chrome, and then you turn around that Mozilla doesn't have the funding that Google does. Why would Mozilla need funding to keep up with Chrome's version numbers? How poor do you need to be before you're unable to afford to artificially bump version numbers? Your claims are all contradicting each other. They don't even come together to form a cohesive story, much less any facts.

Mozilla needs multiple release channels because no sane software vendor writes fresh patches for a product as complex as Firefox and deploys it to the masses six weeks later. Six weeks is simply nowhere near enough time for QA and for add-on authors to test and react to new changes. Do you honestly believe that everyone should be running the Aurora channel?

Firefox is not all that complex of a program. Google is trying to take control of the entire internet. They have billions at their disposal, Chrome is not an open source product such as Firefox. Chrome started with the numbers game and not Firefox. Mozilla just tried to keep up , knowing that they cannot catchup with the numbers game. Also Firefox is very close to dropping behind Chrome. Maybe Firefox should have ran a TV ad during the World Series as Chrome did.

The addons I am using now with the exception of about 3 are identical to the ones I used with Firefox 3.0. In your opinion then software companies such as Adobe, MS, are all insane as they only have one channel. For Adobe right now it is Photoshop CS6. No I do not believe everyone should be on the Aurora channel. I never said that. The Aurora channel should not exist. The progression should be from Nightly to Beta to Final.

Firefox is not all that complex of a program.

A program that has more than 60 megabytes' worth of source code and almost a hundred developers working full-time on it is "not all that complex"?? Wow, which university did you graduate from and what are your qualifications that something like Firefox "isn't all that complex" to you?

Chrome is not an open source product such as Firefox.

You've never heard of the Chromium project, have you?

Chrome started with the numbers game and not Firefox. Mozilla just tried to keep up , knowing that they cannot catchup with the numbers game.

And why the hell not? If Mozilla's motive was really to catch up with Chrome in the numbers game they could release once every three weeks and pass Chrome in a matter of months. Hell, they could release once every week if they wanted to. What's stopping them? How on earth would Mozilla's lack of "billions" prevent them from releasing Firefox quicker than Chrome if they really wanted to catch up? Are you even trying to make any sense?

The addons I am using now with the exception of about 3 are identical to the ones I used with Firefox 3.0. In your opinion then software companies such as Adobe, MS, are all insane as they only have one channel.

*facepalm* For ****'s sake, it's because Adobe and Microsoft's products ARE NOT ON RAPID RELEASE SCHEMES!

For Adobe right now it is Photoshop CS6. No I do not believe everyone should be on the Aurora channel. I never said that. The Aurora channel should not exist. The progression should be from Nightly to Beta to Final.

And how does that change anything? That's still three release channels, which is exactly what you were whining about earlier.

I don't mean to flame you, but your ignorance is unbelievably astounding. Please go and at least make some semblance of an effort to educate yourself before claiming you "know damn well" about anything.

A program that has more than 60 megabytes' worth of source code and almost a hundred developers working full-time on it is "not all that complex"?? Wow, which university did you graduate from and what are your qualifications that something like Firefox "isn't all that complex" to you?

You've never heard of the Chromium project, have you?

And why the hell not? If Mozilla's motive was really to catch up with Chrome in the numbers game they could release once every three weeks and pass Chrome in a matter of months. Hell, they could release once every week if they wanted to. What's stopping them? How on earth would Mozilla's lack of "billions" prevent them from releasing Firefox quicker than Chrome if they really wanted to catch up? Are you even trying to make any sense?

*facepalm* For ****'s sake, it's because Adobe and Microsoft's products ARE NOT ON RAPID RELEASE SCHEMES!

And how does that change anything? That's still three release channels, which is exactly what you were whining about earlier.

I don't mean to flame you, but your ignorance is unbelievably astounding. Please go and at least make some semblance of an effort to educate yourself before claiming you "know damn well" about anything.

I would do as you said. Educate yourself and learn some manners. Chromium is NOT Chrome.Going from Nightly to Beta to Final is not three release channels. The channel would progress from Nightly to Firefox Beta and Firefox Final. You see once a Mozilla product becomes Beta, it is branded as Firefox. The Aurora channel is a waste. Why would anyone want to use a channel that is in between Alpha and Beta which is what Aurora is. Now unless you can conduct yourself in a civil manner, I am done responding to any of your posts.

