Recommended Posts

Windows 8 Start button isn't coming back, but there will be a tutorial

The Start button won't be coming back, no matter how much detractors of Windows 8's new user interface would like it to. But to make the new operating system easier to understand for mouse and keyboard users, it will contain a tutorial to explain how things work.

Investment firm Nomura has hosted a series of meetings with Tami Reller, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Marketing Officer of the Windows and Windows Live division, to talk about what's coming up for Microsoft's next operating system.

In these meetings, Reller discussed the concerns that reviewers have raised about the Windows 8 interface: in particular, the lack of familiarity that the interface will have, and the worry that it will be confusing for mouse users. Windows 8 removes the Start button and instead depends on hot corners for essential functionality, and in the current beta there is little to tell users what to do.

According to Nomura, Reller confirmed that the Start button will remain gone, but that the discoverability problem will be addressed through a tutorial for users, so that when they first run the operating system they will be guided through the new interactions.

A tutorial won't solve every concern that people have about the new interface?for example, the very different look-and-feel between the desktop and Metro?but it could go a long way towards ensuring that new users don't get stuck.

Source: Ars Technica

Sorry guys but as someone who did use 3.1 for work, it was never good :p

True. Windows 3.1x sucked compared to better OSs at the time, like OS/2.

But I liked Me D: I used it for four years xD

I liked Windows Me too a lot because it had the Windows 2000 shell and many improvements over Windows 98. I didn't have any stability issues with it, but then again it was a co-operatively multi-tasking OS for 16-bit apps, so once users had the taste of Windows 2000 stability with full Plug and Play support, Windows Me looked inferior. Vista was the first OS to disappoint me, Windows 7 the second and Windows 8 might kill my passion for Windows entirely. Microsoft never learns from their past mistakes. That's the truth. You no longer control the computer, the computer controls you.

People really do have short memories or just like to forget things when it helps try and prove their point. Windows 95 was fine and it had a tutorial (a slide show guide or w/e) when you first booted into it. As did Windows 98 iirc. Also Windows 98 was full of problems and ****ty till 98 SE shipped which fixed most of them and actually made it semi-usable back then. The same thing with XP, god it was a mess and MS had to freeze EVERYTHING just to fix it with SP2. How people block that out to this day in some shallow attempt to make seem like it was good from the start is beyond me. I never used ME so I'll skip on that one but I have a midrange PC with Vista and it's working fine though not the fastest thing out there.

  • Like 2

In fairness, I think maybe some of the people here are too young to have cared about computers unpon Win95s release...

Also, EVERY version of Windows has come with tutorials in one form or another.

  • Like 1

In my opinion:

Windows 95 - Good [it had a tutorial just like 3.1 at the beginning]

Windows 98 - I had no problems with it...

Windows XP - Buggy at the beginning. [Also had a tutorial, it was in accessories or whatever]

Windows Vista - I actually never had any problems just like 98.

Windows 7 - Good

Windows 8 - Good, interface is decent once you get used to it....

  • Like 3

microsoft is trying so hard to push the whole knect / touch expereince, while some might like it, others wont and will be more at home using

OSX or ubuntu as their daily use os. but for support reasons iam going to have this installed on an seprate pc.

As someone who ran a network of over 1,000 Win95/Win98 boxes, trust me - they were both awful. Anything pre-2k was just .. do not want to remember.

Why on earth would you run a 1000 client network in home computer non network OS', that's why you had NT which is what you switched to when you switched to 2k, win 9x ws fine for home use however, great even.

Sure, networking was a pain but back then most people, hell, everyone, just had one PC at home anyways. Business should've been using NT4 Workstation imo.

Why on earth would you run a 1000 client network in home computer non network OS', that's why you had NT which is what you switched to when you switched to 2k, win 9x ws fine for home use however, great even.

Unfortunately I didn't build it - I inherited it. It was originally a school/town network (running on Novell Netware) that was later on turned into a Win2k network.

Let's just say the people who originally implemented it were.. replaced.

People seem to forget the Windows 95 "Tip of the day" boxes, showing how to do things in the UI

People seem to forget that Windows 3.1 had a tutorial on how to use the mouse ;) Heck, just did a search and found that MS still has this tutorial, albeit in an updated Vista/7 style: http://windows.micro...o-use-the-mouse

Windows 3.1 mouse tutorial

People seem to forget that EVERY version of windows on first start and second when you can click the don't show again checkbox, comes with a windows on startup telling you how to do stuff with links to more detailed guides on how to use windows.

If you need a tutorial then something has gone wrong.

well...tell that to Apple ;) because every single iPhone/iPad add is a tutorial in disguise. And you know how bad that turned out.

People seem to forget that Windows 3.1 had a tutorial on how to use the mouse ;) Heck, just did a search and found that MS still has this tutorial, albeit in an updated Vista/7 style: http://windows.micro...o-use-the-mouse

Windows 3.1 mouse tutorial

...

But you needed a tutorial back then, heck the GUI was a completely new thing! But to have a tutorial like they will in Windows 8 to show you where they've 'hidden' key features of getting around in the OS is not good UI design.

  • Like 2

Again, every windows has come with a tutorial on startup, and on most regular people's computers they never turn it off, so it's there every boot, I also believe OSX has one, and iOS.

So what was that again.

Again, every windows has come with a tutorial on startup, and on most regular people's computers they never turn it off, so it's there every boot
I seem recall Windows XP having one (not 100% on that :s) but don't remember seeing one in Vista or Win7. It could just be a case that I always disable it immediately but I honestly don't recall ever coming across a tutorial.

I seem recall Windows XP having one (not 100% on that :s) but don't remember seeing one in Vista or Win7. It could just be a case that I always disable it immediately but I honestly don't recall ever coming across a tutorial.

Windows XP has the Windows XP Tour.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGhyDSfu_n4

Windows 7 has the Getting Started screen that shows on first boot. Go online to learn more links to some basic tutorials and a tour.

ZeSUv.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
    • It does invite Linux because MS should have been improving their products all along these years instead chose to ignore the users now this year they’re making all of these improvements to their products where as Linux doesn’t have this kind of problems in fact it has gotten so good I can even play Windows games in Steam that I no longer ever needed Windows to carry on with my life, unlike you still use Windows and chose to try beat down down those who don't use Windows because they love their LG TV. (Surprisingly I actually own a 55” LED LG TV and it has been going strong for almost 14 years, longer than any Sony TV”)
    • As much as I love owning my own hardware, it's hard to argue with the value. I'm not a huge gamer, I'd actually be interested in a cheaper plan with limited monthly hours, or even a pay-by-the-hour plan.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!