Windows 8 HAS NO START MENU


Recommended Posts

[. . .]

the metro look will simply not look right on a laptop or desktop with a non touch screen. what we need is a revised aero look with a classic start menu for users that do not want the "wall of tiles".

You are wrong. It looks beautiful in the Zune software. It appears you're suggesting it won't look right on a desktop or laptop without a touchscreen, but it will look fine on a desktop or laptop with a touchscreen; is that what you're suggesting? If so, a device having a touchscreen or not having a touchscreen cannot change the look of the software that runs on it. . . .

the bottom line is if you do not like windows 8 then stick to windows 7... it will be supported for many more years plus im sure it will get another service pack or two.

the metro look will simply not look right on a laptop or desktop with a non touch screen. what we need is a revised aero look with a classic start menu for users that do not want the "wall of tiles".

You know this how?

After using a Windows Phone since October, I'm confident the Start Screen will work much better than the Start Menu does. Unlike you, I'm willing to try it out, give it a chance, and actually see whether it does work better. You're judging and berating it before Microsoft have even told us much about it. You're implying people shouldn't get rid of things that work, but they certainly should if they release improvements; this new experience may well be an improvement.

Wait wait wait.

Did you seriously just say that you're confident that the start screen will be better, because you were using a phone with a similar interface? :rofl:

I was just using my watch, and I'm confident that a strict four-button only interface for all computing devices will be -fabulous-.

You're seriously coming across as a naive apologist in this thread.

Your opinion is fact now?

Of course not. I have never stated it as fact! My reply was clearly my opinion. He said the Metro design language would never work on the desktop, and I informed him he is wrong because it looks beautiful in the Zune software (something that is clearly an opinion). Although, to add: It is fact that the Metro design language works on the desktop, due to the Zune software. It was just my opinion that it looks beautiful.

Of course not. I have never stated it as fact! My reply was clearly my opinion. He said the Metro design language would never work on the desktop, and I informed him he is wrong because it looks beautiful in the Zune software (something that is clearly an opinion). Although, to add: It is fact that the Metro design language works on the desktop, due to the Zune software. It was just my opinion that it looks beautiful.

I agree, I love the Zune software. It's the best looking desktop app MSFT has ever done.

Wait wait wait.

Did you seriously just say that you're confident that the start screen will be better, because you were using a phone with a similar interface? :rofl:

I was just using my watch, and I'm confident that a strict four-button only interface for all computing devices will be -fabulous-.

You're seriously coming across as a naive apologist in this thread.

I find it amusing how you tried to be clever, but you forgot to include common sense in your reply.

Of course my experience with Windows Phone's Start Screen can give me confidence in Windows 8's Start Screen. When I said that, I was referring to how useful the live tiles are. The live tiles in Windows 8 will be very similar to Windows Phone's; they'll just display more information as Microsoft have pointed out. Due to this, it makes sense to suggest that as I find them so useful on Windows Phone, I may find them useful on Windows 8. It's nothing to do with the screen size; it's to do with the concept, and the live tile concept is something that will work on any screen size. Your response about the watch is completely idiotic. If you even bother to look at both Windows 8 and Windows Phone, you will realise that the live tiles in each operating system are somewhat different, but the concept is the same. Your idiotic, stupid, asinine mention of a watch-inspired user interface doesn't take this into account.

You are seriously coming across as someone who doesn't understand a lot in life with this reply.

Oh the irony.

Of course my experience with Windows Phone's Start Screen can give me confidence in Windows 8's Start Screen. When I said that, I was referring to how useful the live tiles are. The live tiles in Windows 8 will be very similar to Windows Phone's; they'll just display more information as Microsoft have pointed out. Due to this, it makes sense to suggest that as I find them so useful on Windows Phone, I may find them useful on Windows 8. It's nothing to do with the screen size; it's to do with the concept, and the live tile concept is something that will work on any screen size. Your response about the watch is completely idiotic. Anyone with common sense understands that such an interface would not work. If you even bother to look at both Windows 8 and Windows Phone, you will realise that the live tiles are somewhat different, but the concept is the same. Your idiotic, stupid, asinine mention of a watch-inspired user interface doesn't take this into account.

I'm not the one making assumptions of success based on subjective effectiveness over polar form-factors.

But okay, clearly you're completely ignorant and naive when it comes to UI design, and are incapable of anything else but parroting gimmicks and apologies.

It's funny because earlier you rejected the notion of the start screen being the same UI crammed onto the desktop, but now you unintentionally confirm it. Hilarious.

Of course not. I have never stated it as fact! My reply was clearly my opinion. He said the Metro design language would never work on the desktop, and I informed him he is wrong because it looks beautiful in the Zune software (something that is clearly an opinion). Although, to add: It is fact that the Metro design language works on the desktop, due to the Zune software. It was just my opinion that it looks beautiful.

i know your a mod but it's your opinion and no you did NOT correct me as no ones opinion can be wrong. im glad you like metro but many of us do not.