I would do as you said. Educate yourself and learn some manners. Chromium is NOT Chrome.Going from Nightly to Beta to Final is not three release channels. The channel would progress from Nightly to Firefox Beta and Firefox Final. You see once a Mozilla product becomes Beta, it is branded as Firefox. The Aurora channel is a waste. Why would anyone want to use a channel that is in between Alpha and Beta which is what Aurora is. Now unless you can conduct yourself in a civil manner, I am done responding to any of your posts.

1. Chromium is Chrome for all intents and purposes. Google takes Chromium snapshots and slaps proprietary codecs, Flash/PDF plugins, an updater, and a different logo on them, and you get Chrome. The underlying browser is completely identical. If you wanted Chrome's source code, you dig around the Chromium repositories and get it.

2. Just because Beta is branded as Firefox doesn't mean it's the same channel as Release. If they were the same channel, they'd be, oh I don't know, be the same channel instead of being called Beta and Release and have different version numbers? I'm not sure why I'm reduced to explaining something this obvious, but oh well...

3. Maybe if you stop trying to act like you "know damn well" about anything at all while spewing all sorts of ignorant nonsense and yet insisting they're facts, you might get respected. Yes, I know probably it's a strange concept for you, but that's how it works.

You can read can't you. Read what I posted. If you do not agree I do not care. This is a forum and being such debates will happen. C-Ya

I go away for a few hours and there's two pages of useless comments. If you are looking for a debate, use the search function on the forum. This numbering issue has already been debated on at least a dozen threads, going on and on with useless drivel like this for pages.

So bottom line is this. Regardless of what you think about Mozilla's intentions are about version numbers, keep this thread kosher for discussing new features, bug reports, and user issues related to the use of Firefox.

really Grinder, go away, you've lost this pointless argument

now can we please get a mod in here to clean this thread back up

You go away .Listen, I tried to end this long time ago. I stated my opinion and it was not agreed to. So what. I said to move on but no one seems to want to. This is a Forum and this section is about Firefox. Deal with it.

You go away .Listen, I tried to end this long time ago. I stated my opinion and it was not agreed to. So what. I said to move on but no one seems to want to. This is a Forum and this section is about Firefox. Deal with it.

yes this is about firefox, so when i come here and see new replies i want to hear new things about what's landing on firefox, not some petty argument, which whether you want to see it or not you were causing just by trying to claim your opinions as hard facts

yes this is about firefox, so when i come here and see new replies i want to hear new things about what's landing on firefox, not some petty argument, which whether you want to see it or not you were causing just by trying to claim your opinions as hard facts

I want to see the same things as you do. That being said the OP is Firefox Next. I see nothing wrong with bringing up an Idea. I did not start this and I am sorry I ever brought it up. The proper person has been notified.

I want to see the same things as you do. That being said the OP is Firefox Next. I see nothing wrong with bringing up an Idea. I did not start this and I am sorry I ever brought it up. The proper person has been notified.

don't be sorry for stating your opinions, just be a little careful with your wording as things can easily be taken the wrong way on the internet

I too should apologize to you as I think I was a little harsh when I told you to just go away, for that I'm sorry

anyway, the firefox 11 nightly has been running great for me so far, mozilla's making some good progress performance wise :)

I just wish the memory use would drop.

Compare to what? All modern browsers have almost same RAM usage in this days, in Firefox, extensins are most of the time problematic once, some goodies will land ASAP in Fx and memory usage will go down, I've alredy notice that in latest Nightly RAM consumption is far smaller then it was ;)

Compare to what? All modern browsers have almost same RAM usage in this days, in Firefox, extensins are most of the time problematic once, some goodies will land ASAP in Fx and memory usage will go down, I've alredy notice that in latest Nightly RAM consumption is far smaller then it was ;)

IE 9.0. I have one tab open with Firefox and I am using 131,828KB. With one tab open with IE I use around 87,000KB. I understand that some extensions use a great deal of Ram but I still think Firefox can be lower. This is not a real concern to me as I have 16GB of Ram but it may be to some users.

