Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



A-Patch for Windows Live Messenger 2012


249 replies to this topic * * * - - 10 votes

#1 م ahmz

    Ahmad

  • 2,389 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 05
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:04

Praise be to God.

Current Version for Windows Live Messenger 2012: 1.43 (build 22)
Updated: 5/10/2012
Supported Versions: 2012 (16.4.3505.0912 & 16.4.3503.0728 - older downloads also supported)
Total Features: 12

New: Added compatibility for Windows Live Messenger 2012 version 16.4.3505.0912

Feature: Disable Nudge Shake (thanks digitaldj)
Feature: Remove Nudge Delay (thanks digitaldj)
Feature: Remove Search Bar
Feature: Remove the "Connected to..." bar
Feature: Accept more than 3 files (transfers at a time) (thanks digitaldj)
Feature: Remove advertisement from main window
Feature: Remove text & banner advertisement in the IM window
Feature: Polygamy - open more than one Messenger at once
Feature: Remove the "See More Offerings" items in the file menus
Feature: Remove "Featured" section from the Emoticons "more" dialog box
Feature: Disable Photo Sharing (thanks Erazor)
Feature: Disable Video Sharing (thanks Erazor)


» Download A-Patch for Windows Live Messenger 2012

2011 / Wave 3 downloads also available.


#2 Slimy

    Ars + Neowin

  • 22,355 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 04

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:09

Sweet! :D

#3 +littleneutrino

    I am the Little Neutrino

  • 13,222 posts
  • Joined: 25-July 05
  • Location: Newark, Ohio
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: GS3 CM10.1

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:12

didnt take long did it lol they always seem to be at the beginning of things and right there to get things done.

#4 dl0711

    Resident Fanatic

  • 970 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 04
  • Location: CANADA

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:15

sweet.. I think A-Patch is the best Windows Messenger patch out there..

Keep up the good work guys...

#5 Amano

    Resident Fanatic

  • 701 posts
  • Joined: 29-January 06
  • Location: Egypt

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:15

Thanks, Ahmad for this great tool.

#6 FloatingFatMan

    Resident Fat Dude

  • 11,409 posts
  • Joined: 23-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:31

As much as I love A-Patch and always use it on Messenger; it's probably not wise for anyone actually IN the beta to use it, as it'll modify the client beyond the scope of the beta testing.

#7 )-(orus

    Neowinian³

  • 348 posts
  • Joined: 25-August 04
  • Location: UK

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:33

View PostFloatingFatMan, on Nov 28 2007, 16:31, said:

As much as I love A-Patch and always use it on Messenger; it's probably not wise for anyone actually IN the beta to use it, as it'll modify the client beyond the scope of the beta testing.

+1

#8 OP م ahmz

    Ahmad

  • 2,389 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 05
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia

Posted 28 November 2007 - 16:38

View PostFloatingFatMan, on Nov 29 2007, 03:31, said:

As much as I love A-Patch and always use it on Messenger; it's probably not wise for anyone actually IN the beta to use it, as it'll modify the client beyond the scope of the beta testing.
Indeed, serious testers shouldn't use any patches at all.. but for the rest of us :cool:

#9 Miuku.

    A damned noob

  • 4,885 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 03
  • Location: Finland, EU
  • OS: :: OS X :: SLES ::

Posted 28 November 2007 - 17:32

Here's a conondrum:
If posting pictures of the program is against the rules (as it breaks the holy grail of NDA), why is patching the software (which is strictly forbidden in the EULA) not considered to be against the rules here?

As per license.rtf in the Messenger directory (and during installation):

Quote

"You will not disassemble, decompile, or reverse engineer any software included in the service, except and only to the extent that the law expressly permits this activity."


I'm not against the A-Patch of course as it is a fine program - just wondering at the slightly hypocritical stance on the subject.

#10 torrentthief

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,131 posts
  • Joined: 18-November 06
  • Location: Manchester, England

Posted 28 November 2007 - 18:22

daphoneix, you are pretty and have a brain, will you marry me? :p

#11 Huleboeren

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,445 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 06
  • Location: cph

Posted 28 November 2007 - 18:29

Am I the only one who didnt get an invite? :p

#12 vetbangbang023

    -=53=-

  • 36,187 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 01
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY

Posted 28 November 2007 - 18:31

View PostdaPhoenix, on Nov 28 2007, 12:32, said:

Here's a conondrum:
If posting pictures of the program is against the rules (as it breaks the holy grail of NDA), why is patching the software (which is strictly forbidden in the EULA) not considered to be against the rules here?

As per license.rtf in the Messenger directory (and during installation):


I'm not against the A-Patch of course as it is a fine program - just wondering at the slightly hypocritical stance on the subject.
There are gray areas to all of our rules (some more than others) and we allow flex where we have room. If Microsoft were to clamp down on apps like these, you can rest assured we would immediately disallow any further discussion.

#13 - Kaboose -

    0_-

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: 25-June 07
  • Location: Searching....

Posted 28 November 2007 - 20:08

damn, you're working fast with those patches, good job (Y)

#14 Unimatrix Xero

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,863 posts
  • Joined: 17-February 05
  • Location: Wolverhampton (West Midlands)

Posted 28 November 2007 - 20:11

is it me or is the apatch site down?

#15 Slimy

    Ars + Neowin

  • 22,355 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 04

Posted 28 November 2007 - 20:20

View PostUnimatrix Xero, on Nov 28 2007, 15:11, said:

is it me or is the apatch site down?
Just you, but it usually goes down when there's a new version.