Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I'm sorry for posting this question here, but this thread is alive and you guys probably know everything about Firefox.

So, I want to completely remove Google from my life and for me, the only alternative to Chrome is Firefox. But there's one thing that's killing me. If I import Chrome's bookmarks, favicons are not imported. There used to be a plug-in for restoring/refreshing favicons, it was called Check Places. It doesn't exist anymore (at least not in the extension "store"). Are there any other extensions that can restore favicons?

Thanks in advance

I do not know why it was crashing on users. The 32 Bit Crashed many many times. I , to the best of my knowledge have never had a crash using the 64 Bit version. Maybe some users don't know where to find the proper plug-ins, IDK. But I agree with you Zippy, it is a very bad decision on Mozilla's part.

The 64bit version is much buggier than the 32bit version, and was never intended to be tested by end users (But in the end more people were using the unsupported 64bit release than the supported 32bit release, which was one of the reasons why it was turned off)

Every time I tried the 64bit nightly I'd get about 2-3 crashes, and on average only 1 of those would ever have been caught by the crash reporter. So even if 64bit Firefox was providing most of the top crasher bugs, I'd say they were still missing out on a bunch.

There is no one to be blamed for bad 64-bit support other than the developers.

Any good browser should start transitioning to more modern technologies.

How long are you going to rely on a WOW COMPATIBILITY LAYER? Till it will be gone?

Till Microsoft wont certify 32-bit apps? What?

I am not saying that it is normal for a browser to use more than ~3GB RAM.

But it sure beats getting on OOM when you have 8/16/32 GB RAM free.

Also proper 64-bit support means of equivalent or better performance than 32-bit.

Obviously. Less Assembly Code. Better performance handling 64-bit numbers and SSE2 and more registers.

That is all there is to it. Besides Linux and Mac are 64-bit already.

So WTF. Lead Mozilla. Not follow.

hate to say it, but Mozilla will eventually Crumble just like Netscape. even Open Source Browser such as Epiphany are starting to take features from Chrome that Mozilla still lack. another problem with Mozilla, they do not have any Goals, just look at when they said they'd dump 64bit support browsers, now they dig ther 64bit browser out of the Grave an put life back into it. an you call that a Goal? they have none.

The WoW64 layer won't be removed from a proper consumer release of Windows (not talking about locked down crap like WinRT) for a very long time, Microsoft only just got rid of 16bit compatibility recently. And it's not like it would just vanish overnight, if Microsoft do remove it, it'll be over a very obvious and slow transition period.

There are benefits to moving to a pure 64bit build, but they won't benefit a program like Firefox much (For example, 64bit Firefox is slower than 32bit Firefox)

The WoW64 layer won't be removed from a proper consumer release of Windows (not talking about locked down crap like WinRT) for a very long time, Microsoft only just got rid of 16bit compatibility recently. And it's not like it would just vanish overnight, if Microsoft do remove it, it'll be over a very obvious and slow transition period.

There are benefits to moving to a pure 64bit build, but they won't benefit a program like Firefox much (For example, 64bit Firefox is slower than 32bit Firefox)

I did not notice a drop in performance using the 64 Bit version of Firefox. Maybe it is your machine or your OS? Should MS do away with their 64 Bit Browser as well?

Firefox really doing great in WebIDL (JS class based bindings) and many of these are gonna land today.

Snappy work is now really progressing especially off the main thread sweets landing once in a week at least. So snappiness is improved great deal for me but I noticed one issue, my old profile of several months history does not load site quickly if I open Firefox which is very pathetic although solved this by making new profile.

Firefox progress on WebIDL can be measured on this simple benchmark given on IE Test Center: http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/HTML5/DOMCapabilities/Default.html

IE9 and 10 score perfect 24 out of 24

Chrome score 21 out of 24

Previously Firefox used to score 17 out of 24 but now latest Nightly score 23 out of 24, so I think it is great improvement.

Salute to Boris dev working on WebIDL work.

  • Like 2

I think the whole concept of the library window is pretty ****ty. Should just integrate that into the options UI (incontent ofc)

That's the ultimate plan to implement Incontent UI.

Some more from Inbound:

Code refactoring and cleanup: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825866

DOM: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825949 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=816340 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=818708

JS Engine: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=824217

Phishing Protection: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650935 ,

Private Browsing UI related (in Autostart): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826371

Performance improvement (Backed out): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791546

Ion Monkey Improvement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822436

Networking Cache performance improvement: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725993

Click to Play Doorhanger bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820303

Per Window Private Browsing bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826063

Plugins issue on Linux: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814200

JS Engine GC bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826435 (More precisely Exact Rooting - Generational GC bug)

Social API: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=824800

Per Window Private Browsing & Addon SDK: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815847

(Snappy) ADD UI when Plugins become unresponsive (backed out): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805591

Cookie Manager bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826159

MemShrink (Added new memory reporter): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826553

  • Like 2

What I like the most about using Nightly builds is that you never know what fixes are included untill hours after you update.

A pretty detailed list of things changing in the nightly builds day-to-day can be found here: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2+days+ago&enddate=now

It's not surprising that you always don't get a nicely formatted list (here, or on mozillazine) until after the update, because nightly generation is an automated process - the daily lists rely on the kindness of volunteers.