OK, agree about IE but this browser is system native so there is huge diffrent in engine and code and when You look at overall usage difrent is not even 50MB where Firefox is open source code....

This looks like looking for hole where there is no hole :D

OK, agree about IE but this browser is system native so there is huge diffrent in engine and code and when You look at overall usage difrent is not even 50MB where Firefox is open source code....

This looks like looking for hole where there is no hole :D

I know what you mean. MS can hide the stats anywhere. :)

IE 9.0. I have one tab open with Firefox and I am using 131,828KB. With one tab open with IE I use around 87,000KB. I understand that some extensions use a great deal of Ram but I still think Firefox can be lower. This is not a real concern to me as I have 16GB of Ram but it may be to some users.

Based on ... ? Please don't tell me that you are looking at memory consumption in the task manager ...

I wish the memory use would drop also. Grinder, stop defending your statements. The comments are pointed, there is no right answer. Your "wish" is good enough and those that argue the point should review the definition of Trolling. I have an atom core processor and like to surf while watching watching 720p content. Asrock Ion 330 has a gpu but tends to freeze when launching Ff.

Well I am of the opinion that Mozilla should stop all of this silliness and concentrate on one Nightly build like they did before the rush to compete with Chrome (number wise). I am now using Firefox 11 and I can see not all of the difference between it and Firefox 4.

Agreed. They lost alot of people with delayed release dates. The switch from using a point system to implementing a entire new version is entirely Chrome. We had 3.5, then 3.6, and so on. Chrome has been gaining ground and those of us who have used Phoenix, Firebird, know the truth. 3 pages of arguing over this? He is right.

Yes they have. Firefox 11 has been running great. The fonts have improved as well as video quality., I just wish the memory use would drop.

Not sure why people are having problems with Firefox memory usage. Here's my stats for Firefox 9 (11 extensions) and Chrome 16 (8 extensions) with the exact same tabs open, Firefox has been running for at least 2 hours while Chrome was freshly launched for the test.

post-356036-0-67705300-1321236937.png

Agreed. They lost alot of people with delayed release dates. The switch from using a point system to implementing a entire new version is entirely Chrome. We had 3.5, then 3.6, and so on. Chrome has been gaining ground and those of us who have used Phoenix, Firebird, know the truth. 3 pages of arguing over this? He is right.

Do you have any logical arguments to put on the table or are you just ranting about your personal opinions?

IE 9.0. I have one tab open with Firefox and I am using 131,828KB. With one tab open with IE I use around 87,000KB. I understand that some extensions use a great deal of Ram but I still think Firefox can be lower. This is not a real concern to me as I have 16GB of Ram but it may be to some users.

Not sure why people are having problems with Firefox memory usage. Here's my stats for Firefox 9 (11 extensions) and Chrome 16 (8 extensions) with the exact same tabs open, Firefox has been running for at least 2 hours while Chrome was freshly launched for the test.

post-356036-0-67705300-1321236937.png

Memory consumption is moot when most people now have computers with at least 4GB ram these days. This is like saying I have a 250GB hd and Windows system files take up 15GB. Low ram footprint is always great, but I'm not worried about it when it means giving up performance.

Not sure why people are having problems with Firefox memory usage. Here's my stats for Firefox 9 (11 extensions) and Chrome 16 (8 extensions) with the exact same tabs open, Firefox has been running for at least 2 hours while Chrome was freshly launched for the test.

post-356036-0-67705300-1321236937.png

Do you have any logical arguments to put on the table or are you just ranting about your personal opinions?

If you are referring to me, I am not ranting about anything. Maybe you should read the prior two posts..

Memory consumption is moot when you have at least 4GB ram these days. This is like saying I have a 250GB hd and Windows system files take up 15GB. Low ram footprint is always great, but I'm not worried about it when it means giving up performance. Ram does help in temporarily caching data in memory to make it available faster than writing data on the hd and reading it back.

