Recommended Posts

615411275.png

Left is SPDY enabled, right is with it disabled.

The onload times are skewed a but, due to things Google loads in, but is you look at the graphs you can see that objects hosted on the same IP take less time to load, and spend less time waiting (Classical HTTP uses 1 connection per resource, SPDY uses 1 connection per IP for all resources, and stuff like WebSockets)

Edit: The cyan in the graphs is "time spent waiting to connect", SPDY doesn't suffer from that since it multiplexes data into the single connection, allowing other resources to load without having to wait.

Edit 2: I was wrong :laugh: Cyan is DNS lookup, the green is connecting. That said, I think either Firebug is mishandling the values, or Firefox is reporting stuff wrong, as the times can be a bit strange (0ms to transfer 10KB of content, but 500ms to transfer 15KB?)

Strange, problem exist, so looks like there is some other dependence, since now I start think about SPDY enabled in my build....

The only time I crash is if I enter About:Memory into the URL Bar. A Bug report has been filed:

Bug 708248 - Crash in mozilla::storage::StorageSQLiteMultiReporter::CollectReports with Stylish 1.2.4 enabled

Yeah, I had stylish running. I only have one script for it so I disabled it for the time being until they get the recent bugs straightened out. Seems like they added quite a bit of code this week. Otherwise, there is still Aurora to fall back on until the dust clears.

Also previously it was decided that if Silent Updates (Removal of UAC dialog and update progress bar) land early development phase of FF then these will be also land in Aurora FF10, now they missed the train, it maybe now only in FF11 and FF12.

Also addons default to compatible dream..

You was right, in today's build it is out...shame.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709193 looks like this is big problem....

Yeah, it's the second time they're run into this issue. One problem is that they compile 32bit builds on 32bit systems, so at most they're limited to 3GB of RAM for the compile tools (which they're now using), moving to 64bit systems for the 32bit builds will give them 4GB of RAM, which they'll also hit soon enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!