Recommended Posts

should be coming soon, there are a list of things that need to be done for it to be more native.

1. Page bounce when scrolling

2. Lion scrollbars

3. page forward and back animation

These are just a few above the surface elements as there are things that still need to be done below to increase performance on OS X.

Thanks for letting me know. :) Hopefully these are all added in near future.

Oh my nativeness! That looks great! Is it a good alternative to Speed Dial?

To me its okay... The thumbnails do not look THAT good plus i think they should be larger. But anyways a nice feature which DOES have a turn off button :)

Google chrome copy/pasted? :(

Speed dial is like bookmark, where the new tab page is more like history/most visited.

What the heck!! You can not call it Google Chrome copy paste , idea of thumbnails is from Opera while showing history pages is by Safari. Chrome did not innovate this idea :/

What the heck!! You can not call it Google Chrome copy paste , idea of thumbnails is from Opera while showing history pages is by Safari. Chrome did not innovate this idea :/

Sorry, I should have said "everybody will think that it's been copy/pasted from Google Chrome", I typed my post too quickly!

Sorry, I should have said "everybody will think that it's been copy/pasted from Google Chrome", I typed my post too quickly!

Let them think... Safari copied Opera , Chrome copied both , we copy all three whatever

PS : It got backed out again :'(

Sorry, I should have said "everybody will think that it's been copy/pasted from Google Chrome", I typed my post too quickly!

Again, most of the times is not copypasta, just progress. You wouldn't say that chrome copied the addon thing from Firefox, even though firefox had them before chrome.

Good ideas should not be avoided just because someone else did them first.

That's not what've said.

But I prefer innovation instead of copy/pasting.

Again, most of the times is not copypasta, just progress. You wouldn't say that chrome copied the addon thing from Firefox, even though firefox had them before chrome.

What's the diff between Firefox/Chrome on this feature? I don't see any, really.

What's the diff between Firefox/Chrome on this feature? I don't see any, really.

None. And i really can't see where the problem is. I don't find it a shame to implement good features from other browsers.

That's not what've said.

But I prefer innovation instead of copy/pasting.

Well of course. But innovation and making use of good ideas are not mutually exclusive.

It's perfectly sensible for software to take cues from others for good ideas and implementations. You can still innovate at the same time. Browsers currently seem to be in a pretty good place with all that - good ideas are being shared, while all are pushing the boundaries elsewhere.

Yep having this same bug as well for the last couple of days. Took some trial and error to figure out which one was causing it. Frustrating too because the awesome bar suggestions look so huge now with the addon disabled.

Tried re-enabling the omnibar add-on with the latest nightly build and it's working properly now. So happy to have it back.

That's not what've said.

But I prefer innovation instead of copy/pasting.

What's the diff between Firefox/Chrome on this feature? I don't see any, really.

Ok.How about this.Someone invented the roof of a house looong before you were even born.So why do you copy/paste it and use a roof for your house???Just innovate something else.

I don't get you guys.Who cares who invented something first???The only thing i care is that i have that nice feature in my favorite browser and that it works ok.I don't give a duck who tought of it first.And like ppl said you can't just ditch good ideas and features just because someone tought of them first.Nothing in this world is purely innovative.Most of the things use something from other things,so your theory of making something purely innovative is flawed.

Tried re-enabling the omnibar add-on with the latest nightly build and it's working properly now. So happy to have it back.

Completely forgot about it for the past couple of days. But yeah, this addon is just that awesome.

New Tab Page in fx branch again for testing , lets hope it will make it to Firefox 12

they really need to do something more with it though, it's way too plain and featureless in its current form

they really need to do something more with it though, it's way too plain and featureless in its current form

That's really what they want though, something unobtrusive and out of the way. The original goal included RSS feeds, Google search box, etc. but they decided that was too much clutter and drew the user away from just going to the site they wanted.

That's really what they want though, something unobtrusive and out of the way. The original goal included RSS feeds, Google search box, etc. but they decided that was too much clutter and drew the user away from just going to the site they wanted.

A wise decision.

That's really what they want though, something unobtrusive and out of the way. The original goal included RSS feeds, Google search box, etc. but they decided that was too much clutter and drew the user away from just going to the site they wanted.

They have already innovated ideas and made mockups for the implementation ,its just that devs are too busy ...

See, thoses are nice and innovating mockups.

You says that devs are too busy copy/pasting Chrome? Come on ...

sarcastic?

Anyways , if you do not know what the devs are busy with , please don't assume anything just like that please... They have this IonMonkey base ready and up on arewefastyet , incrementalGC in progress , Profile clean up , and VARIOUS snappy and memshrink projects worked on and landing to nightly... What i have told is just about performance , rest UI related stuff is also fixed now and then (inline autocomplete , new tab page , download manager)

New Tab Page is landing again for tomorrow's nightly , lets see...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, mucking around with settings, maybe shoot some calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!