I posted that somewhere in this thread that the memory usage does not bother me as I have 16Gb of memory.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
    • Microsoft Weekly: Surface Laptop Ultra, Windows 11 context menus, Build 2026 recap, and more by Taras Buria This week's news recap is here, with Microsoft announcing the new Surface Laptop Ultra, fresh chips from NVIDIA for Windows on ARM, a no-build week, fixes for Windows 11's context menus, gaming news, reviews, and more. Quick links: Windows 10 and 11 Windows Insider Program Updates are available Reviews are in Gaming news Great deals to check Windows 11 and Windows 10 Here, we talk about everything happening around Microsoft's latest operating system in the Stable channel and preview builds: new features, removed features, controversies, bugs, interesting findings, and more. And, of course, you may find a word or two about older versions. At Computex 2026, together with NVIDIA, Microsoft announced the Surface Laptop Ultra, its most powerful laptop to date, powered by NVIDIA's RTX Spark processor. Details about this computer are currently scarce, as Microsoft has only revealed certain parts of its specs. So far, we know that the computer has a 15-inch mini-LED display, a rich set of ports, a powerful processor, and all-day battery life. It also comes with a new wallpaper, which you can already download here in full resolution. The Surface Laptop Studio is not the only NVIDIA-powered Surface, which Microsoft unveiled this week. At Build 2026, the company also debuted the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box, an odd-shaped desktop with a 20-core NVIDIA Grace CPU and an NVIDIA Blackwell RTX GPU with 6,144 CUDA cores and fifth-generation Tensor Cores with FP4 precision, connected via the NVIDIA NVLink-C2C chip-to-chip interconnect for high performance. According to Microsoft, it can run models with up to 120 billion parameters locally without relying on cloud GPU infrastructure. These two new Surface devices are likely to cost quite a lot, and for those who need a more affordable device, Microsoft is preparing the next-gen Qualcomm-powered Surface Pro and Surface Laptop. This week, details about these two devices leaked in plenty of detail. Other announcements at Build 2026 include the following: Microsoft unveils new security tools for IT admins and developers building AI products Microsoft announces Scout, an OpenClaw-powered personal agent for enterprise customers Microsoft unveils MAI-Thinking-1 reasoning and MAI-Code-1 coding models Microsoft announced a new Windows 11 native command-line utility Microsoft unveils Majorana 2 quantum chip, accelerating commercial timeline to 2029 Microsoft believes that AI agents will eventually replace apps through Project Solara Microsoft introduces Web IQ, a Bing-powered search system built for AI agents Last week, Microsoft released a new Experimental build, which introduced a major Start menu upgrade. It now lets you toggle off specific parts of the menu without affecting other features, resize the menu, and hide additional UI elements. We published a closer look here, so if you want to know what Microsoft is cooking without enrolling in the Insider program and installing unstable builds, check it out. Speaking of new features, many users are very annoyed about the way Microsoft delivers them. Recently, a frustrated user shared their experience with gradual rollouts, and even Microsoft engineers admitted there is a flaw in the system that prevents new features from applying properly. One of those new features includes the ability to uninstall AI models in Windows 11 with a single click. Windows 11 is finally getting fixes for its slow context menus. Marcus Ash from Microsoft confirmed that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are going to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." According to Marcus, Microsoft will share more details soon. Windows Insider Program Windows 11 preview builds, released last week, are now available for download as standalone ISO files. These days, Microsoft regularly pushes new images, allowing users to clean-install its recent Windows 11 preview builds faster and easier. If you want to try the latest Windows 11 features without jumping through the Windows Update hoops, get those new images here. Sadly, Microsoft did not release new Windows 11 preview builds this week. Come back next time. Updates are available This section covers software, firmware, and other notable updates (released and coming soon) delivering new features, security fixes, improvements, patches, and more from Microsoft and third parties. Microsoft is preparing new features for Teams. Later this month, the messenger will receive a new download manager with auto-dismissing notifications, reducing clutter and making the overall experience less annoying when dealing with downloads. Mozilla released Firefox 151.0.3, a new bug-fixing update for the browser. It is a small release, which fixes problems with pasting