Any advice for my first DSLR ?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'll be getting my first real paycheck next month (yay !) and I was thinking about geting my first DSLR, something I always wanted to do as I'm huge fan of photography (actually read countless books without ever practicing). I'm seeking your help here as I don't want to be blinded by my excitment. What I would like to achieve is a long-term investment (something that I'll be using at least for 2-3 years) so I can start working on the lens collection. My budget would be in the 1000$ range but I'm willing to put more on the table if it's worth it.

Any help would be very much appreciated :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/994102-any-advice-for-my-first-dslr/
Share on other sites

Well depends on availability. Finding it here in Morocco would be better but if I can't do that I'll just buy it online.

PS : I was just looking at the EOS 5D Mark II and that thing is beautiful ! Do you think it would be worth it to wait a little longer and buy it ? Or is there a cheaper satisfying alternative that I can go with ?

Argote, yep I'm aware of that :) That's why I asked if it would be worth it to wait a little longer and go with it ? In any case, any advice on a ~1000$ DSLR would be appreciated !

EDIT : Thanks for the suggestions, I'll look into these and figure out which one suits me.

like he said guys... he is aware it is above $1000 and (like he mentioned in his original post) he is willing to go ABOVE $1000... IF it is worth it.

So the question isn't "will the 5D MKII ever be $1000" the question is "is it worth it to spend the extra money to get a 5D MKII opposed to another camera that is around the $1000 price range"

I personally do not know about the 5D MKII so I can not answer that question, but as others have mentioned, the list that Argote gave is pretty good, look into those cameras, hopefully someone else will be able to tell you if it would be worth it for you to wait a little longer and save up for the 5D MKII

Like Crazzy said, Nikon and Canon are your best choices. (mainly because they have such a huge selection of lenses) I recommend testing one of each to determine which brand feels better in your hands.

Ok landscapes/urbex: You'll want a really good wide angle lens for that. Expect an additional $1500-2000 for that. I dunno what canon's top of the line is, but something in the 10-25mm range with a constant aperture of F4 or faster. I'm sure they have something wide that's "L" class.

I was in a similar situation (Although it wasn't for a first dSLR) to decide whether I should get a 60D, 7D, or 5D2. (Avoid those Digital Rebels... just my personal opinion)

In the end I stuck with an EOS 60D and has been turning out impressive photos. Sure the 5D2 is full frame but are you really willing to pay 2.5x the price? For most enthusiasts and even semi-pro the 60D offers excellent bang for the buck imo. Spend your money on better lenses and buy a good flash.

Alright yeah, I agree with most people, don't go full frame for now, as long as you get a current midrange dslr, it will last 2-3 years (as you want).

As crazzy said for what you want (landscape/urbex) a wide-angle is a must, but you don't HAVE to spend as much as he says; I would look into Tokina's 11-16 f/2.8, I have it and it is a great lens!

Here are some Urbex shots I did with mainly it:

In addition, you are going to need a tripod.

So again, I would go with a body near the $1000 range... and then get a nice wide-angle and a basic 35mm or 50mm to start with

Wow thanks a lot guys :) I think I'll go with what you said and get a 1000$ body so I can invest in lens. Gonna check out what you suggested and keep you posted if I need any more advice. Thanks again !

By the way, awesome shots remus :)

In my opinion, if you need to ask if it's worth saving up for something like a 5D over a cheaper body, the answer is already no.

This is grossly oversimplifying, but these days the body is towards the bottom of the list of things that affect photo quality - technique, lens, available light, etc are all more important.

I think it's best when starting out to get a cheap but decent body - my girlfriend just bought a 1000D, for example. That thing can take superb pictures, especially with the L lens that normally lives on my 7D. Once you get experience, you'll start figuring out if a more expensive body would be better for you. The more expensive bodies buy you features - weatherproofing, a faster image processor, more AF points, more megapixels, etc - but not necessarily better image quality.

So, in summary: Photo quality = Technique + Lens + body.

Starting out with a cheap body means you can spend more of a limited budget on lenses, which will benefit you more than a slightly better body. You can then "graduate" to better bodies as you see fit.

Thanks iKenndac :) I fully agree with you, it's just that I want to seize this opportunity to get something that will last me, something that I will just get and forget so I can concentrate on lens without feeling limited by the body. After reading some reviews on what you guys suggested (and looking for different opinions on the web) I think I'll settle on the Nikon D7000 camera. What do you think guys ? Anyone had a previous experience with it ?

The D7000 is a great camera. I used mine since launch in November and couldn't be happier. It gives me sufficient controls, fits well in the hand, has great low light performance for a DX sensor and has enough "pro" features and build quality to satisfy most people. I've collected some lenses to go along with it and probably will move to a pro/FX body once I get better.

If you are willing to pay a bit extra for the D7000 then it is definitely worth it. It is one of the best APS-C cameras out there right now. It is right up there with the PENTAX K-5, better than the 7D IMO and Sony doesn't have a prosumer grade body right now (though the A580 uses the same sensor).

The only thing to consider here IMO is whether to get the D7000 or save some money and go with the D5100 (same IQ but less direct controls, smaller body, no in-body motor and less advanced AF system). I'd say go with the D7000.

As crazzy said for what you want (landscape/urbex) a wide-angle is a must, but you don't HAVE to spend as much as he says; I would look into Tokina's 11-16 f/2.8, I have it and it is a great lens!

Well it depends. If he was gunna dish out for a 5DMKII, it'd be stupid to put a $600 lens on a body that expensive. See quote below!

So, in summary: Photo quality = Technique + Lens + body.

+100

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!