Recommended Posts

Firefox Nightly 11 now support IndexedDB final spec and also Websocket API final spec. Addon Sync is now possible and Hotfix Addon is also available. Mac OS X Lion Scrollbar is in Inbound currently. Style Editor is also enhanced with current theme of developer tools.

Firefox Nightly 11 now support IndexedDB final spec and also Websocket API final spec. Addon Sync is now possible and Hotfix Addon is also available. Mac OS X Lion Scrollbar is in Inbound currently. Style Editor is also enhanced with current theme of developer tools.

Would be really nice to have a sync option that would not require pairing it with other devices, kind of like how Chrome allows all data and extension syncing.

what does that mean? will it be in nightly or ux tomorrow?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636564

It will be in FF11 and tomorrow's Nightly..

Would be really nice to have a sync option that would not require pairing it with other devices, kind of like how Chrome allows all data and extension syncing.

detailed here: http://www.ghacks.net/2011/12/20/firefox-11-will-synchronize-add-ons/

Firefox on Mac, after all these years and versions, is still nowhere as close to being native as Safari.

I run Firefox on win and osx because I like it better than Safari and IE not because its native.

How is safari more native? and what is native to you?

Yeah, I saw that the other day. But unless I am mistaken, it still requires you to add another device first before syncing rather than just logging in and letting it do the rest.

Is it me or does the hardware acceleration feature not do much on ff? I have it enabled and the about:support page shows it's enabled, as well as in the settings. I have an ATi Radeon 4800. Yet when I visit pages such as http://hip-hoproom.com/ that have snow animations or even other pages my cpu usage for firefox spikes up and down like crazy, about 30/40% sometimes higher. I'd have thought that any graphical parts of the page especially animated/video like would be offloaded for the gfx card to decode, hence keeping the cpu usage stable. Even when I use the group tabs feature (where all the tabs are shown on a page), when I select a tab to view the switchover seems very sluggish and just not smooth. I've noticed this since they started their rapid release program. I've tried fresh installs too. Pretty annoying!

Yeah, I saw that the other day. But unless I am mistaken, it still requires you to add another device first before syncing rather than just logging in and letting it do the rest.

This might be a silly question (I'm a bit tired so it might just be me), but what functionality are you looking for exactly? What do you mean by "letting it do the rest"?

You can set up Sync on one device without doing anything else. Technically, as long as you keep a record of your sync key and account credentials you should be able to retrieve all your old data if you, for instance, delete your old profile. I don't know if Mozilla's stance has changed since then, but months ago I read it wasn't recommended to treat Sync as a backup service, however. It's only really intended to keep all of your devices synced with each other (from what I read months ago).

If anyone is running Nightly 11 there is a version update to Nightly 12.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20111220 Firefox/12.0a1

Yep, just got the update a little while ago. :)

Is it me or does the hardware acceleration feature not do much on ff? I have it enabled and the about:support page shows it's enabled, as well as in the settings. I have an ATi Radeon 4800. Yet when I visit pages such as http://hip-hoproom.com/ that have snow animations or even other pages my cpu usage for firefox spikes up and down like crazy, about 30/40% sometimes higher. I'd have thought that any graphical parts of the page especially animated/video like would be offloaded for the gfx card to decode, hence keeping the cpu usage stable. Even when I use the group tabs feature (where all the tabs are shown on a page), when I select a tab to view the switchover seems very sluggish and just not smooth. I've noticed this since they started their rapid release program. I've tried fresh installs too. Pretty annoying!

If site is using CSS3 gradient code, then it is known issue...

nice! now let?s hope they fix Lion fullscreen support.

FF10 has Full Screen API support if I am not mistaken.

mind explaining how Safari is not?

The UI in Safari is composed of 2 parts, WebKit and the toolbar region. The toolbar is custom and WebKit can't use native widgets for web compatibility reasons. The preferences window is the most native part of it.

It's not important or hinders it's functionality in any way, which is why "is it native" is a pretty bad way of judging browsers.

I was comparing it to Safari on Mac by the way. But even on Windows, they did a pretty solid job.

So on the Mac, just to name a few, about Firefox :

- The prefpane is super slow

- It still doesn?t have Lion?s scrollbar (which doesn?t require much on the Developer?s end)

- It still doesn?t have Lion?s full-screen (which doesn?t require much on the Developer?s end)

- The back button is a complete joke visually

- The complementary modules is just strange? as in, it opens a webpage rather than staying in the application itself.

- The close button on the tabs is on the right instead of being on the left.

- Closing the contextual menu doesn?t fade it out. It simply disappears.

- The tab group certainly doesn?t use native OS X animations. It?s all screwed up.

- The gear icon in the popup window when you display all your favorites is different than the Finder?s, and while we?re at it, all the icons are a shade darker than the Finder?s and everywhere else in OS X.

- I could go on, and on, and on, but decided to shut it down after 5 minutes.

I?m running the latest Firefox 8.0.1 by the way. I can?t wait to see what Firefox Next brings to me?

I was comparing it to Safari on Mac by the way. But even on Windows, they did a pretty solid job.

So on the Mac, just to name a few, about Firefox :

- The prefpane is super slow

- It still doesn?t have Lion?s scrollbar (which doesn?t require much on the Developer?s end)

- It still doesn?t have Lion?s full-screen (which doesn?t require much on the Developer?s end)

- The back button is a complete joke visually

- The complementary modules is just strange? as in, it opens a webpage rather than staying in the application itself.

- The close button on the tabs is on the right instead of being on the left.

- Closing the contextual menu doesn?t fade it out. It simply disappears.

- The tab group certainly doesn?t use native OS X animations. It?s all screwed up.

- The gear icon in the popup window when you display all your favorites is different than the Finder?s, and while we?re at it, all the icons are a shade darker than the Finder?s and everywhere else in OS X.

- I could go on, and on, and on, but decided to shut it down after 5 minutes.

I?m running the latest Firefox 8.0.1 by the way. I can?t wait to see what Firefox Next brings to me?

try nightly It have lion scrollbars.

full-screen will be in nightly or ux any day now https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639705

use small icons to have it look more like safari

I?m glad they don?t copy all the stuff safari have like tabs on bottom and close bottom on tabs on left side.

LOL!! Sir, I didn't know that Lion new some kind of other Full Screen support but to make HTML5 Full screen, Full Screen API is landed...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
    • Thanks for the advice guys, I'll give my current GPU a clean and then run the benchmarks to see how similar it is. Hopefully a bit of a clean-out will help it last a bit longer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!