Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Boo Berry said:

Aren't they considering moving Pocket and/or Hello to an extension?

It's already been done & will be added soon.

loop code is in browser/extensions, the final build step places it in dist/bin/browser/features (as does the pocket addon build) which is the system addons location.

 

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215694

 

 

Firefox’s Tracking Protection feature gets a boost soon

 

Tracking Protection is enabled by default as an experiment in Private Browsing. We added it to give users more choice and control over third party tracking across the Internet. At Mozilla we work in the open and we are still experimenting with Tracking Protection in our Nightly Channel to get more feedback. There are no current plans to extend the scope of this feature.

tracking protection privacy

 

  • Like 7
39 minutes ago, Boo Berry said:

Aren't they considering moving Pocket and/or Hello to an extension?

no idea, i dont keep up with Firefox as much as others do. but why would they Add them to the Browser an then take themm away an make them Extensions only? if there planning on making Hello an Pocket Extensions, why didnt they just leave them as extensions to begin with? i swear, some at Mozilla are idiots 

36 minutes ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

It's already been done & will be added soon.


loop code is in browser/extensions, the final build step places it in dist/bin/browser/features (as does the pocket addon build) which is the system addons location.

 

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215694

 

 

Firefox’s Tracking Protection feature gets a boost soon

 

Tracking Protection is enabled by default as an experiment in Private Browsing. We added it to give users more choice and control over third party tracking across the Internet. At Mozilla we work in the open and we are still experimenting with Tracking Protection in our Nightly Channel to get more feedback. There are no current plans to extend the scope of this feature.

tracking protection privacy

 

by the looks of it, Firefox/Mozilla Devs are going to have a Adblocker kinda thing  installed by Default which i dont think is a good thing, let an Adblocker Extension Author do it. 

23 hours ago, Demz said:

by the looks of it, Firefox/Mozilla Devs are going to have a Adblocker kinda thing  installed by Default which i dont think is a good thing, let an Adblocker Extension Author do it. 

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

11 minutes ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

well thats good its turned off by default , i would of thought it'd cause issues with Extension Adblockers if they had of turned it on by default 

3 hours ago, Dingle berry San the Super said:

They plan to ship it as default=off & on for Private windows

Plus choice for power user is a good thing.

 

Plus pocket/hello has landed as system addon(but hidden in v45 for now)

Tracking protection already shipped in 42.

anyone know if Firefox Devs are still Targetting  Firefox 46 for E10's to be default?

 

nvm : http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=13231577#p13231577

 

could some MOD put that link in the First Post Please. easier to find

19 hours ago, illegaloperation said:

On look. It's December 15, 2015 and Firefox finally support touchscreens!

Good grief, every other thread has you whining about something Firefox did or didn't do. Has Firefox drowned your puppies and kittens or why the hell are so obsessed with it?

27 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

is there a way to disable the signature check for add-ons in 43?

yes. go into " about:config " without the quotes

 

 

an type this

 

xpinstall.signatures.required an  flip it to FALSE an restart ya browser

 

having said that, in Firefox 44, you wont get that option, your extensions will be Disabled if there not signed . go an have a look in http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php in i think Firefox Support for more info

4 hours ago, Demz said:

yes. go into " about:config " without the quotes

 

 

an type this

 

xpinstall.signatures.required an  flip it to FALSE an restart ya browser

 

having said that, in Firefox 44, you wont get that option, your extensions will be Disabled if there not signed . go an have a look in http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php in i think Firefox Support for more info

please read this for those that will need to know ,https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension

 

but in Firefox 45 it looks like you'll still have the Preference  to Disable extension signing  check

On 21/12/2015 at 4:32 PM, The_Decryptor said:

Only in the ESR version.

no word as to yet when they'll force the signature checking  basck to on, 43.0.2 disables extension signature checking. from what i been told, by a Dev i keep in contact with, Mozilla are having more trouble with it on Windows  than Linux.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
    • Classic outlook, not only does it have a much fuller feature set, it doesn't include Microsoft attempting to sync my emails from my servers to theirs. If classic outlook is ever removed from office, and the version I paid for in 2021 stops working for some reason, I'll use Thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!