Trillian 5 for Windows Public Beta!


Recommended Posts

Working flawlessly here.

A few steps i took to keep it in check:

  • Disabled docking the contact list to enable jumplist support
  • Disabled the system tray icon to make the taskbar icon open the contact list, instead of trying to launch a new instance
  • Disabled the instant lookup options in chat settings.

MSN, Gmail/Gtalk, and skype work out-of-the-box as intended.

Yes downloaded it earlier, I have used many programs that do the same stuff, but this version is quite an improvement over everything I've tried in the past.

So far I'm very happy user, it also seems quite stable. Digsby has gone for now anyway.

Yes downloaded it earlier, I have used many programs that do the same stuff, but this version is quite an improvement over everything I've tried in the past.

So far I'm very happy user, it also seemed quite stable.

It certainly is super stable. There's a bunch of stuff coming in the next few builds, including the new theme and our first look at full blown chat history syncronization, which will be nothing short of awesome for me once the Android App hits.

This is a beta...there should be no pro version. Let people pre-order if they want by all means, but to ask your paying customers to have to pay again to use a beta? That's just ridiculous, it's like asking you to pay for testing their software.

During the Astra beta everyone had pro accounts.

Wrong, wrong wrong.

New Astra users, like users brand new to the concept of Astra and all 4.x+ products get 30 days of Pro for free to see if its worth it, then it reverts.

As for the guy whining above about the lack of upgrade, no, you did not "just" buy Astra, that was quite some time ago, and is well outside of Trillian's 1-month grace period. They make it quite clear that a license only covers incremental upgrades and not new major version numbers, if you didn't read that it's your fault. I saw your post on the CS forums, and honestly, that's kinda sad.

Cerulean Studios is a five-person team. That's it. Not like Microsoft, which is so humongous that they had a much longer grace period for Office 2010 if you bought 07. Give them a break, will ya?

Yeah I did, just looked again and some avatars are showing while most aren't.

Are you sure all your buddies have avatars? I know a lot of mine don't.

How do I get GMail working with this?

Thanks

Add your GTalk account to the accounts section. It's not a full fledged email client, but it can check and preview your email for you, as well as mark it as read, spam, or archive it.

How does the voice chat quality compare to Skype?

I have tried Google Talk, Nimbuzz and Skype. Both of the first two have major issues (30+ minutes) where they cut out every other word said and just sound like crap (virtually impossible to understand the person on the other end). Skype however is much better, almost never cutting out (it does, but only for a word or two every now and then, not cutting out whole sentences like the first two) with much better sound quality.

How is Trillian 5 on both voice quality and overall call quality?

Installed it last night. Spent a bit of time configuring it to the way I like and have to say I'm impressed. Coming from Digsby it feels a lot nippier and I like the look of the contact list.

The only thing I'm not mad about are the two choices for the chat window style. Simple is too simple and Bubbles is lame. Also the grey-on-grey-on-white colours in Bubbles make it a bit hard to see. Other than that, the only other thing I could do with is foobar2000 integration so I can continue to spam my friends with my awesome musical taste.

Wrong, wrong wrong.

New Astra users, like users brand new to the concept of Astra and all 4.x+ products get 30 days of Pro for free to see if its worth it, then it reverts.

As for the guy whining above about the lack of upgrade, no, you did not "just" buy Astra, that was quite some time ago, and is well outside of Trillian's 1-month grace period. They make it quite clear that a license only covers incremental upgrades and not new major version numbers, if you didn't read that it's your fault. I saw your post on the CS forums, and honestly, that's kinda sad.

Cerulean Studios is a five-person team. That's it. Not like Microsoft, which is so humongous that they had a much longer grace period for Office 2010 if you bought 07. Give them a break, will ya?

Wrong, wrong wrong.

Astra BETA every single person in that beta had a pro account (valid only for the length of the beta period and only on Astra). Near the end of the beta, RC stages, were the pro differences made clear and people who didn't pay got reverted to the basic.

Almost every company who gets people to beta test their products gives them full access without charging for it. I don't care if its a pre-order, keep that separate (you could pre-order Windows 7 but still use Win 7 RC ultimate edition).

What I find amazing is that Astra was in development for literally years, with only a closed beta that was only available to the elite few. Then it was released, now not long after v5 is straight out with a public beta. What changed between 4 and 5? How come it took you so long to get Astra out, and yet you're coming out with this version relatively quickly?

