Recommended Posts

What do you mean by memory leaks? You mean the overall responsiveness of the browser? Like it won't say not responding sometimes or feel jerky when scrolling or opening tabs? I have just upgraded to 19 beta after reading what you posted, and so far I agree. It does seem to be more responsive, but it could just be because I have a fresh Firefox loaded. I hope it keeps this up!! There used to be a great extension called TabGroups Manager, but it hasn't worked correctly since version 17, I think. That is the only thing I am really missing so far!! Firefox needs to expand upon the great idea of Panorama in the same way that TabGroups Manager had done. I am using TabGroups Menu as a somewhat acceptable substitute, but it's just not the same. Anything better out there for managing Tab Groups? Also, I just noticed that UnloadTab has been updated. That should help the memory issues with too many tabs open. I'm going to check it out and see how it works. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/unloadtab/?src=ss

Some updates from Inbound:

Now since many WebIDL bindings are landed and many still have yet to landing, more focus of Firefox is now snappy fixes, download panel, JS engine, WebRTC, Video/Audio backends these days.

I missed few updates post but I will try to compensate as much as I can:

FF18 topcrash fix: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828184

Video/Audio: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814308 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=804875 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=819377 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825329 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828901 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828713 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825325 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826349 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822933 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793274 , https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829042 ,

HTML5 Table rendering bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=827799

New JS Engine friend api: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828139

Download Panel (Clear Download bug should appear only in Download View): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830842

Ion Monkey JS Crash: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830269

Crash when printing <canvas>: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830236

Layout Forms Controls bug [Mac only]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829886

SVG regression: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828815

Download Panel (Download button shows progress remaining after download finishes): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830205

Ion Monkey bug (also will be in FF18.0.1): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=818023

Ion Monkey array related fix: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830967

Bug related to getting FF to C++11 standard: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785918

Crash with Table and transform: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822906

JS engine: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829758

[snappy] Hang fix, pasting a URL in URL bar is expensive: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830600

Private browsing flag fix: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830652

Crash fix related to Zoom In: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830948

GFX: Color Management: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=817153

[MemShrink] anonymous memory reporting: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=827691

Ion Monkey regression fix: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=810525

[MemShrink] Increasing DMD effectiveness: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830226

Making :scope selector match style scope: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=829363

WebIDL: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=827158

Rooting Analysis (base of Generational GC): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830839

  • Like 2

When will Firefox if ever get new tab animations when dragging like Chrome and even IE have?

what are you talking about? firefox has had tab animations for a couple versions now

what are you talking about? firefox has had tab animations for a couple versions now

Maybe I did not explain it currectly.

When you move tabs around in firefox its not the same as in Chrome and IE.

In both Chrome and IE you can see the tab actually move where as in firefox you see a small arrow pointing up and then it just appears in the new spot.

Maybe I did not explain it currectly.

When you move tabs around in firefox its not the same as in Chrome and IE.

In both Chrome and IE you can see the tab actually move where as in firefox you see an arrow and then it just appears in the new spot.

nope, the tab definitely moves around just like in IE and Chrome for me and has for a couple versions now (I'm on the 19 beta btw)

I think this happens because you are using a Third party theme and the arrow is to indicate where the tab is going to drop. Try the default theme.

I think this happens because you are using a Third party theme and the arrow is to indicate where the tab is going to drop. Try the default theme.

I am using default theme.

I take it back Tab animations are now working.

Now I just have to re enable addons one by one to see what was causingthe issue.

No issue and do share addon name so it will be helpful for others as well, enjoy tab animation.

Good news this issue is already fixed in the latest Pre Release build

http://tmp.garyr.net/dev-builds/

:)

If you are going to use Firefox Nightly Builds then use the Dev version of TMP and you will have no problems. If you happen to get one, it will be fixed by the next day.

anyone know whats going on with https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=770135 . any New Try-Builds available?

Assigned developer posted new updated patches for that bug just recently but didn't give testrun link or try builds etc. So nothing know more than that.

anyone know whats going on with https://bugzilla.moz...g.cgi?id=770135 . any New Try-Builds available?

Assigned developer posted new updated patches for that bug just recently but didn't give testrun link or try builds etc. So nothing know more than that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!