Your opinion is fact now?

you cannot argue or talk sensibly with wp7 fanboys. ive learned that. just because they like looking at a wall of tiles does not mean everybody else will. IMO microsoft is taking a huge gamble with this new design. i can easily see windows 7 being the new xp as many users will not upgrade for 5+ years.

Oh the irony.

There is no irony. You posted a reply that made no sense.

I'm not the one making assumptions of success based on subjective effectiveness over polar form-factors.

Neither am I. I suggest you actually read my posts. I implied that I will find the live tiles in Windows 8 useful because I find the live tiles in Windows Phone useful. If I suggested that I may find the search function in Windows 8 useful because I find the search function in Windows Phone useful, would you still attempt to erroneously ridicule me?

But okay, clearly you're completely ignorant and naive when it comes to UI design, and are incapable of anything else but parroting gimmicks and apologies.

Yet I'm a designer and developer who designs user interfaces. What do you do? Your accusation makes absolutely no sense, and is completely unfounded.

It's funny because earlier you rejected the notion of the start screen being the same UI crammed onto the desktop, but now you unintentionally confirm it. Hilarious.

Again, you have a problem understanding my posts. Is it something to do with your level of English, or are you just purposely ignoring the majority of my posts' content? The Start Screen on Windows 8 is somewhat different to the Start Screen on Windows Phone; likewise, the live tiles are somewhat different on both platforms. How is that hard for you to understand? Due to those differences, the Start Screen on Windows 8 is not the same Start Screen crammed onto the desktop as that which is on Windows Phone. Would you like me to go into more detail and explain this further so you finally understand and stop posting idiotic, erroneous responses?

i know your a mod but it's your opinion and no you did NOT correct me as no ones opinion can be wrong. im glad you like metro but many of us do not.

Me being a moderator has nothing to do with whether a post can be construed as an opinion or not; I'm a member here just like you. It was an opinion in terms of me finding it beautiful, but the fact the Metro design language works well on the desktop cannot be disputed because the Zune software is completely usable. Usability is not something that can be an opinion; it is a fact. You may not like the Metro design language, but that doesn't make it any less usable.

Using that logic everything developers can translate in stable code would "work" on the desktop.

No, it wouldn't. Software has to be usable for it to work on the desktop. I could write stable code, but design an interface that isn't usable. Software has to be usable, and no one can reasonably deny that the Zune software is usable.

you cannot argue or talk sensibly with wp7 fanboys. ive learned that. just because they like looking at a wall of tiles does not mean everybody else will. IMO microsoft is taking a huge gamble with this new design. i can easily see windows 7 being the new xp as many users will not upgrade for 5+ years.

I am not a Windows Phone fanboy :rolleyes: I simply like to use Windows Phone. I've said many times that I can understand why some people don't like it. Why don't you try reading my posts before making ridiculous, unfounded accusations?

There is no irony. You posted a reply that made no sense.

;)

Neither am I. I suggest you actually read my posts. I implied that I will find the live tiles in Windows 8 useful because I find the live tiles in Windows Phone useful. If I suggested that I may find the search function in Windows 8 useful because I find the search function in Windows Phone useful, would you still attempt to erroneously ridicule me?

Yes, I would. Because the fact you think a generic concept such as Search is similar to UI widget such as Tiles is laughable.

Yet I'm a designer and developer who designs user interfaces. What do you do? Your accusation makes absolutely no sense, and is completely unfounded.

Everyone is a designer these days. :laugh:

I'm a web developer if you must know. Not that your attempt at a strawman has any relevance mind you.

Again, you have a problem understanding my posts. Is it something to do with your level of English, or are you just purposely ignoring the majority of my posts' content? The Start Screen on Windows 8 is somewhat different to the Start Screen on Windows Phone; likewise, the live tiles are somewhat different on both platforms. How is that hard for you to understand? Due to those differences, the Start Screen on Windows 8 is not the same Start Screen crammed onto the desktop as that which is on Windows Phone. Would you like me to go into more detail and explain this further so you finally understand and stop posting idiotic, erroneous responses?

"Somewhat different" :rofl:

So if they're only "somewhat" difference, then they're obviously not "all that" different; so back to the original point of "why are they trying to to reuse a phone UI for the desktop".

Do you disagree that the WP7 UI is specifically tailored to compensate for the relative lack of screen real estate in a mobile form factor?

Of course Windows 8 looks to be a radical departure, but why is that a bad thing? IT's about time some company moved the desktop UI paradigm into the 21st century!

Its not a radical departure, its just a Tablet UI being forced onto desktop users for sake of parity between platforms.

Its not a radical departure, its just a Tablet UI being forced onto desktop users for sake of parity between platforms.

Guess what? You can still open up Windows Explorer, MS Office is still in Aero UI. It's just that MOST apps will be Zune-like.