into text fields and the oversized VPN button on the toolbar. The update is now available for all users in the Release channel. Here are other updates and releases you may find interesting: VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows Microsoft OneDrive is getting a simple yet much-needed feature Microsoft faces heat after quietly blocking promised Office features on Apple systems Microsoft resumes forced Copilot app installation on some Windows PCs Browser vendors pen an open letter to Microsoft, saying "enough is enough" Here are the latest drivers and firmware updates released this week: AMD Radeon Software 26.6.1 with optimizations for F1 25: 2026 Season, World of Tanks: HEAT, and various bug fixes. Reviews are in Here is the hardware and software we reviewed this week Steven Parker dropped more mini PC reviews this week. GEEKOM Air12 2026 Edition is a low-power, affordable computer with an Intel Tiger Lake Pentium Gold processor, up to 16GB of memory, and 512GB of storage, costing just $349. It is light, quiet, energy efficient, and has modern ports on the front. However, the front-facing USB Type-C is data-only, and there are some quirks with the computer's memory, so check out the full review. The AMD RX 9070 GRE has been released worldwide, and we published a benchmark review comparing this powerful graphics card to the RX 9070 XT, 7800 XT, the NVIDIA RTX 5070, and RTX 4070. It has solid, balanced performance, plenty of RAM, and low temperatures, but watch out for mediocre ray tracing performance and not the best efficiency. Also, we reviewed the Cuktech 10 Ultra, a compact, high-power charger with four ports and a big display full of various stats. This tiny charger can pull nearly 120W and spread that power according to each connected device's needs. It also comes with a high-quality 240W cable, three power modes, and retractable prongs. The best part? It is quite affordable, just make sure you have an outlet placed in the right spot to benefit from the built-in display. On the gaming side Learn about upcoming game releases, Xbox rumors, new hardware, software updates, freebies, deals, discounts, and more. Do you remember the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally, Microsoft's first handheld console designed in partnership with ASUS? This week, ASUS revealed a new version of the device to celebrate twenty years of its Republic of Gamers brand. The new ROG Xbox Ally X20 features an OLED display, a transforming D-Pad, TMR sticks, and other changes. However, the chip inside the console is still the same. Forza Horizon 6 launched last month to critical acclaim, but the game will soon have a new rival made by those who used to work on Forza Horizon titles. Mike Brown from Maverick Games announced Clutch, an upcoming racing game with a story-driven campaign, deep car customization, and rich multiplayer. The game is coming to PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 in Spring 2027. The next update for Minecraft now has a release date. This week, Mojang announced that Chaos Cubed will be available on June 16, 2026. In addition, Mojang published a teaser of the next Minecraft movie. A Minecraft Movie Squared has now been confirmed for a release somewhere in 2027. NVIDIA GeForce Now is getting 18 new games in June. Those include Jurassic World Evolution 3, Fatekeeper, GOALS, Gothic 1 Remake, NTE: Neverness to Everness, and more. If you are a Game Pass subscriber, you can also get new games soon: Persona 5 Royal, Starseeker: Astroneer Expeditions, and more are coming to the service this month. Sumer Game Fest 2026 happened this week, where we saw plenty of new games, including Alien Isolation 2, Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3, Gen Atlas from the Shadow of the Colossus creator, a new Cuphead game in 8-bit style, a new expansion for Mafia: The Old Country, and more. Finally, here are this week's Weekend PC Game Deals, full of discounts and the latest freebies from the Epic Games Store. Other gaming news includes the following: God of War Laufey announced, introducing Kratos' wife as the new protagonist Ori studio's No Rest for the Wicked 1.0 release and console plans announced Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine Great deals to check Every week, we cover many deals on different hardware and software. The following discounts are still available, so check them out. You might find something you want or need. Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe - $389.99 | 39% off Sonos Sub 4 - Wireless Subwoofer - $759 | 16% off Logitech MX Creative Console - $159.99 | 20% off This link will take you to other issues of the Microsoft Weekly series. You can also support Neowin by registering for a free member account or subscribing for extra member benefits, along with an ad-free tier option.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      JKR earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      274
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!