Changes can land any time of day, by many different people, and not all of them are noteworthy (many aren't listed even on the most detailed changelogs that volunteers produce). Nor, to be honest, does it matter what's in the lists most of the time - Firefox developers watch their respective areas, and many changes have no relevance to end-users.

Then there's the fact that things can get pulled out of nightly at a moment's notice, rendering the changelog incorrect. The changelog for one day could have a quarter of the items negated the next day by a backout.

Essentially, I'm saying this is normal, and expected. I work at a software company, and even though I *love* reading changelogs, it would be ridiculous to try and effectively watch everything that's going on. Important changes for end-users have different methods of communication.

So - be very happy for the kindness of volunteers who look out for interesting changes from nightly to nightly, even if Firefox will survive just fine without them :)

A pretty detailed list of things changing in the nightly builds day-to-day can be found here: http://hg.mozilla.or...ago&enddate=now

It's not surprising that you always don't get a nicely formatted list (here, or on mozillazine) until after the update, because nightly generation is an automated process - the daily lists rely on the kindness of volunteers.

Changes can land any time of day, by many different people, and not all of them are noteworthy (many aren't listed even on the most detailed changelogs that volunteers produce). Nor, to be honest, does it matter what's in the lists most of the time - Firefox developers watch their respective areas, and many changes have no relevance to end-users.

Then there's the fact that things can get pulled out of nightly at a moment's notice, rendering the changelog incorrect. The changelog for one day could have a quarter of the items negated the next day by a backout.

Essentially, I'm saying this is normal, and expected. I work at a software company, and even though I *love* reading changelogs, it would be ridiculous to try and effectively watch everything that's going on. Important changes for end-users have different methods of communication.

So - be very happy for the kindness of volunteers who look out for interesting changes from nightly to nightly, even if Firefox will survive just fine without them :)

I know where and how to get the updates. It is at one Time the updates were posted before the release of the Nightly. I intended to follow Fx 20 through the cycle but the Aurora version is still at 19. So I wait. When Mozilla came out with These Branches one was able to go from one to the other like from Nightly to Aurora and so forth. That lasted about 10 days I think. Anyway now I am on Fx21 and it works just fine so maybe I will follow it through.

Firefox 20 Nightly is marked as 21 now, so FF20 is in Aurora stage now.

Firefox is going amazing path nowadays.

I am loving every single bit of it now and it is vastly improved in every single way from FF3.6+ havock era.

Also DOM performance is quite splendid, you can witness it in several artifical benchmark sites as well like Peacekeeper, Dromaeo benchmark etc.

Some highlight of landings which I does not manage to cover due to my college classes starting. Sorry folks.

HTML5 "undo" feature implementation, SVG WebIDL elements, Anonymouse Health Report stuff

Some more info from Inbound:

Ion Monkey: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=826734, https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827659 (test failing more appropriate),

Crash fix: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827274

GC: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827929 , https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=799252 ,

Regression fix appeared on Firefox automated TALOS tests: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827188

Phishing Protection: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=825891

Shaping library Update rollup: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=826226

Crash fix (Appearing in FF18 as well): https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=823041

SVG Rendering bug: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=825411

CC related (SNAPPY) fix: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=820378 |ALSO BACKPORTED TO FF20|

WebIDL: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=810644

FF Theme related fix: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827524

HTML5 Scoped Style Attribute Support landed BUT GOT BACKOUT: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=508725

CSS2 test fail fix: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=605231

CSS Flexbox related layout bug: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=826149

Download Panel: https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827298 , https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=827164

Per Window Private Browsing UI for desktop: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729865

Also work on dense or sparse arrays fast path is again started by Brian Hackett it will make Firefox make particularly quite better in Peackeeper "Array" benchmark where Chrome literally destory every other browser and gain massive points lead.

Not only this, it will also improve other web apps performance.

  • Like 3

I know where and how to get the updates. It is at one Time the updates were posted before the release of the Nightly. I intended to follow Fx 20 through the cycle but the Aurora version is still at 19. So I wait. When Mozilla came out with These Branches one was able to go from one to the other like from Nightly to Aurora and so forth. That lasted about 10 days I think. Anyway now I am on Fx21 and it works just fine so maybe I will follow it through.

Yes, Aurora does not update automatically for a few days after the Nightly merge, so the code can stabilise.

Why would you follow a specific version through the cycle? That seems somewhat pointless.

All you would do is not get any new features for four months, and potentially lose features as they're backed out for not being stable enough. What benefit is there? (And you end up with the problem that your browser wants to update, but you are avoiding it ... sort of).

Now that 18 is out, anyone have a link to 19 beta 1? From The FTP or wherever. Also, what has changed from 18 to 19? Thanks!

You will get some more WebIDL spec implementation and Snappy fixes for sure and some more developer tools.

Let the release notes comes.. http://www.mozilla.o...a2/auroranotes/

Link to release notes when it was in aurora channel.

Link to FF19 Beta 1: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/19.0b1/win32/en-US/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!