I adore it, it is everything I'd expected and more. Granted, my expectations weren't very high. I've been a Trillian supporter for years, but let's face it, until Astra came out development was very, very slow and some features didn't work as well as or in the manner as advertised. I was happy when I got into the Astra beta but the new UI is much more streamlined, Facebook integration seems to actually work (in Astra it'd stop updating the feed, if it even updated it at all after the intial program startup, and often I couldn't actually communicate through the chat; they wouldn't get the messages or they'd send me messages and I would never get them). I love the new "no skin" appearence. The only glitch I've encountered so far is that, even though I tell it to hide my AOL inbox (why the hell I even have an AOL mail account I have no idea; I've only ever used the chat app) it still shows up every time I start Trillian. It's no big deal, I just right-click on it and select hide again, but hopefully they'll get that fixed before the final release. Of course I adore it now that it's shiny and new, we'll see how it holds up after I've been using it for a few weeks.

Wrong, wrong wrong.

Astra BETA every single person in that beta had a pro account (valid only for the length of the beta period and only on Astra). Near the end of the beta, RC stages, were the pro differences made clear and people who didn't pay got reverted to the basic.

Almost every company who gets people to beta test their products gives them full access without charging for it. I don't care if its a pre-order, keep that separate (you could pre-order Windows 7 but still use Win 7 RC ultimate edition).

I'm quite sure I remember using the very first beta build that was available to the public, and it would revert to basic after 30 days. I don't believe the Pro status was available for the duration of the beta; lest you forget, the Beta lasted for a REALLY long time. CS needed support to cope with that long dev time.

As for your second point, I'm sorry, but that's complete bull-crap. So, what you're saying, is that a tech news site that gets hundreds of thousands of hits every day, like, oh, I don't know, Lifehacker, happens to point out this software is in beta, and assuming that CS uses your logic of having the beta be fully unlocked during its dev period, Lifehacker makes that point clear that all features are unlocked, what will happen is hundreds of thousands of people will go and get Trillian and use its full features even though its in Beta, and CS has to cope with all the support requests, bug fixes, and potentially angry users, and all of that time, not get paid for it at all? Who will buy 3.1 when 4.0 is huge, is the future, and being tested? Who will be motivated to purchase any sort of license if the whole Beta (which goes on for a notoriously long time) has no limitations?

Why does no one else seem to understand that CS is made of 5 people, and that's it? They're human beings. If you're not going to bother getting a 5.0 license, they shouldn't have to support you through you Beta testing the pro features, because if you're going to be a free user, you should be beta-testing only the free parts.

What I find amazing is that Astra was in development for literally years, with only a closed beta that was only available to the elite few. Then it was released, now not long after v5 is straight out with a public beta. What changed between 4 and 5? How come it took you so long to get Astra out, and yet you're coming out with this version relatively quickly?

I don't think you know much about Astra's timeline. It was in closed beta for not as long as you think, and was in open beta for much much longer. Also, you're failing to remember that 4.0 was just the first part of Astra. 4.1 and 4.2 were the next milestones, and they had big features in them. After 4.2, they started to speed up development because they don't want to run into the long beta period like last time, and lets not forget, they're subsequently developing a Blackberry Beta, an unreleased Android alpha, AND a public Alpha Mac Release, all the while still maintaining the iPhone STABLE.

Holy crap. Why is everyone being such jerks about CS? Does NO ONE understand what it means to have all of the above on your plate with just a 5-man team? I don't even know if CS is their full-time job. And on top of this, there are self-entitled people who believe that it should be entirely free during its beta, people who don't understand that many people using the Beta will never pay for it.

Honestly. People used to be compassionate and appreciative of hard work. Now everyone is a software analyst who "knows" what's right and what should be done during a dev process.

I don't recall any significant changes between 4.0-4.2. They were also free updates, so there you go. I think CS is doing a great job, but if you want to support them just give them your $10 for the upgrade license like I did. You don't have to get all fanatical about it. :p

I don't recall any significant changes between 4.0-4.2. They were also free updates, so there you go. I think CS is doing a great job, but if you want to support them just give them your $10 for the upgrade license like I did. You don't have to get all fanatical about it. :p

I've been a supporter of Trillian and have no issues with that. I know that 4.x updates were free to 4.x license holders, but that's not the point I'm making. The point I'm making is that there was still a significant amount of work going into finding and killing bugs and adding new features between 4.0 and 5, on top of all the other platforms that are being built.

I'm quite sure I remember using the very first beta build that was available to the public, and it would revert to basic after 30 days. I don't believe the Pro status was available for the duration of the beta; lest you forget, the Beta lasted for a REALLY long time. CS needed support to cope with that long dev time.

