Recommended Posts

Is anyone using the new mozilla profile manager? http://ftp.mozilla.o...ilemanager/1.0/

profilemanager.jpg

Now is very easy to use use all firefox versions without having to change things on shortcuts icons. Besides by changing the user agent string on about:config (nightly and ux are recognized as mobile browsers for some websites) (string->new->general.useragent.override->value=(example: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0) you can try every version without worry.

I wonder if mozilla will add the option to add a new tab as private without having to star a new session. (like google chrome)

Memory consumption is moot when most people now have computers with at least 4GB ram these days. This is like saying I have a 250GB hd and Windows system files take up 15GB. Low ram footprint is always great, but I'm not worried about it when it means giving up performance.

Freeing up memory and allocating memory are not free operations.

Anyone know how to get the extension Linkification to work with Firefox 9.0 Beta? Almost all of my extensions work except for that one and the Java console. It worked great in 8.0

You can install Addon Compatibility reporter. That should allow it to work.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/?src=api

Yes I know, 11 is a great deal faster and does better things but the same results could have been with Firefox 4.11. The only reason they jumped the numbers up, was due to Chrome. This cannot be denied. At the rate Mozilla is going we will have a Firefox 20 by 2013.

They jumped the numbers up because they moved to a time based release cycle. Why would they try and artificially inflate version numbers, to compete with chrome's version number, when chrome does NOT ADVERTISE OR REFER TO THEIR VERSION NUMBER ANYWHERE ON THEIR SITE? (and only in the about box as expected in the browser) Chrome is simply referred to as Chrome. not Chrome 11. Chrome.

Firefox is copying their sucessful release cycle, not their version number. The point is to get improvements and features to the users faster, so we don't end up with an outdated, stagnant releases like firefox 3 ended up being before 4 finally came out.

I am a huge fan of this release cycle, its very consistant and streamlines, and the channels are great for testers. So sick of all the whiners trying to insinuate its some ridiculous version number conspiracy, and they feel the need to psot in every thread or article that has to due with firefox.

/rant

  • Like 3

They jumped the numbers up because they moved to a time based release cycle. Why would they try and artificially inflate version numbers, to compete with chrome's version number, when chrome does NOT ADVERTISE OR REFER TO THEIR VERSION NUMBER ANYWHERE ON THEIR SITE? (and only in the about box as expected in the browser) Chrome is simply referred to as Chrome. not Chrome 11. Chrome.

Firefox is copying their sucessful release cycle, not their version number. The point is to get improvements and features to the users faster, so we don't end up with an outdated, stagnant releases like firefox 3 ended up being before 4 finally came out.

I am a huge fan of this release cycle, its very consistant and streamlines, and the channels are great for testers. So sick of all the whiners trying to insinuate its some ridiculous version number conspiracy, and they feel the need to psot in every thread or article that has to due with firefox.

/rant

:yes:

They jumped the numbers up because they moved to a time based release cycle. Why would they try and artificially inflate version numbers, to compete with chrome's version number, when chrome does NOT ADVERTISE OR REFER TO THEIR VERSION NUMBER ANYWHERE ON THEIR SITE? (and only in the about box as expected in the browser) Chrome is simply referred to as Chrome. not Chrome 11. Chrome.

Firefox is copying their sucessful release cycle, not their version number. The point is to get improvements and features to the users faster, so we don't end up with an outdated, stagnant releases like firefox 3 ended up being before 4 finally came out.

I am a huge fan of this release cycle, its very consistant and streamlines, and the channels are great for testers. So sick of all the whiners trying to insinuate its some ridiculous version number conspiracy, and they feel the need to psot in every thread or article that has to due with firefox.

/rant

I am glad to hear that, then I hope that you are testing every release up and including the final.

Some sweetness related to addons - more will come soon - in the end (default compatibility of addons)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700201

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695977

-Removal Trace Monkey JS engine code may happen this week, which means 67k lines code going to finish its journey in FF. Also related bugs to it will die. (in test process currently)

-Silent Updates (removal of UAC dialog) work is finished and may land soon. (in review process currently)

-Partial support of Chrome to FF your data import is done, may land soon (in review process currently)

I am glad to hear that, then I hope that you are testing every release up and including the final.

There is no need to follow each version through Nightly, Aurora, then Beta, and especially not after Final is released. If a bug or feature isn't fixed coming out of Nightly then that usually means you can just keep following it in the next version of Nightly. Aurora is basically for stability testing of the Nightly patches that landed and Beta is pretty much what the Release Candidates used to be.

You can install Addon Compatibility reporter. That should allow it to work.

https://addons.mozil...porter/?src=api

I knew about that, but I didn't think I'd have to do that since all my other addons work. I found a hacked version that works, though. Here is the link to it for anyone that wants it. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2061460/linkification_1.3.9c.xpi

There is no need to follow each version through Nightly, Aurora, then Beta, and especially not after Final is released. If a bug or feature isn't fixed coming out of Nightly then that usually means you can just keep following it in the next version of Nightly. Aurora is basically for stability testing of the Nightly patches that landed and Beta is pretty much what the Release Candidates used to be.

The nightly patches are for the Nightly builds. Aurora has it's own patching process. By the time a build reaches the Aurora stage it is stable. The build I am using right now is stable.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111116 Firefox/11.0a1

The nightly patches are for the Nightly builds. Aurora has it's own patching process. By the time a build reaches the Aurora stage it is stable. The build I am using right now is stable.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111116 Firefox/11.0a1

Grinder, can you do us all a favor and at least go and read up on some official resources before spewing your misinformation all over the place? I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here, but if it's to be helpful and share accurate information, you are failing horribly at it.

