Recommended Posts

That's only a temporary solution as a) Australis will eventually land on ESR and b) there's rumors going around that Mozilla might drop ESR builds (which would be very a idiotic and shortsighted thing to do).

i somehow donbt  Mozilla would get rid of the ESR builds , companies like Redhat  depend on the ESR for there Enterprise Product

so now that Australis is coming to beta is there a way to get forecastfox working with it yet?

also this is a helpful addon https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/the-addon-bar if anyone likes the addon bar

so now that Australis is coming to beta is there a way to get forecastfox working with it yet?

also this is a helpful addon https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/the-addon-bar if anyone likes the addon bar

annoy the Author of the Extension as its there problem to get Extensions working with Australis,.

annoy the Author of the Extension as its there problem to get Extensions working with Australis,.

i think development may have been abandoned on forecastfox as it hasn't been updated since 2012. are there any good alternatives out there or a way to force it to work on firefox 29?

In the latest Firefox UX Nightly 31.0a1 (March 21st), I've noticed I can no longer use middle click to open links in new tabs. Is that something they have changed? Chrome is doing the same thing with their most recent stable version. I'm hoping there is an about:config change I can make. Is there one? Thanks!

In the latest Firefox UX Nightly 31.0a1 (March 21st), I've noticed I can no longer use middle click to open links in new tabs. Is that something they have changed? Chrome is doing the same thing with their most recent stable version. I'm hoping there is an about:config change I can make. Is there one? Thanks!

Now it seems it's working again. Strange. Might've had something to do with an extension.

Anyone know of a good zoom extension that works with the latest UX Nightly 31.0a1? I don't think NoSquint works anymore.

 

I used to use AliceWhite extension but it also makes Nightly works abnormal. So I think a common bug affected all zoom related extensions. What I think recent landing of zoom stuff related to Electrolysis (e10s) broke it.

For people wondering about New Tab Page, here its new look of New Tab Page.

Firefox devs are also planning to integrate search bar on NTP like Chrome:

 

kcJFQT6.png

 

@Konstantine

 

Not possible without use of addons or userstyles.

  • Like 1

Anyone know of a good zoom extension that works with the latest UX Nightly 31.0a1? I don't think NoSquint works anymore.

 

Try this available FullZoom text experimental addon, its working on Nightly. Although its work in progress. Alice is trusted person, you can install from other amo as well.

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=13397111#p13397111

I have a question, forgive me if it's ignorant.

 

Which would be better to use, Aurora or Australis nightlies?

 

I'm reading this and that about the different versions, etc.  So many ways to go.   Trunk, branch, nightlies, etc.

 

TIA

For people wondering about New Tab Page, here its new look of New Tab Page.

Firefox devs are also planning to integrate search bar on NTP like Chrome:

These are way too small at high resolution

SYRLxkb.jpg

If you know some addon or a userstyle that can "fix" it, then share it please. Thanks!

 

 

Do you have Stylish installed if Yes, I can create Userstyle for you?

 

Try below one, its work like charm for me with 1680*1050 full window Firefox Nightly. Although it will introduce horizontal scrollbar when you reduce window size. No scrollbar till 1096*713 window using Responsive Mode Developer tool and below mentioned code.

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

@-moz-document url("about:newtab") {
    
.newtab-cell {
  height: 200px !important;
  width: 320px !important;
}

}
  • Like 1

Which would be better to use, Aurora or Australis nightlies?

that's not a valid question. i'm guessing you don't understand what each is.

 

Aurora is the Alpha 2 branch (pre-beta branch). Australis is the name of the new firefox theme

I have a question, forgive me if it's ignorant.

 

Which would be better to use, Aurora or Australis nightlies?

 

I'm reading this and that about the different versions, etc.  So many ways to go.   Trunk, branch, nightlies, etc.

 

TIA

 

No issue.. Does not matter.. We are here to help..

 

Aurora - little stable, less new features popup but more consistent improvements patches to make it stable.

Nightly - bleeding edge trunk branch which get cut off each day and build is made from mozilla-central branch. Get more frequent updates and features.

 

If you rely heavily on addons, I don't recommend Nightly. Neither if you are on limited bandwidth connection.

 

For Australis testing, best is if you stick with Aurora unless you want to see all upcoming changes then you should go with new profile on Nightly.

 

Do you have Stylish installed if Yes, I can create Userstyle for you?

 

Try below one, its work like charm for me with 1680*1050 full window Firefox Nightly. Although it will introduce horizontal scrollbar when you reduce window size. No scrollbar till 1096*713 window using Responsive Mode Developer tool and below mentioned code.

@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

@-moz-document url("about:newtab") {
    
.newtab-cell {
  height: 200px !important;
  width: 320px !important;
}

}

 

Thanks a lot! You nailed it! :)

that's not a valid question. i'm guessing you don't understand what each is.

 

Aurora is the Alpha 2 branch (pre-beta branch). Australis is the name of the new firefox theme

 

Not valid?   It was why I asked, so I could understand better.  Thanks for the links.

 

No issue.. Does not matter.. We are here to help..

 

Aurora - little stable, less new features popup but more consistent improvements patches to make it stable.

Nightly - bleeding edge trunk branch which get cut off each day and build is made from mozilla-central branch. Get more frequent updates and features.

 

If you rely heavily on addons, I don't recommend Nightly. Neither if you are on limited bandwidth connection.

 

For Australis testing, best is if you stick with Aurora unless you want to see all upcoming changes then you should go with new profile on Nightly.

 

Thank you very much.  Your explanation and Brando's links helped a lot.  (Y)

 

I'll use Aurora then.  I'm liking the new (Australis) interface a lot.

  • Like 2

Not valid?   It was why I asked, so I could understand better.  Thanks for the links.

 

 

Thank you very much.  Your explanation and Brando's links helped a lot.  (Y)

 

I'll use Aurora then.  I'm liking the new (Australis) interface a lot.

Australis is on the Beta Branch now too if you want something that's guaranteed more stable

Australis is on the Beta Branch now too if you want something that's guaranteed more stable

 

Thank you.  Aurora seems to be what I was looking for.  ADblock+ works (Neowin whitelisted of course) the only extension I use.

Just installed the beta. Few thought:

 

-It looks okay. People were making too big of a fuss regarding the curved tabs, and I guess it's a userstyle away from looking like it did before.

-Seems a bit more responsive (though I never had issues with Firefox performance-wise).

-Easy to use sync. F'ING FINALLY. Not that this was a deal-breaker as Xmarks always worked nicely, but I guess now it's one less add-on to think about. The previous way it worked was just awful.

 

How it looks (Windows 8 with Aero enabled):

 

ff_29_b1.png

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!