I was a beta tester for a lot longer than a mere 30 days. Think along the lines of many months. I was part of the closed beta pretty much from the day it came out, and every single one of us were given pro licenses for the duration. Later on they opened up the beta for more people, especially those with 3.0 / 3.1 pro and gave them 4.0 alpha/beta pro licenses too.

As for your second point, I'm sorry, but that's complete bull-crap. So, what you're saying, is that a tech news site that gets hundreds of thousands of hits every day, like, oh, I don't know, Lifehacker, happens to point out this software is in beta, and assuming that CS uses your logic of having the beta be fully unlocked during its dev period, Lifehacker makes that point clear that all features are unlocked, what will happen is hundreds of thousands of people will go and get Trillian and use its full features even though its in Beta, and CS has to cope with all the support requests, bug fixes, and potentially angry users, and all of that time, not get paid for it at all? Who will buy 3.1 when 4.0 is huge, is the future, and being tested? Who will be motivated to purchase any sort of license if the whole Beta (which goes on for a notoriously long time) has no limitations?

Amazing how it worked for Astra right? I didn't hear of people complaining. CS made it very clear that pro features would be added in near the end of the beta, and people understood. I'm sorry but I paid for my 4.0 license the instant they gave me an option.

As it stands theres no reason for me to go pay for another license when my current one is still valid on 4.0. When 5.0 comes out and is final I may consider buying it, but not during the beta. I'm not going to pay to be able to test your product, sorry but thats not how it works. At the very least current 4.0 pro users should be given a beta pro license, and then given the option at the end to either continue using it as a pro by paying for it, or reverting back to free.

People are just upset because they recently shelled out $15-25 for Astra depending on whether or not they got it when it was on sale and now they have to shell out $10 more to keep the pro features in 5. I think that's an understandable outrage. I also think that $10 isn't that much money and they should suck it up or stick with 4.x, but I freely admit that I'm an ###### so maybe not everybody is going to agree with me there. ;)

I was a beta tester for a lot longer than a mere 30 days. Think along the lines of many months. I was part of the closed beta pretty much from the day it came out, and every single one of us were given pro licenses for the duration. Later on they opened up the beta for more people, especially those with 3.0 / 3.1 pro and gave them 4.0 alpha/beta pro licenses too.

Amazing how it worked for Astra right? I didn't hear of people complaining. CS made it very clear that pro features would be added in near the end of the beta, and people understood. I'm sorry but I paid for my 4.0 license the instant they gave me an option.

As it stands theres no reason for me to go pay for another license when my current one is still valid on 4.0. When 5.0 comes out and is final I may consider buying it, but not during the beta. I'm not going to pay to be able to test your product, sorry but thats not how it works. At the very least current 4.0 pro users should be given a beta pro license, and then given the option at the end to either continue using it as a pro by paying for it, or reverting back to free.

And you've outlined the issue yourself. There's no guarantee that you'll use Trillian 5 Pro, so therefore, you'll use Basic unless you guarantee that you'll be a Pro user, otherwise, your take on Pro features is not needed to them, and therefore, they assume that you will be content with Basic features because they assume you will use Basic when it comes out.

This is not rocket science. This is a balanced profit-model that weeds out the hit-and-runners who want free software while they can get it and go run off to other free choices, and all the time and effort spent on people who were never going to pay for pro features is left to be pondered.

Money doesn't grow on trees. If you're not going to pay CS to test the Pro features of their product, then test the Basic one and give feedback, or leave it alone. But don't bother trying to make it seem like its some sort of injustice, because it's really not.

So you will consider buying it when its out of beta but not when in? What the hell is the difference? If you buy it now you can get the pro features you want and can stop whining about it. It's not like you are at any disadvantage by buying it now instead of later.

And this is my point. Inevitably, due to their terms of license, you will end up purchasing a 5.0 license in the future if you want to use the 5.0 program with Pro features. If you want to be a part of the development of the 5.0 Pro features, you go Pro. If you're going to get mad about it, then leave it alone.

I think it's stupid they're charging people for v5 for people who bought Astra.. I mean I seriously JUST BOUGHT Astra. :angry:

http://forums.ceruleanstudios.com/showthread.php?p=815233#post815233

i found this on their forums, dunno if it applies. $5 isnt really a lot.

You are entitled to anything that is released while your subscription is current at no extra charge. If your subscription has expired, you can purchase any upgrade for as little as US$5.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!