How is it being forced onto users? You don't have to use it AND you have the option to disable it.

QFT. Nobody is making him buy Windows 8!

How is it being forced onto users? You don't have to use it AND you have the option to disable it.

Because its there by default. I know you CAN disable it but because its there developers will code applications that are geared towards the start screen, its not as simple as "omg you can disable it ffs".

Guess what? You can still open up Windows Explorer, MS Office is still in Aero UI. It's just that MOST apps will be Zune-like.

QFT. Nobody is making him buy Windows 8!

Exactly, and all those people who dont want Zune like apps are screwed for the sake of the idiotic iPad generation.

I agree no one is making me buy it but eventually i will HAVE to buy it if i want to keep using Windows, support will eventually stop and Windows 7 will eventually be phased out because of this transition over to more tablet like UI and i will lose functionality because im not using the latest OS.

I wish people would stop talking to me like im some sort of idiot, i am concerned that a whole lot of people are going to be shoved to one side for the sake of parity.

[. . .]

Yes, I would. Because the fact you think a generic concept such as Search is similar to UI widget such as Tiles is laughable.

[. . .]

It appears you still don't understand my position on this. The tiles are different on each platform; they look different and display different amounts of information. Due to that, I'm not looking at the tiles themselves; I'm looking at the concept. The concept, the feature, the notion of a "live tile" feature. The search feature is a feature, and the live tile feature is a feature. The search feature also has a user interface, but as with the live tile concept, I'm not looking at the user interface; I'm discussing the feature and its usefulness.

I'm a web developer if you must know. Not that your attempt at a strawman has any relevance mind you.

What attempt at a strawman? You erroneously claimed I'm naive in regard to user interface design, so I informed you I'm a designer.

"Somewhat different" :rofl:

So if they're only "somewhat" difference, then they're obviously not "all that" different; so back to the original point of "why are they trying to to reuse a phone UI for the desktop".

:rolleyes: Please, at least try to understand what I'm posting. I am speaking English after all. It would help if you've seen the user interfaces of both Windows 8 and Windows Phone. I assume you haven't because you're erroneously claiming Microsoft are trying to reuse a phone user interface on a desktop operating system :blink: Please, take a look at the user interfaces of both Start Screens. When you do, you'll realise that the user interface of the Windows 8 Start Screen is different enough to the user interface of the Windows Phone Start Screen in order for it to be usable on a desktop PC.

Do you disagree that the WP7 UI is specifically tailored to compensate for the relative lack of screen real estate in a mobile form factor?

No, I don't; I agree with that. Just like I agree that the interface of the Windows 8 Start Screen is specifically tailored to scale well, be usable, and be enjoyable to use on all of the screen sizes it supports. The two user interfaces are different. If you do not understand that, then you're possibly beyond help.

Just because the tiles can show more information because its on a bigger screen doesnt mean its tailored to being used on a desktop computer, it just means that the UI has been ADAPTED to use on the desktop, its still awkward and not as intuitive to use.

Because its there by default. I know you CAN disable it but because its there developers will code applications that are geared towards the start screen, its not as simple as "omg you can disable it ffs".

Exactly, and all those people who dont want Zune like apps are screwed for the sake of the idiotic iPad generation.

I agree no one is making me buy it but eventually i will HAVE to buy it if i want to keep using Windows, support will eventually stop and Windows 7 will eventually be phased out because of this transition over to more tablet like UI and i will lose functionality because im not using the latest OS.

I wish people would stop talking to me like im some sort of idiot, i am concerned that a whole lot of people are going to be shoved to one side for the sake of parity.

Microsoft is ending Windows 7 support by 2015. Windows 9 will be out by then and who knows what that's going to be.

Just because the tiles can show more information because its on a bigger screen doesnt mean its tailored to being used on a desktop computer, it just means that the UI has been ADAPTED to use on the desktop, its still awkward and not as intuitive to use.

None of us really know what the full Windows 8 experience will be. That demo was too short and Windows 8 is not even in beta yet.

Microsoft is ending Windows 7 support by 2015. Windows 9 will be out by then and who knows what that's going to be.

Thats not my point, i dont know how much simpler i can say it.

The Start Screen is going to be default, thus because its default developers are going to change their roadmap to take advantage of this Start Screen, thus if i dont buy Windows 8 im going to miss out on functionality because they have gone in this Tablet UI direction.

I like how you ignore the meat of my argument and just pick up on the life cycle of the OS.

Thats not my point, i dont know how much simpler i can say it.

The Start Screen is going to be default, thus because its default developers are going to change their roadmap to take advantage of this Start Screen, thus if i dont buy Windows 8 im going to miss out on functionality because they have gone in this Tablet UI direction.

I like how you ignore the meat of my argument and just pick up on the life cycle of the OS.

Ubuntu awaits you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!