Recommended Posts

I think mozilla is slowly becoming a closed source browser.

 

Please show me the parts of Firefox that don't have source code released for them. Otherwise, why on Earth do you keep making this ridiculous assertion?

  • Like 2

Apart from freezing the APIs indefinitely, there's not much they can do to improve add-on compatibility (And to be clear, we're talking about compatibility with abandoned add-ons)

And that type of backwards compatibility code incurs a cost, a lot of issues with add-ons and E10S involve add-ons using the old backwards compatibility APIs rather than the newer (Still like 3 years old though) APIs that work across processes, if those old APIs were aggressively deprecated then updates add-ons would work better, at the cost of breaking abandoned ones, etc.

  • 2 weeks later...

Almost 45MB last update :s

 

 

Did that to me too, looks like the partial update failed.

 

Full update installed fine though.

 

Yesterday they jumped Firefox Nightly to 38 bandwagon, so you might have missed yesterday respin for version pickup. So that's why with today's Nightly you get full update.

Mozilla's Servo Engine that's written in the Rust programming language and designed to be a highly parallel layout engine continues to be advancing very well and could see an alpha release this year.

Jack Moffitt of Mozilla talked at last week's Linux.Conf.Au 2015 conference about the work he and a dozen or so other Mozilla engineers have been doing on the experimental Servo engine.

As explained during a status update from November, Servo's performance has been very fast compared to Gecko and other web layout engines. As mentioned in that update and reaffirmed last week, Servo developers are indeed hoping to have an alpha quality release of the engine out in 2015.

Besides being fast and written to offer greater standards compliance, Servo should be more secure with being written in Rust. Servo has also been designed to be embeddable from the start. The first bits of Servo support in Firefox OS are now working in experimental form -- at least for booting to the ACID2 test. Jack said during his presentation that he hopes to have about 50% of standard web features implemented this year while the most popular web pages are all rendering well.

The performance of Servo has been described as "amazingly well" compared to Gecko and that even a single thread ofServo is faster than Gecko. However, the results for now should be taken for a grain of salt given that more functionality still needs to be implemented. CNN and Reddit were frequently mentioned as popular sites rendering well with Servo. The goal with Servo is to deliver better responsiveness and lower power use than Gecko (and alternatives).

With Servo coming along, the developers hope to eventually begin landing Servo and Rust support within Gecko to allow more developers to begin familiarizing themselves with the new engine. The first component likely to find its way implemented in Gecko/Firefox from Servo is probably the BMP decoder, given that it's a small piece of the puzzle and shouldn't cause too much fallout in the case of problems. Other Servo/Rust components likely to get green lit early on is also a new HTML parser and URL parsing library.


Those wishing to watch Jack Moffitt's LCA2015 presentation can find it embedded
 

Servo is very interesting, it's parallelism done right (Compared to the current multi-process implementation that IE/Safari/Chrome/Firefox do/want to do), it'll probably still end up running in multiple processes though because JavaScript has some crappy semantics (Which is the main reason why we do multi-process stuff currently)

 

I'm surprised they're going to replace something as simple as the BMP decoder with a Rust variant, but it does make sense considering the only thing it's really used for these days if site icons (And even then they're being replaced with PNGs over time). A new HTML parser would be interesting too, currently it's implemented as a machine translation of a Java parser and I think they're still actually keeping the old parser around just for the special "about:blank" page.

In 2015, we have two high-level goals for Servo:

 

Release an alpha-quality browser that uses Servo as its rendering engine

Land a Servo component that is authored in Rust into Gecko

Q1 2015

   

Extensive CSS property coverage (> 70%)
Android browser and APK
OSX and Linux platform daily builds of "miniservo"
Get the browser "safe enough" to use for basic browsing scenarios
Identify and begin building a Rust component inside of Firefox
Begin reporting and tracking Servo's Web Platform conformance, performance, and power usage over time
Initial fragmentation (multicol)
Initial flexbox
Upgrade SpiderMonkey
Zero-copy HTML & CSS parsing

Q2 2015

   

Create dynamic test suite
Add high impact platform features
Add a Rust component to Gecko

Critical 2015 work

Layout

   

variables
transforms
transitions
animations
tables: the rest of colspan,rowspan,percantage heights & web-compat bugs will-change

Other

   

Explore using Servo as a UI toolkit
Visualization support
multiprocess
multimedia
sandboxing
addons
prefs
bookmarks
history
cookies

ffs, what have they done to the search bar!?!?

I want the address bar to always use my default search engine, and the search bar to stay on whatever I have set it to for the time being.

Would be nice if the Right Click menu gave the option to search with the default and also the currently selected.

Wish I knew how to write addons :(

ffs, what have they done to the search bar!?!?

I want the address bar to always use my default search engine, and the search bar to stay on whatever I have set it to for the time being.

Would be nice if the Right Click menu gave the option to search with the default and also the currently selected.

Wish I knew how to write addons :(

No need for an addon, you can revert to the old search by going to about:config and setting browser.search.showOneOffButtons to false

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!