Grinder, can you do us all a favor and at least go and read up on some official resources before spewing your misinformation all over the place? I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here, but if it's to be helpful and share accurate information, you are failing horribly at it.

What I posted is correct. Nightly patches are for Nightly builds. Aurora patches are for Aurora builds. You sir are the one that fails to comprehend a very simple concept. I suggest that you visit some of the sites below and educate yourself:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Features/Release_Tracking

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Main_Page

https://quality.mozilla.org/

https://affiliates.mozilla.org/en-US/

http://www.andrewturnbull.net/mozilla/historyfx.html

https://developer.mozilla.org/en

You can do me a favor and just leave me alone as you are contributing nothing.

anyone?

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Features/Desktop/Firefox_Home_Tab

The above is all I can find on it.

What I posted is correct. Nightly patches are for Nightly builds. Aurora patches are for Aurora builds.

I see now that rather than educating yourself, you're choosing to throw a hissy fit over your ignorance getting called out. So would you mind telling us which one of your posted links back up your claim above, or that Aurora is stable? :rolleyes:

I see now that rather than educating yourself, you're choosing to throw a hissy fit over your ignorance getting called out. So would you mind telling us which one of your posted links back up your claim above, or that Aurora is stable? :rolleyes:

You still have a problem with the English language. I said that The Nightly build that I am using is stable. To this is can prove as it has never crashed. I did use Aurora while it was still under the release as a Nightly and at that time it was stable. I do not use Aurora now so I have no Idea of it's stability other than to say if the build was stable as a Nightly, logic would dictate that it is stable in the second release phase which is Aurora,

I need to switch from Nightly to Aurora today, since yesterday Nightly build I'm facing memory leaks, when You look in about:memory after few minutes of browsing there will be entry: "Heap Unclassified" which is not releasing memory and during browsing this memory is stuck there for good (browser restart), I've check this in save mode, normal mode with all adds disabled, same thing over and over again, on Mozilla forum I saw some similar reports but looks like no one is taking this seriously... :)

Edit:

OK, Looks like bug is on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702813

I need to switch from Nightly to Aurora today, since yesterday Nightly build I'm facing memory leaks, when You look in about:memory after few minutes of browsing there will be entry: "Heap Unclassified" which is not releasing memory and during browsing this memory is stuck there for good (browser restart), I've check this in save mode, normal mode with all adds disabled, same thing over and over again, on Mozilla forum I saw some similar reports but looks like no one is taking this seriously... :)

Edit:

OK, Looks like bug is on https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=702813

I'm experiencing the same issue. Thanks for the link.

The nightly patches are for the Nightly builds. Aurora has it's own patching process. By the time a build reaches the Aurora stage it is stable. The build I am using right now is stable.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111116 Firefox/11.0a1

Yeah, the Nightly builds have been very stable for me for quite some time, too. That being said there's still a chance that you'll run into issues (like the one above) that an Aurora user would be less likely to encounter.

From some of your other posts you seemed to hint that you should test, for example, Nightly 11, then Aurora 11, and so on. I was just saying there's no need to do so. I wasn't saying that each channel doesn't get their own patches.

I had that same issue when I updated my nightly and finally got to restoring it. browsed the net for a while... had the same thing.

had 2.2GB commit and 2.1GB RAM usage overnight. I only left 15 tabs open overnight. but with 120 approx browser actions.

I'm experiencing the same issue. Thanks for the link.

Yeah, the Nightly builds have been very stable for me for quite some time, too. That being said there's still a chance that you'll run into issues (like the one above) that an Aurora user would be less likely to encounter.

From some of your other posts you seemed to hint that you should test, for example, Nightly 11, then Aurora 11, and so on. I was just saying there's no need to do so. I wasn't saying that each channel doesn't get their own patches.

What I said is that I do not do that, I stay with the Nightly Builds. I did say that the Builds that I did test turned into Aurora and they were stable when I tested them in the nightly channel. One may run into problems no matter what channel that they are on. It is supposed to be that the Final is more stable than the Beta and the Beta is more stable than Aurora and so forth. But it does not always work that way. Firefox 8.01 will be released later today or tomorrow , so I suppose a problem was found. More than likely a security issue.

You still have a problem with the English language. I said that The Nightly build that I am using is stable. To this is can prove as it has never crashed. I did use Aurora while it was still under the release as a Nightly and at that time it was stable. I do not use Aurora now so I have no Idea of it's stability other than to say if the build was stable as a Nightly, logic would dictate that it is stable in the second release phase which is Aurora,

Or maybe you should learn some technical knowledge about software and realize that stability entails a lot more than simply not crashing. And even then the current Aurora channel contained at least two crasher bugs when it was first released. Just because you don't run into them since you don't do extensive testing doesn't mean no one else does.

There's also no such thing as Aurora "having its own patching process". If you really knew how Bugzilla works you'd also know that all incoming patches are always merged with mozilla-central first, but tracking flags can be nominated for each bug to be merged to other release channels as well without waiting for the patched mozilla-central code to trickle out to them days or weeks later.

Again, if your intention is to help, then please make sure you have accurate information before you do. If your intention here is simply to put on a show of being more intelligent and informed than you actually are... then carry on, I guess.

Anyone know why Firefox always slows down and even locks up for a few seconds whenever downloads are done? I don't have that issue with Chrome or other browsers. Is it because of the pop-up notification, poor code, bad extension, or what? Is that being worked on? It's my only real complaint right now. Surely I'm not the only one experiencing this, right? I'm using 9.0 Beta

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!